Integrating evidence-based reading practices into middle-school content instruction: exploring a facet of sustainability

References

• Alfassi, M. 2004. “Reading to Learn: Effects of Combined Strategy Instruction on High School Students.” The Journal of Educational Research 97 (4): 171–185. doi:10.3200/JOER.97.4.171-185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierman, K. L., R. M. Sanford DeRousie, B. Heinrichs, C. E. Domitrovich, M. Greenberg, and S. Gill. 2013. “Sustaining High-Quality Teaching and Evidence-Based Curricula: Follow-Up Assessment of Teachers in the REDI Project.” Early Education & Development 24 (8): 1194–1213. doi:10.1080/10409289.2013.755457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, A. G., P. Buckley, S. Vaughn, G. Roberts, K. Scornavacco, and J. K. Klingner. 2016. “Relationship between Implementation of Collaborative Strategic Reading and Student Outcomes for Adolescents with Disabilities.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 49 (6): 644–657. doi:10.1177/0022219416640784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, P., B. Moore, A. Boardman, D. Arya, and A. Maul. 2017. “Validating a Fidelity Scale to Understand Intervention Effects in Classroom-Based Studies.” American Educational Research Journal 54 (6): 1378–1413. doi:10.3102/00283121776522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. 2003. “Rethinking Scale: Moving beyond Numbers to Deep and Lasting Change.” Educational Researcher 32 (6): 3–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X032006003.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., J. L. Russell, J. H. Kaufman, and M. K. Stein. 2012. “Supporting Sustainability: Teachers’ Advice Networks and Ambitious Instructional Reform.” American Journal of Education 119 (1): 137–182. doi:10.1086/667699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Durlak, J. A., and E. P. DuPre. 2008. “Implementation Matters: A Review of Research on the Influence of Implementation on Program Outcomes and the Factors Affecting Implementation.” American Journal of Community Psychology 41 (3–4): 327–350. doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehn, B., and K. E. Koeppen. 1998. “Intensive Document-Based Instruction in a Social Studies Methods Course and Student Teachers’ Attitudes and Practice in Subsequent Field Experiences.” Theory & Research in Social Education 26 (4): 461–484. doi:10.1080/00933104.1998.10505861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, B., W. R. Penuel, S. Hegedus, and J. Roschelle. 2011. “What Happens When the Research Ends? Factors Related to the Sustainability of a Technology-Infused Mathematics Curriculum.” Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 30 (4): 329–353.
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., and L. C. Moats. 2004. “Conditions for Sustaining Research-Based Practices in Early Reading Instruction.” Remedial and Special Education 25 (1): 51–60. doi:10.1177/07419325040250010601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 2012. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. L., P. Smagorinsky, and S. Valencia. 1999. Appropriating Conceptual and Pedagogical Tools for Teaching English: A Conceptual Framework for Studying Professional Development. Albany, NY: National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., and W. R. Penuel. 2014. “Relevance to Practice as a Criterion for Rigor.” Educational Researcher 43 (1): 19–23. doi:10.3102/0013189X13520289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harn, B., D. Parisi, and M. Stoolmiller. 2013. “Balancing Fidelity with Flexibility and Fit: What Do We Really Know about Fidelity of Implementation in Schools?” Exceptional Children 79 (2): 181–193. doi:10.1177/001440291307900204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchman, K. A., and D. W. Moore. 2013. “Close Reading: A Cautionary Interpretation.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 56 (6): 441–450. doi:10.1002/JAAL.163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. K., A. G. Boardman, and K. L. McMaster. 2013. “What Does It Take to Scale up and Sustain Evidence-Based Practices?” Exceptional Children 79 (2): 195–211. doi:10.1177/001440291307900205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. K., S. Vaughn, A. Boardman, and E. Swanson. 2012. Now We Get It! Boosting Comprehension with Collaborative Strategic Reading. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• LeCompte, M. D., and J. J. Schensul. 2010. Designing and Conducting Ethnographic Research: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leont‘ev, A. N. 1974. “The Problem of Activity in Psychology.” Soviet Psychology 13 (2): 4–33. doi:10.2753/RPO1061-040513024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leont‘ev, A. N. 1981. Problems of the Development of Mind. Moscow: Progress.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C. L. 2008. “Defining, Conceptualizing, and Measuring Fidelity of Implementation and Its Relationship to Outcomes in K–12 Curriculum Intervention Research.” Review of Educational Research 78 (1): 33–84. doi:10.3102/0034654307313793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, R., and L. Elder. 2008. How to Read a Paragraph: The Art of Close Reading. Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. 2012. “Reading like A Historian: A Document-Based History Curriculum Intervention in Urban High Schools.” Cognition and Instruction 30 (1): 86–112. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.634081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. 1990. “Significant and Worthwhile Change in Teaching Practice.” Educational Researcher 19 (7): 10–18. doi:10.3102/0013189X019007010.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, G., S. Vaughn, S. N. Veretvas, and V. Wong. 2016. Treatment Fidelity in Studies of Educational Intervention. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M., and Y. J. Lee. 2007. “‘Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy’: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory.” Review of Educational Research 77 (2): 186–232. doi:10.3102/0034654306298273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenbach, R., and C. Greenleaf. 2009. “Fostering Adolescents’ Engaged Academic Literacy.” In Handbook of Adolescent Literacy Research, edited by L. Christenbury, R. Bomer, and P. Smagorinsky, 98–112. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., and C. Shanahan. 2008. “Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents: Rethinking Content-Area Literacy.” Harvard Educational Review 78 (1): 40–59. doi:10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, E., J. Wanzek, L. McCulley, S. Stillman-Spisak, S. Vaughn, D. Simmons, M. Fogarty, and A. Hairrell. 2015. “Literacy and Text Reading in Middle and High School Social Studies and English Language Arts Classrooms.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 32 (3): 1–24. doi:10.1080/10573569.910718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., D. D. Houston, L. M. Rissman, S. M. Decker, G. Roberts, S. Vaughn, J. Wexler, D. J. Francis, M. O. Rivera, and N. Lesaux. 2007. Academic Literacy Instruction for Adolescents: A Guidance Document from the Center on Instruction. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., G. Roberts, J. K. Klingner, E. A. Swanson, A. Boardman, S. J. Stillman-Spisak, S. S. Mohammed, and A. J. Leroux. 2013. “Collaborative Strategic Reading: Findings from Experienced Implementers.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 6 (2): 137–163. doi:10.1080/19345747.2012.741661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1986. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar