NEAT approach for testing and validation of geospatial network agent-based model processes: case study of influenza spread

References

• Alizadeh, M., Cioffi-Revilla, C., and Crooks, A., 2017. Generating and analyzing spatial social networks. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 23 (3), 362–390. doi:10.1007/s10588-016-9232-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alstott, J., Bullmore, E., and Plenz, D., 2014. powerlaw: a Python package for analysis of heavy-tailed distributions. PloS One, 9 (1), e85777. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. and Dragićević, S., 2018. Network-agent based model for simulating the dynamic spatial network structure of complex ecological systems. Ecological Modelling, 389, 19–32. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. and Dragićević, S., 2020. A geographic network automata approach for modelling dynamic ecological systems. Geographical Analysis, 52 (1), 3–27. doi:10.1111/gean.v52.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augusiak, J., Van den Brink, P.J., and Grimm, V., 2014. Merging validation and evaluation of ecological models to ‘evaludation’: a review of terminology and a practical approach. Ecological Modelling, 280, 117–128. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabási, A.L., 2016. Network science. Glasgow, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barthélemy, M., 2003. Crossover from scale-free to spatial networks. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 63 (6), 915.
   Google Scholar
• Barthélemy, M., 2011. Spatial networks. Physics Reports, 499 (1), 1–101. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthélemy, M., 2018. Morphogenesis of spatial networks. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bian, L., 2004. A conceptual framework for an individual-based spatially explicit epidemiological model. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31 (3), 381–395. doi:10.1068/b2833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian, L. and Liebner, D., 2007. A network model for dispersion of communicable diseases. Transactions in GIS, 11 (2), 155–173. doi:10.1111/tgis.2007.11.issue-2.
   Google Scholar
• Biggerstaff, M., et al., 2014. Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature. Bmc Infectious Diseases, 14 (1), 480.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bousquet, F. and Le Page, C., 2004. Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review. Ecological Modelling, 176 (3), 313–332. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D.G., et al., 2005. Path dependence and the validation of agent‐based spatial models of land use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19 (2), 153–174. doi:10.1080/13658810410001713399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruggeman, J., 2013. Social networks: an introduction Vol. 194. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. and Sattenspiel, L., 2009. The design and use of an agent‐based model to simulate the 1918 influenza epidemic at Norway house, Manitoba. American Journal of Human Biology: The Official Journal of the Human Biology Association, 21 (3), 290–300. doi:10.1002/ajhb.v21:3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castle, C.J. and Crooks, A.T., 2006. Principles and concepts of agent-based modelling for developing geospatial simulations. UCL Working Papers Series. Available from from: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/3342/1/3342.pdf [Accessed 6 July 2019]
   Google Scholar
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018. Summary of the 2017–2018 influenza season. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/season/flu-season-2017-2018.htm [Accessed 6 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, B.J., Wagner, B.G., and Blower, S., 2009. Modeling influenza epidemics and pandemics: insights into the future of swine flu (H1N1). BMC Medicine, 7 (1), 30. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-7-30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen, J., 1968. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70 (4), 213. doi:10.1037/h0026256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton, R.G., 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37 (1), 35–46. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks, A., Castle, C., and Batty, M., 2008. Key challenges in agent-based modelling for geo-spatial simulation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32 (6), 417–430. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks, A.T. and Hailegiorgis, A.B., 2014. An agent-based modeling approach applied to the spread of cholera. Environmental Modelling & Software, 62, 164–177. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, T., 2006. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27 (8), 861–874. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, C.S., 1982. To dwell among friends: personal networks in town and city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frias-Martinez, E., Williamson, G., and Frias-Martinez, V., 2011. An agent-based model of epidemic spread using human mobility and social network information. In: Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), 9–11 October 2011 Boston. Boston: IEEE, 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., 2006. Putting the social into social simulation. In: Keynote address to the First World Social Simulation Conference. Kyoto.
   Google Scholar
• Goodall, D.W., 1972. Building and testing ecosystem models. In: F. Heinmets, ed. Mathematical models in ecology. 173–194. New York: Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, V., et al., 1996. Pattern-oriented modelling in population ecology. Science of the Total Environment, 183 (1–2), 151–166. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(95)04966-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, V., et al., 2006. A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecological Modelling, 198 (1–2), 115–126. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, V., et al., 2010. The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecological Modelling, 221 (23), 2760–2768. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.08.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, V. and Berger, U., 2016. Structural realism, emergence, and predictions in next-generation ecological modelling: synthesis from a special issue. Ecological Modelling, 326 (24), 177–187. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, V. and Railsback, S.F., 2012. Pattern-oriented modelling: a ‘multi-scope’for predictive systems ecology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 367 (1586), 298–310. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, A., 2003. Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17 (3), 235–249. doi:10.1080/13658810210157822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries, M.D., Gurney, K., and Sporns, O., 2008. Network “small-world-ness”: a quantitative method for determining canonical network equivalence. PLoS ONE, 3 (4), e0002051. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocabas, V. and Dragićević, S., 2009. Agent-based model validation using Bayesian networks and vector spatial data. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36 (5), 787–801. doi:10.1068/b34143t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, K., et al., 2017. Social contact patterns relevant to the spread of respiratory infectious diseases in Hong Kong. Scientific Reports, 7 (1), 7974. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08241-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liljeros, F., et al., 2003. Social networks (communication arising): sexual contacts and epidemic thresholds. Nature, 423 (6940), 606. doi:10.1038/423606a.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F.C.S., 2011. Validation and agent-based modeling: a practice of contrasting simulation results with empirical data. New Mathematics and Natural Computation, 7 (3), 515–542. doi:10.1142/S1793005711002050.
