Stringency of regulation and innovation in waste management: an empirical analysis on EU countries

References

• Aichele, R. , and G. Felbermayr . 2012. “Kyoto and the Carbon Footprint of Nations.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 63 (3): 336–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambec, S. , and P. Barla . 2006. “Can Environmental Regulations Be Good for Business? An Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis.” Energy Studies Review 14 (2): 42–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ambec, S. , N. Johnstone , P. Lanoie , and J. Laurent-Luchetti . 2011. “Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 20 (3): 803–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambec, S. , and P. Lanoie . 2008. “Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview.” Academy of Management Perspectives 22: 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambec, S. , M. A. Cohen , S. Elgie , and P. Lanoie . 2013. “The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 7 (1): 2–22.10.1093/reep/res016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, S. , and M. A. Cohen . 1997. The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Innovation: A Panel Data Study . Nashville, TN : Vanderbilt University. http://www.vanderbilt.edu/vcems/papers/innovate.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cagatay, S. , and H. Mihci . 2003. “Industrial Pollution, Environmental Suffering and Policy Measures: An Index of Environmental Sensitivity Performance (IESP).” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 5 (2): 205–245.10.1142/S1464333203001309
   Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G. , A. D’Amato , and M. Mazzanti . 2015. “Adoption of Waste-reducing Technology in Manufacturing: Regional Factors and Policy Issues.” Resource and Energy Economics 39 (C): 53–67.10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chimeli, A. , J. B. Braden , and K.-J. Han . 1999. An Economic Measure of National Environmental Stringency, Working Paper # 21. Urbana, IL: Program in Environmental and Resource Economics (pERE), UIUC.
   Google Scholar
• Criscuolo, P. 2006. “The ‘Home Advantage’ Effect and Patent Families. A Comparison of OECD Triadic Patents, the USPTO and the EPO.” Scientometrics 66 (1): 23–41.10.1007/s11192-006-0003-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Marchi, V. 2012. “Environmental Innovation and R&D Cooperation: Empirical Evidence from Spanish Manufacturing Firms.” Research Policy 41 (3): 614–623.10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, F. P. , and C. Withagen . 2005. Innovation and Environmental Stringency: The Case of Sulfur Dioxide Abatement . Kyoto: World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economics.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission . 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Packaging_waste_statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. , R. Newell , and R. N. Stavins . 2002. “Technological Change and the Environment.” Environmental Resource Economics 22: 41–69.10.1023/A:1015519401088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. , and K. Palmer . 1997. “Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 79 (4): 610–619.10.1162/003465397557196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, N. , I. Haščič , and D. Popp . 2010. “Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts.” Environmental and Resource Economics 45 (1): 133–155.10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, N. , I. Haščič , J. Poirier , M. Hemar , and C. Michel . 2012. “Environmental Policy Stringency and Technological Innovation: Evidence from Survey Data and Patent Counts.” Applied Economics 44 (17): 2157–2170.10.1080/00036846.2011.560110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesidou, E. , and P. Demirel . 2012. “On the Drivers of Eco-innovations: Empirical Evidence from the UK.” Research Policy 41: 862–870.10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kounetas, K. 2015. “Heterogeneous Technologies, Strategic Groups and Environmental Efficiency Technology Gaps for European Countries.” Energy Policy 83: 277–287.10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanjouw, J. O. , and A. Mody . 1996. “Innovation and the International Diffusion of Environmentally Responsive Technology.” Research Policy 25: 549–571.10.1016/0048-7333(95)00853-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanoie, P. , J. Laurent-Lucchetti , N. Johnstone , and S. Ambec . 2011. “Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insight on the Porter Hypothesis.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 20: 803–842.10.1111/jems.2011.20.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. A. , B. H. Hall , and Z. Griliches . 1984. “Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship.” Econometrica 52: 909–938.10.2307/1911191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hottenrott, H. , and S. Rexhäuser . 2015. “Policy-induced Environmental Technology and Inventive Efforts: Is There a Crowding out?” Industry and Innovation 22 (5): 375–401.10.1080/13662716.2015.1064255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzanti, M. , and A. Montini . 2009. Waste and Environmental Policy . London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzanti, M. , A. Montini , and F. Nicolli . 2011. “Embedding Landfill Diversion in Economic, Geographical and Policy Settings.” Applied Economics 43 (24): 3299–3311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, R. D. 2002. “Technical Change, External Economies, and the Porter Hypothesis.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43 (1): 158–168.10.1006/jeem.2000.1166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzanti, Massimiliano , and Francesco Nicolli . 2011. “Waste Dynamics, Decoupling and Ex Post Policy Effectiveness: Evidence from the EU 15.” International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 11 (1): 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolli, F. 2012. “Convergence of Waste-Related Indicators of Environmental Quality in Italy.” Environmental Economics and Policy Studies-The Official Journal of the Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 14 (4): 383–401.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolli, F. , M. Mazzanti , and V. Iafolla . 2012. “Waste Dynamics, Country Heterogeneity and European Environmental Policy Effectiveness.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 14 (4): 371–393.10.1080/1523908X.2012.719694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolli, F. , and F. Vona . 2014. “Heterogeneous Policies, Heterogenous Technologies: The Case of Renewable Energy, Documents de Travail de l’OFCE2014-15.” Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 1991. “America’s Green Strategy.” Scientific American 264 (4): 168.10.1038/scientificamerican0491-168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. , and C. van der Linde . 1995. “Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4): 97–118.10.1257/jep.9.4.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, W. R. 2015. “On the Practice of Lagging Variables to Avoid Simultaneity.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 77 (6): 897–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubashkina, Y. , M. Galeotti , and E. Verdolini . 2015. “Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness: Empirical Evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European Manufacturing Sectors.” Energy Policy 83: 288–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanyal, P. , and S. Ghosh . 2013. “Product Market Competition and Upstream Innovation: Evidence from the U.S. Electricity Market Deregulation.” Revue of Economics and Statistics 95: 237–254.10.1162/REST_a_00255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triguero, A. , L. Moreno-Mondéjar , and M. A. Davia . 2013. “Drivers of Different Types of Eco-innovation in European SMEs.” Ecological Economics 92: 25–33.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. 2003. The Porter Hypothesis Rivisited: A Literature Review of Theoretical Models and Empirical Tests . Lüneburg: Research Memorandum Center for Sustainability Management (SM) University of Lüneburg.
   Google Scholar
• Xing, Y. , and C. Kolstad . 2002. “Do Lax Environmental Regulations Attract Foreign Investment?” Environmental and Resource Economics 21: 1–22.10.1023/A:1014537013353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar