References
- Aditya, T. and Kraak, M.-J., June 2007. A search interface for an SDI: implementation and evaluation of metadata visualization strategies. Transactions in GIS, 11 (3), 413–435. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2007.01053.x
- Agarwal, P., 2005. Ontological considerations in GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19 (5), 501–536. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810500032321
- Akella, M.K., Jan 2009. First responders and crisis map symbols: clarifying communication. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 36 (1), 19–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1559/152304009787340179
- Andrienko, G., et al., 2010. Space, time and visual analytics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (10), 1577–1600. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2010.508043
- Andrienko, G., et al., Sept 2007. Geovisual analytics for spatial decision support: setting the research agenda. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21 (8), 839–857. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810701349011
- Andrienko, N. and Andrienko, G., Oct. 2008. Evacuation trace mini challenge award: tool integration analysis of movements with Geospatial Visual Analytics Toolkit. In: VAST’08 - IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology. Columbus, Ohio, USA: IEEE, 205–206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/VAST.2008.4677388.
- Andrienko, N., Andrienko, G., and Gatalsky, P., 2003. Exploratory spatio-temporal visualization: an analytical review. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 14 (6), 503–541. Dec . doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-926X(03)00046-6
- Avram, H.D., 2003. Machine-readable cataloging (MARC) program. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, 3, 1712–1730. doi:https://doi.org/10.1081/E-ELIS120008993
- Badam, S.K. and Elmqvist, N., Jan 2019. Visfer: camera-based visual data transfer for cross-device visualization. Information Visualization, 18 (1), 68–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871617725907
- Ballatore, A., 2019. A context frame for interactive maps. In: P. Kyriakidis et al., eds. Accepted Short Papers and Posters from the 22nd AGILE Conference on Geo-information Science (AGILE 2019). Cyprus, Greece.
- Battle, L., et al., 2018. “Beagle: automated extraction and interpretation of visualizations from the Web”. In: R.L. Mandryk et al., eds. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2018). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: ACM, 594. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174168.
- Bell, S., Jan 2020. Map icon design. In: J.P. Wilson ed. Geographic information science & technology body of knowledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.22224/gistbok/2020.1.6. University Consortium for Geographic Information Science, Washington, D.C.
- Bertin, J., 1983. Semiology of graphics: diagrams, networks, maps. Translated by William J. Berg. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
- Bibri, S.E., Dec 2018. Backcasting in futures studies: a synthesized scholarly and planning approach to strategic smart sustainable city development. European Journal of Futures Research, 6 (1), 13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-018-0142-z
- Bishr, Y., June 1998. Overcoming the semantic and other barriers to GIS interoperability. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12 (4), 299–314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/136588198241806
- Bittner, T., Donnelly, M., and Smith, B., 2009. A spatio-temporal ontology for geographic information integration. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23 (6), 765–798. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810701776767
- Bostock, M. and Davies, J., May 2013. Code as cartography. The Cartographic Journal, 50 (2), 129–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1179/0008704113Z.00000000078
- Bostock, M. and Heer, J., Nov 2009. Protovis: a graphical toolkit for visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15 (6), 1121–1128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.174
- Bostock, M., Ogievetsky, V., and Heer, J., Dec 2011. D3 data-driven documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17 (12), 2301–2309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.185
- Brehmer, M. and Munzner, T., Dec 2013. A multi-level typology of abstract visualization tasks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19 (12), 2376–2385. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.124
- Brereton, P., Budgen, D., and Hamilton, G., 1998. Hypertext: the next maintenance mountain. Computer, 31 (12), 49–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/2.735850
- Brewer, C.A., Jan 2003. A transition in improving maps: the ColorBrewer example. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 30 (2), 159–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1559/152304003100011126
- Brodaric, B., Mar 2018. Interoperability of representations. In: D. Richardson. et al. eds. International encyclopedia of geography. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0894.pub2
- Bröring, A., et al., Mar 2011. New generation sensor web enablement. Sensors, 11 (3), 2652–2699. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/s110302652
- Brovelli, M.A., et al., Apr 2012. Web geoservices and ancient cadastral maps: the web C.A.R.T.E. project. Transactions in GIS, 16 (2), 125–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01311.x
- Capilla, R., et al., Aug 2019. Opportunities for software reuse in an uncertain world: from past to emerging trends. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 31 (8). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2217
- Cardoso, N. and Silva, M.J., 2007. Query expansion through geographical feature types. In: R. Purves and C.B. Jones, eds. Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop On Geographic Information Retrieval (GIR 2007). Lisbon, Portugal: ACM, 55–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1316948.1316963.
- Chiang, Y.-Y., et al., 2020. Creating structured, linked geographic data from historical maps: challenges and trends. In: Y.-Y. Chiang, et al., eds. Using historical maps in scientific studies. Cham: Springer, 37–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66908-3_3
- Chiang, Y.-Y., Leyk, S., and Knoblock, C.A., May 2014. A survey of digital map processing techniques. ACM Computing Surveys, 47 (1), 1–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2557423
- Cleveland, W.S. and McGill, R., Sept 1984. Graphical perception: theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79 (387), 531. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2288400
- Çöltekin, A., et al., Oct 2017. Persistent challenges in geovisualization – a community perspective. International Journal of Cartography, 3 (sup1), 115–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1302910
- Çöltekin, A., et al., Jan 2009. Evaluating the effectiveness of interactive map interface designs: a case study integrating usability metrics with eye-movement analysis. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 36 (1), 5–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1559/152304009787340197
- Çöltekin, A., Janetzko, H., and Fabrikant, S.I., 2018. Geovisualization. In: ed., J.P. Wilson The geographic information science & technology body of knowledge (2nd quarter 2018 edition). doi:https://doi.org/10.22224/gistbok/2018.2.6
- Couclelis, H., 2010. Ontologies of geographic information. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (12), 1785–1809. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2010.484392
- Craglia, M., et al., Jan 2012. Digital Earth 2020: towards the vision for the next decade. International Journal of Digital Earth, 5 (1), 4–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2011.638500
- De Miranda Azevedo, R. and Dumontier, M., Jan 2020. Considerations for the conduction and interpretation of FAIRness evaluations. Data Intelligence, 2 (1–2), 285–292. 2641-435X. https://direct.mit.edu/dint/article/2/1-2/285-292/10015.
- Degbelo, A., 2017. Linked data and visualization: two sides of the transparency coin. In: H.T. Vo and H. Bill, eds. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Smart Cities and Urban Analytics - UrbanGIS’17. Los Angeles, California, USA: ACM Press, 1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3152178.3152191.
- Degbelo, A., 2020a. An ontology design pattern for geovisualization content description. In: E. Blomqvist, et al., eds. Advances in pattern-based ontology engineering. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 279 - 291.
- Degbelo, A., Apr. 2020b. Open data user needs: a preliminary synthesis. In: A.E.F. Seghrouchni et al. eds. Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020. Taipei, Taiwan: ACM, 834–839. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3366424.3386586.
- Degbelo, A., et al., 2016. Opening up smart cities: citizen-centric challenges and opportunities from GIScience. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5 (2), 16. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5020016
- Degbelo, A. and Kauppinen, T., 2018. Increasing transparency through web maps. In: P.-A. Champin et al. eds. Companion of Proceedings of the Web Conference 2018 - WWW ’18. Lyon, France: ACM Press, 899–904. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3191515.
- Degbelo, A. and Kray, C., 2018. Intelligent geovisualizations for open government data (vision paper). In: F. Banaei- Kashani et al. eds. 26th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. Seattle, Washington, USA: ACM Press, 77–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3274895.3274940.
- Degbelo, A., Sarfraz, S., and Kray, C., Mar 2020. Data scale as Cartography: a semi-automatic approach for thematic web map creation. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 47 (2), 153–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2019.1677176
- Degbelo, A. and Sherpa, A., Apr. 2020. Open geodata reuse: towards natural language interfaces to web APIs. In: A.E.F. Seghrouchni et al. eds. Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020. Taipei, Taiwan: ACM, 703–710. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3366424.3384363.
- Degbelo, A. and Teka, B., 2019. Spatial search strategies for open government data: a systematic comparison. In: R. Purves and C.B. Jones eds. 13th Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval (GIR’19). Lyon, France: ACM Press, 2:1–2:10.doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3371140.3371142.
- Degbelo, A., et al., 2016. Designing semantic application programming interfaces for open government data. JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 8 (2), 21–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v8i2.420
- Degbelo, A., Wissing, J., and Kauppinen, T., Oct 2018. A comparison of geovisualizations and data tables for transparency enablement in the open government data landscape. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 14 (4), 39–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2018100104
- Diaz, L., et al. 2012. Future SDI - Impulses from Geoinformatics research and IT trends. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 7, 378–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.2902/1725-0463.2012.07.art18
- Döllner, J., 2005. Geospatial digital rights management in geovisualization. The Cartographic Journal, 42 (1), 27–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1179/000870405X57266
- Downs, R.M., 2015. Exploring the nature and development of expertise in geography. In: D. Montello, K. Grossner, and D. Janelle, eds. Space in mind: concepts for spatial learning and education. MIT press, Cambridge, MA. Chap. 14. 281–305
- Dreborg, K.H., Nov 1996. Essence of backcasting. Futures, 28 (9), 813–828. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(96)00044-4
- Fechner, T. and Kray, C., 2014. Georeferenced open data and augmented interactive geo-visualizations as catalysts for citizen engagement. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 6 (1), 14–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v6i1.283
- Fechner, T., Wilhelm, D., and Kray, C. 2015. Ethermap - real-time collaborative map editing. In: B. Begole et al. eds. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’15. Seoul, South Korea: ACM Press, 3583–3592. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702536.
- Feitelson, D., et al., 2020. How developers choose names. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.2976920
- Froehlich, J.E., et al., Feb 2019. Grand challenges in accessible maps. Inter- Actions, 26 (2), 78–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3301657
- Fu, G., Jones, C.B., and Abdelmoty, A.I., 2005. Ontology-based spatial query expansion in information retrieval. In: R. Meersman, et al. eds. On the move to meaningful internet systems 2005. Vol. 3761. Springer, 1466–1482. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/11575801_33
- Furnas, G.W., 1985. Experience with an adaptive indexing scheme. In: L. Borman and R. Smith eds. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’85. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 131–135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/317456.317480.
- Furnas, G.W., et al., Nov 1987. The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Communications of the ACM, 30 (11), 964–971. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/32206.32212
- Gao, S., Janowicz, K., and Zhang, D., 2016. Designing a map legend ontology for searching map content. In: K. Hammar et al. eds. Advances in Ontology Design and Patterns [revised and extended versions of the papers presented at the 7th edition of the Workshop on Ontology and Semantic Web Patterns (WOP@ISWC 2016). Vol. 32. IOS Press, 119–130. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-826-6-119.
- Goodchild, M.F., Nov 2009. Geographic information systems and science: today and tomorrow. Annals of GIS, 15 (1), 3–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19475680903250715
- Goodchild, M.F., 2010. Twenty years of progress: gIScience in 2010. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 1, 3–20.
- Goodchild, M.F., et al., July 2012. Next-generation digital earth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109 (28), 11088–11094. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202383109
- Gould, N. and Mackaness, W., May 2016. From taxonomies to ontologies: formalizing generalization knowledge for on-demand mapping. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 43 (3), 208–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2015.1072737
- Grammel, L., 2013. A survey of visualization construction user interfaces. In: M. Hlawitschka, et al., eds. EuroVis - short papers. Leipzig, Germany: The Eurographics Association. doi:https://doi.org/10.2312/PE.EuroVisShort.EuroVisShort2013.019-023
- Graves, A. and Hendler, J., 2013. Visualization tools for open government data. In: S. Mellouli, L.F. Luna-Reyes, and J. Zhang eds. Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research - dg.o ’13. Quebec, Canada: ACM Press, 136–145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2479724.2479746.
