Measuring shallow-water bathymetric signal strength in lidar point attribute data using machine learning

References

• ASPRS (American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing), 2013. LAS Specification Version 1.3-R13, 15 July.
   Google Scholar
• Beyan, C. and Browman, H., 2020. Setting the stage for machine intelligence era in marine science. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 77 (4), 1267–1273. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsaa084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boots, B. and Getis, A., 1988. Point pattern analysis. London, UK: SAGE Publications Scientific Geography Series (Series Editor: G. Thrall), 8, 93.
   Google Scholar
• Calder, B. and Mayer, L., 2003. Automatic processing of high-rate, high-density multibeam echosounder data. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 4 (6), 22. doi:10.1029/2002GC000486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, B. and Rice, G., 2017. Computationally efficient variable resolution depth estimation. Computers & Geosciences, 106, 49–59. doi:10.1016/j.cageeo.2017.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chust, G., et al., 2008. Coastal and estuarine habitat mapping, using LIDAR height and intensity and multi-spectral imagery. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 78, 633–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin, A., Archambault, P., and Long, B., 2008. Mapping the shallow water seabed habitat with the SHOALS. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46, 10. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2008.920020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin, A., Archambault, P., and Long, B., 2011. Predicting species diversity of benthic communities within turbid nearshore using full-waveform bathymetric LiDAR and machine learners. PLoS ONE, 6 (6), e21265. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin, A., et al., 2018. Very high resolution mapping of coral reef state using airborne bathymetric LiDAR surface intensity and drone imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39 (17), 5676–5688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, P., 2002. Ripley’s K Function. In: Encyclopedia of Environmetrics. Vol. 3. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 1796–1803.
   Google Scholar
• Eren, F., et al., 2019. Bottom characterization by using airborne lidar bathymetry (ALB) waveform features obtained from bottom residual analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 206, 260–274. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischler, M. and Bolles, J., 1981. Random sample consensus – a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communication of the ACM, 24 (6), 381–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, B., et al., 2015. Classification of airborne scanning data using JointBoost. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 100, 71–83. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X. and Yuan, Y., 2016. Deep-learning-based classification for DTM extraction from ALS point cloud. Remote Sensing, 8 (9), 730. 16 pp.. doi:10.3390/rs8090730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Z., Yang, J., and Zhong, R., 2016. A Bayesian-network-based classification method integrating airborne LiDAR data with optical images. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations & Remote Sensing, 9 (12), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. and Sohn, G., 2011. Random forests based multiple classifier system for power-line scene classification. In: International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XXXVIII-5/W12, ISPRS Workshop, 29–31 August. Calgary, Canada, 6
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., 2008. Airborne lidar for DEM generation: some critical issues. Progress in Physical Geography, 32 (1), 31–49. doi:10.1177/0309133308089496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowell, K. and Calder, B., 2019. Machine learning strategies for enhancing bathymetry extraction from imbalanced lidar point clouds. In: Proceedings Oceans 2019. Seattle, Washington, United States, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Macon, C., et al., 2008. Seafloor and land cover classification through airborne lidar and hyperspectral data fusion. In: Proc: IEEE International Geosciences and Remote Sensing Symposium. Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 77–80.
   Google Scholar
• Malde, K., et al., 2020. Machine intelligence and the data-driven future of marine science. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 77 (4), 1274–1285. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsz057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallet, C., et al., 2011. Relevance assessment of full-waveform lidar data for urban area classification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66 (6), S71–S84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matikainen, L., Hyyppä, J., and Kaartinen, H., 2009. Comparison between first pulse and last pulse laser scanner data in the automatic detection of buildings. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 75 (2), 133–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D., 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: P. Zarembka, ed.. Frontiers in Econometrics. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press, 105–142.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed, H., et al., 2016. Bathymetry determination from high resolution imagery using ensemble learning algorithms in shallow lakes: case study El_Burullus Lake. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 7 (4), 7 pp. doi:10:7763/IJESD.2016.V7.787.
   Google Scholar
• Mongus, D. and Zalik, B., 2012. Parameter-free ground filtering of LiDAR data for automatic DTM generation. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 67, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagle, D. and Wright, C., 2016. Algorithms used in the Airborne Lidar Processing System (ALPS). United States Dept. of the Interior/United States Geological Survey, Open File Report 2016–1046, 45 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Nahhas, F., et al., 2018. Deep learning approach for building detection using LiDAR-orthophoto fusion.”. Journal of Sensors, Article ID: 7212307, 12. doi:10.1155/2018/7212307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanan, R., Kim, H., and Sohn, G., 2009. Classification of SHOALS 3000 bathymetric LiDAR signals using decision tree and ensemble techniques. In: Proc. TIC-STH 2009: IEEE Toronto International Conference – Science and Technology for Humanity. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 462–467.
   Google Scholar
• Nayegandhi, A., Brock, J., and Wright, C., 2009. Small-footprint, waveform-resolving lidar estimation of submerged and sub-canopy topography in coastal environments. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 4, 861–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odland, J., 1988. Spatial Autocorrelation. London, UK: SAGE Publications Scientific Geography Series (Editor: G. Thrall), 9, 87.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, C., Rogers, J., and Calder, B., 2014. Assessment of waveform features for lidar uncertainty modeling in a coastal salt marsh environment. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 11 (2), 569–573. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2013.2280182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittman, S., Costa, B., and Battista, T., 2009. Using lidar bathymetry and boosted regression trees to predict the diversity and abundance of fish and corals. Journal of Coastal Research, 53, 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RIEGL, 2017. LAS extrabytes implementation in RIEGL software (whitepaper). RIEGL Laser Measurement Systems. Available from: http://www.riegl.com/uploads/tx_pxpriegldownloads/Whitepaper_LASextrabytes_implementation_in-RIEGLSoftware_2017-12-04.pdf, 17.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, J., et al., 2015. Evaluation of field-measured vertical obscuration and full waveform lidar to assess salt marsh vegetation biophysical parameters. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 156, 264–275. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014.09.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salameh, E., et al., 2019. Monitoring beach topography and nearshore bathymetry using spaceborne remote sensing: A review. Remote Sensing, 11 (19), 2212, 32 pp. doi:10.3390/rs11192212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuell, G., et al., 2005. SHOALS-enabled 3D benthic mapping. In: Proc. SPIE 5806: Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XI. Orlando, Florida, United States, 816–826
   Google Scholar
• Tulldahl, H., 2014. Processing of airborne lidar bathymetry data for detailed sea floor mapping. In Proc. SPIE 9250: Electro-optical Remote Sensing, Photonic Technologies and Applications VIII; and (SPIE 92500E) Military Applications in Hyperspectral Imaging and High Spatial Resolution Sensing II. Amsterdam, Netherlands, 16.
   Google Scholar
• Tulldahl, M. and Wikström, S., 2012. Classification of aquatic macrovegetation and substrate with airborne lidar. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 121, 347–357. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojinovic, Z., et al., 2013. A machine learning approach for estimation of shallow water depths from optical satellite images and sonar measurements. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 15 (4), 17. doi:10.2166/hydro.2013.234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wozencraft, J. and Millar, D., 2005. Airborne lidar and integrated technologies for coastal mapping and nautical charting. Marine Technology Society Journal, 39 (3), 27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., et al., 2016. Discriminative-dictionary-learning-based multilevel point-cluster features for ALS point-cloud classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54 (12), 7309–7322. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2016.2599163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, R., Pang, M., and Wang, J., 2018. Classifying airborne LiDAR point clouds via deep features learned by a multi-scale convolutional neural network. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32 (5), 960–979. doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1431840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar