Supporting university content specialists in providing effective professional development: the educative role of evaluation

References

• Abell, Sandra K. 1997. “The Professional Development of Science Teacher Educators: Is There a Missing Piece?” Electronic Journal of Science Education 1 (4). http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7567/5334
   Google Scholar
• Abell, Sandra K., Meredith A. Park Rogers, Deborah L. Hanuscin, Michele H. Lee, and Mark J. Gagnon. 2009. “Preparing the Next Generation of Science Teacher Educators: A Model for Developing PCK for Teaching Science Teachers.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 20 (1): 77–93.10.1007/s10972-008-9115-6
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, Fran, James Nolan, Kelly Parks, and Rebecca Burns. 2012. “The Practices and Knowledge of School-Based Teacher Education Practitioners.” In Placing Practitioner Knowledge at the Center of Teacher Education: Rethinking the Policy and Practice of the Education Doctorate, edited by Margaret Macintyre Latta and Susan Wunder, 105–123. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, Roger W. 1997. Achieving Scientific Literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, Thomas R. 2000. Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, Pam, Felix Maringe, and Mary Ratcliffe. 2008. “Evaluation of Professional Development: Deploying a Process‐Focused Model.” International Journal of Science Education 30: 711–725.10.1080/09500690701854899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, Heather C., Deborah Loewenberg Ball, and Stephen G. Schilling. 2008. “Unpacking Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Conceptualizing and Measuring Teachers’ Topic-Specific Knowledge of Students.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 39 (4): 372–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lannin, John K., Matthew Webb, Kathryn B. Chval, Fran Arbaugh, Sarah Hicks, Cynthia Taylor, and Rebecca Bruton. 2013. “The Development of Beginning Mathematics Teacher Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 16 (6): 403–426. doi:10.1007/s10857-013-9244-5.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, Susan, Nancy Love, Katherine E. Stiles, Susan Mundry, and Peter W. Hewson. 2010. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, John. 2006. Developing a Pedagogy of Teacher Education: Understanding Teaching and Learning about Teaching. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, Shirley, Joseph Krajcik, and Hilda Borko. 1999. “Nature, Sources, and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teaching.” In Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge, edited by Julie Gess-Newsome and Norman G. Lederman, 95–132. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marra, Rose M., Fran Arbaugh, John K. Lannin, Sandra K. Abell, Mark Ehlert, Rena Smith, and Meredith Park Rogers. 2011. “Orientations to Professional Development Design and Implementation: Understanding Their Relationship To PD Outcomes Across Multiple Projects.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9 (4): 793–816. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9223-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merle-Johnson, Dominike, Ya-Wen Cheng, Rose Marra, and Anna Waldron. 2012. “Teacher Professional Development Delivery and Its Impact on Higher Education Faculty and Their Institutions.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Indianapolis, March 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. 2010. Common Core State Standards (Mathematics). Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park Rogers, Meredith A., Sandra K. Abell, Rose M. Marra, Fran Arbaugh, Kristen Hutchins, and James S. Cole. 2010. “Orientations to Science Teacher Professional Development: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 21 (3): 309–328. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9179-y.
   Google Scholar
• Patten, Mildred L. 2007. Understanding Research Methods: An Overview of the Essentials. Glendale: Pyrczak Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, Janine T. 2005. “Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula.” Review of Educational Research 75 (2): 211–246.10.3102/00346543075002211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, Rebecca M., Joseph Krajcik, and Phyllis Blumenfeld. 2005. “Enacting Reform-Based Science Materials: The Range of Teacher Enactments in Reform Classrooms.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (3): 283–312.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, Dwight A., and William S. Carlsen. 2009. “Scientists’ Teaching Orientations in the Context of Teacher Professional Development.” Science Education 93: 635–655.10.1002/sce.v93:4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, Mary K., Margaret S. Smith, and Edward A. Silver. 1999. “The Development of Professional Developers: Learning to Assist Teachers in New Settings in New Ways.” Harvard Educational Review 69 (3): 237–270.10.17763/haer.69.3.h2267130727v6878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zoest, Laura R., D. L. Moore, and S. L Stockero. 2006. “Transition to Teacher Educator: A Collaborative Effort.” In The Work of Mathematics Teacher Educators: Continuing the Conversation, edited by Kathleen Lynch-Davis and Robin Rider, 133–148. San Diego: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, Edwin K. P., and Alexander S. Yeung. 2002. “Evaluation of Teacher Development Programs: Participant Satisfaction and Recommendation.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 29: 57–66.10.1016/S0191-491X(03)90005-8
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert K. 2013. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar