Identifying what constitutes complexity perception of decision points during indoor route guidance

References

• Baskaya, A., 2004. Wayfinding in an unfamiliar environment: different spatial settings of two polyclinics. Environment and Behavior, 36 (6), 839–867. doi:10.1177/0013916504265445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedikt, M.L., 1979. To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 6, 47–65. doi:10.1068/b060047
   Google Scholar
• Brösamle, M., Hölscher, C., and Vrachliotis, G., 2007. Multi-level complexity in terms of space syntax: a case study. In: Proceedings, 6th International Space Syntax Symposium. Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, L.A., et al., 2010. Getting lost in buildings. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19 (5), 284–289. doi:10.1177/0963721410383243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy Dalton, R. and Dalton, N., 2001. OmniVista, an application for isovist field and path analysis. In: Proceedings 3rd international space syntax symposium. Atlanta.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, A.S. and Bernstein, J., 1995. Interactive wayfinding: use of cues by men and women. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15 (1), 23–38. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90012-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, A.S. and Bernstein, J., 1997. Interactive way-finding: map style and effectiveness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17 (2), 99–110. doi:10.1006/jevp.1997.0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diwadkar, V.A. and McNamara, T.P., 1997. Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8 (4), 302–307. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00442.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogu, U. and Erkip, F., 2000. Spatial factors affecting wayfinding and orientation: A case study in a shopping mall. Environment and Behavior, 32 (6), 731–755. doi:10.1177/00139160021972775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenner, J., Heathcote, D., and Jerrams-Smith, J., 2000. The development of wayfinding competency: asymmetrical effects of visuo-spatial and verbal ability. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20 (2), 165–175. doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, E., Bravo, M., and Roskos, B., 2015. Single-destination navigation in a multiple-destination environment: a new “later-destination attractor” bias in route choice. Memory and Cognition, 43, 1043–1055. doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0521-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giudice, N.A., Walton, L.A., and Worboys, M., 2010. The informatics of indoor and outdoor space: a research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Indoor Spatial Awareness. New York: ACM, 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Head, D. and Isom, M., 2010. Age effects on wayfinding and route learning skills. Behavioural Brain Research, 209 (1), 49–58. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölscher, C., Brösamle, M., and Vrachliotis, G., 2012. Challenges in multilevel wayfinding: A case study with the space syntax technique. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39, 63–82. doi:10.1068/b34050t
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H., Schmidt, M., and Gartner, G., 2012. Spatial knowledge acquisition with mobile maps, augmented reality and voice in the context of GPS-based pedestrian navigation: results from a field test. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 39 (2), 107–116. doi:10.1559/15230406392107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, T., et al., 2008. Wayfinding with a GPS-based mobile navigation system: A comparison with maps and direct experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28 (1), 74–82. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton, C.A., 1996. Strategies for indoor wayfinding: the role of orientation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 137–145. doi:10.1006/jevp.1996.0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, R. and Klippel, A., 2010. Using space syntax to understand knowledge acquisition and wayfinding in indoor environments. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics. Beijing, 302–307.
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt, G. and Schmieg, P., 2009. Dementia-friendly architecture: environments that facilitate wayfinding in nursing homes. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 24 (4), 333–340. doi:10.1177/1533317509334959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mast, V., Jian, C., and Zhekova, D., 2012. Elaborate descriptive information in indoor route instructions. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Sapporo, 1972–1977.
   Google Scholar
• McElhinney, S., 2018. Isovist_2.1: a basic user guide, v1.1 [online]. Available from: http://www.isovists.org/user_guide/
   Google Scholar
• Meilinger, T., Franz, G., and Bülthoff, H.H., 2012. From isovists via mental representations to behaviour: first steps toward closing the causal chain. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39, 48–62. doi:10.1068/b34048t
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D.R., 2014. Spatial cognition and architectural space: research perspectives. Architectural Design, 84 (5), 74–79. doi:10.1002/ad.2014.84.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohm, C., Müller, M., and Ludwig, B., 2015. Displaying landmarks and the user’s surroundings in indoor pedestrian navigation systems. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 7 (5), 635–657. doi:10.3233/AIS-150335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooms, K., 2016. Cartographic user research in the 21st century: mixing and interacting. 6th International Conference on Cartography and GIS Proceedings, June. Albena, 367–377.
   Google Scholar
• Ostwald, M. and Dawes, M., 2013. Prospect-refuge patterns in Frank Lloyd Wright’s Prairie houses: using isovist fields to examine the evidence. The Journal of Space Syntax, 4 (1), 136–159.
   Google Scholar
• Peponis, J., Zimring, C., and Choi, Y.K., 1990. Finding the building in wayfinding. Environment and Behavior, 22 (5), 555–590. doi:10.1177/0013916590225001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaczewska, P., Schneider, S., and Kuliga, S., 2019. Exploring urban experiences, two case studies. In: Proceedings of the 12th international space syntax symposium. Beijing.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R.E., et al., 2017. User studies in cartography: opportunities for empirical research on interactive maps and visualizations. International Journal of Cartography, 3 (S1), 61–89. doi:10.1080/23729333.2017.1288534
   Google Scholar
• Ruddle, R.A., Payne, S.J., and Jonas, D.M., 1998. Navigating large-scale ‘desk-top’ virtual buildings: effects of orientation aids and familiarity. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7 (2), 179–192. doi:10.1162/105474698565668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, D.M., et al., 2002. Are sex differences in navigation caused by sexually dimorphic strategies or by differences in the ability to use the strategies? Behavioral Neuroscience, 116 (3), 403–410. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.116.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwering, A., et al., 2017. Wayfinding through orientation. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 17 (4), 273–303. doi:10.1080/13875868.2017.1322597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, D., Wilson, P., and Foreman, N., 1996. Using virtual reality environments to aid spatial awareness in disabled children. In: The First European Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies. Maidenhead, 93–101.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A., et al., 2001. From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28 (1), 103–121. doi:10.1068/b2684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viaene, P., et al., 2016. Examining the validity of the total dwell time of eye fixations to identify landmarks in a building. Journal Of Eye Movement Research, 9 (3), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisman, J., 1981. Evaluating architectural legibility. Environment and Behavior, 13 (2), 189–204. doi:10.1177/0013916581132004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, J.M., et al., 2007. Isovist analysis captures properties of space relevant for locomotion and experience. Perception, 36 (7), 1066–1083. doi:10.1068/p5587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, K.S., et al., 2009. A comparison of spatial knowledge acquisition with maps and mobile maps. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33 (2), 100–110. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woollett, K. and Maguire, E.A., 2010. The effect of navigational expertise on wayfinding in new environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30 (4), 565–573. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar