A view of clustering as emergent and innovative processes

References

• Andersson, G. 2013. “Rethinking Regional Innovation.” Systemic Practice and Action Research 26 (1): 99–110. doi:10.1007/s11213-012-9265-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., A. Isaksen, and M. Trippl. 2019. Advanced Introduction to Regional Innovation Systems. Elgar Advanced Introductions. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., A. Isaksen, R. Martin, and M. Trippl. 2017. “The Role of Clusters and Public Policy in New Regional Economic Path Development.” In Cluster Policies from a Cluster Life Cycle Perspective, edited by Robert Hassink and Dirk Fornahl, 13–34. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2017. “Relatedness as Driver of Regional Diversification: A Research Agenda.” Regional Studies 51 (3): 351–364. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1990. “Techno-Economic Networks and Irreversibility.” The Sociological review 38 (S1): 132–161. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03351.x.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 2004. “On Time, Space, and Action Nets.” Organization 11 (6): 773–791. doi:10.1177/1350508404047251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 2008. A Theory of Organizing. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M., J. Francis, and J. Bercovitz. 2005. “Creating a Cluster While Building a Firm: Entrepreneurs and the Formation of Industrial Clusters.” Regional studies 39 (1): 129–141. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangenheim, A., M. Trippl, and C. Chlebna. 2019. “Beyond the Single Path View: Interpath Dynamics in Regional Contexts.” Economic geography: 1–21. doi:10.1080/00130095.2019.1685378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromhold-Eisebith, M., and G. Eisebith. 2005. “How to Institutionalize Innovative Clusters? Comparing Explicit Top-down and Implicit Bottom-up Approaches.” Research policy 34 (8): 1250–1268. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R. 2008. “Conferences as Venues for the Configuration of Emerging Organizational Fields: The Case of Cochlear Implants.” Journal of Management Studies 45 (6): 1061–1088. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00783.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., A. Kumaraswamy, and P. Karnøe. 2010. “Path Dependence or Path Creation?” Journal of Management Studies 47 (4): 760–774. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., and P. Karnoe. 2001. “Path Creation as a Process of Mindful Deviation.” In Path Dependence and Creation, edited by Raghu Garud and Peter Karnoe, 1–39. Mahwah, New Jersey; London: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., and P. Karnøe. 2003. “Bricolage versus Breakthrough: Distributed and Embedded Agency in Technology Entrepreneurship.” Research Policy, Special Issue on Technology Entrepreneurship and Contact Information for Corresponding Authors 32 (2): 277–300. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., P. Tuertscher, and A. H. Van de Ven. 2013. “Perspectives on Innovation Processes.” The Academy of Management annals 7 (1): 775–819. doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.791066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guile, D., and S. M. Fosstenløkken. 2018. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Knowledge Dynamics, Innovation and Learning.” Industry and Innovation 25 (4): 333–338. doi:10.1080/13662716.2017.1414767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., A. Isaksen, and M. Trippl. 2019. “Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of New Regional Industrial Path Development.” Regional studies 53 (11): 1636–1645. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoholm, T., and L. Araujo. 2011. “Studying Innovation Processes in Real-Time: The Promises and Challenges of Ethnography.” Industrial Marketing Management, Business Networks: Global, Regional and Local The Best from IMP 2010 - Budapest 40 (6): 933–939. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.036.
   Google Scholar
• Ingstrup, M. B., and T. Damgaard. 2013. “Cluster Facilitation from a Cluster Life Cycle Perspective.” European Planning Studies 21 (4): 556–574. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A. 2015. “Industrial Development in Thin Regions: Trapped in Path Extension?” Journal of Economic Geography 15 (3): 585–600. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbu026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and S.-E. Jakobsen. 2017. “New Path Development between Innovation Systems and Individual Actors.” European Planning Studies 25 (3): 355–370. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1268570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., S.-E. Jakobsen, R. Njøs, and R. Normann. 2019. “Regional Industrial Restructuring Resulting from Individual and System Agency.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 32 (1): 48–65. doi:10.1080/13511610.2018.1496322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnøe, P., and R. Garud. 2012. “Path Creation: Co-Creation of Heterogeneous Resources in the Emergence of the Danish Wind Turbine Cluster.” European Planning Studies 20 (5): 733–752. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.667923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1996. “On Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications.” Soziale Welt 47 (4): 369–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 2004. After Method : Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge. Table of contents. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0413/2004001842.html
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, K., and B. Czarniawska. 2006. “Knotting the Action Net, or Organizing between Organizations.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 22 (4): 292–306. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2006.09.001.
   Google Scholar
• Lindqvist, G., C. Ketels, and S. Örjan. 2013. The Cluster Initiative Greenbook 2.0, 95b355. Stockholm: Ivory Tower Publishers. http://www.clusterobservatory.eu/system/modules/com.gridnine.opencms.modules.eco/providers/getpdf.jsp?uid=c57a2f9f-aa59-4af8-a8f9-4fa99e
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., S. Dawley, A. Pike, and A. Cumbers. 2019. “Rethinking Path Creation: A Geographical Political Economy Approach.” Economic geography 95 (2): 113–135. doi:10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., and P. Sunley. 2006. “‘Path Dependence and Regional Economic Evolution’.” Journal of Economic Geography 6 (4): 395–437. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbl012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., and P. Sunley. 2011. “Conceptualizing Cluster Evolution: Beyond the Life Cycle Model?” Regional studies 45 (10): 1299–1318. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.622263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njøs, R., and S.-E. Jakobsen. 2016. “Cluster Policy and Regional Development: Scale, Scope and Renewal.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 3 (1): 146–169. doi:10.1080/21681376.2015.1138094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njøs, R., S.-E. Jakobsen, H. W. Aslesen, and F. Arnt. July 2016. “Encounters between Cluster Theory, Policy and Practice in Norway: Hubbing, Blending and Conceptual Stretching.” European urban and regional studies: 0969776416655860. doi:10.1177/0969776416655860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østfold county, County council. 2007a. Support for Centre of Expertise - ´Environmentally Friendly Energy and Commodities Trading and Energy Security.
   Google Scholar
• Østfold county, County council. 2007b. Support for Centre of Expertise - ´Environmentally Friendly Energy and Commodities Trading and Energy Security´.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Innovation Clusters. n.d. Accessed 16 April 2019. http://www.innovationclusters.no/
   Google Scholar
• Oinas, P., M. Trippl, and M. Höyssä. 2018. “Regional Industrial Transformations in the Interconnected Global Economy.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (2): 227–240. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsy015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, S. Q., and J. Dumay. 2011. “The Qualitative Research Interview.” Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 8 (3): 238–264. doi:10.1108/11766091111162070.
   Google Scholar
• Rubach, S. 2013. “Collaborative Regional Innovation Initiatives: A Booster for Local Company Innovation Processes?” Systemic Practice and Action Research 26 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1007/s11213-012-9270-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmie, J. 2012. “Path Dependence and New Technological Path Creation in the Danish Wind Power Industry.” European Planning Studies 20 (5): 753–772. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.667924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M. 2016. “Reconsidering Path Creation in Economic Geography: Aspects of Agency, Temporality and Methods.” European Planning Studies 24 (9): 1605–1622. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1204427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. N. 2010. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Revised ed. Incerto, Nassim Nicholas Taleb[…]. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., M. Grillitsch, A. Isaksen, and T. Sinozic. 2015. “Perspectives on Cluster Evolution: Critical Review and Future Research Issues.” European Planning Studies 23 (10): 2028–2044. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.999450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., K. Flanagan, E. Magro, J. R. Wilson, and M. Sotarauta. 2017. “Understanding Regional Innovation Policy Dynamics: Actors, Agency and Learning.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 (4): 559–568. doi:10.1177/2399654417705914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., D. Polley, R. Garud, and S. Venkataraman. 1999. The Innovation Journey. New York, N.Y., [etc.]: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2013. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar