Co-teaching/co-generative dialogues in a teaching education program as room for agency and new forms of participation: ‘I found Jesus in [writing] the paper’

References

• Balli, S. J. 2009. Making a Difference in the Classroom. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Beijaard, D., P. C. Meijer, and N. Verloop. 2004. “Reconsidering Research on Teachers’ Professional Identity.” Teaching and Teacher Education 20: 107–128.10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carambo, C., and C. T. Stickney. 2009. “Coteaching Praxis and Professional Service: Facilitating the Transition of Beliefs and Practices.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 4: 433–441.10.1007/s11422-008-9148-3
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. 2007. “Relational Agency in Professional Practice: A CHAT Analysis.” International Journal of Human Activity Theory 1: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., and C. D’Arcy. 2004. “Relational Agency and Disposition in Sociocultural Accounts of Learning to Teach.” Educational Review 56: 147–155.10.1080/0031910410001693236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., and L. Protheroe. 2003. “Learning to See in Classrooms: What Are Student Teachers Learning About Teaching and Learning While Learning to Teach in Schools?” British Educational Research Journal 29: 227–242.10.1080/0141192032000060957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Kadri, M. S. 2014. “English Language Teachers’ Changing Identities in a Teaching Practicum: PIBID and {Coteaching|Cogenerative Dialogue} as Opportunities for Professional Learning.” PhD diss., Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina.
   Google Scholar
• El Kadri, M. S., and W.-M. Roth. 2013. “‘I Am a Pibidiana’: Societal Relations as the Locus of Sustained Development in a Teacher Education Program in Brazil.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 38: 89–114. http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol38/iss5/7.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2005. “Knotworking to Create Collaborative Intentionality Capital in Fluid Organizational Fields.” In Collaborative Capital: Creating Intangible Value, edited by M. M. Beyerlein, S. T. Beyerlein, and F. A. Kennedy, 307–336. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., and R. B. Faux. 2006. “Towards Productive Disciplinary Engagement of Prospective Teachers in Educational Psychology: Comparing Two Methods of Case-Based Instruction.” Teaching Educational Psychology 1: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Goulart, M. I. M., and W.-M. Roth. 2006. “Margin | Center: Toward a Dialectic View of Participation.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 38: 679–700.10.1080/00220270600692936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. 2006. “Authoritative, Accountable Positioning and Connected, General Knowing: Progressive Themes in Understanding Transfer.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 15: 537–547.10.1207/s15327809jls1504_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 1977. Sein und Zeit [Being and Time]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Holzkamp, K. 1983a. “Der Mensch als Subjekt wissenschaftlicher Methodik [Man as Subject of Scientific Method].” In Karl Marx und die Wissenschaft vom Individuum, edited by K.-H. Braun, W. Hollitscher, K. Holzkamp, and K. Wetzel, 120–166. Marburg: Verlag Arbeiterbewegung und Gesellschaftswissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Holzkamp, K. 1983b. Grundlegung der Psychologie [Founding/Foundation of Psychology]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Holzkamp, K. 1985. “Grundkonzepte der Kritischen Psychologie [Foundational Concepts of Critical Psychology].” In Wi(e)der die Anpassung. Texte der Kritischen Psychologie zu Schule und Erziehung, edited by AG Gewerkschaftliche Schulung und Soltau Lehrerfortbildung, 13–19. Soltau: Herman Schulze Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Holzkamp-Osterkamp, U. 1975. Grundlagen der psychologischen Motivationsforschung 1 [Foundations of Psychological Motivation Research Vol. 1]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Holzkamp-Osterkamp, U. 1976. Grundlagen der psychologischen Motivationsforschung 2 [Foundations of Psychological Motivation Research Vol. 2]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. E. 2006. “The Sociocultural Turn and Its Challenges for Second Language Teacher Education.” Tesol Quarterly 40 (1): 235–256.10.2307/40264518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., and A. Henderson. 1995. “Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 4: 39–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketelaar, E., D. Beijaard, H. P. A. Boshuizen, and P. J. Den Brok. 2012. “Teachers’ Positioning Towards an Educational Innovation in the Light of Ownership, Sense-Making and Agency.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28: 273–282.10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasky, S. 2005. “A Sociocultural Approach to Understanding Teacher Identity, Agency and Professional Vulnerability in a Context of Secondary School Reform.” Teaching and Teacher Education 21: 899–916.10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Lipponen, L., and K. Kumpulainen. 2011. “Acting as Accountable Authors: Creating Interactional Spaces for Agency Work in Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27: 812–819.10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. 2004. “Finding Balance: Impact of Classroom Management Conceptions on Developing Teacher Practice.” Teaching and Teacher Education 20: 405–422.10.1016/j.tate.2004.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K./Engels, F. 1958. Werke Band 3 [Works Vol. 3]. Berlin: Dietz.
   Google Scholar
• Matusov, E. 2001. “Intersubjectivity as a Way of Informing Teaching Design for a Community of Learners’ Classroom.” Teaching and Teacher Education 17: 383–402.10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00002-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. 2002. “Gesture and Language Dialectic.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 34: 7–37.10.1080/03740463.2002.10414607
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, B. 2010. “Fostering Conceptual Roles for Change: Identity and Agency in ESEA Teacher Preparation.” Kritika Kultura 15: 34–55.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, A. 2008. “Choosing Teachers: Exploring Agency and Structure in the Distribution of Newly Qualified Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 674–683.10.1016/j.tate.2007.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J., and S. Graham. 2008. “Agency and Conformity in School-based Teacher Training.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 1401–1412.10.1016/j.tate.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. 2005. Doing Qualitative Research: Praxis of Methods. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. 2006. “Collective Responsibility and the Other.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 1: 607–614.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. 2011. Passibility: At the Limits of the Constructivist Metaphor. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-1908-8
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., S. Hwang, Y.-J. Lee, and M. I. M. Goulart. 2005. Participation, Learning, and Identity: Dialectical Perspectives. Berlin: Lehmanns Media.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., D. Lawless, and K. Tobin. 2000. “Time to Teach: Towards a Praxeology of Teaching.” Canadian Journal of Education 25: 1–15.10.2307/1585864
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., D. Masciotra, and N. Boyd. 1999. “Becoming-in-the-Classroom: A Case Study of Teacher Development Through Coteaching.” Teaching and Teacher Education 17: 771–784.10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00027-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., and L. Radford. 2011. A Cultural-Historical Perspective on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6091-564-2
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., K. Tobin, C. Carambo, and C. Dalland. 2004. “Coteaching: Creating Resources for Learning and Learning to Teach Chemistry in Urban High Schools.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41: 882–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., K. Tobin, A. Zimmerman, N. Bryant, and C. Davis. 2002. “Lesson on and from the Dihybrid Cross: An Activity Theoretical Study of Learning in Coteaching.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39: 253–282.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino, A. 2010. “Teachers’ Talk of Experiencing: Conflict, Resistance and Agency.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26: 838–844.10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scantlebury, K., J. Gallo-Fox, and B. Wassell. 2008. “Coteaching as a Model for Preservice Secondary Science Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 967–981.10.1016/j.tate.2007.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. 1990. Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stith, I., and W.-M. Roth. 2008. Students in Action: Cogenerative Dialogues from Secondary to Elementary Schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stith, I., and W.-M. Roth. 2010. “Teaching as Mediation: The Cogenerative Dialogue and Ethical Understandings.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26: 363–370.10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoughton, E. H. 2007. “‘How Will I Get Them to Behave?’: Pre Service Teachers Reflect on Classroom Management.” Teaching and Teacher Education 23: 1024–1037.10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 1995. “Making Work Visible.” Communications of the ACM 38 (9): 56–64.10.1145/223248.223263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, K., and W.-M. Roth. 2006. Teaching to Learn: A View from the Field. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotskij, L. S. 2005. Psyxhologija razvitija čeloveka [Psychology of Human Development]. Moscow: Eksmo.
   Google Scholar
• Wassell, B. A., and S. K. Lavan. 2009. “Tough Transitions? Mediating Beginning Urban Teachers’ Practices Through Coteaching.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 4: 409–432.10.1007/s11422-008-9151-8
   Google Scholar