Industrial internet platform provider and end-user perceptions of platform openness impacts

References

• Alexopoulos, K., K. Sipsas, E. Xanthakis, S. Makris, and D. Mourtzis. 2018. “An Industrial Internet of Things Based Platform for Context-Aware Information Services in Manufacturing.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 31 (11): 1111–1123. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2018.1500716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benlian, A., D. Hilkert, and T. Hess. 2015. “How Open Is This Platform? the Meaning and Measurement of Platform Openness from the Complementors’ Perspective.” Journal of Information Technology 30 (3): 209–228. doi:10.1057/jit.2015.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. 2010. “Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access Vs. Devolving Control.” Management Science 56 (10): 1849–1872. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, G., C. Nam, and S. Kim. 2019. “The Impacts of Technology Platform Openness on Application Developers’ Intention to Continuously Use a Platform: From an Ecosystem Perspective.” Telecommunications Policy The data economy and data-driven ecosystems: regulation, frameworks, and case studies 43 (2): 140–153. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2018.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J., T. Edgar, R. Graybill, P. Korambath, B. Schott, D. Swink, J. Wang, and J. Wetzel. 2015. “Smart Manufacturing.” Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering 6 (1): 141–160. doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061114-123255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eckhardt, J. T., M. P. Ciuchta, and M. Carpenter. 2018. “Open Innovation, Information, and Entrepreneurship within Platform Ecosystems.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 12 (3): 369–391. doi:10.1002/sej.1298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, T. R. 2008. “Managing Proprietary and Shared Platforms.” California Management Review 50 (4). doi:10.2307/41166455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, T. R., G. Parker, and M. Van Alstyne. 2009. “Opening Platforms: How, When and Why?” Platforms, Markets and Innovation 131–162. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1264012
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, Päivi, and Anne Kovalainen. 2008. Qualitative Methods in Business Research: A Practical Guide to Social Research. Sage. doi:10.4135/9780857028044.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. C., and M. Annunziata. 2012. “Industrial Internet: Pushing the Boundaries of Minds and Machines.” General Electric. .
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Swartz, D. D., and F. Garcia-Vicente. 2015. “Network Effects on the IPhone Platform: An Empirical Examination.” Telecommunications Policy 39 (10): 877–895. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2015.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A. 2009. “Platforms, Markets and Innovation”. Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9781849803311
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., and M. Cusumano. 2002. “Platform Leadership: HowIntel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation.,” 305.
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., and M. A. Cusumano. 2014. “Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 31 (3): 417–433. doi:10.1111/jpim.12105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., and R. Henderson. 2007. “Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 16 (1): 1–34. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00130.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebregiorgis, S. A., and J. Altmann. 2015. “IT Service Platforms: Their Value Creation Model and the Impact of Their Level of Openness on Their Adoption.” Procedia Computer Science 68: 173–187. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.233.
   Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh, A., and O. Henfridsson. 2013. “Balancing Platform Control and External Contribution in Third-Party Development: The Boundary Resources Model.” Information Systems Journal 23 (2): 173–192. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00406.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagiu, A. 2014. “Strategic Decisions for Multisided Platforms.” MIT Sloan Management Review 55 (2): 71.
   Google Scholar
• Hallikas, J., V.-M. Virolainen, and M. Tuominen. 2002. “Understanding Risk and Uncertainty in Supplier Networks–A Transaction Cost Approach.” International Journal of Production Research 40 (15): 3519–3531. doi:10.1080/00207540210146512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henten, A. H., and I. M. Windekilde. 2016. “Transaction Costs and the Sharing Economy.” Info 18 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1108/info-09-2015-0044.
   Google Scholar
• Heppelmann, J., M. E. Porter, and J. E. Heppelmann. 2014. “How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition.” Harvard Business Review 92: 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilkert, D., A. Benlian, M. Sarstedt, and T. Hess. 2011. “Perceived Software Platform Openness: The Scale and Its Impact on Developer Satisfaction.” ICIS 2011 Proceedings. 13. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/onlinecommunity/13.
   Google Scholar
• Ivezic, N., B. Kulvatunyou, D. Brandl, H. Cho, L. Yan, D. Noller, J. Davis, T. Wuest, F. Ameri, and W. Z. Bernstein. 2017. “NISTOAGi Workshop: Drilling down on Smart Manufacturing - Enabling Composable Apps.” Gaithersburg, MD. doi:10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-8.
   Google Scholar
• Kagermann, H., J. Helbig, A. Hellinger, and W. Wahlster. 2013. Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the Future of German Manufacturing Industry; Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Forschungsunion.
   Google Scholar
• Kusiak, A. 2017. “Smart Manufacturing.” International Journal of Production Research. July 1–10. doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1351644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, S., K. Liu, and Y. Dong. 2019. “Dancing with Wolves: How Value Creation and Value Capture Dynamics Affect Complementor Participation in Industry Platforms.” Industry and Innovation 1–21. doi:10.1080/13662716.2019.1598339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., B. Bagheri, and H.-A. Kao. 2015. “A Cyber-Physical Systems Architecture for Industry 4.0-based Manufacturing Systems.” Manufacturing Letters 3. doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, J., T. Wuest, and W. Engelbert. 2018. “Holistic Approach to Machine Tool Data Analytics.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Special Issue on Smart Manufacturing 48 (July): 180–191. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Lesjak, C., T. Ruprechter, J. Haid, H. Bock, and E. Brenner. 2014. “A Secure Hardware Module and System Concept for Local and Remote Industrial Embedded System Identification.” In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA), 1–7. Barcelona: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ETFA.2014.7005086.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, K., H. Kärkkäinen, and J. P. Gupta. 2016. “Role of Industrial Internet Platforms in the Management of Product Lifecycle Related Information and Knowledge.” In IFIP International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, 549–558. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, K., H. Kärkkäinen, and T. Wuest. 2017. “Role of Openness in Industrial Internet Platform Providers’ Strategy.” In IFIP International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management. Seville: Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, Karan, Hannu Kärkkäinen, Thorsten Wuest, and Jayesh Prakash Gupta. 2019. “Industrial Internet Platforms: A Conceptual Evaluation from a Product Lifecycle Management Perspective.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 233 (5): 1390–1401. doi:10.1177/0954405418760651
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. H., and A. P. Lehnerd. 1997. The Power of Product Platforms : Building Value and Cost Leadership. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal, Sameer, Muztoba Ahmad Khan, David Romero, and Thorsten Wuest. 2019. “Smart Manufacturing: Characteristics, Technologies and Enabling Factors.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 233 (5): 1342–1361. doi:10.1177/0954405417736547
   Google Scholar
• Muffatto, M., and M. Roveda. 2002. “Product Architecture and Platforms: A Conceptual Framework.” International Journal of Technology Management 24 (1): 1. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2002.003040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, J., B. Koh, and S. Raghunathan. 2015. “Value Appropriation between the Platform Provider and App Developers in Mobile Platform Mediated Networks.” Journal of Information Technology 30 (3): 245–259. doi:10.1057/jit.2015.21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ondrus, J., A. Gannamaneni, and K. Lyytinen. 2015. “The Impact of Openness on the Market Potential of Multi-Sided Platforms: A Case Study of Mobile Payment Platforms.” Journal of Information Technology 30 (3): 260–275. doi:10.1057/jit.2015.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opara-Martins, J., R. Sahandi, and F. Tian. 2014. “Critical Review of Vendor Lock-in and Its Impact on Adoption of Cloud Computing.” In International Conference on Information Society (i-Society 2014), London, 92–97. IEEE. doi:10.1109/i-Society.2014.7009018.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G. G., and M. W. Van Alstyne. 2005. “Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design.” Management Science 51 (10): 1494–1504. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G. G., M. W. Van Alstyne, and S. P. Choudary. 2016. Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets are Transforming the Economy–And How to Make Them Work for You. W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 2015. “How Smart, Connected Products are Transforming Companies The.” HBR 2015. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
   Google Scholar
• Rajala, R., E. Hakanen, J. Mattila, T. Seppälä, and M. Westerlund. 2018. “How Do Intelligent Goods Shape Closed-Loop Systems?” California Management Review 60 (3): 20–44. doi:10.1177/0008125618759685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, P. P. 2018. “A Survey on Internet of Things Architectures.” Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences 30 (3): 291–319. doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochet, J. C., and J. Tirole. 2003. “Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (4): 990–1029. doi:10.1162/154247603322493212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, D., J. Stahre, T. Wuest, O. Noran, P. Bernus, Å. Fast-berglund, and D. Gorecky. 2016. “Towards an Operator 4.0 Typology: A Human-Centric Perspective on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies.” In International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering CIE 46, China, 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Schreieck, M., M. Wiesche, and H. Krcmar . n.d. Design and Governance of Platform Ecosystems-Key Concepts and Issues for Future Research. ECIS, and undefined 2016. Turkey: AIS.
   Google Scholar
• Stefi, A., M. Berger, and T. Hess. 2014. “What Influences Platform Provider’s Degree of Openness? - Measuring and Analyzing the Degree of Platform Openness.” In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 182 LNBIP:258–272. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08738-2.
   Google Scholar
• Thoben, K.-D., S. Wiesner, and T. Wuest. 2017. “‘industrie 4.0ʹ And Smart Manufacturing – A Review of Research Issues and Application Examples.” International Journal of Automation Technology 11 (1): 4–16. doi:10.20965/ijat.2017.p0004.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. 2014. Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy. Elsevier.doi:10.1016/C2012-0-06625-2.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-L. 2018. “The Timing of Fostering Complementary Innovation: Exploring the Antecedent of Industry Platform Emergence.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 30 (10): 1121–1135. doi:10.1080/09537325.2018.1442924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velandia, D. M. S., N. Kaur, W. G. Whittow, P. P. Conway, and A. A. West. 2016. “Towards Industrial Internet of Things: Crankshaft Monitoring, Traceability and Tracking Using RFID.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 41: 66–77. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2016.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R., S. Geiger, and R. Vize. 2019.“A Platform Approach in Solution Business: How Platform Openness Can Be Used to Control Solution Networks.” Industrial Marketing Management, April. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel, M., F. Thies, and A. Benlian. 2017. “Opening the Floodgates: The Implications of Increasing Platform Openness in Crowdfunding.” Journal of Information Technology 32 (4): 344–360. doi:10.1057/s41265-017-0040-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesner, S., E. Marilungo, and K.-D. Thoben. 2017. “Cyber-Physical Product-Service Systems – Challenges for Requirements Engineering.” International Journal of Automation Technology 11 (1): 17–28. doi:10.20965/ijat.2017.p0017.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2013. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., O. Henfridsson, and K. Lyytinen. 2010. “The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research.” Information Systems Research 21 (4): 724–735. doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, P., X. Xun, Y. Shiqiang, and C. Liu. 2017. “Personalized Product Configuration Framework in an Adaptable Open Architecture Product Platform.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems Special Issue on the 12th International Conference on Frontiers of Design and Manufacturing 43 (April): 422–435. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.03.010.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, P., Y. Lin, C. H. Chen, and X. Xun. 2019. “Smart, Connected Open Architecture Product: An IT-Driven Co-Creation Paradigm with Lifecycle Personalization Concerns.” International Journal of Production Research 57 (8): 2571–2584. doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1530475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar