References
- Audretsch, D. B., and M. Belitski. 2022. “A Strategic Alignment Framework for the Entrepreneurial University.” Industry and Innovation 29 (2): 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2021.1941799.
- Barczak, G., C. Hopp, J. Kaminski, F. Piller, and G. Pruschak. 2022. “How Open Is Innovation research?–An Empirical Analysis of Data Sharing among Innovation Scholars.” Industry and Innovation 29 (2): 1–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2021.1967727.
- Beck, S., C. Bergenholtz, M. Bogers, T.-M. Brasseur, M. Louise Conradsen, D. Di Marco, A. P. Distel, L. Dobusch, D. Dörler, and A. Effert. 2022. “The Open Innovation in Science Research Field: A Collaborative Conceptualisation Approach.” Industry and Innovation 29 (2): 1–50.
- Cetina, K. K. 2007. “Culture in Global Knowledge Societies: Knowledge Cultures and Epistemic Cultures.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 32 (4): 361–375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1179/030801807X163571.
- Dasgupta, P., and P. A. David. 1994. “Toward a New Economics of Science.” Research Policy 23 (5): 487–521. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1.
- Fortunato, S., C. T. Bergstrom, K. Börner, J. A. Evans, D. Helbing, S. Milojević, A. M. Petersen, F. Radicchi, R. Sinatra, and B. Uzzi. 2018. “Science of Science.” Science 359 (6379): eaao0185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0185.
- Franzoni, C., M. Poetz, and H. Sauermann. 2022. “Crowds, Citizens, and Science: A Multi-dimensional Framework and Agenda for Future Research.” Industry and Innovation 29 (2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2021.1976627.
- Johnston, A. 2022. “Open Innovation in Science: Assessing the Formation and Function of SME-university Collaborations through the Proximity Matrix.” Industry and Innovation 29 (2): 1–23 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2021.1997725.
- Merton, R. K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
- Nature editorial. 2018. “The Best Research Is Produced When Researchers and Communities Work Together.” Nature 562 (7). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06855-7.
- Nature editorial. (2021). Research collaborations bring big rewards: The world needs more. Nature, 594(7863), 301–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01581-z
- Pujol Priego, L., J. Wareham, and K. R. Angelo. 2022. “The Puzzle of Sharing Scientific Data.” Industry and Innovation 29 (2).
- Sauermann, H., K. Vohland, V. Antoniou, B. Balázs, C. Göbel, K. Karatzas, P. Mooney, J. Perelló, M. Ponti, and R. Samson. 2020. “Citizen Science and Sustainability Transitions.” Research Policy 49 (5): 103978. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103978.
- Stokes, D. E. 2011. Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
- Van Noorden, R. 2015. “Interdisciplinary Research by the Numbers.” Nature 525 (7569): 306–307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/525306a.