- Graves, A. and Hendler, J., 2014. A study on the use of visualizations for Open Government Data. Information Polity, 19 (1,2), 73–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-140333
- Griffin, A.L., et al., Oct 2017. Designing across map use contexts: a research agenda. International Journal of Cartography, 3 (sup1), 90–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1315988
- Griffin, A.L., June 2020. Trustworthy maps. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 20. doi:https://doi.org/10.5311/JOSIS.2020.20.654
- Guidero, E., July 2017. Typography. In: J.P. Wilson ed. Geographic Information Science & Technology Body of Knowledge. Q3. doi:https://doi.org/10.22224/gistbok/2017.3.2
- Hardisty, F. and Robinson, A.C., Mar 2011. The GeoViz toolkit: using component-oriented coordination methods for geographic visualization and analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25 (2), 191–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810903214203
- Harper, S. and Yesilada, Y., Sept 2007. Web Authoring for Accessibility (WAfA). Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 5 (3), 175–179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2007.05.001
- Harrie, L., Stigmar, H., and Djordjevic, M., Mar 2015. Analytical estimation of map readability. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4 (2), 418–446. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4020418
- Harrower, M. and Brewer, C.A., June 2003. ColorBrewer.org: an online tool for selecting colour schemes for maps. The Cartographic Journal, 40 (1), 27–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1179/000870403235002042
- Haslauer, E., Biberacher, M., and Blaschke, T., May 2016. A spatially explicit backcasting approach for sustainable land-use planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59 (5), 866–890. 0964-0568. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1044652
- Hennig, S., Zobl, F., and Wasserburger, W.W., Nov 2017. Accessible web maps for visually impaired users: recommendations and example solutions. Cartographic Perspectives, 88 (88), 6–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.14714/CP88.1391
- Horbiński, T., Cybulski, P., and Medyńska-Gulij, B., 2020. Graphic design and button placement for mobile map applications. The Cartographic Journal, 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2019.1631008
- Hu, Y., et al., 2015a. Enabling semantic search and knowledge discovery for ArcGIS online: a linked-data-driven approach. In: F. Bacao, M.Y. Santos, and M. Painho eds. AGILE 2015 - Geographic Information Science as an Enabler of Smarter Cities and Communities. Lisbon, Portugal, Cham: Springer, 107–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16787-9_7.
- Hu, Y., et al., June 2015b. Metadata topic harmonization and semantic search for linked-data- driven geoportals: a case study using ArcGIS online. Transactions in GIS, 19 (3), 398–416. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12151
- Huang, W. and Harrie, L., 2019 Apr. Towards knowledge-based geovisualisation using Semantic Web technologies: a knowledge representation approach coupling ontologies and rules. International Journal of Digital Earth, 1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2019.1604835.
- Ipatow, N. and Harvey, F., Dec 2019. Bertin’s graphic variables and online map makers: an empirical study of maps produced by prosumers and cartographers. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 54 (4), 233–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.3138/cart.54.4.2018-0024
- Jacobsen, A., et al., Jan 2020. FAIR principles: interpretations and implementation considerations. Data Intelligence, 2 (1–2), 10–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_r_00024
- Janowicz, K., et al., 2010. Semantic enablement for spatial data infrastructures. Transactions in GIS, 14 (2), 111–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01186.x
- Javed, W., McDonnel, B., and Elmqvist, N., Nov 2010. Graphical perception of multiple time series. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16 (6), 927–934. 1077-2626. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.162
- Jiang, Y., et al., Sept 2018. Towards intelligent geospatial data discovery: a machine learning framework for search ranking. International Journal of Digital Earth, 11 (9), 956–971. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2017.1371255
- Jones, C.B., et al. 2004. The SPIRIT spatial search engine: architecture, ontologies and spatial indexing. In: M.J. Egenhofer, C. Freksa, and H.J. Miller, eds. Geographic Information Science. Adelphi, Maryland, USA: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 125–139.
- Jones, J., et al., 2014. Making the web of data available via web feature services. In: J. Huerta, S. Schade, and C. Granell eds. The 17th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science - Connecting a Digital Europe Through Location and Place. Castellón, Spain: Springer International Publishing, 341–361.
- Käfer, T., et al., 2013. Observing linked data dynamics. In: P. Cimiano et al. eds. The Semantic Web: Semantics and Big Data, 10th International Conference (ESWC 2013). Montpellier, France: Springer Berlin, 213–227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38288-8_15.
- Kent, R.B. and Klosterman, R.E., June 2000. GIS and mapping. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66 (2), 189–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360008976098
- Kinkeldey, C., et al., Oct 2014. Evaluation of noise annotation lines: using noise to represent thematic uncertainty in maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41 (5), 430–439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2014.949868
- Kiser, T. and Smeltekop, N., Sept 2018. A method for creating scanned map metadata for geoportals, library catalogs, and digital repositories: reworking existing MARC records of paper maps to create new records for their scanned counterparts. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries, 14 (2–3), 109–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15420353.2019.1640166.
- Knuth, M., Waitelonis, J., and Sack, H. 2016. I am a machine, let me understand web media! In: A. Bozzon, P. Cudre-Maroux, and C. Pautasso eds. International Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE 2016). Lugano, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 467–475. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38791-8_33.
- Köbben, B.J. and Kraak, M.-J., 2020. Web mapping. In: A. Kobayashi, ed. International encyclopedia of human geography. Elsevier, 333–337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10565-7
- Koehler, W., 1999. An analysis of web page and web site constancy and permanence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50 (2), 162–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:2<162::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO;2-B
- Korpi, J. and Ahonen-Rainio, P., Nov 2010. Cultural constraints in the design of pictographic symbols. The Cartographic Journal, 47 (4), 351–359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1179/000870410X12911337964923
- Koylu, C. and Guo, D., Oct 2017. Design and evaluation of line symbolizations for origin–destination flow maps. Information Visualization, 16 (4), 309–331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871616681375
- Kraak, M.-J. and Fabrikant, S.I., Oct 2017. Of maps, cartography and the geography of the International Cartographic Association. International Journal of Cartography, 3 (sup1), 9–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1288535
- Kraak, M.-J., Ricker, B., and Engelhardt, Y., Dec 2018. Challenges of mapping sustainable development goals indicators data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7 (12), 482. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7120482
- Kraak, M.-J., et al., 2020. Mapping for a sustainable world. 79. New York, NY:The United Nations.
- Kray, C. and Degbelo, A., 2019. Map plasticity. In: Poster Session at Conference on Spatial Information Theory: COSIT’19. Regensburg, Germany. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3385238.
- Kray, C., Schmid, F., and Fritze, H., July 2017. Guest editorial: map interaction. GeoInformatica, 21 (3), 573–576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-016-0290-x
- Krueger, C.W., June 1992. Software reuse. ACM Computing Surveys, 24 (2), 131–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/130844.130856
- Kuhn, W., 2012. Core concepts of spatial information for transdisciplinary research. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (12), 2267–2276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2012.722637
- Kuhn, W., Kauppinen, T., and Janowicz, K., 2014. Linked Data - A paradigm shift for Geographic Information Science. In: M. Duckham et al. eds. Geographic Information Science - Eighth International Conference. Vienna, Austria: Springer International Publishing, 173–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11593-1_12.
- Lacoche, J., et al., 2019. 3DPlasticToolkit: plasticity for 3D user interfaces. In: P. Bourdot et al. eds. Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality - 16th EuroVR International Conference (EuroVR 2019). Tallinn, Estonia: Springer, Cham, 62–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31908-3_5.
- Lai, P.-C. and Degbelo, A., June 2021. A comparative study of typing and speech for map metadata creation. In: P. Partsinevelos, P. Kyriakidis, and M. Kavouras eds. Proceedings of the 24th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science (AGILE 2021), 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-2-7-2021.
- Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., Jan 2003. Metaphors we live by. London, United Kingdom: The university of Chicago Press.
- Larkin, J.H. and Simon, H.A., Jan 1987. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11 (1), 65–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x
- Lemmens, R., et al., Sept 2006. Integrating semantic and syntactic descriptions to chain geographic services. IEEE Internet Computing, 10 (5), 42–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2006.106
- Library of Congress. 2020. MARC standards (network development and MARC standards office, library of congress) https://www.loc.gov/marc/ [accessed 09 Feb 2020].
- Lutz, M. and Klien, E., Mar 2006. Ontology-based retrieval of geographic information. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20 (3), 233–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810500287107
- MacEachren, A., 1995. How maps work: representation, visualization, and design. Guilford Press. New York, New York.
- MacEachren, A. and Kraak, M.-J., 2001. Research challenges in geovisualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28 (1), 3–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1559/152304001782173970
- Mai, G., et al., July 2020. Semantically-enriched search engine for Geoportals: a case study with ArcGIS online. In: P. Partsinevelos, P. Kyriakidis, and M. Kavouras eds. Proceedings of the 23th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science (AGILE 2020). Vol. 1, 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-1-13-2020.
- Marzouki, A., et al., 2017. The relevance of geovisualization in citizen participation processes. In: Charles C. Hinnant and Adegboyega Ojo. dg.o ’17 eds. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. Staten Island, NY: ACM, 397–406. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3085228.3085240.
- Meixner, G., Calvary, G., and Coutaz, J., 2014. Introduction to model- based user interfaces. http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-mbui-intro-20140107/.
- Mikkonen, T. and Taivalsaari, A., May 2019. Software reuse in the era of opportunistic design. IEEE Software, 36 (3), 105–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.2884883
- Monmonier, M., 2005. Lying with maps. Statistical Science, 20 (3), 215–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/088342305000000241
- Mons, B., et al., Mar 2017. Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR Data guiding principles for the European Open Science Cloud. Information Services & Use, 37 (1), 49–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-170824
- Muehlenhaus, I., Nov 2013. The design and composition of persuasive maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40 (5), 401–414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2013.783450
- Mwalongo, F., et al., June 2016. State-of-the-art report in web-based visualization. Computer Graphics Forum, 35 (3), 553–575. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12929
- Mylavarapu, P., et al., 2019. Ranked-list visualization: a graphical perception study. In: S.A. Brewster et al. eds. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Compuing Systems - CHI ’19. Glasgow, Scotland, UK: ACM Press, 192. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300422.
- Noy, N., Burgess, M., and Brickley, D., 2019. Google Dataset Search: building a search engine for datasets in an open Web ecosystem. In: L. Liu et al. eds. Proceedings of The Web Conference (WebConf ’2019). San Francisco, CA: ACM Press, 1365–1375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313685.
- Obrenovic, Z., Abascal, J., and Starcevic, D., 2007. Universal accessibility as a multimodal design issue. Communications of the ACM, 50 (5), 83–88. May . doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1230819.1241668
- Pelzetter, J. Apr. 2020. A declarative model for accessibility requirements. In: C. Duarte et al. eds. Proceedings of the 17th International Web for All Conference. Taipei, Taiwan: ACM, 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3371300.3383339.
- Peuquet, D.J., Sept 1988. Representations of geographic space: toward a conceptual synthesis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78 (3), 375–394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1988.tb00214.x
- Plaisant, C., Fekete, J.-D., and Grinstein, G., Jan 2008. Promoting insight-based evaluation of visualizations: from contest to benchmark repository. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14 (1), 120–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.70412
- Purves, R.S., et al., Aug 2007. The design and implementation of SPIRIT: a spatially aware search engine for information retrieval on the Internet. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21 (7), 717–745. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810601169840
- Purves, R.S., et al., 2018. Geographic information retrieval: progress and challenges in spatial search of text. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 12 (2–3), 164–318. doi:https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000034
- Ren, D., Hollerer, T., and Yuan, X., Dec 2014. iVisDesigner: expressive interactive design of information visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20 (12), 2092–2101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346291
- Roberts, J.C., 2008. Coordinated multiple views for exploratory geovisualization. In: M. Dodge, M. McDerby, and M. Turner, eds. Geographic Visualization. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 25–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470987643.ch3
- Robinson, A.C., Jan 2019. Representing the presence of absence in Cartography. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109 (1), 286–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1473754
- Robinson, A.C., et al., Oct 2017. Geospatial big data and cartography: research challenges and opportunities for making maps that matter. International Journal of Cartography, 3 (sup1), 32–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2016.1278151
- Robinson, A.C., et al., Nov 2013. Symbol Store: sharing map symbols for emergency management. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40 (5), 415–426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2013.803833
- Roth, R.E., 2013a. An empirically-derived taxonomy of interaction primitives for interactive cartography and geovisualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19 (12), 2356–2365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.130
- Roth, R.E., 2013b. Interactive maps: what we know and what we need to know. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 6, 59–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.5311/JOSIS.2013.6.105
- Roth, R.E., Mar 2017. Visual variables. In: D. Richardson. et al., eds. International encyclopedia of geography: people, the earth, environment and technology. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0761
- Roth, R.E., Brewer, C.A., and Stryker, M.S., 2011. A typology of operators for maintaining legible map designs at multiple scales. Cartographic Perspectives, 68 (68), 29–64. Mar . doi:https://doi.org/10.14714/CP68.7
- Roth, R.E., et al., Oct 2017. User studies in cartography: opportunities for empirical research on interactive maps and visualizations. International Journal of Cartography, 3 (sup1), 61–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1288534
- Safarov, I., Meijer, A., and Grimmelikhuijsen, S., May 2017. Utilization of open government data: a systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Information Polity, 22 (1), 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160012
- Saket, B., Endert, A., and Demiralp, C., July 2019. Task-based effectiveness of basic visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25 (7), 2505–2512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2829750
- Satyanarayan, A. and Heer, J., June 2014. Lyra: an interactive visualization design environment. Computer Graphics Forum, 33 (3), 351–360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12391
- Satyanarayan, A., et al., 2020. Critical reflections on visualization authoring systems. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934281
- Satyanarayan, A., et al., Jan 2017. Vega-Lite: a grammar of interactive graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23 (1), 341–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2599030
- Scheider, S., et al. 2014. Content and context description - How linked spatio-temporal data enables novel information services for libraries. gis.Science, 4, 138–149.
- Scheider, S., et al., 2014. Encoding and querying historic map content. In: J. Huerta, S. Schade, and C. Granell, eds. The 17th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science - Connecting a Digital Europe Through Location and Place. Castellón, Spain: Springer International Publishing, 251–273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03611-3_15.
- Schmidt, D.C., 1999. Why software reuse has failed and how to make it work for you. C++ Report, 11 (1).
- Schnabel, O., 2005. Map Symbol Brewer - a new approach for a cartographic map symbol generator. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Cartographic Conference. A Coruña, Spain.
- Schnur, S., Bektaş, K., and Çöltekin, A., May 2018. Measured and perceived visual complexity: a comparative study among three online map providers. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 45 (3), 238–254. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2017.1323676
- Schnürer, R., et al., July 2020. An empirical evaluation of three-dimensional pie charts with individually extruded sectors in a geovisualization context. Information Visualization, 19 (3), 183–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871619896103
- Seo, D. and Yoo, B., July 2020. Interoperable information model for geovisualization and interaction in XR environments. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34 (7), 1323–1352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2019.1706739
- Shneiderman, B., May 2000. Universal usability. Communications of the ACM, 43 (5), 84–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/332833.332843
- Stolte, C., Tang, D., and Hanrahan, P., 2002. Polaris: a system for query, analysis, and visualization of multidimensional relational databases. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 8 (1), 52–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/2945.981851
- Swienty, O., et al., Aug 2008. The role of relevance and cognition in attention- guiding geovisualisation. The Cartographic Journal, 45 (3), 227–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1179/000870408X311422
- Tait, A., Apr 2018. Visual hierarchy and layout. In: J.P. Wilson ed. Geographic Information Science & Technology Body of Knowledge. Q2. doi:https://doi.org/10.22224/gistbok/2018.2.4
- Thevenin, D. and Coutaz, J., 1999. Plasticity of user interfaces: framework and research agenda. In: M.A. Sasse and C.W. Johnson, eds. Proceedings of INTERACT ’99. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: IOS Press, 110–117.
- Thrash, T., et al., 2019. The future of geographic information displays from GI- Science, cartographic, and cognitive science perspectives (Vision Paper). In: S. Timpf et al. eds. 14th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2019). Regensburg, Germany: Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 19:1–19:11. doi: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.COSIT.2019.19.
- Trilles, S., et al. Jan 2020. Interactive guidelines: public communication of databased research in cities. PLOS ONE, 15 (1), e0228008. Ed. by Sara Rubinelli. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228008
- Van Ho, Q., et al., Jan 2012. A web-enabled visualization toolkit for geovisual analytics. Information Visualization, 11 (1), 22–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871611425870
- Vanhulst, P., et al., 2018. Designing a classification for user-authored annotations in data visualization. In: A. Telea, A. Kerren, and J. Braz eds. Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (VISI- GRAPP 2018) - Volume 3: IVAPP. Funchal, Portugal: SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 85–96. isbn: 978-989-758-289-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.5220/0006613700850096.
- Varanka, D. and Usery, L., May 2018. The map as knowledge base. International Journal of Cartography, 4 (2), 201–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1421004
- Viegas, F.B., et al., Nov 2007. ManyEyes: a site for visualization at Internet scale. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13 (6), 1121–1128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.70577
- Vilches-Blázquez, L.M. and Saavedra, J., Feb 2019. A framework for connecting two interoperability universes: OGC web feature services and linked data. Transactions in GIS, 23 (1), 22–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12496
- Volz, J., et al., 2009. Discovering and maintaining links on the web of data. In: A. Bernstein eds. 8th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2009). Berlin, USA: Springer, 650–665. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04930-9_41.
- Wagemans, J., et al., 2012. A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychological Bulletin, 138 (6), 1218–1252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029334
- Weikum, G., Hoffart, J., and Suchanek, F., 2019. Knowledge harvesting: achievements and challenges. In: B. Steffen and G. Woeginger eds. Computing and Software Science: State of the Art and Perspectives. 217–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91908-9_13
- Wickham, H., et al., Nov 2010. Graphical inference for infovis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16 (6), 973–979. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.161
- Wilkinson, M.D., et al., 2016. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3 (160018). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
- Wilkinson, M.D., et al., Dec 2018. A design framework and exemplar metrics for FAIRness. Scientific Data, 5 (1), 180118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.118
- Wills, G. and Wilkinson, L., Jan 2010. AutoVis: automatic visualization. Information Visualization, 9 (1), 47–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/ivs.2008.27
- Wongsuphasawat, K., et al., Jan 2016. Voyager: exploratory analysis via faceted browsing of visualization recommendations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22 (1), 649–658. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467191
- Yeates, L.B., 2004. Thought experimentation: a cognitive approach. Doctoral dissertation. University of New South Wales.
- Zhang, Y., et al., 2020. A decentralized model for spatial data digital rights management. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9 (2). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020084
- Zhao, T., Zhang, C., and Weidong, L., 2016. Accessing distributed WFS data through a RDF query interface. In: International Conference on GIScience (GISCience 2016) - Short Paper Proceedings. Vol. 1. 1. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.