Robots, skills and temporary jobs: evidence from six European countries

References

• Acemoglu, D., C. Lelarge, and P. Restrepo. 2020. “Competing with Robots: Firm-Level Evidence from France.” AEA Papers and Proceedings 110 (May): 383–388. doi:10.1257/pandp.20201003.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., and P. Restrepo. 2019. “Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (2): 3–30. doi:10.1257/jep.33.2.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., and P. Restrepo. 2020. “Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets.” The Journal of Political Economy 128 (6): 2188–2244. doi:10.1086/705716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D., C. Criscuolo, and P. N. Gal (2015) Frontier Firms, Technology Diffusion and Public Policy, OECD Working Papers 2015-12, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Autor, D. H., F. Levy, and R. J. Murnane. 2003. “The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4): 1279–1333. doi:10.1162/003355303322552801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, C. F., M. E. Schaffer, and S. Stillman. 2007. “Enhanced Routines for Instrumental Variables/Generalized Method of Moments Estimation and Testing.” The Stata Journal 7 (4): 465–506. doi:10.1177/1536867X0800700402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessen, J. E., M. Goos, A. Salomons, and W. Van den Berge (2019). Automatic Reaction-What Happens to Workers at Firms That Automate? Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O., and A. Landier. 2002. “The Perverse Effects of Partial Labour Market Reform: Fixed‐term Contracts in France.” The Economic Journal 112 (480): F214–244. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeri, T. 2011. “Institutional Reforms and Dualism in European Labor Markets.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, edited by O. Ashenfelter and D. Card. 1173–1236. Amsterdam and New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, A. L., M. Francesconi, and J. Frank (2000). Temporary Jobs: Who Gets Them, What are They Worth, and Do They Lead Anywhere? (No. 2000-13). ISER Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, A. L., M. Francesconi, and J. Frank. 2002. “Temporary Jobs: Stepping Stones or Dead Ends?” The Economic Journal 112 (480): F189–213. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., F. Malerba, and L. Orsenigo. 2000. “Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation.” The Economic Journal 110 (463): 288–410. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., and P. K. Trivedi. 2009. Microeconometrics Using Stata. 706. College Station: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cappellari, L., C. Dell’Aringa, and M. Leonardi. 2012. “Temporary Employment, Job Flows and Productivity: A Tale of Two Reforms.” The Economic Journal 122 (562): F188–215. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02535.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetrulo, A., V. Cirillo, and D. Guarascio. 2019. “Weaker Jobs, Weaker Innovation. Exploring the Effects of Temporary Employment on New Products.” Applied Economics 51 (59): 6350–6375. doi:10.1080/00036846.2019.1619015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrado, C., C. Criscuolo, J. Haskel, A. Himbert, and C. Jona-Lasinio (2021). New Evidence on Intangibles, Diffusion and Productivity. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2021/10, OECD Publishing, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Cuccu, L., and V. Royuela. 2022. Just Reallocated? Robots, Displacement and Job Quality. University of Barcelona: Mimeo. Paper available at https://www.ifo.de/sites/default/files/events/2022/pillars22-Cuccu.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dauth, W., S. Findeisen, J. Südekum, and N. Woessner (2017) ‘German Robots-The Impact of Industrial Robots on Workers’ CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP12306.
   Google Scholar
• Dauth, W., S. Findeisen, J. Suedekum, and N. Woessner. 2021. “The Adjustment of Labor Markets to Robots.” Journal of the European Economic Association 19 (6): 3104–3153. doi:10.1093/jeea/jvab012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destefano, T., S. Haneda, and H. U. Kwon. 2019. Determinants of Structural Adjustment and Employment Use in Japan: Firm Characteristics, Offshoring and Industrial Robotics. DISCUSSION PAPER SIERIES 19-E-067. RIETI.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., B. Hong, and L. Wu. 2021. “The Robot Revolution: Managerial and Employment Consequences for Firms.” Management science 67 (9): 5586–5605. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. 2007. “Statistical Regularities in the Evolution of Industries. A Guide Through Some Evidence and Challenges for the Theory.” In Perspectives on Innovation, edited by F. Malerba and S. Brusoni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 153–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618390.009
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G., D. Guarascio, A. Ricci, and M. E. Virgillito. 2021b. “Neodualism in the Italian Business Firms: Training, Organizational Capabilities, and Productivity Distributions.” Small Business Economics 57 (1): 167–189. doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00295-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosi, G., M. Piva, M. E. Virgillito, and M. Vivarelli. 2021a. “Embodied and Disembodied Technological Change: The Sectoral Patterns of Job-Creation and Job-Destruction.” Research Policy 50 (4): 104199. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2015. Recent Developments in Temporary Employment: Employment Growth, Wages and Transitions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2020. Labour Market Change: Trends and Policy Approaches Towards Flexibilisation, Challenges and Prospects in the EU Series. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2020), Joint Employment Report 2020, European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. 1049 Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Macias, E., D. Klenert, and J. I. Anton. 2021. “Not so Disruptive Yet? Characteristics, Distribution and Determinants of Robots in Europe.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 58: 76–89. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2021.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filomena, M., and M. Picchio. 2022. “Are Temporary Jobs Stepping Stones or Dead Ends? A Systematic Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Manpower 43 (9): 60–74. doi:10.1108/IJM-02-2022-0064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, L., C. Grim, J. C. Haltiwanger, and Z. Wolf. 2021. Innovation, Productivity Dispersion, and Productivity Growth Corrado, Carol, Haskel, Jonathan, Miranda, Javier, Sichel, Daniel. Measuring and Accounting for Innovation in the Twenty-First Century. 103–136. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graetz, G., and G. Michaels. 2018. “Robots at Work.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 100 (5): 753–768. doi:10.1162/rest_a_00754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. 2010. “Testing Hypotheses About Interaction Terms in Nonlinear Models.” Economics letters 107 (2): 291–296. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2010.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humlum, A. 2019. Robot Adoption and Labor Market Dynamics. Princeton: Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Robotics (2016) ‘World Robotics Industrial Robots 2016’ International Federation of Robotics, https://ifr.org/img/office/Industrial_Robots_2016_Chapter_1_2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Office. 2013. Global Employment Trends for Youth 2013: A Generation at Risk. Geneva: International Labour Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht, A. 2020. “The (Negative) Impact of Supply-Side Labour Market Reforms on Productivity: An Overview of the Evidence.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 44 (2): 445–464. doi:10.1093/cje/bez068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht, A., F. N. van Schaik, and H. Zhou. 2014. “Is Flexible Labour Good for Innovation? Evidence from Firm-Level Data.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 38 (5): 1207–1219. doi:10.1093/cje/bet077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. 1996. “Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation Over the Product Life Cycle.” The American Economic Review 86 (3): 562–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S., and J. H. Miller. 1995. “Entry, Exit, and Shakeouts in the United States in New Manufactured Products.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 13 (4): 567–591. doi:10.1016/0167-7187(95)00505-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, M., I. Manuylov, and M. Smolka. 2021. “Robots and Firms.” The Economic Journal 131 (638): 2553–2584. doi:10.1093/ej/ueab009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzywdzinski, M. 2017. “Automation, Skill Requirements and Labour Use Strategies: High-Wage and Low-Wage Approaches to High-Tech Manufacturing in the Automotive Industry.” New Technology, Work and Employment 32 (3): 247–267. doi:10.1111/ntwe.12100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, C., and J. Payne. 2021. “Fewer Jobs, Better Jobs? An International Comparative Study of Robots and ‘Routine’work in the Public Sector.” Industrial Relations Journal 52 (2): 109–124. doi:10.1111/irj.12323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, F., and L. Orsenigo. 1996. “Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation are Technology-Specific.” Research Policy 258 (3): 451–478. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(95)00840-3.
   Google Scholar
• McGuinness, S., K. Pouliakas, and P. Redmond (2017). How Useful is the Concept of Skills Mismatch? IZA Discussion Papers No.10786
   Google Scholar
• Mize, T. D., L. Doan, and J. S. Long. 2019. “A General Framework for Comparing Predictions and Marginal Effects Across Models.” Sociological Methodology 49 (1): 152–189. doi:10.1177/0081175019852763.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. OECD Employment Outlook 2019: The Future of Work. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Peneder, M. 2010. “Technological Regimes and the Variety of Innovation Behaviour: Creating Integrated Taxonomies of Firms and Sectors.” Research Policy 39 (3): 323–334. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieroni, L., and F. Pompei. 2007. “Evaluating Innovation and Labour Market Relationships: The Case of Italy.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 32 (2): 325–347. doi:10.1093/cje/bem032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeer, R., S. Dhondt, A. Kleinknecht, and K. Kraan. 2015. “Will ‘Structural Reforms’ of Labour Markets Reduce Productivity Growth? A Firm-Level Investigation.” European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention 12 (3): 300–317. doi:10.4337/ejeep.2014.03.04.
   Google Scholar
• Wachsen, E., and K. Blind. 2016. “More Labour Market Flexibility for More Innovation? Evidence from Employer–Employee Linked Micro Data.” Research Policy 45 (5): 941–950. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, Massachussets: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2015. “Control Function Methods in Applied Econometrics.” The Journal of Human Resources 50 (2): 420–445. doi:10.3368/jhr.50.2.420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar