Identifying home locations in human mobility data: an open-source R package for comparison and reproducibility

References

• Ahas, R., et al., 2010. Using mobile positioning data to model locations meaningful to users of mobile phones. Journal of Urban Technology, 17 (1), 3–27. doi:10.1080/10630731003597306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahas, R., et al., 2015. Everyday space–time geographies: using mobile phone-based sensor data to monitor urban activity in Harbin, Paris, and Tallinn. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29 (11), 2017–2039. doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1063151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backstrom, L., Sun, E., and Marlow, C., 2010. Find me if you can: improving geographical prediction with social and spatial proximity. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web - WWW ’10. Presented at the the 19th international conference, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA: ACM Press, 61.
   Google Scholar
• Balcan, D., et al., 2009. Multiscale mobility networks and the spatial spreading of infectious diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (51), 21484–21489. doi:10.1073/pnas.0906910106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belyi, A., et al., 2017. Global multi-layer network of human mobility. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (7), 1381–1402. doi:10.1080/13658816.2017.1301455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bivand, R., Altman, M., Anselin, L., Assunção, R., Berke, O., Bernat, A., Blanchet, G., Blankmeyer, E., Carvalho, M., Christensen, B., Chun, Y., Dormann, C., Dray, S., Gómez-Rubio, V., Gubri, M., Halbersma, R., Krainski, E., Legendre, P., Lewin-Koh, N., Li, A., Li, H., Ma, J., Mallik, A., Millo, G., Mueller, W., Ono, H., Peres-Neto, P., Piras, G., Reder, M., Tiefelsdorf, M., Westerholt, R., and Yu, D., 2020. spdep: Spatial Dependence: Weighting Schemes, Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, W.H., 1943. Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 24 (3), 346. doi:10.2307/1374834
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese, J.M., Fleming, C.H., and Gurarie, E., 2016. ctmm: an r package for analyzing animal relocation data as a continuous-time stochastic process. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7 (9), 1124–1132. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calenge, C. and Fortmann-Roe, C.F.S., 2020. adehabitatHR: home range estimation. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/adehabitatHR/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, S., Khan, L., and Muhaya, F.B., 2011. Estimating Twitter user location using social interactions–A content based approach. In: 2011 IEEE Third Int’l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int’l Conference on Social Computing. Presented at the 2011 IEEE Third Int’l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT)/2011 IEEE Third Int’l Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), Boston, MA, USA: IEEE, 838–843.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H., et al., 2012. @Phillies Tweeting from Philly? Predicting Twitter user locations with spatial word usage. In: 2012 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. Presented at the 2012 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining,  Istanbul, Turkey. 111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Z., Caverlee, J., and Lee, K., 2010. You are where you tweet: a content-based approach to geo-locating twitter users. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management - CIKM ’10. Presented at the the 19th ACM international conference, Toronto, ON, Canada: ACM Press, 759.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, R., Jurgens, D., and Allen, D., 2014. Geotagging One Hundred Million Twitter Accounts with Total Variation Minimization. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), 393–401.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, J., et al., 2013. Beyond the geotag: situating ‘big data’ and leveraging the potential of the geoweb. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40 (2), 130–139.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, A.J., Mills, J.W., and Leitner, M., 2006. Spatial confidentiality and GIS: re-engineering mortality locations from published maps about Hurricane Katrina. International Journal of Health Geographics, 5 (1), 44. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-5-44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Montjoye, Y.-A., et al., 2013. Unique in the crowd: the privacy bounds of human mobility. Scientific Reports, 3 (1), 1376. doi:10.1038/srep01376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efstathiades, H., et al., 2015. Identification of key locations based on online social network activity. In: 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). Presented at the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. 218–225.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, J., et al., 2010. A latent variable model for geographic lexical variation. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1277–1287.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. and Leszczynski, A., 2011. Privacy, reconsidered: new representations, data practices, and the geoweb. Geoforum, 42 (1), 6–15. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore, M., et al., 2020. Privacy in trajectory micro-data publishing : a survey. arXiv:1903.12211 [Cs].
   Google Scholar
• Fung, B.C.M., et al., 2010. Privacy-preserving data publishing: A survey of recent developments. ACM Computing Surveys, 42 (4), 14:1–14:53. doi:10.1145/1749603.1749605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, S., et al., 2019. Exploring the effectiveness of geomasking techniques for protecting the geoprivacy of Twitter users. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 2019 (19), 105–129.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, B., et al., 2011. Tweets from Justin Bieber’s heart: the dynamics of the location field in user profiles. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 237–246.
   Google Scholar
• Hincks, S., et al., 2018. A new geodemographic classification of commuting flows for England and Wales. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32 (4), 663–684. doi:10.1080/13658816.2017.1407416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Q. and Wong, D.W.S., 2016. Activity patterns, socioeconomic status and urban spatial structure: what can social media data tell us? International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (9), 1873–1898. doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1145225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järv, O., Tenkanen, H., and Toivonen, T., 2017. Enhancing spatial accuracy of mobile phone data using multi-temporal dasymetric interpolation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (8), 1630–1651. doi:10.1080/13658816.2017.1287369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, R., et al., 2020. Navigating through the r packages for movement. Journal of Animal Ecology, 89 (1), 248–267. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jr, C.A.D., et al., 2011. Inferring the location of Twitter messages based on user relationships. Transactions in GIS, 15 (6), 735–751. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2011.01297.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurgens, D., 2013. That’s what friends are for: inferring location in online social media platforms based on social relationships. In: ICWSM.
   Google Scholar
• Katragadda, S., Jin, M., and Raghavan, V., 2014. An Unsupervised Approach to Identify Location Based on the Content of User’s Tweet History. In: D. Ślȩzak, G. Schaefer, S.T. Vuong, and Y.–S. Kim, eds. Active Media Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 311–323.
   Google Scholar
• Keßler, C. and McKenzie, G., 2018. A geoprivacy manifesto. Transactions in GIS, 22 (1), 3–19. doi:10.1111/tgis.12305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, S., Murdock, V., and O’Hare, N., 2011. ‘I’m eating a sandwich in Glasgow’: modeling locations with tweets. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Search and mining user-generated contents. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kounadi, O. and Leitner, M., 2014. Why does geoprivacy matter? The scientific publication of confidential data presented on maps. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9 (4), 34–45. doi:10.1177/1556264614544103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M., 2004. Gis methods in time‐geographic research: geocomputation and geovisualization of human activity patterns. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86 (4), 267–280. doi:10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00167.x
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P., Casas, I., and Schmitz, B., 2006. Protection of geoprivacy and accuracy of spatial information: how effective are geographical masks? Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39 (2), 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Li, R., Wang, S., and Chang, K.-C.-C., 2012. Multiple location profiling for users and relationships from social network and content. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 5 (11), 1603–1614. doi:10.14778/2350229.2350273
   Google Scholar
• Li, G., Hu, J., Feng, J., and Tan, K., 2014. Effective location identification from microblogs. In: 2014 IEEE 30th International Conference on Data Engineering. Presented at the 2014 IEEE 30th International Conference on Data Engineering, 880–891
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J. and Cromley, R.G., 2018. Inferring the home locations of Twitter users based on the spatiotemporal clustering of Twitter data. Transactions in GIS, 22 (1), 82–97. doi:10.1111/tgis.12297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Huang, Q., and Gao, S., 2019. Exploring the uncertainty of activity zone detection using digital footprints with multi-scaled DBSCAN. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 33 (6), 1196–1223. doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1563301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longley, P.A. and Adnan, M., 2016. Geo-temporal Twitter demographics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (2), 369–389. doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1089441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovelace, R., et al., 2016. From Big noise to big data: toward the verification of large data sets for understanding regional retail flows. Geographical Analysis, 48 (1), 59–81. doi:10.1111/gean.12081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovelace, R., Nowosad, J., and Muenchow, J., 2019. Geocomputation with R. CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9780203730058
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, A.J., Turner, W.C., and Getz, W.M., 2013. Home range plus: a space-time characterization of movement over real landscapes. Movement Ecology, 1 (1), 2. doi:10.1186/2051-3933-1-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maat, K., van Wee, B., and Stead, D., 2005. Land use and travel behaviour: expected effects from the perspective of utility theory and activity-based theories. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32 (1), 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmud, J., Nichols, J., and Drews, C., 2014. Home location identification of Twitter users. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 5 (3), 47:1–47:21.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, J., Caverlee, J., and Cheng, Z., 2013. Location prediction in social media based on tie strength. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Conference on information & knowledge management - CIKM ’13. Presented at the the 22nd ACM international conference, San Francisco, California, USA: ACM Press, 459–468.
   Google Scholar
• Norval, C. and Henderson, T., 2017. Contextual consent: ethical mining of social media for health research. arXiv:1701.07765 [Cs].
   Google Scholar
• Olson, K.L., Grannis, S.J., and Mandl, K.D., 2006. Privacy protection versus cluster detection in spatial epidemiology. American Journal of Public Health, 96 (11), 2002–2008. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.069526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pebesma, E. 2018. Simple features for R: Standardized support for spatial vector data. The R Journal, 10 (1), 439–446.
   Google Scholar
• Poorthuis, A. and Zook, M., 2017. Making big data small: strategies to expand urban and geographical research using social media. Journal of Urban Technology, 24 (4), 115–135. doi:10.1080/10630732.2017.1335153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhu, V.U. and Birhane, A., 2020. Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision? arXiv:2006.16923 [Cs, Stat].
   Google Scholar
• Rey, S.J. and Anselin, L., 2010. PySAL: A Python library of spatial analytical methods. In: M.M. Fischer and A. Getis, eds.. Handbook of applied spatial analysis: software tools, methods and applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 175–193.
   Google Scholar
• Rout, D., et al., 2013. Where’s @wally?: a classification approach to geolocating users based on their social ties. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media - HT ’13. Presented at the the 24th ACM Conference, Paris, France: ACM Press, 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sadilek, A., Kautz, H., and Bigham, J.P., 2012. Finding your friends and following them to where you are. In: Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining - WSDM ’12. Presented at the the fifth ACM international conference, Seattle, Washington, USA: ACM Press, 723.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J., 2019. When data is capital: datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society, 6 (1), 2053951718820549. doi:10.1177/2053951718820549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, A., et al., 2013. A multi-indicator approach for geolocalization of Tweets. In: ICWSM.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, T., Poorthuis, A., and Zook, M., 2015. Social media and the city: Rethinking urban socio-spatial inequality using user-generated geographic information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 198–211.
   Google Scholar
• Signer, J. and Balkenhol, N., 2015. Reproducible home ranges (rhr): A new, user-friendly R package for analyses of wildlife telemetry data. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 39 (2), 358–363. doi:10.1002/wsb.539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signer, J., Fieberg, J., and Avgar, T., 2018. Animal movement tools (amt): R-package for managing tracking data and conducting habitat selection analyses. Ecology and Evolution,9 (2), 880–890.
   Google Scholar
• Siła-Nowicka, K., et al., 2016. Analysis of human mobility patterns from GPS trajectories and contextual information. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (5), 881–906. doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1100731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, K., et al., 2018. How many days are enough?: capturing routine human mobility. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32 (7), 1485–1504. doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1434888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanlund, D., Schuurman, N., and Brussoni, M., 2020. MaskMy.XYZ: an easy-to-use tool for protecting geoprivacy using geographic masks. Transactions in GIS, 24 (2), 390–401. doi:10.1111/tgis.12606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., 2016. No place to hide? The ethics and analytics of tracking mobility using mobile phone data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34 (2), 319–336. doi:10.1177/0263775815608851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson and Warzel, 2019. Opinion | twelve million phones, one dataset, zero privacy - The New York Times [online]. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/19/opinion/location-tracking-cell-phone.html [Accessed 23 Oct 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, J., et al., 2014. R package ‘mkde’ manual (2D and 3D movement-based kernel density estimates). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mkde/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Tu, W., et al., 2017. Coupling mobile phone and social media data: a new approach to understanding urban functions and diurnal patterns. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (12), 2331–2358. doi:10.1080/13658816.2017.1356464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., et al., 2019. Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4 (43), 1686. doi:10.21105/joss.01686
   Google Scholar
• Xin, Y. and MacEachren, A.M., 2020. Characterizing traveling fans: a workflow for event-oriented travel pattern analysis using Twitter data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y. and Raubal, M., 2016. Analyzing the distribution of human activity space from mobile phone usage: an individual and urban-oriented study. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (8), 1594–1621. doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1143555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer, M., 2018. Addressing conceptual gaps in big data research ethics: an application of contextual integrity. Social Media + Society, 4 (2), 2056305118768300. doi:10.1177/2056305118768300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zook, M., et al., 2017. Ten simple rules for responsible big data research. PLOS Computational Biology, 13 (3), e1005399. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar