The wealth of (Open Data) nations? Open government data, country-level institutions and entrepreneurial activity

References

• Acs, Z. J. 2010. “Entrepreneurship and Economic Development: The Valley of Backwardness.” Annals of Innovation & Entrepreneurship 1 (1): 5641. doi:10.3402/aie.v1i1.5602.
   Google Scholar
• Acs, Z. J., and D. B. Audretsch. 2005. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Technological Change. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship 1 (4): 149–195. doi:10.1561/0300000004.
   Google Scholar
• Acs, Z., E. Autio, and L. Szerb. 2014. “National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement Issues and Policy Implications.” Research Policy 43 (3): 476–494. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acs, Z. J., S. Desai, and J. Hessels. 2008. “Entrepreneurship, Economic Development and Institutions.” Small Business Economics 31 (3): 219–234. doi:10.1007/s11187-008-9135-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acs, Z. J., E. Stam, D. B. Audretsch, and A. O’Connor. 2017. “The Lineages of the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Approach.” Small Business Economics 49 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acs, Z., L. Szerb, and E. Autio, Eds. 2017. “The Global Entrepreneurship Index.” In Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2016, 19–38. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. 1992. “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction.” Econometrica 60 (2): 323–351. doi:10.2307/2951599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Marhubi, F. A. 2005. “Openness and Governance: Evidence across Countries.” Oxford Development Studies 33 (3–4): 453–471. doi:10.1080/13600810500199269.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H. E., and C. M. Fiol. 1994. “Fools Rush In? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation.” Academy of Management Review 19 (4): 645–670. doi:10.5465/amr.1994.9412190214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almirall, E. 2015. “Open Data Is Not Working – How to Fix It?” http://estevealmirall.com/2015/07/26/open-data-is-not-working-how-to-fix-it
   Google Scholar
• Anokhin, S., and W. S. Schulze. 2009. “Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Corruption.” Journal of Business Venturing 24 (5): 465–476. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, S., D. Urbano, and D. Audretsch. 2016. “Institutional Factors, Opportunity Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: Panel Data Evidence.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 102: 45–61. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arenius, P., and M. Minniti. 2005. “Perceptual Variables and Nascent Entrepreneurship.” Small Business Economics 24 (3): 233–247. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-1984-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B. 2004. “Sustaining Innovation and Growth: Public Policy Support for Entrepreneurship.” Industry and Innovation 11 (3): 167–191. doi:10.1080/1366271042000265366.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., I. Grilo, and A. R. Thurik. 2007. “Explaining Entrepreneurship and the Role of Policy: A Framework.” In The Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy, edited by D. B. Audretsch, I. Grilo, and A. R. Thurik, 1–17. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Autio, E., M. Kenney, P. Mustard, D. Siegele, and M. Wright. 2014. “Entrepreneurial Innovation: The Importance of Context.” Research Policy 43 (7): 1097–1108. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, J. 2012. “‘This Is What Modern Deregulation Looks Like’: Co-optation and Contestation in the Shaping of the UK’s Open Government Data Initiative.” The Journal of Community Informatics 8 (2). doi:10.15353/joci.v8i2.3038.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, C. F., M. E. Schaffer, and S. Stillman. 2007. “Enhanced Routines for Instrumental variables/generalized Method of Moments Estimation and Testing.” The Stata Journal 7 (4): 465–506. doi:10.1177/1536867X0800700402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. 1990. “Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (5): 893–921. doi:10.1086/261712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. 2002. The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belloni, A., D. Chen, V. Chernozhukov, and C. Hansen. 2012. “Sparse Models and Methods for Optimal Instruments with an Application to Eminent Domain.” Econometrica 80 (6): 2369–2429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belloni, A., V. Chernozhukov, and C. Hansen. 2014. “Inference on Treatment Effects after Selection among high-dimensional Controls.” The Review of Economic Studies 81 (2): 608–650. doi:10.1093/restud/rdt044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berends, J., W. Carrara, W. Engbers, and H. Vollers. 2020. In Re-using Open Data. A Study on Companies Transforming Open Data into Economic and Societal Value. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Bergh, A., I. Mirkina, and T. Nilsson. 2014. “Globalization and Institutional quality—A Panel Data Analysis.” Oxford Development Studies 42 (3): 365–394. doi:10.1080/13600818.2014.884555.
   Google Scholar
• BIS. 2014. Open Data Strategy 2014-2016. London: BIS.
   Google Scholar
• Block, J. H., C. O. Fisch, and M. Van Praag. 2017. “The Schumpeterian Entrepreneur: A Review of the Empirical Evidence on the Antecedents, Behaviour and Consequences of Innovative Entrepreneurship.” Industry and Innovation 24 (1): 61–95. doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1216397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettke, P. J., and C. J. Coyne. 2003. “Entrepreneurship and Development: Cause or Consequence?” Advances in Austrian Economics 6: 67–87.
   Google Scholar
• Bogers, M., A. K. Zobel, A. Afuah, E. Almirall, S. Brunswicker, L. Dahlander, L. Frederiksen, et al. 2017. “The Open Innovation Research Landscape: Established Perspectives and Emerging Themes across Different Levels of Analysis.” Industry and Innovation 24 (1): 8–40. doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1240068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonina, C. M. 2013. New Business Models and the Value of Open Data: Definitions, Challenges and Opportunities. NEMODE–3K Small Grants Call. http://www.nemode.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Bonina-Opendata-Report-FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, H. P., and D. De Clercq. 2008. “Institutional Context and the Allocation of Entrepreneurial Effort.” Journal of International Business Studies 39 (4): 747–767. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. 2012. Open Data: Unleashing the Potential. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciotti, G., J. C. Hayton, J. R. Mitchell, and A. Giazitzoglu. 2016. “A Reconceptualization of Fear of Failure in Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Business Venturing 31 (3): 302–325. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Certo, S. T., M. C. Withers, and M. Semadeni. 2017. “A Tale of Two Effects: Using Longitudinal Data to Compare Within‐and Between‐firm Effects.” Strategic Management Journal 38 (7): 1536–1556. doi:10.1002/smj.2586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C. M. 2013. “From Open Data to Open Innovation Strategies: Creating e-services Using Open Government Data.” System Sciences (HICSS), 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 1890–1899.
   Google Scholar
• Chattapadhyay, S. 2013. “Towards an Expanded and Integrated Open Government Data Agenda for India.” In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 202–205). Seoul: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. P., and C. Y. Zhang. 2014. “Data-intensive Applications, Challenges, Techniques and Technologies: A Survey on Big Data.” Information Sciences 275: 314–347. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernozhukov, V., C. Hansen, and M. Spindler. 2015. “Post-selection and post-regularization Inference in Linear Models with Many Controls and Instruments.” American Economic Review 105 (5): 486–490. doi:10.1257/aer.p20151022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhabra, M., R. Hassan, and A. Shamim, eds. 2021. Entrepreneurship and Big Data: The Digital Revolution. Florida, US: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, H., and S. Park. 2018. “Network Variations at the Intersection of National Capability Orientation and Technological Path Dependence – Patent Citation Network Analysis of the Hydrogen Energy and nano-tech Sectors.” Industry and Innovation 25 (8): 8, 809–831. doi:10.1080/13662716.2017.1358605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y., and P. Phan. 2006. “The Influences of Economic and Technology Policy on the Dynamics of New Firm Formation.” Small Business Economics 26 (5): 493–503. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-5989-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, F., D. B. Audretsch, and M. Belitski. 2019. “Institutions and Entrepreneurship Quality.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 43 (1): 51–81. doi:10.1177/1042258718780431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrales-Garay, D., M. Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, and E. M. Mora-Valentín. 2019. “Knowledge Areas, Themes and Future Research on Open Data: A co-word Analysis.” Government Information Quarterly 36 (1): 77–87. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dance, G. J. X., M. LaForgia, and N. Confessore. 2018. “As Facebook Raised a Privacy Wall, It Carved an Opening for Tech Giants.” The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/18/technology/facebook-privacy.html
   Google Scholar
• Dau, L., and A. Cuervo-Cazurra. 2014. “To Formalize or Not to Formalize: Entrepreneurship and pro-market Institutions.” Journal of Business Venturing 29 (5): 668–686. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, U., S. Aparicio, and D. B. Audretsch, Eds. 2019. “The Effect of Entrepreneurial Activity on Economic Growth.” In Institutions, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Performance, 85–106. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P. 2006. “Nascent Entrepreneurship: Empirical Studies and Developments.” Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 2 (1): 1–76.
   Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P. 2015. “Entrepreneurial Opportunities and the Entrepreneurship Nexus: A re-conceptualization.” Journal of Business Venturing 30 (5): 674–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S., and N. Helbig (2010, August). Information Strategies for Open Government: Challenges and Prospects for Deriving Public Value from Government Transparency. In International Conference on Electronic Government (pp. 50–60). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• De Mooij, R. A., and G. Nicodème. 2006. “Corporate Tax Policy, Entrepreneurship and Incorporation in the EU.” https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=956276
   Google Scholar
• DECODE. 2019. https://decodeproject.eu/publications/impact-and-economic-sustainability-decode-ecosystem-and-future-development
   Google Scholar
• Dodgson, M., D. Gann, and A. Salter. 2006. “The Role of Technology in the Shift Towards Open Innovation: The Case of Procter & Gamble.” R&D Management 36 (3): 333–346. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00429.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos Brito, K., M. A. da Silva Costa, V. C. Garcia, and S. R. de Lemos Meira. 2014. “Brazilian Government Open Data: Implementation, Challenges, and Potential Opportunities.” In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 11–16). ACM, Aguascalientes Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, N., and R. Sobel. 2016. “Does Corruption Ever Help Entrepreneurship?” Small Business Economics 47 (1): 179–199. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9728-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eftekhari, N., and M. Bogers. 2015. “Open for Entrepreneurship: How Open Innovation Can Foster New Venture Creation.” Creativity and Innovation Management 24 (4): 574–584. doi:10.1111/caim.12136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estermann, B. 2014. “Diffusion of Open Data and Crowdsourcing among Heritage Institutions: Results of a Pilot Survey in Switzerland.” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 9 (3): 15–31. doi:10.4067/S0718-18762014000300003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrin, S., J. Korosteleva, and T. Mickiewicz. 2013. “Which Institutions Encourage Entrepreneurial Growth Aspirations?” Journal of Business Venturing 23 (4): 564–580. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.05.001.
   Google Scholar
• Faniel, I. M., A. Kriesberg, and E. Yakel. 2016. “Social Scientists’ Satisfaction with Data Reuse.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67 (6): 1404–1416. doi:10.1002/asi.23480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentelsaz, L., C. González, J. P. Maícas, and J. Montero. 2015. “How Different Formal Institutions Affect Opportunity and Necessity Entrepreneurship.” BRQ Business Research Quarterly 18 (4): 246–258. doi:10.1016/j.brq.2015.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershman, M., V. Roud, and T. Wolfgang. 2019. “Open Innovation in Russian state-owned Enterprises.” Industry and Innovation 26 (2): 199–217. doi:10.1080/13662716.2018.1496815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gindling, T. H., and D. Newhouse. 2014. “Self-employment in the Developing World.” World Development 56: 313–331. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittelman, M. 2006. “National Institutions, public–private Knowledge Flows, and Innovation Performance: A Comparative Study of the Biotechnology Industry in the US and France.” Research Policy 35 (7): 1052–1068. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2004. “Do Institutions Cause Growth?” Journal of Economic Growth 9 (3): 271–303. doi:10.1023/B:JOEG.0000038933.16398.ed.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, M. S., and M. G. T. Abed. 2002. Governance, Corruption, and Economic Performance. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Hain, D. S., and R. Jurowetzki. 2019. “The Potentials of Machine Learning and Big Data in Entrepreneurship research–the Liaison of Econometrics and Data Science.” In Handbook of Quantitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship, edited by George Saridakis, and Marc Cowling, 176–220. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F.,sJr., R. L. Tatham, R. E. Anderson, and W. Black. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hauk, W., and R. Wacziarg. 2009. “A Monte Carlo Study of Growth Regressions.” Journal of Economic Growth 14 (2): 103–147. doi:10.1007/s10887-009-9040-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, F. 2000. Econometrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. 2013. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heimstädt, M., F. Saunderson, and T. Heath. 2014. “From Toddler to Teen: Growth of an Open Data Ecosystem.” JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government 6 (2): 123–135. doi:10.29379/jedem.v6i2.330.
   Google Scholar
• Hey, T., and A. E. Trefethen. 2005. “Cyberinfrastructure for e-science.” Science 308 (5723): 817–821. doi:10.1126/science.1110410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, F. 2013. “Knowledge-sourcing of R&D Workers in Different Job Positions: Contextualising External Personal Knowledge Networks.” Research Policy 42 (1): 167–179. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, F., T. Wainwright, and F. Rentocchini. 2020. “Open Data for Open Innovation: Managing Absorptive Capacity in SMEs.” R&D Management 50 (1): 31–46. doi:10.1111/radm.12347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes-Cromwick, E., and J. Coronado. 2019. “The Value of US Government Data to US Business Decisions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (1): 131–146. doi:10.1257/jep.33.1.131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijboom, N., and T. Van den Broek. 2011. “Open Data: An International Comparison of Strategies.” European Journal of ePractice 12 (1): 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., Y. Charalabidis, and A. Zuiderwijk. 2012. “Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government.” Information Systems Management 29 (4): 258–268. doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.716740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C., and C. Tonetti. 2020. “Nonrivalry and the Economics of Data.” American Economic Review 110 (9): 2819–2858. doi:10.1257/aer.20191330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juell-Skielse, G., A. Hjalmarsson, E. Juell-Skielse, P. Johannesson, and D. Rudmark. 2014. “Contests as Innovation Intermediaries in Open Data Markets.” Information Polity 19 (3–4): 247–262. doi:10.3233/IP-140346.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2010. “The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2011. “The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 3 (2): 220–246. doi:10.1017/S1876404511200046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitsios, F., M. Kamariotou, and E. Grigoroudis. 2021. “Digital Entrepreneurship Services Evolution: Analysis of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Models for Open Data Ecosystems.” Sustainability 13 (21): 12183. doi:10.3390/su132112183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knack, S., and P. Keefer. 1995. “Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross‐country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures.” Economics & Politics 7 (3): 207–227. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0343.1995.tb00111.x.
   Google Scholar
• Komlósi, É., L. Szerb, Z. J. Ács, and R. Ortega-Argilés. 2015. “Quality-related Regional Differences in Entrepreneurship Based on the GEDI Methodology: The Case of Hungary.” Acta Oeconomica 65 (3): 455–477. doi:10.1556/032.65.2015.3.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, S., C. Palmer, N. Kailer, F. L. Kallinger, and J. Spitzer. 2019. “Digital Entrepreneurship: A Research Agenda on New Business Models for the twenty-first Century.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 25 (2): 353–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakomaa, E., and J. Kallberg. 2013. “Open Data as a Foundation for Innovation: The Enabling Effect of Free Public Sector Information for Entrepreneurs.” IEEE Access 1: 558–563. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2013.2279164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Dinh, T., M. C. Vu, and A. Ayayi. 2018. “Towards a Living Lab for Promoting the Digital Entrepreneurship Process.” International Journal of Entrepreneurship 22 (1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. J., E. Almirall, and J. D. Wareham. 2014. “Open Data & Civic Apps: 1st Generation Failures – 2nd Generation Improvements.” ESADE Business School Research Paper, No. 256. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2508358
   Google Scholar
• Lindman, J., and L. Nyman. 2014. “The Businesses of Open Data and Open Source: Some Key Similarities and Differences.” Technology Innovation Management Review 4 (1): 12–17. doi:10.22215/timreview/757.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-A. 2007. “National Innovation Systems – Analytical Concept and Development Tool.” Industry and Innovation 14 (1): 1, 95–119. doi:10.1080/13662710601130863.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhaes, G., and C. Roseira. 2017. “Open Government Data and the Private Sector: An Empirical View on Business Models and Value Creation.” Government Information Quarterly. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.004.
   Google Scholar
• Matsakis, L. 2019. The Wired Guide To Your Personal Data (And Who Is Using It). San Francisco, US: Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/wired-guide-personal-data-collection
   Google Scholar
• Mc Dermott, P. 2010. “Building Open Government.” Government Information Quarterly 27: 401–413. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menard, S. 1995. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis: Sage University Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nagaraj, A. 2020. “The Private Impact of Public Maps: Landsat Satellite Maps Increased Gold Discoveries and Encouraged Entry.” https://abhishekn.com/files/nagaraj_landsat_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D., and M. Paczos. 2020. “Measuring the Economic Value of Data and cross-border Data Flows: A Business Perspective.” OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 297, Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Obschonka, M., and D. B. Audretsch. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Entrepreneurship: A New Era Has Begun.” Small Business Economics 55 (3): 529–539. doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00202-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open Data Barometer. 2013. “Open Data Barometer: 2013 Researchers Handbook.” June 2013. http://opendatabarometer.org/doc/1stEdition/OpenDataBarometer-ResearchHandbookDownloadVersion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Open Data Barometer. 2014. Open Data Barometer. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: ODB Methodology.
   Google Scholar
• Open Data Barometer. 2015. “Open Data Barometer 3rd Edition ODB Methodology - v1.0.” Accessed April 28 2015. https://opendatabarometer.org/doc/3rdEdition/ODB-3rdEdition-Methodology.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Open Data Barometer. 2016. “Open Data Barometer 4th Edition ODB Methodology - v1.0.” Accessed April 28 2016. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_6FR6nZ6Uj4xr2tMsnhGBjocbxOd4MRcBsXe2OMh1CE/edit#
   Google Scholar
• Open Data Barometer. 2017. Global Report. 4th ed. World wide web foundation, Geneva, Switzerland. https://opendatabarometer.org/doc/4thEdition/ODB-4thEdition-GlobalReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Open Data Institute. 2015. Open Data Means Business: UK Innovation across Sectors and Regions. London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Open Data Institute. 2019. “Open Data Skills Framework.” https://theodi.org/article/open-data-skills-framework
   Google Scholar
• Open Knowledge Foundation. 2019. “Global Open Data Index Methodology” Accessed July 31 2019. https://index.okfn.org/methodology
   Google Scholar
• Parkins, D. 2017. “The World’s Most Valuable Resource Is No Longer Oil, but Data.” The Economist. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2017/05/06/the-worlds-most-valuable-resource-is-no-longer-oil-but-data
   Google Scholar
• Pasquetto, I. V., C. L. Borgman, and M. F. Wofford. 2019. “Uses and Reuses of Scientific Data: The Data Creators’ Advantage.” Harvard Data Science Review 1 (2): 1–34. doi:10.1162/99608f92.fc14bf2d.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Villar, L., and A. Seric. 2015. “Multinationals in Sub-Saharan Africa: Domestic Linkages and Institutional Distance.” International Economics 142: 94–117. doi:10.1016/j.inteco.2014.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, R., M. Atchison, and R. Brooks. 2008. “Business Plan Competitions in Tertiary Institutions: Encouraging Entrepreneurship Education.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 30 (2): 123–138. doi:10.1080/13600800801938739.
   Google Scholar
• Saberi, M., and A. Hamdan. 2019. “The Moderating Role of Governmental Support in the Relationship between Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: A Study on the GCC Countries.” Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies 11 (2): 200–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahut, J. M., L. Iandoli, and F. Teulon. 2021. “The Age of Digital Entrepreneurship.” Small Business Economics 56 (3): 1159–1169. doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00260-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savona, M. 2019. The Value of Data: Towards a Framework to Redistribute It. Falmer, UK: SPRU-Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School. No. 2019-21.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. 1929. Review of Economic Theory. NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schunck, R. 2013. “Within and between Estimates in random-effects Models: Advantages and Drawbacks of Correlated Random Effects and Hybrid Models.” Stata Journal 13 (1): 65–76. doi:10.1177/1536867X1301300105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S., and S. Venkataraman. 2000. “The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research.” Academy of Management Review 25 (1): 217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, R. 2008. “Testing Baumol: Institutional Quality and the Productivity of Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Business Venturing 23 (6): 641–655. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somaya, D., and D. Teece. 2021. Patents, licensing, and entrepreneurship: Effectuating innovation in multi-invention contexts. In edited by E. Sheshinski, R. J. Strom, and W. J. Baumol. Entrepreneurship, innovation, and the growth mechanism of the free-enterprise economies, US.185–212. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, J. 2007. “Bureaucracy and Entrepreneurship: Workplace Effects on Entrepreneurial Entry.” Administrative Science Quarterly 52 (3): 387–412. doi:10.2189/asqu.52.3.387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szerb, L., R. Aidis, and Z. J. Acs. 2013. “The Comparison of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor and the Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index Methodologies.” Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship 9 (1): 1–142. doi:10.1561/0300000046.
   Google Scholar
• Tebaldi, E., and B. Elmslie. 2013. “Does Institutional Quality Impact Innovation? Evidence from cross-country Patent Grant Data.” Applied Economics 45 (7): 887–900. doi:10.1080/00036846.2011.613777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theil, H. 1971. Principles of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tinholt, D. 2013. The Open Data Economy: Unlocking Economic Value by Opening Government and Public Data. Capgemini Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Welle Donker, F., and B. van Loenen. 2017. “How to Assess the Success of the Open Data Ecosystem?” International Journal of Digital Earth 10 (3): 284–306. doi:10.1080/17538947.2016.1224938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welter, F. 2011. “Contextualizing Entrepreneurship – Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward.” Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 35 (1): 165–184. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welzel, C. 2013. Freedom Rising. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welzel, C., and Christian. 2014. “Description of Welzel Data for QoG and WVS 1 T 6 Key Aggregates.” doi:10.13140/2.1.2217.3769.
   Google Scholar
• Wennberg, K., S. Pathak, and E. Autio. 2013. “How Culture Moulds the Effects of self-efficacy and Fear of Failure on Entrepreneurship.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 25 (9–10): 756–780. doi:10.1080/08985626.2013.862975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, E., R. Teigland, B. Donnellan, and W. Golden. 2010. “How Internet Technologies Impact Information Flows in R&D: Reconsidering the Technological Gatekeeper.” R&D Management 40 (4): 400–413. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00610.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. A., and T. L. Pett. 2006. “Small‐firm Performance: Modeling the Role of Product and Process Improvements.” Journal of Small Business Management 44 (2): 268–284. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00167.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Ed. 2010. Linking Enterprise Data. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Woodruff, C. 2006. “Measuring Institutions.” International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption 1: 105–127.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. 1995. “Score Diagnostics for Linear Models Estimated by Two Stage Least Squares.” In Advances in Econometrics and Quantitative Economics: Essays in Honor of Professor C, edited by R. Rao, G. S. Maddala, P. C. B. Phillips, and T. N. Srinivasan, 66–87. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Group. 2019. Doing Business 2019. 16th ed. Washington DC, US: World Bank Group. http://www.doingbusiness.org/en/reports/global-reports/doing-business-2019
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Group. 2021. The Huge Potential of Open Data for Business Applications. Washington DC, US: World Bank Group. https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/full/10.1596/978-1-4648-1600-0_Spotlight3_1
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S., and M. Wright. 2011. “Entrepreneurship’s Next Act.” Academy of Management Perspectives 25 (4): 67–83. doi:10.5465/amp.2010.0149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuiderwijk, A., M. Janssen, and C. Davis. 2014. “Innovation with Open Data: Essential Elements of Open Data Ecosystems.” Information Polity 19 (1–2): 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Zurada, J., and W. Karwowski. 2011. “Knowledge Discovery Through Experiential Learning from Business and Other Contemporary Data Sources: A Review and Reappraisal.” Information Systems Management 28 (3): 258–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar