An improved assessment method for urban growth simulations across models, regions, and time

References

• Al-Shaar, W., et al., 2021. Application of modified cellular automata Markov chain model: forecasting land use pattern in Lebanon. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 7 (2), 1321–1335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-shalabi, M., et al., 2013. Modelling urban growth evolution and land-use changes using GIS based cellular automata and SLEUTH models: the case of Sana’a metropolitan city, Yemen. Environmental Earth Sciences, 70 (1), 425–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benham, T., et al., 2015. CEoptim: cross-entropy R package for optimization. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1503.01842,
   Google Scholar
• Berberoğlu, S., Akın, A., and Clarke, K.C., 2016. Cellular automata modeling approaches to forecast urban growth for adana, Turkey: a comparative approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 153, 11–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, A.S., and Charlton, M.E., 1996. Geographically weighted regression: a method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis, 28 (4), 281–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charif, O., et al., 2017. A multi‐label cellular automata model for land change simulation. Transactions in GIS, 21 (6), 1298–1320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton, R.G., and Green, K., 2019. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Boca Raton: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahal, K.R., and Chow, T.E., 2015. Characterization of neighborhood sensitivity of an irregular cellular automata model of urban growth. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29 (3), 475–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dezhkam, S., et al., 2017. Performance evaluation of land change simulation models using landscape metrics. Geocarto International, 32 (11), 1171–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Y., et al., 2019. Spatial patterns of land surface temperature and their influencing factors: a case study in Suzhou, China. Remote Sensing, 11 (2), 182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Y., et al., 2022. A moving window-based spatial assessment method for dynamic urban growth simulations. Geocarto International, 37 (27), 15282–15301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Y., and Tong, X., 2017. Using exploratory regression to identify optimal driving factors for cellular automaton modeling of land use change. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189 (10), 515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Y., and Tong, X., 2018. Dynamic land use change simulation using cellular automata with spatially nonstationary transition rules. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 55 (5), 678–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Y., and Tong, X., 2020. A new cellular automata framework of urban growth modeling by incorporating statistical and heuristic methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34 (1), 74–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Y., et al., 2018. The effect of observation scale on urban growth simulation using particle swarm optimization-based CA models. Sustainability, 10 (11), 4002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florax, R.J., Folmer, H., and Rey, S.J., 2003. Specification searches in spatial econometrics: the relevance of Hendry’s methodology. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33 (5), 557–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, C., et al., 2020a. Modeling urban encroachment on ecological land using cellular automata and cross-entropy optimization rules. The Science of the Total Environment, 744, 140996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, C., et al., 2020b. Modeling urban growth using spatially heterogeneous cellular automata models: comparison of spatial lag, spatial error and GWR. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 81, 101459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, A., et al., 2013. Calibration of an urban cellular automaton model by using statistical techniques and a genetic algorithm. Application to a small urban settlement of NW Spain. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (8), 1593–1611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen-Zanker, A., and Lajoie, G., 2008. Neutral models of landscape change as benchmarks in the assessment of model performance. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86 (3-4), 284–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen-Zanker, A., and Martens, P., 2008. Map comparison methods for comprehensive assessment of geosimulation models, International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications. Springer, pp. 194–209.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, R., and Diaz-Pacheco, J., 2017. Stable models for metastable systems? Lessons from sensitivity analysis of a Cellular Automata urban land use model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 62, 113–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, X., Qi, L., and Zeng, C., 2016. A partitioned and asynchronous cellular automata model for urban growth simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (4), 637–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, C.-A., 2016. Incorporating spatial regression model into cellular automata for simulating land use change. Applied Geography, 69, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Zhou, Y., and Chen, W., 2020. An improved urban cellular automata model by using the trend-adjusted neighborhood. Ecological Processes, 9 (1), 13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J., et al., 2014. Modeling urban vertical growth using cellular automata—Guangzhou as a case study. Applied Geography, 53, 172–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y.-P., et al., 2011. Predictive ability of logistic regression, auto-logistic regression and neural network models in empirical land-use change modeling–a case study. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25 (1), 65–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., et al., 2019. Detection and prediction of land use/land cover change using spatiotemporal data fusion and the Cellular Automata–Markov model. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191 (2), 68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarigal, K., et al., 2018. Modeling non-stationary urban growth: The SPRAWL model and the ecological impacts of development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 177, 178–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirbagheri, B., and Alimohammadi, A., 2017. Improving urban cellular automata performance by integrating global and geographically weighted logistic regression models. Transactions in GIS, 21 (6), 1280–1297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, A., et al., 2018. A time Monte Carlo method for addressing uncertainty in land-use change models. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32 (11), 2317–2333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newland, C.P., et al., 2018. Empirically derived method and software for semi-automatic calibration of Cellular Automata land-use models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 108, 208–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijanowski, B.C., et al., 2014. A big data urban growth simulation at a national scale: configuring the GIS and neural network based land transformation model to run in a high performance computing (HPC) environment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 51, 250–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, N., Antunes, A.P., and Roca, J., 2017. Applicability and calibration of an irregular cellular automata model for land use change. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 65, 93–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius, R.G., Jr,., and Millones, M., 2011. Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32 (15), 4407–4429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius, R.G., Jr, Peethambaram, S., and Castella, J.-C., 2011. Comparison of three maps at multiple resolutions: a case study of land change simulation in Cho Don District, Vietnam. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101 (1), 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius, R., 2000. Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps (vol 66, pg 1011, 2000). Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67, 540–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius, R.G., et al., 2008. Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. The Annals of Regional Science, 42 (1), 11–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbani, A., Aghababaee, H., and Rajabi, M.A., 2012. Modeling dynamic urban growth using hybrid cellular automata and particle swarm optimization. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 6 (1), 063582–1.
   Google Scholar
• Rienow, A., and Goetzke, R., 2015. Supporting SLEUTH–Enhancing a cellular automaton with support vector machines for urban growth modeling. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 66–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodposhti, M.S., Aryal, J., and Bryan, B.A., 2019. A novel algorithm for calculating transition potential in cellular automata models of land-use/cover change. Environmental Modelling & Software, 112, 70–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, R., 1999. The cross-entropy method for combinatorial and continuous optimization. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 1 (2), 127–190.
   Google Scholar
• Şalap-Ayça, S., et al., 2018. A meta-modeling approach for spatio-temporal uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: an application for a cellular automata-based Urban growth and land-use change model. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32 (4), 637–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H., et al., 2017. Sensitivity analysis and accuracy assessment of the land transformation model using cellular automata. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 54 (5), 639–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, X., and Feng, Y., 2020. A review of assessment methods for cellular automata models of land-use change and urban growth. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34 (5), 866–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vliet, J., Bregt, A.K., and Hagen-Zanker, A., 2011. Revisiting Kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land-use change models. Ecological Modelling, 222 (8), 1367–1375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, H., and De Nijs, T., 2006. The map comparison kit. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21 (3), 346–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., et al., 2019. Integrating temporal evolution with cellular automata for simulating land cover change. Remote Sensing, 11 (3), 301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R., Engelen, G., and Uljee, I., 1997. The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24 (3), 323–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitsed, R., and Smallbone, L.T., 2017. A hybrid genetic algorithm with local optimiser improves calibration of a vegetation change cellular automata model. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (4), 717–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F., 2002. Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: the application to rural-urban land conversions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16 (8), 795–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F., and Webster, C.J., 1998. Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25 (1), 103–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., and Xia, C., 2022. The effects of sample size and sample prevalence on cellular automata simulation of urban growth. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 36 (1), 158–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, D., et al., 2018. Remote sensing of the urban heat island effect in a highly populated urban agglomeration area in East China. The Science of the Total Environment, 628-629, 415–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar