3,337
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Detecting country of residence from social media data: a comparison of methods

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1931-1952 | Received 18 Jun 2020, Accepted 15 Feb 2022, Published online: 07 Mar 2022

References

  • Ahas, R., et al., 2008. Evaluating passive mobile positioning data for tourism surveys: an Estonian case study. Tourism Management, 29 (3), 469–486.
  • Ahas, R., et al., 2010. Using mobile positioning data to model locations meaningful to users of mobile phones. Journal of Urban Technology, 17 (1), 3–27.
  • Ajao, O., Hong, J., and Liu, W., 2015. A survey of location inference techniques on Twitter. Journal of Information Science, 41 (6), 855–864.
  • Belyi, A., et al., 2017. Global multi-layer network of human mobility. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (7), 1381–1402.
  • Blanford, J.I., et al., 2015. Geo-located tweets. Enhancing mobility maps and capturing cross-border movement. PLOS One, 10 (6), e0129202.
  • Boeing, G., 2018. Clustering to reduce spatial data set size. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3145515
  • Bojic, I., et al., 2016. Scaling of foreign attractiveness for countries and states. Applied Geography, 73, 47–52.
  • Bojic, I., et al., 2015. Choosing the right home location definition method for the given dataset. In: T.-Y. Liu, C.N. Scollon, W. Zhu, eds. Social Informatics. SocInfo 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9471. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 194–208.
  • Boyd, d., and Crawford, K., 2012. Critical questions for big data: provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15 (5), 662–679.
  • Cesario, E., et al., 2017. SMA4TD: a social media analysis methodology for trajectory discovery in large-scale events. Online Social Networks and Media, 3–4, 49–62.
  • Chen, Q., and Poorthuis, A., 2021. Identifying home locations in human mobility data: an open-source R package for comparison and reproducibility. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (7), 1425–1448.
  • Coats, S., 2019. Language choice and gender in a Nordic social media corpus. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 42 (01), 31–55.
  • Cohen, J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 (1), 37–46.
  • Compton, R., Jurgens, D., and Allen, D., 2015. Geotagging one hundred million Twitter accounts with total variation minimization. In: Proceedings – 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, IEEE Big Data 2014. IEEE, 393–401.
  • Crooks, A., et al., 2013. # Earthquake: Twitter as a distributed sensor system. Transactions in GIS, 17 (1), 124–147.
  • Dahinden, J., 2010. The dynamics of migrants’ transnational formations: between mobility and locality. In: R. Bauböck and T. Faist, eds. Diaspora and Transnationalism – Concepts, Theories and Methods. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Ester, M., et al., 1996., A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: Kdd. 226–231.
  • Freelon, D., 2018. Computational research in the post-API age. Political Communication, 0 (0), 1–4.
  • GADM 2019., Database of Global Administrative Areas.
  • García-Palomares, J.C., Gutiérrez, J., and Mínguez, C., 2015. Identification of tourist hot spots based on social networks: a comparative analysis of European metropolises using photo-sharing services and GIS. Applied Geography, 63, 408–417.
  • Ghermandi, A., 2018. Integrating social media analysis and revealed preference methods to value the recreation services of ecologically engineered wetlands. Ecosystem Services, 31, 351–357.
  • Girardin, F., et al., 2008. Digital footprinting: uncovering tourists with user-generated content. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7 (4), 36–43.
  • Graham, M., Hale, S.A., and Gaffney, D., 2014. Where in the world are you? Geolocation and language identification in Twitter. The Professional Geographer, 66 (4), 568–578.
  • Haghighi, S., et al., 2018. PyCM: Multiclass confusion matrix library in Python. Journal of Open Source Software, 3 (25), 729.
  • Hasnat, M.M., and Hasan, S., 2018. Identifying tourists and analyzing spatial patterns of their destinations from location-based social media data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 96, 38–54.
  • Hausmann, A., et al., 2018. Social media data can be used to understand tourists’ preferences for nature-based experiences in protected areas. Conservation Letters, 11 (1), e12343.
  • Hawelka, B., et al., 2014. Geo-located Twitter as proxy for global mobility patterns. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41 (3), 260–271.
  • Heikinheimo, V., et al., 2017. User-generated geographic information for visitor monitoring in a national park: a comparison of social media data and visitor survey. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6 (3), 85.
  • Heikinheimo, V., et al., 2020. Understanding the use of urban green spaces from user-generated geographic information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 201, 103845.
  • Hiippala, T., et al., 2019. Exploring the linguistic landscape of geotagged social media content in urban environments. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 34 (2), 290–309.
  • Hu, T. r., et al., 2016. Home location inference from sparse and noisy data: models and applications. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 17 (5), 389–402.
  • Hu, Y., and Wang, R.-Q., 2020. Understanding the removal of precise geotagging in tweets. Nature Human Behaviour, 4 (12), 1219–1221.
  • Hu, Y., et al., 2015. Extracting and understanding urban areas of interest using geotagged photos. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54, 240–254.
  • Huang, Q., and Wong, D.W.S., 2016. Activity patterns, socioeconomic status and urban spatial structure: what can social media data tell us? International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (9), 1873–1898.
  • Järv, O., et al., 2021. The impact of COVID-19 on daily lives of transnational people based on smartphone data: Estonians in Finland. Journal of Location Based Services, 15 (3), 169–129.
  • Jiang, Y., Li, Z., and Ye, X., 2019. Understanding demographic and socioeconomic biases of geotagged Twitter users at the county level. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 46 (3), 228–242.
  • Kádár, B., 2014. Measuring tourist activities in cities using geotagged photography. Tourism Geographies, 16 (1), 88–104.
  • Kitchin, R., and McArdle, G., 2016. What makes big data, big data? Exploring the ontological characteristics of 26 datasets. Big Data & Society, 3 (1), 205395171663113.
  • Kitchin, R., 2014. Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1 (1), 205395171452848–205395171452812.
  • Kwan, M., 2013. Beyond space (as we knew it): toward temporally integrated geographies of segregation, health, and accessibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103 (5), 1078–1086.
  • Lenormand, M., et al., 2014. Tweets on the road. PLOS One, 9 (8), e105407.
  • Li, D., Zhou, X., and Wang, M., 2018. Analyzing and visualizing the spatial interactions between tourists and locals: a Flickr study in ten US cities. Cities, 74, 249–258.
  • Li, L., Goodchild, M.F., and Xu, B., 2013. Spatial, temporal, and socioeconomic patterns in the use of Twitter and Flickr. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40 (2), 61–77.
  • Longley, P.A., and Adnan, M., 2016. Geo-temporal Twitter demographics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (2), 369–389.
  • Longley, P.A., Adnan, M., and Lansley, G., 2015. The geotemporal demographics of Twitter usage. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 47 (2), 465–484.
  • Luo, F., et al., 2016. Explore spatiotemporal and demographic characteristics of human mobility via Twitter: a case study of Chicago. Applied Geography, 70, 11–25.
  • Mahmud, J., Nichols, J., and Drews, C., 2014. Home location identification of twitter users. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 5 (3), 1–21.
  • Manca, M., et al., 2017. Using social media to characterize urban mobility patterns: state-of-the-art survey and case-study. Online Social Networks and Media, 1, 56–69.
  • McCay-Peet, L., and Quan-Haase, A., 2017. What is social media and what questions can social media research help us answer. In: L. Sloan and A. Quan-Haase, eds. The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. London, UK: SAGE, 13–26.
  • McGee, J., Caverlee, J., and Cheng, Z., 2013. Location prediction in social media based on tie strength. International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings, 459–468.
  • Oksanen, J., et al., 2015. Methods for deriving and calibrating privacy-preserving heat maps from mobile sports tracking application data. Journal of Transport Geography, 48, 135–144.
  • Olteanu, A., et al., 2019. Social data: biases, methodological pitfalls, and ethical boundaries. Frontiers in Big Data, 2, 13.
  • Pedregosa, F., et al., 2011. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830.
  • Pontes, T., et al., 2012., Beware of what you share: Inferring home location in social networks. In: Proceedings - 12th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, ICDMW 2012. IEEE, 571–578.
  • Poorthuis, A., and Zook, M., 2017. Making big data small: strategies to expand urban and geographical research using social media. Journal of Urban Technology, 24 (4), 115–135.
  • Ruths, D., and Pfeffer, J., 2014. Social media for large studies of behavior. Science, 346 (6213), 1063–1064.
  • Shelton, T., Poorthuis, A., and Zook, M., 2015. Social media and the city: rethinking urban socio-spatial inequality using user-generated geographic information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 198–211.
  • Silm, S., Järv, O., and Masso, A., 2020. Tracing human mobilities through mobile phones. In: Handbook of Research Methods and Applications for Mobilities. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Sloan, L., et al., 2015. Who tweets? Deriving the demographic characteristics of age, occupation and social class from twitter user meta-data. PLoS One, 10 (3), e0115545.
  • Sloan, L., et al., 2013. Knowing the Tweeters: deriving sociologically relevant demographics from Twitter. Sociological Research Online, 18 (3), 74–84.
  • Steiger, E., et al., 2015. Twitter as an indicator for whereabouts of people? Correlating Twitter with UK census data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54, 255–265.
  • Su, S., et al., 2016. Characterizing geographical preferences of international tourists and the local influential factors in China using geo-tagged photos on social media. Applied Geography, 73, 26–37.
  • Sui, D., and Goodchild, M., 2011. The convergence of GIS and social media: Challenges for GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25 (11), 1737–1748.
  • Tasse, D., et al., 2017., State of the geotags: Motivations and recent changes. In: Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
  • Tenkanen, H., et al., 2017. Instagram, Flickr, or Twitter: Assessing the usability of social media data for visitor monitoring in protected areas. Scientific Reports, 7 (1), 17615.
  • Toivonen, T., et al., 2019. Social media data for conservation science: A methodological overview. Biological Conservation, 233, 298–315.
  • Tufekci, Z., 2014. Big Questions for Social Media Big Data: Representativeness, Validity and Other Methodological Pitfalls. Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
  • Wang, Q., et al., 2018. Urban mobility and neighborhood isolation in America's 50 largest cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115 (30), 7735–7740.
  • Xu, C., Wong, D.W., and Yang, C., 2013. Evaluating the ‘geographical awareness’ of individuals: An exploratory analysis of twitter data. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40 (2), 103–115.
  • Yuan, Y., and Medel, M., 2016. Characterizing international travel behavior from geotagged photos: A case study of Flickr. PLoS One, 11 (5), e0154885.
  • Zhang, Y., et al., 2018. Mining bike-sharing travel behavior data: An investigation into trip chains and transition activities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 69, 39–50.
  • Zheng, X., Han, J., and Sun, A., 2018. A survey of location prediction on Twitter. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 30 (9), 1652–1671.
  • Zook, M., et al., 2017. Ten simple rules for responsible big data research. PLoS Computational Biology, 13 (3), e1005399.