   Google Scholar
• Manson, S.M., 2007. Challenges in evaluating models of geographic complexity. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34 (2), 245–260. doi:10.1068/b31179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLane, A.J., et al., 2011. The role of agent-based models in wildlife ecology and management. Ecological Modelling, 222 (8), 1544–1556. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, S., 1967. The small world problem. Psychology Today, 2 (1), 60–67.
   Google Scholar
• Mossong, J., et al., 2008. Social contacts and mixing patterns relevant to the spread of infectious diseases. PLoS Medicine, 5 (3), e74. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M.E., 2002. Assortative mixing in networks. Physical Review Letters, 89 (20), 208701. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.208701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M.E., 2004. Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69 (6), 066133. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, D., 2014. Spatial network analysis. In: M.M. Fischer and P. Nijkamp, eds. Handbook of regional science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1253–1273.
   Google Scholar
• Parunak, H.V.D., Savit, R., and Riolo, R.L., 1998. Agent-based modeling vs equation-based modeling : a case study and users’ guide. In: N. Gilbert, R. Conte, and J.S. Sichman, eds. Multi-agent systems and agent-based simulation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, L. and Dragićević, S., 2009. An agent-based approach for modeling dynamics of contagious disease spread. International Journal of Health Geography, 8 (1), 50. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-8-50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pérez, L., Dragićević, S., and White, R., 2013. Model testing and assessment: perspectives from a swarm intelligence, agent-based model of forest insect infestations. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 39, 121–135. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius, R.G., Jr, 2000. Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66 (8), 1011–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius, R.G., Jr, Peethambaram, S., and Castella, J.C., 2011. Comparison of three maps at multiple resolutions: a case study of land change simulation in Cho Don District, Vietnam. Annual Association of American Geographers, 101 (1), 45–62. doi:10.1080/00045608.2010.517742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Health Agency of Canada, 2018. Canadian immunization guide chapter on influenza statement on seasonal influenza vaccine for 2018–2019. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/publications/healthy-living/canadian-immunization-guide-statement-seasonal-influenza-vaccine-2018-2019/canadian-immunization-guide-statement-seasonal-influenza-vaccine-2018-2019.pdf [Accessed 6 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Railsback, S.F., 2001. Concepts from complex adaptive systems as a framework for individual-based modelling. Ecological Modelling, 139 (1), 47–62. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00228-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakowski, F., et al., 2010. Influenza epidemic spread simulation for Poland—a large scale, individual based model study. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 389 (16), 3149–3165. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2010.04.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repast Simphony, 2018. Version 2.6. [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Rykiel, E.J., 1996. Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation. Ecological Modelling, 90 (3), 229–244. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(95)00152-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skvortsov, A.T.R.B., et al., 2007. Epidemic modelling: validation of agent-based simulation by using simple mathematical models. In: MODSIM 2007 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Christchurch, New Zealand: Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Small, M., Walker, D.M., and Tse, C.K., 2007. Scale-free distribution of avian influenza outbreaks. Physical Review Letters, 99 (18), 188702. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.188702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada, 2016. Census profile, 2016 census vancouver [Census metropolitan area], British Columbia and British Columbia [Province]. Available from: https://www12.statcan.gc.ca [Accessed 6 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Ten Broeke, G., Van Voorn, G., and Ligtenberg, A., 2016. Which sensitivity analysis method should I use for my agent-based model? Journal of Artificial Societies & Social Simulation, 19 (1), doi:10.18564/jasss.2857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Y., et al., 2013. Evaluating the effectiveness of contact tracing on tuberculosis outcomes in Saskatchewan using individual-based modeling. Health Education & Behavior, 40 (1_suppl), 98S–110S. doi:10.1177/1090198113493910.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tong, X. and Feng, Y., 2019. A review of assessment methods for cellular automata models of land-use change and urban growth. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1–33. doi:10.1080/13658816.2019.1684499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, C.J., Høye, T.T., and Olesen, C.R., 2010. Opening the black box—development, testing and documentation of a mechanistically rich agent-based model. Ecological Modelling, 221 (2), 245–255. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrens, P.M., 2010. Agent-based models and the spatial sciences. Geography Compass, 4 (5), 428–448. doi:10.1111/()1749-8198.
   Google Scholar
• US Bureau of Labor Statistics, (2018a). Table 6. Employed persons working at home, workplace, and time spent working at each location by full- and part-time status and sex, jobholding status, and educational attainment, 2018 annual averages. Available from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/atus.t06.htm [Accessed 17 February 2020].
   Google Scholar
• US Bureau of Labor Statistics, (2018b). Table 1. Time spent in primary activities and percent of the civilian population engaging in each activity, averages per day by sex, 2018 annual averages. Available from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/atus.t01.htm [Accessed 17 February 2020].
   Google Scholar
• van Vliet, J., Bregt, A.K., and Hagen-Zanker, A., 2011. Revisiting Kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land-use change models. Ecological Modelling, 222 (8), 1367–1375. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, H. and de Nijs, T., 2006. Map comparison kit. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21 (3), 346–358. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, D.J. and Strogatz, S.H., 1998. Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393 (6684), 440–442. doi:10.1038/30918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R., 2006. Pattern based map comparisons. Journal of Geographical Systems, 8 (2), 145–164. doi:10.1007/s10109-006-0026-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, L.H., Pattison, P., and Robins, G., 2006. A spatial model for social networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 360 (1), 99–120. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2005.04.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, 2009. Influenza (seasonal). Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs211/en/[Accessed 6 July 2019].
   Google Scholar