Prospective teachers’ professional skill needs: a Q method analysis

References

• Adıgüzel, A. 2017. “The Relationship between Teacher Candidates’ Pedagogical Competence Perceptions and Their Attitudes about Teaching Profession.” Turkish Journal of Education 6 (3): 113–128. doi:10.19128/turje.296481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AITSL (Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership). 2011. “Australian Professional Standards for Teachers.” Accessed 2 September 2019. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/national-policy-framework/australianprofessional-standards-for-teachers.pdf?sfvrsn=5800f33c_64
   Google Scholar
• Akay, E., and H. Gurgur. 2018. “Professional Development of a Teacher Providing Special Education Support Service: Mentoring.” Journal of Qualitative Research in Education 6 (1): 9–36. doi:10.14689/.2148-2624.1.6c1s1m.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, J., and J. G. Coggshall. 2009. Teaching as a Clinical Practice Profession: Implications for Teacher Preparation and State Policy. New York: New York Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., and V. Lavy. 2001. “Does Teachers Training Affect Pupil Learning? Evidence from Matched Comparisons in Jerusalem Public Schools.” Journal of Labor Economics 19 (2): 343–369. doi:10.1086/319564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakaç, E., and R. Özen. 2017. “Examining Preservice Teachers’ Material Design Self-Efficacy Beliefs Based on Their Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Competent.” Kirsehir Faculty of Education Journal 18 (2): 613–632.
   Google Scholar
• Bayındır, N., H. Çavdar, and M. Gökçe. 2016. “Pre-Teacher of the Expectations regarding Ideal Instructional Skills.” Usak University Journal of Social Sciences 9 (1): 79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. Wiliam. 2003. Assessment for Learning: Putting It into Practice. New York: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. 2004. “Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain.” Educational Researcher 33 (8): 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003.
   Google Scholar
• Bozhuisen, H., R. Bromme, and H. Gruber. 2004. Professional Learning: Gaps and Transitions on the Way from Novice to Expert. New York: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. 1993. “A Primer on Q Methodology.” Operant Subjectivity 16 (3/4): 91–138.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. 1996. “Q Methodology and Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Health Research 6 (4): 561–567. doi:10.1177/104973239600600408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakmak, M. 2011. “Changing Roles of Teachers: Prospective Teachers’ Thoughts.” Egitim Ve Bilim 36 (159): 14–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çapri, B., and Ö. Çelikkaleli. 2008. “Investigation of Pre-Service Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Teaching and Professional Self-Efficacy Beliefs according to Their Gender, Programs, and Faculties.” Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education 9 (15): 33–53.
   Google Scholar
• Çögmen, S., and N. Köksal. 2014. “University Facilities Supporting Pre-Service Teachers’ Professional Development.” Pamukkale University Journal of Education 35: 85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Döş, B. 2016. “Determining the Deficiencies of the Teachers in Terms of Professional Knowledge and Skills: A Qualitative Study.” Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education 17 (3): 41–52. doi:10.17679/iuefd.17351841.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, J., and J. Boyd. 1992. “Teachers as Leaders.” Primary Principal 2 (3): 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2006. Powerful Teacher Education: Lessons from Exemplary Programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dilci, T., and H. Yıldız. 2012. “Beliefs of Preservice Teachers upon Their Professional Competency.” The Journal of Social Sciences Research 1: 245–265.
   Google Scholar
• Doganay, A., M. Akbulut Taş, M. Yeşilpınar, E. Yolcu, B. Turhan Türkkan, M. Sarı, M. Karakuş et al. 2015. “Hizmet Öncesi Ögretmen Egitiminde Model Arayışı [Search for a New Model in Pre-Service Teacher Education].” International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction Studies 5 (9): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, R. M., and E. M. Hundert. 2002. “Defining and Assessing Professional Competence.” Journal of the American Medical Association 287 (2): 226–235. doi:10.1001/jama.287.2.226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eret Orhan, E. 2017. “What Do Teacher Candidates in Turkey Think about Their Teacher Education? A Qualitative Study.” Education and Science 42 (189): 197–2016. doi:10.15390/EB.207.4661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurydice. 2015. The Teaching Profession in Europe: Practices, Perceptions, and Policies. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Gokmenoglu, T., C. M. Clark, and E. Kiraz. 2016. “Professional Development Needs of Turkish Teachers in an Era of National Reforms.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 41 (1): 113–126. doi:10.14221/ajte.2016v41n1.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gökyer, N. 2012. “The Views of Teacher Candidates on the Handling of Classes during the Process of Their Pre-Service Education.” National Education 196 (3): 124–141.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, A. L., and C. Kosnik. 2013. “Quality Teacher Educators = Quality Teachers? Conceptualizing Essential Domains of Knowledge for Those Who Teach Teachers.” Teacher Development 17 (3): 334–346. doi:10.1080/13664530.2013.813766.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 2002. “Professional Development and Teacher Change.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 8 (3): 381–391. doi:10.1080/135406002100000512.
   Google Scholar
• Harju, V., and H. Niemi. 2020. “Newly Qualified Teachers’ Support Needs in Developing Professional Competences: The Principal’s Viewpoint.” Teacher Development 24 (1): 52–70. doi:10.1080/13664530.2019.1685588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgar, Ş. 2017. “An Investigation of the Awareness of Teacher Candidates about Children with Special Needs (I U Hasan Ali Yücel Faculty of Education Sample).” Journal of Hasan Ali Yücel Education Faculty 14 (27): 313–338.
   Google Scholar
• Kara, D. A., and M. Saglam. 2014. “Öğretmenlik Meslek Bilgisi Derslerinin Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecine Yönelik Yeterlikleri Kazandırması Yönünden Değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of Professional Teaching Knowledge Courses in Terms of Competencies Regarding the Learning and Teaching Process].” Journal of Qualitative Research in Education 2 (3): 28–86. doi:10.14689/.2148-2624.1.2c3s2m.
   Google Scholar
• Karaca, E. 2004. “Ögretmen Adaylarının Planlama Ve Ögretim Süreci Yeterliklerine Ilişkin Algıları [Perceptions of Teacher Candidates on Planning and Teaching Process Competencies].” Paper presented at the XIII. National Educational Sciences Congress, Malatya, Turkey, July 6 –9.
   Google Scholar
• Karasu, M., and M. Peker. 2019. “Q Method: History, Theory and Application.” Türk Psikoloji Yazilari 22 (43): 28–39. doi:10.31828/tpy1301996120181122m000003.
   Google Scholar
• Kavas, A. B., and A. Bugay. 2009. “Perceptions of Prospective Teachers about Deficiencies of Pre-Service Teacher Education and Suggestions.” Pamukkale University Journal of Education Faculty 25 (25): 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kazu, I. Y., and E. T. Yenen. 2015. “A Model of Teaching Practice in Teacher Education System.” Researcher: Social Science Studies 3 (2): 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kiraz, E. 2002. “Supervising Teachers’ Function in Professional Development of Teacher Candidates during Preservice Education.” Journal of Educational Sciences and Practices 1 (2): 183–196.
   Google Scholar
• Köksal, N. 2008. “Assessment of Generic Competences of Teaching Profession by Teacher, School Director and Consultants from the Ministry of National Education.” Pamukkale University Journal of Education Faculty 23 (23): 36–46.
   Google Scholar
• Kurt, H., and G. Ekici. 2013. “The Effect of the Educational Planning and Evaluation Lesson on Pre-Service Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Related to the Teaching Process.” Elementary Education Online 12 (4): 1157–1172.
   Google Scholar
• Leana-Taşçılar, M. Z. 2014. “The Contribution of Education to the Special Education Qualifications and Needs of Teacher Candidates.” Journal of Hasan Ali Yücel Education Faculty 11 (2): 135–155.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. B., J. J. Wheeler, and S. L. Carter. 2017. Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms. 9th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Mehmetlioglu, D. 2010. “Investigating the Readiness of Preservice Mathematics Teachers Towards Teaching Profession.” Unpublished Master Thesis. METU, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Mizell, H. 2008. “Self Efficacy and Professional Development.” Accessed 18 October 2018. https://learningforward.org/docs/default-source/pdf/mizellremarks12_08.pdf?sfvrsn=0
   Google Scholar
• Mizell, H. 2010. Why Professional Development Matters. Oxford, OH: Learning Forward.
   Google Scholar
• MoNE (Ministry of National Education). 2008. Öğretmen Yeterlikleri. Öğretmenlik Mesleği Genel Ve Özel Alan Yeterlikleri [The General and Specific Domain Competencies for Teaching Profession]. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü.
   Google Scholar
• MoNE (Ministry of National Education) 2017. “Ögretmenlik Meslegi Genel Yeterlikleri [The General Competencies for Teaching Profession].” Accessed 11 October 2018. http://oygm.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretmenlik-meslegi-genel-yeterlikleri/icerik/39
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2014. TALIS 2013 Results: An International Perspective on Teaching and Learning. Accessed 08 November 2018. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/talis-2013-results_9789264196261-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2009. “The Professional Development of Teachers.” Accessed 8 November 2018. https://www.oecd.org/berlin/43541636.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oral, B. 2003. “Ögretmenin Hizmet Öncesi Ve Hizmet Içi Egitimi [Teacher’s Pre-Service and In-Service Training].” Electronic Journal of Social Sciences 5: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Özdemir, S. M. 2008. “An Investigation of Prospective Primary Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs regarding Teaching Process in Terms of Certain Variables.” Educational Administration: Theory and Practice 54: 277–306.
   Google Scholar
• Özdemir, S. M., M. Ceylan, and S. N. Canoglu. 2015. “To What Extent Can Pre-Service Teachers Turn Theoretical Knowledge They Have Acquired into Practice?” International Online Journal of Educational Sciences 7 (2): 265–282.
   Google Scholar
• Sabancı, O., and K. Yazıcı. 2017. “Examining Pre-Service Teachers’ Efficacy Perceptions Towards Measurement and Evaluation.” Trakya University Journal of Education Faculty 7 (1): 128–153.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar Noguera, J., and K. McCluskey. 2017. “A Case Study of Early Career Secondary Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Preparedness for Teaching: Lessons from Australia and Spain.” Teacher Development 21 (1): 101–117. doi:10.1080/13664530.2016.1204353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savaş, A. C., I. Döş, B. Döş, and H. Demir. 2013. “Experiencing a Learning Organization: School Administrators Identify Causes of Teacher Ineffectiveness.” The Anthropologist 16 (1–2): 417–425. doi:10.1080/09720073.2013.11891367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seferoglu, S. S. 2005. “A Study on Teaching Competencies of Teacher Candidates.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Education, National University of Singapore, Singapore, December 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Şendag, S., and N. Gedik. 2015. “Teacher Training Problems of Turkey on the Threshold of Higher Education Transformation and a Support Model.” Educational Technology Theory and Practice 5 (1): 72–91.
   Google Scholar
• Senemoglu, N. 2011. “How Effective are Initial Primary Teacher Education Curricula in Turkey: Student Teacher Faculty and Teachers Let Us Know.” International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies 1 (1): 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–22. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenner, P., S. Watts, and M. Worrell. 2008. “Q Methodology.” In Qualitative Research in Psychology, edited by C. Willig and W. Stainton Rogers, 215–239. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, X., and H. Wang 2011. “Information Technology in Teacher’s Professional Skill Training Application.” Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), Singapore, August 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Tandogan, M. 1998. “Ögretmen Ve Teknoloji [Teacher and Techology].” In Çagdaş Egitimde Yeni Teknolojiler, edited by B. Özer, 15–24. Eskişehir: T. C. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Tok, Ş. 2010. “The Problems of Teacher Candidate'sabout Teaching Skills during Teaching Practice.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2): 4142–4146. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.654.
   Google Scholar
• Torff, B., and D. Sessions. 2009. “Principals’ Perceptions of the Causes of Teacher Ineffectiveness in Different Secondary Subjects.” Teacher Education Quarterly 36 (3): 127–148.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., and A. W. Hoy. 2001. “Teacher Efficacy: Capturing an Elusive Construct.” Teaching and Teacher Education 17 (7): 783–805. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üstüner, M. 2004. “Geçmişten Günümüze Türk Egitim Sisteminde Ögretmen Yetiştirme Ve Günümüz Sorunları [Teacher Training and Current Problems in the Turkish Education System from Past to Present].” Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education 5 (7): 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Education Association. 2009. Summary Report of Teacher Competencies: Investment in Teachers, Leap into the Future. Ankara: Turkish Education Association Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, T. 2014. “Teachers’ General Pedagogical/Psychological Knowledge: Conceptualization and Test Construction.” Accessed 24 November 2018. http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/Voss_OECD_Brussels_Symposium.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Voss, T., M. Kunter, and J. Baumert. 2011. “Assessing Teacher Candidates‘ General Pedagogical/Psychological Knowledge: Test Construction and Validation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 103 (4): 952–969. doi:10.1037/a0025125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, S., and P. Stenner. 2012. Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method & Interpretation. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Webler, T., S. Danielson, and S. Tuler. 2009. Using Q Method to Reveal Social Perspectives in Environmental Research. Greenfield, MA: Social and Environmental Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Yaralı, D. 2017. “The Analysis of Teacher Candidates’ Competency Perceptions toward Measurement and Assessment (Example of Kafkas University).” Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Education Faculty 17 (1): 487–504.
   Google Scholar
• Yavuz, M., T. Özkaral, and D. Yıldız. 2015. “The Teacher Competencies and Teacher Education in International Reports.” SDU International Journal of Educational Studies 2 (2): 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Yenen, E. T., and H. H. Kılınç. 2018. “Ögretmenlerin Ögretmenlik Meslegi Genel Yeterliklerine Sahip Olma Düzeylerinin Incelenmesi [Investigating Teachers’ General Competency Levels of Teaching Profession].” International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education 7 (4): 2767–2787.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, I. 2017. “Students’ Perceptions about Gamification of Education: A Q-Method Analysis.” Education and Science 42 (191): 235–246. doi:10.15390/EB.2017.6970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar