Messy but meaningful: exploring the transition to reform-based pedagogy with teachers of mathematics and coordinators in Ontario, Canada

References

• Abrahamson, E. 2004. Change without Pain. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrows, H., and R. Tamblyn. 1980. Problem-based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. 2004. “10 Big Math Ideas.” Instructor 113 (7): 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Consortium of Ontario School Boards. 2005. Targeted Implementation and Planning Supports for Revised Mathematics. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Delisle, R. 1997. How to Use Problem-based Learning in the Classroom. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, S., and M. Hammer. 2006. “Laura's Story: Using Problem Based Learning in Early Childhood and Primary Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 22 (4): 465–477.10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, M., and A. Kitsantas. 2013. “Supporting Student Self-regulated Learning in Problem- and Project-based Learning.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning 7 (2): 128–150.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, T., and L. Peng. 2008. “Mobile Math: Math Educators and Students Engage in Mobile Learning.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 20: 69–80.10.1007/s12528-008-9005-0
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2013. “Great to Excellent: Launching the Next Stage of Ontario’s Education Agenda.” Accessed October 8, 2015. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/reports/fullan.html
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, D. H. 2006. “Tracking the TIPS Mathematics Document: Curriculum Negotiation and Professional Development Models.” Doctor of Philosophy (Education Studies) diss., The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, D. H. 2008. “Thinking outside the Rectangular Prism: Fostering Problem-based Mathematics Learning.” Ontario Mathematics Gazette 47 (2): 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, D. H. 2012. “RE4MUL8: Creating an Online and Mobile Technology Support for Grade 7–8 Teachers of Mathematics.” Ontario Mathematics Gazette 51 (2): 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, D. H., and D. Franks. 2011. “‘Messy Time’ Transition to Reform-based Mathematics Teaching and Learning.” Ontario Mathematics Gazette 44 (9): 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, D. H. and D. Franks. 2012. “Interactive Notes and Self-differentied Instruction: Findings from a Case Study Involving the Use of Mobile Technologies in Grade 9 Mathematics Education.” In Technology in Mathematics Education: Contemporary Issues, edited by D. Martinovic, Z. Karadag, and D. McDougall, 25–66. Santa Rosa: Informing Science Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, D. H., J. Mgombelo, and D. Franks. 2012. “Problem-based Mathematics as a Content Area for Collaborative Action Research.” In Teachers Learning Together: Lessons from Collaborative Action Research in Practice, edited by Ruth Dawson, 81–94. Toronto: Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., and L. Christensen. 2012. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Keengwe, J., D. Pearson, and K. Smart. 2009. “Technology Integration: Mobile Devices (IPods), Constructivist Pedagogy, and Student Learning.” Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal 17 (4): 333–346.
   Google Scholar
• MacMath, S., J. Wallace, and X. Chi. 2009. “Problem-based Learning in Mathematics: A Tool for Developing Students’ Conceptual Knowledge.” What Works? Research into Practice Series 22: 1–4. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/research/WW_problem_based_math.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. 2005a. The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 1–8: Mathematics, Revised. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. 2005b. The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 9 and 10: Mathematics, Revised. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. 2007. The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 11 & 12: Mathematics, Revised. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. 1998. “Does Easy Do It? Children, Games, and Learning.” Game Developer Jun.: 88–89.
   Google Scholar
• Pearsall, J., ed. 2001. New Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pourshafie, T., and R. Murray-Harvey. 2013. “Facilitating Problem-based Learning in Teacher Education: Getting the Challenge Right.” Journal of Education for Teaching 39 (2): 169–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. 2001. “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants.” On the Horizon 9 (5): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Shuler, C. 2009. Pockets of Potential: Using Mobile Technologies to Promote Children’s Learning. New York: Cooney Center Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Small, M. 2013. Making Math Meaningful to Canadian Students, K-8. 2nd ed. Toronto: Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Suurtamm, C., and B. Graves. 2007. Curriculum Implementation in Intermediate Math Research Report: Executive Summary. Ottawa: University of Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, J., and S. Folk. 2008. Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally. 2nd Canadian ed. Toronto: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar