Using practitioner inquiry within and against large-scale educational reform

References

• Allen, A. 1997. “Creating Space for Discussions about Social Justice and Equity in an Elementary Classroom.” Language Arts 74 (7): 518–524.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. 2002. Big Brother and National Reading Curriculum: How Ideology Trumped Evidence. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Altwerger, B., P. Arya, L. Jin, N. L. Jordan, B. Laster, P. Martens, P. Wilson, and N. Wiltz. 2004. “When Research and Mandates Collide: The Challenges and Dilemmas of Teacher Education in the Era of NCLB.” English Education 35 (2): 119–133.
   Google Scholar
• Assaf, L. C. 2008. “The Professional Identity of a Reading Teacher: Responding to High Stakes Assessment Teachers and Teaching.” Theory and Practice 14 (3): 239–252.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review 84: 191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1993. “Perceived Self-efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning.” Educational Psychologist 28 (2): 117–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracey, G. W., ed. 2005. “Social Justice Implications of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.” Special issue of Equity and Excellence in Education 38 (3): 180–189.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, E. 2002. “Action Research for School Improvement.” Educational Leadership 59 (6): 18–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campano, G. 2007. Immigrant Students and Literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caro-Bruce, C., R. Flessner, M. Klehr, and K. Zeichner, eds. 2007. Creating Equitable Classrooms through Action Research. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Center for American Progress. 2009. “Ensuring Effective Teachers for All Students.” Accessed January 13, 2014. http://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2009/05/pdf/teacher_effectiveness.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practice Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. Lytle. 2006. “Troubling Images of No Child Left Behind.” Harvard Educational Review 76 (4): 688–697.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. Lytle. 2009. Inquiry as Stance: Practitioner Research in the Next Generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, G. 2000. Misreading Reading: The Bad Science that Hurts Children. New York: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. W. 2006. “Understanding Mixed Methods Research.” In Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, edited by J. W. Cresswell and V. Plano-Clark, 1–19. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among the Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Deemer, S. A., and K. M. Minke. 1999. “An Investigation of the Factor Structure of the Teacher Efficacy Scale.” Journal of Educational Research 93 (1): 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelsky, C., ed. 1999. Making Justice our Project: Teachers Working Toward Critical Whole Language Practice. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischer, C. 2000. Teachers Organizing for Change: Making Literacy Learning Everybody’s Business. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Gamse, B. C., R. T. Jacob, M. Horst, B. Boulay, and F. Unlu. 2008. Reading First Impact Study Final Report. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Science. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Garan, E. M. 2000. “Beyond the Smoke and Mirrors: The National Reading Panel’s Report.” Phi Delta Kappan 81: 500–506.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2000. “The Limits of Reframing: A Response to Professor Snow.” Journal of Literacy Research 32: 121–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2003. What Video Games Have to Teach us about Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2007. Good Video Games + Good Learning: Collected Essays on Video Games, Learning and Literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. 1998. Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley: The Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D. 2001. “Collective Efficacy: A Neglected Construct in the Study of Schools and Student Achievement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (3): 467–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D., and Y. L. Goddard. 2001. “A Multilevel Analysis of Teacher and Collective Efficacy.” Teaching and Teacher Education 17: 807–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, Y. 1978. “Kidwatching: An Alternative to Testing.” Journal of the National Elementary School Principals 57 (4): 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Guisbond, L., and M. Neill. 2004. “Failing our Children: No Child Left Behind Undermines Quality and Equity in Education.” The Clearing House 78: 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, S. 1994. Teacher Research and Urban Literacy Education: Lessons and Conversations in a Feminist Key. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, S., and M. Gallego. 2007. “Editorial Team’s Introduction: Special Issue on No Child Left Behind.” American Educational Research Journal 4: 454–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holme, J. J., and V. S. Rangel. 2012. “Putting School Reform in its Place: Social Geography, Organizational Social Capital, and School Performance.” American Educational Research Journal 49 (2): 257–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamii, C., and M. Manning. 2005. “Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS): A Tool for Evaluating Student Learning?” Journal of Research in Childhood Education 20 (2): 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., and M. Knobel. 2006. New Literacies: Changing Knowledge and Classroom Learning. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., and B. Fabos. 2005. “Instant Messaging, Literacies, and Social Identities.” Reading Research Quarterly 40 (4): 470–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. 2011. “Options in Educational Decision Making.” Ezine Articles. Accessed November 9, 2012. http://ezinearticles.com/?options-in-educational-decision-making&id=6529991
   Google Scholar
• Lofty, J. S. 2003. “Standards and the Politics of Time and Teacher Professionalism.” English Education 35 (3): 195–222.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. 2010. “Australia: The Challenges of Poverty, Pedagogy, and Pathways.” In Balancing Change and Tradition in Global Education Reform, edited by I. C. Rotberg, 339–347. 2nd ed. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Manzo, K. 2007. “Emails Reveal Federal Reach over Reading.” Education Week 26 (24): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Minichiello, V., R. Aroni, E. Timewell, and L. Alexander. 1990. In-depth Interviewing: Researching People. Hong Kong: Longman Cheshire.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C., C. Amanti, D. Neff, and N. Gonzalez. 1992. “Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect Homes and Classrooms.” Theory into Practice 31 (2): 132–141.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. 2000. Teaching Children to Read an Evidence-based Assessment of the Scientific Literature on Reading and its Implications for Reading Instruction: Reports of the Subgroup. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. 2002. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, B., and D. Sexton. 2009. “Threat Rigidity, School Reform, and How Teachers View their Work Inside Current Education Policy Contexts.” American Educational Research Journal 46 (1): 9–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouge, E. C., J. Hansen, P. Muller, and R. Chien. 2008. Evaluation of Indiana Reading First Program. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Evaluation and Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Sagor, R. 2000. Guiding School Improvement with Action Research. Alexandria: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Sagor, R. 2011. The Action Research Guidebook: A Four-Stage Process for Educators and School Teams. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. 2001. “Critical Conversations in Difficult Times.” English Education 33 (2): 153–165.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, L. P. 2003. “Reading First: A Critical Policy Analysis.” Reading Teacher 56 (7): 662–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, V. 2012. A World-class Education: Learning from International Models of Excellence and Innovation. Alexandria: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 2003. “What’s New in New Literacy Studies?” Current Issues in Comparative Education 5 (2): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., and D. Johnson. 2011. “Exploring Literacy Teachers’ Self-efficacy Beliefs: Potential Sources at Play.” Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies 27 (4): 751–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., and A. Woolfolk Hoy. 2001. “Teacher Efficacy: Capturing an Elusive Construct.” Teaching and Teacher Education 17 (7): 783–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., A. Woolfolk Hoy, and W. K. Hoy. 1998. “Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning and Measure.” Review of Research in Education 68 (2): 202–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valli, L., and D. Buese. 2007. “The Changing Roles of Teachers in the Era of High Stakes Accountability.” American Educational Research Journal 44 (3): 519–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. 1990. Basic Content Analysis. Newbury, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, J. S., and J. H. Sandholtz. 2009. “Constrained Professionalism: Dilemmas of Teaching in the Face of Test-based Accountability.” Teachers College Record 111 (4): 1065–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. 2009. Teacher Education and the Struggle for Social Justice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar