Contribution of mathematics in-service training course to the professional development of elementary school teachers in Israel

References

• ACME. 2006. “Ensuring Effective Continuing Professional Development for Teachers of Mathematics in Primary Schools.” The Royal Society. Accessed April 2, 2012. www.acme-uk.org
   Google Scholar
• AFT. 2002. “Principles for Professional Development, AFT’s Guidelines for Creating Professional Development Programs that Make a Difference.” American Federation of Teachers. Accessed May 23, 2012. http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/downloads/teachers/PRINCIPLES.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Robin, Jim Rose, and Chris Woodhead. 1992. Curriculum Organisation and Classroom Practice in Primary Schools. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Deborah Loewenberg, Heather C. Hill, and Hyman Bass. 2005. “Knowing Mathematics for Teaching: Who Knows Mathematics Well Enough to Teach Third Grade, and How Can We Decide?” American Educator 29 (1): 14–17, 20–22, 43–46.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, Hilda. 2004. “Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain.” Educational Researcher 33 (8): 3–15.10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Chaney, Bradford. 1995. “Student Outcomes and the Professional Preparation of Eight-Grade Teachers in Science and Mathematics.” NSF/NELS: 88, Teacher Transcript Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, Marilyn. 2003. “Teaching Quality Matters.” Journal of Teacher Education 54 (2): 95–98.10.1177/0022487102250283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtney, Jane M. 2007. “What are Effective Components of In‐service Teacher Training? A Study Examining Teacher Trainers’ Perceptions of the Components of a Training Programme in Mathematics Education in Cambodia.” Journal of In-Service Education 33 (3): 321–339.10.1080/13674580701486978
   Google Scholar
• CSMTP (Committee on Science and Mathematics Teacher Preparation) 2002. “Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices for the New Millennium.” Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Accessed May 7, 2012. http://fermat.nap.edu/catalog/9832.html
   Google Scholar
• Day, Christopher, Pam Sammos, Gordon Stobart, Alison Kington, and Qing Gu. 2007. Teachers Matter: Connecting Work, Lives and Effectiveness. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, Christopher, and Ruth Leith. 2007. “The Continuing Professional Development of Teachers: Issues of Coherence, Cohesion and Effectiveness.” In International Handbook of School Effectiveness and Improvement, edited by Tony Townsend, 707–726. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-5747-2
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, Michael. 2007. The New Meaning of Educational Change. 4th ed. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, Patrick, Trevor Williams, Leslie Jocelyn, Stephen Roey, David Kastberg, and Summer Brenwald. 2009. “Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and Science Achievement of U.S. Fourth and Eighth-Grade Students in an International Context”. IES, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed May 8, 2012. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, Thomas R. 1995. “Professional Development in Education: In Search of the Optimal Mix.” In Professional Development Education: New Paradigms and Practices, edited by Thomas R. Guskey and Michael Huberman, 114–131. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, Thomas R. 2002. “Professional Development and Teacher Change.” Teachers and Teaching 8 (3): 381–391.10.1080/135406002100000512
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, James, and Douglas A. Grouws. 2007. “The Effect of Classroom Mathematics Teaching on Students’ Learning.” In Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by Frank K. Lester Jr., 371–404. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover Thames, Mark. 2006. “Mathematicians and Educators Investigate the Mathematics Needed for Teaching (K–8).” Critical Issues in Mathematics Education Series 2. Berkeley: Mathematical Sciences Research Institute. Accessed January 1, 2012. http://www.msri.org/attachments/workshops/318/612msriThames.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Mary M. 1991. “Agenda for Research on Teacher Learning.” NCTM Special Report. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Liping. 1999. Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers’ Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport. 2006. Mathematics Curriculum for 1st–6th Grades in All Sectors. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport, Curricula Department [in Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012. PISA 2012 Results. OECD Directorate for Education. Accessed December 11, 2013. www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa/2012
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted (The Office for Standards in Education) 1994. Science and Mathematics in Schools: A Review. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, Margo. 2004. “The Reconceptualisation of Learner-centred Approaches: A Namibian Case Study.” International Journal of Educational Development 24 (6): 585–602.10.1016/S0738-0593(03)00018-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Yehoshua. 2011. What Should Those Engaged in Mathematics Teaching Know? Jerusalem: Report of the Israeli National Academy of Science [in Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, Tim, Sarah Martyn, Patti Barber, and Caroline Heal. 2000. “Primary Teacher Trainees’ Mathematics Subject Knowledge and Classroom Performance.” In Research in Mathematics Education Volume 2: Papers of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, edited by Tim Rowland and Candia Morgan, 3–18. London: BSRLM.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, Lee S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14.10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, Lee S. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57: 1–23.10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, James W., and James Hiebert. 1999. The Teaching Gap. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, Andrew J., and Peter Youngs. 2003. “Teacher Characteristics and Student Achievement Gains: A Review.” Review of Educational Research 73 (1): 89–122.10.3102/00346543073001089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemer, Efrat. 2009. “School Effectiveness and Growth Indices 2009: Moderate Increase of Scores but Still Low.” Maariv, November 24. Accessed April 25, 2012. http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART1/970/499.html [in Hebrew]
   Google Scholar
• Zuzovsky, Ruth. 2001. Attainments of 8th Graders in Israel in the TIMSS-1999 Test in Mathematics. Tel-Aviv: Tel Aviv University, Ramot Publishing [in Hebrew].
   Google Scholar