1,103
Views
54
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

An augmented representation method of debris flow scenes to improve public perception

, , , , &
Pages 1521-1544 | Received 14 Jun 2020, Accepted 02 Oct 2020, Published online: 19 Oct 2020

References

  • Achu, A.L., Aju, C.D., and Reghunath, R., 2020. Spatial modelling of shallow landslide susceptibility: a study from the southern Western Ghats region of Kerala, India. Annals of GIS, 26 (2), 113–131. doi:10.1080/19475683.2020.1758207
  • Bandrova, T., Zlatanova, S., and Konečný, M., 2012. Three dimensional maps for disaster management. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. 4, Melbourne, Australia, 245–250.
  • Bertin, J., 1983. Semiology of graphics: diagrams, networks, maps. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Broen, M.P., et al., 2015. Factor analysis of the hamilton depression rating scale in parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 21, 142–146. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.11.016.
  • Chen, M., et al., 2020. Position paper: open web-distributed integrated geographic modelling to enable wider participation and model application. Earth-Science Reviews, 207, 103223. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103223.
  • Chen, M. and Lin, H., 2018. Virtual geographic environments (VGEs): originating from or beyond virtual reality (VR)? International Journal of Digital Earth, 11 (4), 329–333. doi:10.1080/17538947.2017.1419452.
  • Chen, X.Q., et al., 2015. Engineering measures for debris flow hazard mitigation in the Wenchuan earthquake area. Engineering Geology, 194, 73–85. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.10.002.
  • Chen, Y.L., 2008. Study on visual variable and dynamic expression method of three dimensional animation map. Master’s degree thesis of Wuhan University.
  • Couclelis, H., 2010. Ontologies of geographic information. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24, 1785–1809.
  • Cui, P., 2014. Progress and prospects in research on mountain hazards in China. Progress in Geography, 33, 145–152.
  • Day, J., 2011. The importance of public perceptions and vulnerability in a multidimensional approach to flood risk management. MSc dissertation. Exeter, UK: University of Exeter.
  • DiBiase, D., et al., 1992. Animation and the role of map design in scientific visualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 19 (4), 201–214. doi:10.1559/152304092783721295.
  • Dransch, D., Rotzoll, H., and Poser, K., 2010. The contribution of maps to the challenges of risk communication to the public. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3 (3), 292–311. doi:10.1080/17538941003774668.
  • Fabrikant, S.I. and Goldsberry, K., 2005. “Thematic relevance and perceptual salience of dynamic geovisualization displays.” In: Proceedings, 22th ICA/ACI International Cartographic Conference, 9–16 July. A Coruña, Spain.
  • Fischhoff, B., et al., 1978. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9 (2), 127–152. doi:10.1007/BF00143739.
  • Garlandini, S. and Fabrikant, S.I., 2009. Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of visual variables for geographic information visualization. In: International Conference on Spatial Information Theory. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 195–211.
  • Ho, M.C., et al., 2008. How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception? Risk Analysis, 28 (3), 635–643. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01040.x.
  • Huang, R.Q. and Li, W.L., 2009. Analysis of the geo-hazards triggered by the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, China. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 68 (3), 363–371. doi:10.1007/s10064-009-0207-0.
  • Huebl, J. and Fiebiger, G., 2005. Debris flow mitigation measures. In: M. Jakob and O. Hungr, eds. Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Berlin: Springer, 445–488.
  • Kaur, H., et al., 2019. Evaluation of landslide susceptibility in a hill city of Sikkim Himalaya with the perspective of hybrid modelling techniques. Annals of GIS, 25 (2), 113–132. doi:10.1080/19475683.2019.1575906.
  • Kelman, I., 2015. Climate change and the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6 (2), 117–127. doi:10.1007/s13753-015-0046-5.
  • Lü, G.N., et al., 2019. Reflections and speculations on the progress in Geographic Information Systems (GIS): a geographic perspective. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 33 (2), 346–367. doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1533136.
  • Li, W.L., et al., 2019a. A fusion visualization method for disaster information based on self-explanatory symbols and photorealistic scene cooperation. International Journal of Geo-Information, 8 (3), 104. doi:10.3390/ijgi8030104.
  • Li, Y., et al., 2015. Real-time flood simulations using the CA model driven by dynamic observation data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29 (4), 523–535. doi:10.1080/13658816.2014.977292.
  • Li, Y., et al., 2019b. Semantic visual variables for augmented geovisualization. The Cartographic Journal, 57 (1), 43–56.
  • Lin, H., et al., 2013a. Virtual geographic environments (VGEs): a new generation of geographic analysis tool. Earth-Science Reviews, 126, 74–84. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.08.001.
  • Lin, H., Chen, M., and Lü, G.N., 2013b. Virtual geographic environment: A workspace for computer-aided geographic experiments. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103 (3), 465–482. doi:10.1080/00045608.2012.689234.
  • Liu, W., et al., 2018. Integrated participatory and collaborative risk mapping for enhancing disaster resilience. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7, 68. doi:10.3390/ijgi7020068.
  • Liu, Y.X., 2016. Application of disaster publicity and education in non-engineering measures for disaster prevention and mitigation. Engineering and Construction, 30 (1), 126–130.
  • Macchione, F., et al., 2018. Moving to 3-D flood hazard maps for enhancing risk communication. Environmental Modelling & Software, 111, 510–522. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.11.005.
  • MacEachren, A.M., 2004. How maps work: representation, visualization, and design. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Marincioni, F., et al., 2012. Perception and communication of seismic risk: the 6 April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake case study. Earthquake Spectra, 28 (1), 159–183. doi:10.1193/1.3672928.
  • Meyer, V., 2012. Recommendations for the user-specific enhancement of flood maps. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 12, 1701–1716. doi:10.5194/nhess-12-1701-2012
  • Qiu, L.Y., et al., 2017. An integrated flood management system based on linking environmental models and disaster-related data. Environmental Modelling & Software, 91, 111–126. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.025.
  • Smith, A., Porter, J.J., and Upham, P., 2016. We cannot let this happen again”: reversing UK flood policy in response to the Somerset Levels floods, 2014. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60 (2), 351–369. doi:10.1080/09640568.2016.1157458.
  • Spittal, M.J., et al. 2005. Optimistic bias in relation to preparedness for earthquakes. Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 1, 1–10.
  • UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction), 2015. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. Geneva: United Nations.
  • Wang, G.L., 2013. Lessons learned from protective measures associated with the 2010 Zhouqu debris flow disaster in China. Natural Hazards, 69 (3), 1835–1847. doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0772-1.
  • Xi, D.P., et al., 2016. A visual salience model for way finding in 3D virtual urban environments. Applied Geography, 75, 176–187. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.08.014.
  • Yuan, M. and Hornsby, K.S., 2007. Computation and visualization for understanding dynamics in geographic domains: a research agenda. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 120. ISBN-13: 9781420060324.
  • Zhang, Y.H., et al., 2019. Adaptive construction of the virtual debris flow disaster environments driven by multilevel visualization task. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8 (5), 209. doi:10.3390/ijgi8050209.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.