Seeding Writing Project principles and practices in a school community: a case study

References

• Andrews, R. 2008. The Case for a National Writing Project for Teachers. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., and A. Smith. 2011. Developing Writers: Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2000. Research Methods in Education. 5th ed. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Dix, S., and G. Cawkwell. 2011. “The Influence of Peer Group Response: Building a Teacher and Students’ Expertise in the Writing Classroom.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique 10 (4): 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbow, P. 2000. Everyone Can Write: Essays Towards a Hopeful Theory of Writing and Teaching Writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R. 2012. “Getting to No: Building True Collegiality in Schools.” Independent School 71 (2): 99–107.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, H., W. Penuel, P. Shields, and K. Bosetti. 2008. National Evaluation of Writing Project Professional Development: Year 1 Report. Menlo Park: Centre for Education Policy, SRI International.
   Google Scholar
• Good, J., and A. Weaver. 2003. “Creating Learning Communities to Meet Teachers’ Needs in Professional Development.” Journal of In-Service Education 29 (3): 439–449.
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H. 2010. Literacy and Power. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, P., J. Berry, and D. Battersby. 2007. “Developing Teacher Expertise: Teachers and Students Doing Mathematics Together.” Journal of In-Service Education 33 (1): 41–65.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, R., V. Tze, S. Betts, and K. Gordon. 2011. “Teacher Efficacy Research 1998–2009: Signs of Progress or Unfulfilled Promise.” Educational Psychological Review 23: 21–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, A., and D. Wood. 2003. Inside the National Writing Project: Connecting Network Learning and Classroom Teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, T., ed. 2010a. Beyond the Grammar Wars: A Resource for Teachers and Students on Developing Language Knowledge in the English/Literacy Classroom. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, T. 2010b. “Reading, Writing and Speaking Poetry.” In The Routledge International Handbook of English, Language and Literacy Teaching, edited by D. Wyse, R. Andrews and J. Hoffman, 367–378. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, T., and N. Daly. 2007. “Towards Congeniality: The Place of Politeness in Asynchronous Online Discussion.” International Journal of Learning 13 (12): 121–134.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, T., and A. Goodwyn. 2004. “Editorial: Reclaiming the Professional Development Agenda in an Age of Compliance.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique 3 (2): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, T., and H. Kato. 2012. “Poetry for the Broken-Hearted: How a Marginal Year 12 English Class Was Turned on to Writing.” English in Australia 47 (1): 61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, T., D. Whitehead, S. Dix, and G. Cawkwell. 2011. “New Zealand Teachers Respond to the ‘National Writing Project’ Experience.” Teacher Development 15 (3): 273–291.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson, I., R. Brooker, T. Aspland, and B. Elliott. 1998. “Putting Professional Learning up Front: A Perspective of Professional Development Within a Context of Collaborative Research About Curriculum Leadership.” Journal of In-Service Education 24 (1): 73–86.
   Google Scholar
• McCallister, C. 2008. “‘The Author’s Chair’ Revisited.” Curriculum Inquiry 38 (4): 455–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, R., and R. Honeycutt. 2007. “Best Practices in Implementing a Process Approach to Teaching Writing.” In Best Practices in Writing Instruction, edited by S. Graham, C. MacArthur and J. Fitzgerald, 28–49. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, A. 2002. The Fact of a Doorframe: Selected Poems 1950–2001. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlan, P., and A. Carruthers. 1990. “Report on the New Zealand Writing Project: An Informal Evaluation.” English in Aotearoa 11: 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2006. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thrupp, M., and A. Easter. 2012. Research, Analysis and Insight into National Standards (RAINS) Project. First Report: Researching Schools’ Enactments of New Zealand’s National Standards Policy. Report commissioned by the New Zealand Educational Institute Te Rui Roa (NZEI). Wellington: NZEI.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., and M. Barr. 2004. “Fostering Student Learning: The Relationship of Collective Teacher Efficacy and Student Achievement.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 3 (3): 189–209.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, D., and F. Murphy. 2012. “Teaching Causal Text Connectives in Chemistry.” NZ Science Teacher 129: 36–38.
   Google Scholar
• Whitney, A. 2008. “Teacher Transformation in the National Writing Project.” Research in the Teaching of English 43 (2): 144–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D., and A. Lieberman. 2000. “Teachers as Authors: The National Writing Project’s Approach to Professional Development.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 3 (3): 255–273.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 1989. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar