The importance of collaborative networks in Canadian scientific research

References

• Abbasi, A., J. Altmann, and L. Hossain. 2011. “Identifying the Effects of Co-authorship Networks on the Performance of Scholars: A Correlation and Regression Analysis of Performance Measures and Social Network Analysis Measures.” Journal of Informetrics 5 (4): 594–607.10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J. D., G. C. Black, J. R. Clemmons, and P. E. Stephan. 2005. “Scientific Teams and Institutional Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981–1999.” Research Policy 34 (3): 259–285.10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A., and H. Rebecca. 2002. “Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT.” Management science 48 (1): 44–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azoulay, P., W. Ding, and T. Stuart. 2006. The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality, and Direction of (Public) Research Output. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 11917. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. 10.3386/w11917
   Google Scholar
• Baba, Y., N. Shichijo, and S. R. Sedita. 2009. “How do Collaborations With Universities Affect Firms’ Innovative Performance? The role of “Pasteur scientists” in the Advanced Materials Field.” Research Policy 38 (5): 756–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balconi, M., S. Breschi, and F. Lissoni. 2004. “Networks of Inventors and the Role of Academia: An Exploration of Italian Patent Data.” Research Policy 33 (1): 127–145.10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00108-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bammer, G. 2008. “Enhancing Research Collaborations: Three Key Management Challenges.” Research Policy 37 (5): 875–887.10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banal-Estañol, A., M. Jofre-Bonet, and C. Meissner. 2010. The Impact of Industry Collaboration on Research: Evidence from Engineering Academics in the UK. Working Papers 491. Barcelona: Barcelona Graduate School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Barabási, A. L., H. Jeong, Z. Néda, E. Ravasz, A. Schubert, and T. Vicsek. 2002. “Evolution of the Social Network of Scientific Collaborations.” Physica a: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 311 (3–4): 590–614.10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00736-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudry, C., and S. Allaoui. 2012. “Impact of public and private research funding on scientific production: The case of nanotechnology.” Research Policy 41 (9): 1589–1606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudry, C., and R. Kananian. 2013. “Follow the (Industry) Money – The Impact of Science Networks and Industry-to-University Contracts on Academic Patenting in Nanotechnology and Biotechnology.” Industry and Innovation 20 (3): 241–260.10.1080/13662716.2013.791125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellotti, E. 2012. “Getting Funded. Multi-Level Network of Physicists in Italy.” Social Networks 34 (2): 215–229.10.1016/j.socnet.2011.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercovitz, J., and Maryann Feldman. 2006. “Entpreprenerial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-based Economic Development.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 31 (1): 175–188.10.1007/s10961-005-5029-z
   Google Scholar
• Blume-Kohout, M. E., K. B. Kumar, and N. Sood. 2009. Federal Life Sciences Funding and University R&D. NBER Working Paper No. 15146, July 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bonacich, P. 1972. “Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2 (1): 113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., and E. Corley. 2004. “Scientists’ Collaboration Strategies: Implications for Scientific and Technical Human Capital.” Research Policy 33 (4): 599–616.10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branstetter, L., and Y. Ogura. 2005. Is Academic Science Driving a Surge in Industrial Innovation? Evidence from Patent Citations. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 11561. National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w11561
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., and C. Catalini. 2010. “Tracing the Links between Science and Technology: An Exploratory Analysis of Scientists’ and Inventors’ Networks.” Research Policy 39 (1): 14–26.10.1016/j.respol.2009.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., and F. Lissoni. 2005. “Knowledge Networks from Patent Data.” In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, 613–643. Berlin: Springer Netherlands.10.1007/1-4020-2755-9
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., and F. Lissoni. 2009. “Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows.” Journal of Economic Geography 9 (4): 439–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., F. Lissoni, and F. Montobbio. 2008. “University Patenting and Scientific Productivity: A Quantitative Study of Italian Academic Inventors.” European Management Review 5 (2): 91–109.10.1057/emr.2008.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderini, M., C. Franzoni, and A. Vezzulli. 2007. “If Star Scientists Do Not Patent: The Effect of Productivity, Basicness and Impact on the Decision to Patent in the Academic World.” Research Policy 36 (3): 303–319.10.1016/j.respol.2006.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantner, U., and H. Graf. 2006. “The Network of Innovators in Jena: An Application of Social Network Analysis.” Research Policy 35 (4): 463–480.10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayol, N., and P. Roux. 2007. “The Strategic Formation of Inter-individual Collaboration Networks. Evidence from Co-invention Patterns.” Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 87 (87/88): 275–301.10.2307/27650051
   Google Scholar
• Chung, K. S. K., and L. Hossain. 2009. “Measuring Performance of Knowledge-intensive Workgroups through Social Networks.” Project Management Journal 40 (2): 34–58.10.1002/pmj.v40:2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, R., and N. Jonard. 2004. “Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 28 (8): 1557–1575.10.1016/j.jedc.2003.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespi, G., P. D’Este, R. Fontana, and A. Geuna. 2011. “The Impact of Academic Patenting on University Research and Its Transfer.” Research Policy 40 (1): 55–68.10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Stefano, D., V. Fuccella, M. P. Vitale, and S. Zaccarin. 2013. “The Use of Different Data Sources in the Analysis of Co-authorship Networks and Scientific Performance.” Social Networks 35 (3): 370–381.10.1016/j.socnet.2013.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Stefano, D., and S. Zaccarin. 2013. “Modelling Multiple Interactions in Science and Technology Networks.” Industry and Innovation 20 (3): 221–240.10.1080/13662716.2013.791130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., and P. Patel. 2007. “University–Industry Linkages in the UK: What are the Factors Underlying the Variety of Interactions with Industry?” Research Policy 36 (9): 1295–1313.10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. 1990. “The Second Academic Revolution: The Role of the Research University in Economic Development.” The Research System in Transition, 109–124. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-009-2091-0
   Google Scholar
• Fabrizio, K. R., and A. D. Di Minin. 2008. “Commercializing the Laboratory: Faculty Patenting and the Open Science Environment.” Research Policy 37 (5): 914–931.10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L., C. King III, and A. I. Juda. 2007. “Small worlds and regional innovation.” Organization Science 18 (6): 938–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forti, E., C. Franzoni, and M. Sobrero. 2007. “The Effect of Patenting on the Networks and Connections of Academic Scientists.” Academy of Management Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, J. H. 2005. “Turnout in a Small World.” In Social Logic of Politics, edited by A. Zuckerman, 269–287. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franceschet, M., and A. Costantini. 2010. “The Effect of Scholar Collaboration on Impact and Quality of Academic Papers.” Journal of Informetrics 4 (4): 540–553.10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. 1979. “Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks 1 (3): 215–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., H. Werner, and Friso de Vor. 2005. “The citation impact of research collaborations: the case of European biotechnology and applied microbiology (1988–2002).” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 22 (1): 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., J. Guan, and R. Rousseau. 2011. “Mapping Collaborative Knowledge Production in China Using Patent Co-inventorships.” Scientometrics 88 (2): 343–362.10.1007/s11192-011-0404-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuna, A., and Lionel J. J. Nesta. 2006. “University Patenting and Its Effects on Academic Research: The Emerging European Evidence.” Research Policy 35 (6): 790–807.10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glänzel, W., and A. Schubert. 2005. “Analysing Scientific Networks through Co-authorship.” In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, 257–276. Rotterdam: Springer Netherlands.10.1007/1-4020-2755-9
   Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R., and M. Riddle. 2005. Introduction to Social Network, Methods. Riverside: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, T. 2016. Nanotechnology Funding: A Global Perspective, Cientifia Gobal Funding Report. Cientifica.
   Google Scholar
• Hauptman, R. 2005. “How to be a Successful Scholar: Publish Efficiently.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 36 (2): 115–119.10.3138/jsp.36.2.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z. L., X. S. Geng, and C. Campbell-Hunt. 2009. “Research Collaboration and Research Output: A Longitudinal Study of 65 Biomedical Scientists in a New Zealand University.” Research Policy 38 (2): 306–317.10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicklin, A., L. J. O’Toole Jr., and K. J. Meier. 2007. “Serpents in the Sand: Managerial Networking and Nonlinear Influences on Organizational Performance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (2): 253–273.10.1093/jopart/mum009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis, A. 2001. “Co-authorship and the Output of Academic Economists.” Labour Economics 8 (4): 503–530.10.1016/S0927-5371(01)00041-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummon, N. P., and K. Carley. 1993. “Social Networks as Normal Science.” Social Networks 15 (1): 71–106.10.1016/0378-8733(93)90022-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, B., and L. Lefgren. 2007. The Impact of Research Grant Funding on Scientific Productivity. Working Paper 13519. National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w13519
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J. S. 1994. “Geographical Proximity and Scientific Collaboration.” Scientometrics 31 (1): 31–43.10.1007/BF02018100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. S., and B. R. Martin. 1997. “What is Research Collaboration?” Research Policy 26 (1): 1–18.10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, R., N. Traore, and B. Godin. 1996. “An Econometric Analysis of the Effect of Collaboration on Academic Research Productivity.” Higher Education 32 (3): 283–301.10.1007/BF00138868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudel, G. 2001. “Collaboration, Creativity and Rewards: Why and How Scientists Collaborate.” International Journal of Technology Management 22 (7/8): 762–781.10.1504/IJTM.2001.002990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., and B. Bozeman. 2005. “The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity.” Social Studies of Science 35 (5): 673–702.10.1177/0306312705052359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., T. Scherngell, and M. J. Barber. 2011. “Investigating an Online Social Network Using Spatial Interaction Models.” Social Networks 33 (2): 129–133.10.1016/j.socnet.2010.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, S., and K. B. Wolf. 1998. “Bonding Number in Scientific Disciplines.” Social Networks 20 (3): 239–246.10.1016/S0378-8733(98)00003-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lissoni, F., Patrick Llerena, M. McKelvey, and B. Sanditov. 2008. “Academic Patenting in Europe: New Evidence from the KEINS Database.” Research Evaluation 17 (2): 87–102.10.3152/095820208X287171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. 1991. “Academic Research and Industrial Innovation.” Research Policy 20 (1): 1–12.10.1016/0048-7333(91)90080-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, J., and J. Smith. 1992. “The Effect of Gender-sorting on Propensity to Coauthor: Implications for Academic Promotion.” Economic Inquiry 30 (1): 68–82.10.1111/ecin.1992.30.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, G. S., F. Narin, and D. L. Deeds. 2000. “An Analysis of the Critical Role of Public Science in Innovation: The Case of Biotechnology.” Research Policy 29 (1): 1–8.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00030-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melin, G., and O. Persson. 1996. “Studying Research Collaboration Using Co-authorships.” Scientometrics 36: 363–377.10.1007/BF02129600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minasny, B., A. E. Hartemink, A. McBratney, and H. J. Jang. 2013. “Citations and the H Index of Soil Researchers and Journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.” PeerJ 1: e183.10.7717/peerj.183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, J. 2004. “The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999.” American Sociological Review 69 (2): 213–238.10.1177/000312240406900204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, F. 2002. “Innovation as Co-evolution of Scientific and Technological Networks: Exploring Tissue Engineering.” Research Policy 31 (8–9): 1389–1403.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00070-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Key Biotechnology & Nanotechnology Indicators: A Comparison. OECD data brief.
   Google Scholar
• Paruchuri, S. 2010. “Intraorganizational Networks, Interorganizational Networks, and the Impact of Central Inventors: A Longitudinal Study of Pharmaceutical Firms.” Organization Science 21 (1): 63–80.10.1287/orsc.1080.0414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne Banal-Estañol, A. A., and A. Siow. 2003. “Does Federal Research Funding Increase University Research Output?” Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy 3 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, O., W. Glänzel, and R. Danell. 2004. “Inflationary Bibliometric Values: The Role of Scientific Collaboration and the Need for Relative Indicators in Evaluative Studies.” Scientometrics 60 (3): 421–432.10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034384.35498.7d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, A. L., and J. Youtie. 2009. “How Interdisciplinary is Nanotechnology?” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 11 (5): 1023–1041.10.1007/s11051-009-9607-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, A. L., J. Youtie, P. Shapira, and D. Schoeneck. 2008. “Refining Search Terms for Nanotechnology.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 10 (5): 715–728.10.1007/s11051-007-9266-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., and S. Grodal. 2005. “Networks of Innovators.” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 56–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reagans, R., and B. McEvily. 2003. “Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range.” Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (2): 240–267.10.2307/3556658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotolo, D., and A. Messeni Petruzzelli. 2013. “When Does Centrality Matter? Scientific Productivity and the Moderating Role of Research Specialization and Cross-community Ties.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 34 (5): 648–670.10.1002/job.v34.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhnau, B. 2000. “Eigenvector-centrality—a node-centrality?” Social networks 22 (4): 357–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsteinsdóttir, O. H. 2000. “External Research Collaboration in Two Small Science Systems.” Scientometrics 49 (1): 145–160.10.1023/A:1005617426557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampat, B. N. 2006. “Patenting and US Academic Research in the 20th Century: The World before and after Bayh-Dole.” Research Policy 35 (6): 772–789.10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarigöl, E., R. Pfitzner, I. Scholtes, A. Garas, and F. Schweitzer. 2014. “Predicting Scientific Success Based on Coauthorship Networks.” EPJ Data Science 3 (1): 16569.10.1140/epjds/s13688-014-0009-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, R. D. 1988. “Estimates of the Returns to Quality and Coauthorship in Economic Academia.” Journal of Political Economy 96 (4): 855–866.10.1086/261566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherngell, T., and M. J. Barber. 2011. “Distinct Spatial Characteristics of Industrial and Public Research Collaborations: Evidence from the Fifth EU Framework Programme.” The Annals of Regional Science 46 (2): 247–266.10.1007/s00168-009-0334-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. 2005. “Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns.” Management science 51 (5): 756–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. 2007. “External Collaboration, Social Networks and Knowledge Creation: Evidence from Scientific Publications.” Presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2007 on Appropriability, Proximity, Routines and Innovation, Copenhagen, CBS, Denmark, June 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenwald, D. H. 2007. “Scientific Collaboration.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41 (1): 643–681.10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121
   Google Scholar
• Stokols, D., R. Harvey, J. Gress, J. Fuqua, and K. Phillips. 2005. “In Vivo Studies of Transdisciplinary Scientific Collaboration.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28 (2): 202–213.10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Looy, B., J. Callaert, and K. Debackere. 2006. “Publication and Patent Behavior of Academic Researchers: Conflicting, Reinforcing or Merely Co-existing?” Research Policy 35 (4): 596–608.10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzenböck, I., T. Scherngell, and T. Brenner. 2013. What Determines the Position of Regions in European Knowledge Networks? A Comparative Perspective on R&D Collaboration, Co-patent and Co-publication Networks.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzenböck, I., T. Scherngell, and T. Brenner. 2014. “Embeddedness of regions in European knowledge networks: a comparative analysis of inter-regional R&D collaborations, co-patents and co-publications.” The Annals of Regional Science 53 (2): 337–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J., and S. H. Strogatz. 1998. “Collective Dynamics of ‘Small-World’ Networks.” Nature 393 (6684): 440–442.10.1038/30918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuchty, S., B. F. Jones, and B. Uzzi. 2007. “The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge.” Science 316 (5827): 1036–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D. R., and S. P. Borgatti. 1994. “Betweenness centrality measures for directed graphs.” Social Networks 16 (4): 335–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, E., and Y. Ding. 2009. “Applying Centrality Measures to Impact Analysis: A Coauthorship Network Analysis.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (10): 2107–2118.10.1002/asi.v60:10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., and L. I. Meho. 2006. “Citation Analysis: A Comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science.” Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 43 (1): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Youtie, J., L. Kay, and J. Melkers. 2013. “Bibliographic Coupling and Network Analysis to Assess Knowledge Coalescence in a Research Center Environment.” Research Evaluation 22 (3): 145–156.10.1093/reseval/rvt002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., J. Guan, and X. Liu. 2014. “The Impact of Small World on Patent Productivity in China.” Scientometrics 98 (2): 945–960.10.1007/s11192-013-1142-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, T., G. Yan, and B. H. Wang. 2005. “Maximal Planar Networks with Large Clustering Coefficient and Power-law Degree Distribution.” Physical Review E 71 (4): 9.10.1103/PhysRevE.71.046141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar