Identification of enclaves and exclaves by computation based on point-set topology

References

• Auty, R., 2006. Mining enclave to economic catalyst: large mineral projects in developing countries. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 13 (1), 135–145.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, S., 2010. The study of enclaves–some introductory remarks. Geopolitics, 15 (2), 312–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittner, T., 1997. A qualitative coordinate language of location of figures within the ground. In: International conference on spatial information theory. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 223–240.
   Google Scholar
• Both, A., Duckham, M., and Worboys, M.F., 2018. Identifying surrounds and engulfs relations in mobile and coordinate-free geosensor networks. ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems, 4 (2), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clementini, E., and Di Felice, P., 1996a. An algebraic model for spatial objects with indeterminate boundaries. Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, 2, 155–169.
   Google Scholar
• Clementini, E., and Di Felice, P., 1996b. A model for representing topological relationships between complex geometric features in spatial databases. Information Sciences, 90 (1–4), 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clementini, E., Di Felice, P., and Califano, G., 1995. Composite regions in topological queries. Information Systems, 20 (7), 579–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clementini, E., Di Felice, P., and Van Oosterom, P., 1993. A small set of formal topological relationships suitable for end-user interaction. In: International symposium on spatial databases. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 277–295.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, A.G., and Gotts, N.M., 1996. The ‘egg—yolk’ representation of regions with indeterminate boundaries. In: P.A. Burrough and A. Frank, eds. Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries. Vol. 2. London: Taylor & Francis, 171–188.
   Google Scholar
• DataVic., 2022. Vicmap elevation – 10–20 contours & relief, April. Available from: https://discover.data.vic.gov.au/dataset/vicmap-elevation-10-20-contours-relief [Accessed 7 April 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Dube, M.P., and Egenhofer, M.J., 2014. Surrounds in partitions. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, 233–242.
   Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M.J., 1989. A formal definition of binary topological relationships. In: International conference on foundations of data organization and algorithms. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 457–472.
   Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M.J., 1993. A model for detailed binary topological relationships. Geomatica, 47 (3–4), 261–273.
   Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M.J., Clementini, E., and Di Felice, P., 1994. Topological relations between regions with holes. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 8 (2), 129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M.J., and Franzosa, R.D., 1991. Point-set topological spatial relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5 (2), 161–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M.J., and Herring, J., 1990. Categorizing binary topological relationships between regions, lines, and points in geographic databases. Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, University of California, Santa Barbara, Technical report. 90–12.
   Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M.J., and Vasardani, M., 2007. Spatial reasoning with a hole. In: International conference on spatial information theory. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 303–320.
   Google Scholar
• Formica, A., et al., 2012. A 16-intersection matrix for the polygon-polyline topological relation for geographic pictorial query languages. In: International conference on availability, reliability, and security. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 302–316.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K.P., and Zarsky, L., 2007. The enclave economy: foreign investment and sustainable development in Mexico’s Silicon Valley. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, S., 2020. The Shapely user manual [online]. Available from: https://shapely.readthedocs.io/en/stable/manual.html\#de-9im-relationships [Accessed 19 October 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Kainz, W., Egenhofer, M.J., and Greasley, I., 1993. Modelling spatial relations and operations with partially ordered sets. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7 (3), 215–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, L., 2001. A geometric theory of vague boundaries based on supervaluation. In: International conference on spatial information theory. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 44–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kurata, Y., and Egenhofer, M.J., 2007. The 9+-intersection for topological relations between a directed line segment and a region. In: Gottfried, B. ed. 1st International symposium for behavioral monitoring and interpretation. Germany, 62–76.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., 2009. On the internal topological structure of plane regions. arXiv. preprint. October 18, 2013. Accessed 14 September 2020. arXiv:0909.0109. 
   Google Scholar
• Moravcová, J., et al., 2017. Analysis of land consolidation projects and their impact on land use change, landscape structure, and agricultural land resource protection: case studies of Pilsen-South and Pilsen-North (Czech Republic). Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 13 (1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OGC., 1999. OpenGIS simple features specification for CORBA. In: Open GIS Consortium, Standard, 99–054. Available from https://portal.ogc.org/files/?artifact_id=834 [Accessed 10 October 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., et al., 2020. Nested enclave: supporting fine-grained hierarchical isolation with SGX. In: 2020 ACM/IEEE 47th annual international symposium on computer architecture (ISCA). Manhattan, NY: IEEE, 776–789.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, S.R., Pignotta, G.S., and Vernon, R.H., 2004. The significance of microgranitoid enclave shapes and orientations. Journal of Structural Geology, 26 (8), 1465–1481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J.A., 1880. On concretionary patches and fragments of other rocks contained in granite. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 36 (1–4), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Portes, A., and Jensen, L., 1989. The enclave and the entrants: patterns of ethnic enterprise in Miami before and after Mariel. American Sociological Review, 54 (6), 929–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulaki, I., et al., 2022. Exclave accessibility and cross-border travel: the pene-exclave of Ceuta, Spain. Tourism Geographies, 24 (1), 152–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randell, D.A., Cui, Z., and Cohn, A.G., 1992. A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In: 3rd international conference on knowledge representation and reasoning. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Pub., 165–176.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, G., 1959. Exclaves. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 49 (3), 283–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J., Zhou, T., and Chen, M., 2017. A 27-intersection model for representing detailed topological relations between spatial objects in two-dimensional space. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6 (2), 37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, C., et al., 2021. Enclave-reinforced inequality during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from university campus lockdowns in Wuhan, China. Sustainability, 13 (23), 13100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, S., and Inohara, T., 2015. Mathematical definitions of enclave and exclave, and applications. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 268, 728–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, X., and Kainz, W., 2002. Analysis of topological relations between fuzzy regions in a general fuzzy topological space. In: C. Armenakis and Y.C. Lee, eds. Symposium on geospatial theory, processing and applications. Ottawa, Canada, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Timpf, S., and Frank, A.U., 1997. Using hierarchical spatial data structures for hierarchical spatial reasoning. In: International conference on spatial information theory. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Tobisch, O., McNulty, B., and Vernon, R., 1997. Microgranitoid enclave swarms in granitic plutons, central Sierra Nevada, California. Lithos, 40 (2–4), 321–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B.S., 2007. The enclave society: towards a sociology of immobility. European Journal of Social Theory, 10 (2), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007077807.
   Google Scholar
• Vasardani, M., and Egenhofer, M.J., 2009. Comparing relations with a multi-holed region. In: International conference on spatial information theory. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 159–176.
   Google Scholar
• Vinokurov, E., 2007. A theory of enclaves. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Westerdahl, C., 1994. Maritime cultures and ship types: brief comments on the significance of maritime archaeology. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 23 (4), 265–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerdahl, C., 1998. Inland water boats and shipping in Sweden. The great lakes. Archaeonautica, 14 (1), 135–143.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Q., and Tobisch, O.T., 1994. Microgranitic enclave shapes and magmatic strain histories: constraints from drop deformation theory. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 99 (B12), 24359–24368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K.L., and Martin, W.A., 1982. Ethnic enclaves: A comparison of the Cuban and black economies in Miami. American Journal of Sociology, 88 (1), 135–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S., 2000. Uncertain topological relations between imprecise regions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (5), 411–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worboys, M., and Duckham, M., 2021. Qualitative-geometric ‘surrounds’ relations between disjoint regions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 35 (5), 1032–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worboys, M.F., and Bofakos, P., 1993. A canonical model for a class of areal spatial objects. In: International symposium on spatial databases. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 36–52.
   Google Scholar
• Worboys, M.F., and Duckham, M., 2004. GIS: a computing perspective. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar