908
Views
38
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

External and Internal Knowledge in the Knowledge Generation Function

&

References

  • Antonelli, C. 1999. The Microdynamics of Technological Change. London: Routledge.
  • Antonelli, C., F. Crespi, and G. Scellato. 2013. “Internal and External Factors in Innovation Persistence.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 22 (3): 256–280. doi:10.1080/10438599.2012.708135.
  • Antonelli, C., and P. A. David, eds. 2015. The Economics of Knowledge and Knowledge Driven Economy. London: Routledge.
  • Arrow, K. J. 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.” In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, edited by R. R Nelson, 609–625. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press for N.B.E.R.
  • Arrow, K. J. 1969. “Classificatory Notes on the Production and Transmission of Technical Knowledge.” American Economic Review 59: 29–35.
  • Arthur, W. B. 2009. The Nature of Technology. What It Is and How It Evolves. New York: Free Press.
  • Breschi, S., F. Lissoni, and F. Malerba. 2003. “Knowledge-Relatedness in Firm Technological Diversification.” Research Policy 32 (1): 69–87. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5.
  • Cassiman, B., and R. Veugelers. 2006. “In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition.” Management Science 52 (1): 68–82. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470.
  • Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open Innovation. The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Chesbrough, H., W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West. 2006. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 128–152. doi:10.2307/2393553.
  • Cohen, W. M. 2010. “Fifty Years of Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edited by B. H. Hall and N. Rosenberg, 131–213. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Colombelli, A., J. Krafft, and F. Quatraro. 2014. “High-Growth Firms and Technological Knowledge: Do Gazelles Follow Exploration or Exploitation Strategies?.” Industrial and Corporate Change 23 (1): 261–291. doi:10.1093/icc/dtt053.
  • Colombelli, A., J. Krafft, and F. Quatraro. 2013. “Properties of Knowledge Base and Firm Survival: Evidence from a Sample of French Manufacturing Firms.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80 (8): 1469–1483. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.003.
  • Colombelli, A., and G. N. von Tunzelmann. 2011. “The Persistence of Innovation and Path Dependence.” In Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, edited by C. Antonelli, 105–120. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Conte, A., and M. Vivarelli. 2005. “One or Many Knowledge Production Functions? Mapping Innovative Activity Using Microdata.” IZA DP No. 1878.
  • Crépon, B., E. Duguet, and J. Mairesse. 1998. “Research and Development, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7: 115–158.
  • David, P. A. 1993. “Knowledge Property and the System Dynamics of Technological Change.” In Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • Engelsman, E. C., and A. F. J van Raan. 1994. “A Patent-Based Cartography of Technology.” Research Policy 23 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)90024-8.
  • Feldman, M. A. 2003. “The Locational Dynamics of the US Biotech Industry: Knowledge Externalities and the Anchor Hypothesis..” Industry & Innovation 10 (3): 311–329. doi:10.1080/1366271032000141661.
  • Fleming, L., and O. Sorenson. 2001. “Technology as a Complex Adaptive System: Evidence from Patent Data.” Research Policy 30 (7): 1019–1039. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00135-9.
  • Fritsch, M. 2002. “Measuring the Quality of Regional Innovation Systems: A Knowledge Production Function Approach.” International Regional Science Review 25 (1): 86–101. doi:10.1177/016001702762039394.
  • Furman, J. L., M. E. Porter, and S. Stern. 2002. “The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity.” Research Policy 31 (6): 899–933. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4.
  • Gehringer, A. 2011a. “Pecuniary Knowledge Externalities Across European Countries—Are There Leading Sectors?” Industry & Innovation 18 (4): 415–436. doi:10.1080/13662716.2011.573958.
  • Gehringer, A. 2011b. “Pecuniary Knowledge Externalities and Innovation: Intersectoral Linkages and Their Effects Beyond Technological Spillovers.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 20 (5): 495–515. doi:10.1080/10438599.2011.562357.
  • Gehringer, A. 2012. “A New Sectoral Taxonomy Based on Pecuniary Knowledge Externalities: Knowledge Interactions in a Vertically Integrated System.” Economic Systems Research 24 (1): 35–55. doi:10.1080/09535314.2011.646959.
  • Gomulka, S. 1970. “Extensions of "the Golden Rule of Research" of Phelps.” The Review of Economic Studies 37 (1): 73–93. doi:10.2307/2296499.
  • Griffith, R., S. Redding, and J. Van Reenan. 2003. “R&D and Absorptive Capacity: Theory and Empirical Evidence.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 105 (1): 99–118. doi:10.1111/1467-9442.00007.
  • Griliches, Z. 1979. “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth.” The Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1): 92–116. doi:10.2307/3003321.
  • Griliches, Z. 1990. “Patents Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 28: 1661–1707.
  • Grilcihes, Z. 1992. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey, in R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, 287–342. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the NBER.
  • Hall, B., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2005. “Market Value and Patent Citations.” The RAND Journal of Economics 36 (1): 16–38.
  • Heckman, J.. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47: 153–161.
  • Jaffe, A. 1986. “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits, and Market Value.” American Economic Review 76 (5): 984–1001.
  • Jaffe, A. 1989. “Real Effects of Academic Research.” American Economic Review 79 (5): 957–970.
  • Krafft, J., F. Quatraro, and P. P. Saviotti. 2011. “The Knowledge-Base Evolution in Biotechnology: A Social Network Analysis.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 20 (5): 445–475. doi:10.1080/10438599.2011.562355.
  • Kremer, M. 1993. “The O-Ring Theory of Economic Development.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3): 551–575. doi:10.2307/2118400.
  • Johansson, B., and H. Lööf. 2008. “Innovation Activities Explained by Firm Attributes and Location.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 17 (6): 533–552. doi:10.1080/10438590701407349.
  • Lööf, B., and H. Johansson. 2014. “R&D Strategy, Metropolitan Externalities and Productivity: Evidence from Sweden.” Industry and Innovation 21 (2): 141–154. doi:10.1080/13662716.2014.896600.
  • Johansson, B., and H. Loof. 2015. “Innovation Strategies Combining Internal and External Knowledge.” In Handbook of the Economics of Knowledge, edited by C. Antonelli and A. Link, 29–52. London: Routledge.
  • Laitner, J., and D. Stolyarov. 2013. “Derivative Ideas and the Value of Intangible Assets.” International Economic Review 54 (1): 59–95. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2354.2012.00726.x.
  • Link, A., and D. Siegel. 2007. Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Technological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Love, J. H., and S. Roper. 2009. “Organizing the Innovation Process: Complementarities in Innovation Networking.” Industry & Innovation 16 (3): 273–290. doi:10.1080/13662710902923776.
  • Lucas, R. E. 2009. “Ideas and Growth.” Economica 76 (301): 1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2008.00748.x.
  • McGahan, A. M., and B. S. Silverman. 2006. “Profiting from Technological Innovation by Others: The Effect of Competitor Patenting on Firm Value.” Research Policy 35 (8): 1222–1242. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.006.
  • Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1994. “Complementarities and Systems: Understanding Japanese Economic Organization.” Estudioseconómicos 9: 3–42.
  • Mohnen, P., and B. H. Hall. 2013. “Innovation and Productivity: An Update.” Eurasian Business Review 3: 47–65.
  • Nelson, R. R. 1959. “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research.” Journal of Political Economy 67 (3): 297–306. doi:10.1086/258177.
  • Nelson, R. R. 1982. “The Role of Knowledge in R&D Efficiency.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 97 (3): 453–470. doi:10.2307/1885872.
  • Nesta, L. 2008. “Knowledge and Productivity in the World's Largest Manufacturing Corporations.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 67 (3-4): 886–902. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2007.08.006.
  • Nesta, L., and L. Dibiaggio. 2003. “Technology Strategy and Knowledge Dynamics: The Case of Biotech1.” Industry & Innovation 10 (3): 331–349. doi:10.1080/1366271032000141670.
  • Nesta, L., and P. P. Saviotti. 2005. “Coherence of the Knowledge Base and the Firm's Innovative Performance: Evidence from the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry.” Journal of Industrial Economics 53 (1): 123–142. doi:10.1111/j.0022-1821.2005.00248.x.
  • Nooteboom, B. 2000. Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • O huallachain, B., and T. F. Leslie. 2007. “Rethinking the Regional Knowledge Production Function.” Journal of Economic Geography 7 (6): 737–752. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm027.
  • Pakes, A., and Z. Griliches. 1984. “Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look.” In R & D Patents and Productivity, edited by Z. Griliches, 55–72. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Pakes, A., and M. Schankerman. 1979. “The Rate of Obsolescence of Knowledge, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private rate of Return to Research Resources.” , National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No.346.
  • Patrucco, P. 2008. “The Economics of Collective Knowledge and Technological Communication.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 33 (6): 579–599. doi:10.1007/s10961-008-9085-z.
  • Patrucco, P. 2009. “Collective Knowledge Production Costs and the Dynamics of Technological Systems.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 18 (3): 295–310. doi:10.1080/10438590801969040.
  • Phelps, E. S. 1966. “Models of Technical Progress and the Golden Rule of Research.” The Review of Economic Studies 33 (2): 133–145. doi:10.2307/2974437.
  • Romer, P. M. 1990. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (S5): S71–102. doi:10.1086/261725.
  • Quatraro, F. 2010. “Knowledge Coherence, Variety and Economic Growth: Manufacturing Evidence from Italian Regions.” Research Policy 39 (10): 1289–1302. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.005.
  • Ruckman, K. 2008. “Externally Sourcing Research Through Acquisition: Should It Supplement or Substitute for Internal Research?” Industry & Innovation 15 (6): 627–645. doi:10.1080/13662710802550976.
  • Saviotti, P. P. 2004. “Considerations About the Production and Utilization of Knowledge.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE 160 (1): 100–121. doi:10.1628/093245604773861140.
  • Saviotti, P. P. 2007. “On the Dynamics of Generation and Utilisation of Knowledge: The Local Character of Knowledge.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 18 (4): 387–408. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2007.03.003.
  • Schankerman, M. 1998. “How Valuable is Patent Protection? Estimates by Technology Field.” The RAND Journal of Economics 29 (1): 77–107. doi:10.2307/2555817.
  • Da Silva, M. A. 2014. “The Knowledge Multiplier.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 23 (7): 652–688. 10.1080/10438599.2014.882138.
  • Rahko, J. 2014. “Market Value of R&D, Patents, and Organizational Capital: Finnish Evidence.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 23 (4): 353–377. doi:10.1080/10438599.2013.864923.
  • Strumsky, D., J. Lobo, and S. Van der Leeuw. 2012. “Using Patent Technology Codes to Study Technological Change.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 21 (3): 267–286. doi:10.1080/10438599.2011.578709.
  • Thoma, G., S. Torrisi, A. Gambardella, D. Guellec, B. H. Hall, and D. Haroff. 2010. “Harmonizing and Combining Large Datasets – An Application to Firm-Level Patent and Accounting Data.” NBER Working Paper 15851.
  • Veugelers, R., and B. Cassiman. 1999. “Make and Buy in Innovation Strategies: Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing Firms.” Research Policy 28 (1): 63–80. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00106-1.
  • Von Hippel, E. 1988. The Sources of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Weitzman, M. L. 1996. “Hybridizing Growth Theory.” American Economic Review 86: 207–212.
  • Weitzman, M. L. 1998. “Recombinant Growth.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (2): 331–360. doi:10.1162/003355398555595.
  • Wooldridge, M. 1995. “Selection Corrections for Panel Data Models Under Conditional Mean Independence Assumptions.” Journal of Econometrics 68 (1): 115–132. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01645-G.
  • Wooldridge, M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Youn, H., L. M. A. Bettencourt, D. Strumsky, and J. Lobo. 2014. Invention as a Combinatorial Process: Evidence from U.S. Patents, Santa Fè Working paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.