The impact of dialogic reflections on teacher autonomy

References

• Brinkmann, S., and S. Kvale. 2005. “Confronting the Ethics of Qualitative Research.” Journal of Constructivist Psychology 18 (2): 157–181. doi:10.1080/10720530590914789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H. D. 2002. “English Language Teaching in the ‘Post-Method’ Era: Towards Better Diagnosis, Treatment, and Assessment.” In Methodology in Language Teaching, edited by J. C. Richards and W. A. Renandya, 9–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511667190.003.
   Google Scholar
• Canbolat, Y. 2020. “Professional Autonomy of High School Teachers in Turkey: A Retrospective and Prospective Policy Analysis.” Tedmem Education and Science, Early Release 45 (202): 141–171. doi:10.15390/EB.2020.7833.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, M., and R. Vandenberghe. 2000. “Teachers’ Professional Development: A Solitary Or Collegial (Ad)Venture?” Teaching and Teacher Education 16 (1): 81–101. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00051-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and C. N. Poth. 2016. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 1987. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7.
   Google Scholar
• Dinçer, A. 2019. “Language Teacher Autonomy in Turkish EFL Context: Relations with Teachers’ Autonomy and Job Satisfaction Levels.” i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching 9 (2): 11–25. doi:10.26634/jelt.9.2.15470.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. S. C. 2013. Reflective Practice in ESL Teacher Development Groups: From Practices to Principles. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137317193.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A., and J. R. Pennell. 1993. “Teacher Commitment, Working Conditions, and Differential Incentive Policies.” Review of Educational Research 63 (4): 489–525. doi:10.3102/00346543063004489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavrilyuk, O. A., A. V. Lakhno, T. P. Lebedeva, A. G. Zotin, N. A. Karelina, and E. N. Kuzina. 2014. “Autonomy in Teaching: Escaping Control or Taking Control?” International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education 1 (10): 135–142. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.686.640&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Genç, Z. S. 2010. “Teacher Autonomy through Reflective Journals among Teachers of English as a Foreign Language in Turkey.” Teacher Development 14 (3): 397–409. doi:10.1080/13664530.2010.504028.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M. 2014. “Dialogic Interactions in the Cooperative Classroom.” International Journal of Educational Research 76: 178–189. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, L. 2017. “The Connotations of Language Teacher Autonomy.” English Language Teaching 10 (10): 134–139. doi:10.5539/elt.v10n10p134.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. 1994. Changing Teachers, Changing Times: Teachers’ Work and Culture in the Postmodern Age. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, E., and D. ElHawary. 2020. “Exploring Collaborative Interaction and Self-Direction in Teacher Learning Teams: Case-Studies from a Middle-Income Country Analyzed Using Vygotskian Theory.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 50 (1): 71–89. doi:10.1080/03057925.2018.1502609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgins, H. S., R. Koestner, and N. Duncan. 1996. “On the Compatibility of Autonomy and Relatedness.” Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (3): 227–237. doi:10.1177/0146167296223001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck, S. W. 2012. Reading Statistics and Research. Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Husband, R. E., and P. M. Short. 1994. “Interdisciplinary Teams Lead to Greater Teacher Empowerment.” Middle School Journal 26 (2): 58–60. doi:10.1080/00940771.1994.11494412.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, W. 1999. Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil, B. 2013. “Thinking Together? Teacher Autonomy, Collaboration and Professional Development in Turkish Lower Secondary Schools.” Paper presented at ATEE 40th Annual Conference: Teacher Education Through Partnership and Collaborative Learning Communities, Brussels, 32–42. http://oro.open.ac.uk/48809/
   Google Scholar
• Khezerlou, E. 2013. “Teacher Autonomy Perceptions of Iranian and Turkish EFL Teachers.” Journal of History Culture and Art Research 2 (2): 199–211. http://kutaksam.karabuk.edu.tr/index.php/ilk/article/view/224.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, T. E. 2000. “Finding a Voice: Learner Autonomy and Teacher Education in an Urban Context.” In Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions, edited by B. Sinclair, I. McGrath, and T. E. Lamb, 118–127. Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2007. “Teacher Autonomy: Power or Control?” Education 32 (3): 3–18. doi:10.1080/03004270485200261.
   Google Scholar
• Lehesvuori, S., J. Viiri, H. Rasku-Puttonen, J. Moate, and J. Helaakoski. 2013. “Visualizing Communication Structures in Science Classrooms: Tracing Cumulativity in Teacher-Led Whole Class Discussions.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (8): 912–939. doi:10.1002/tea.21100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlewood, W. 1999. “Defining and Developing Autonomy in East Asian Contexts.” Applied Linguistics 20 (1): 71–94. doi:10.1093/applin/20.1.71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, S., and S. Walsh. 2013. “RP or RIP: A Critical Perspective on Reflective Practice.” Applied Linguistics Review 4 (2): 291–315. doi:10.1515/applirev-2013-0013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maughan, S., D. Teeman, and R. Wilson. 2012. What Leads to Positive Change in Teaching Practice. Slough: NFER. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/media/2115/rctl01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Molander, A., and L. I. Terum. 2008. “Profession and Exercise of Discretion [Profesjonsstudier – En Introduksjon].” In Profesjonsstudier, edited by A. Molander and L. I. Terum, 13–27. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Moomaw, W. E. 2010. “Teacher-Perceived Autonomy: A Construct Validation of the Teacher Autonomy Scale.” PhD diss., University of West Florida. http://www.mifras.org/know/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/TEACHER-PERCEIVED-AUTONOMY-A-CONSTRUCT-VALIDATION-OF-THE-TEACHER-AUTONOMY-SCALE-עמוד-106-יש-כלי-מדידה.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nouhi, N., and S. A. Razmjoo. 2015. “A Data-Driven Model of Language Teacher Autonomy in Iran’s Public Schools.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 4 (3): 159–166. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.3p.159.
   Google Scholar
• Osterman, K. F., and R. B. Kottkamp. 2004. Reflective Practice for Educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Özaslan, G. 2015. “Teachers’ Perception of the Level of Their Professional Autonomy.” Journal of Qualitative Research in Education 3 (2): 25–39. doi:10.14689/.2148-2624.1.3c2s2m.
   Google Scholar
• Öztürk, İ. H. 2011. “Teachers’ Role and Autonomy in Instructional Planning: The Case of Secondary School History Teachers with Regard to the Preparation and Implementation of Annual Instructional Plans.” Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 12 (1): 295–299. https://asosindex.com.tr/index.jsp?modul=articles-page&journal-id=1837&article-id=387363.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, K., and M. Parker. 2017. “Teacher Education Communities of Practice: More than a Culture of Collaboration.” Teaching and Teacher Education 67: 351–360. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, L. C., and W. Moomaw. 2005. “The Relationship between Teacher Autonomy and Stress, Work Satisfaction, Empowerment, and Professionalism.” Educational Research Quarterly 29 (1): 38–54. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ718115.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, A. R. 2017. “Dialogic Reflection for Professional Development through Conversations on a Social Networking Site.” Reflective Practice 19 (1): 105–117. doi:10.1080/14623943.2017.1379385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şakar, A. S. 2013. “English Teachers’ Self-Perceptions of Teacher Autonomy in Middle Schools and High Schools: The Case of Sakarya.” MA Thesis., University of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=9SmG5xwQRs2UkK05zVH6iQ&no=BtWmpWBS8zCdFzq7hjEGLA.
   Google Scholar
• Sedova, K., M. Sedlacek, and R. Svaricek. 2016. “Teacher Professional Development as a Means of Transforming Student Classroom Talk.” Teaching and Teacher Education 57: 14–25. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, M. 2012. “The Importance and Benefits of Teacher Collegiality in Schools – A Literature Review.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46: 1242–1246. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.282.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 2009. “If Teacher Teams are So Good … Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Teams and Teamwork.” PhD diss., Queensland University of Technology. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/31734/1/Gregory_Smith_Thesis.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. U., S. Hayes, and P. Shea. 2017. “A Critical Review of the Use of Wenger’s Community of Practice (Cop) Theoretical Framework in Online and Blended Learning Research.” Online Learning Journal 21 (1): 209–237. doi:10.24059/olj.v21i1.963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 2010. Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street, M. S., and J. W. Licata. 1989. “Supervisor Expertise: Resolving the Dilemma between Bureaucratic Control and Teacher Autonomy.” Planning and Changing 20 (2): 97–107.
   Google Scholar
• Taşdemir, H., and T. Yıldırım. 2017. “Collaborative Teaching from English Language Instructors’ Perspectives.” Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 13 (2): 632–642. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jlls/issue/36120/405634.
   Google Scholar
• Vangrieken, K., I. Grosemans, F. Dochy, and E. Kyndt. 2017. “Teacher Autonomy and Collaboration: A Paradox? Conceptualizing and Measuring Teachers’ Autonomy and Collaborative Attitude.” Teaching and Teacher Education 67: 302–315. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., and R. M. Ryan. 2013. “On Psychological Growth and Vulnerability: Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Need Frustration as a Unifying Principle.” Journal of Psychotherapy Integration 23 (3): 263–280. doi:10.1037/a0032359.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J. R., and S. S. McCotter. 2004. “Reflection as a Visible Outcome for Preservice Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (3): 243–257. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, M., and M. Lawson. 2009. “Using a Meta-Analysis Activity to Make Critical Reflection Explicit in Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (5): 609–616. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. 2013. Dialogic: Education for the Internet Age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 2010. “Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems: The Career of a Concept.” In Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice, edited by C. Blackmore, 179–198. London: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2.
   Google Scholar
• Wermke, W., and G. Höstfält. 2014. “Contextualizing Teacher Autonomy in Time and Space: A Model for Comparing Various Forms of Governing the Teaching Profession.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 46 (1): 58–80. doi:10.1080/00220272.2013.812681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westheimer, J. 2008. “Learning among Colleagues: Teacher Community and the Shared Enterprise of Education.” In Handbook of Research on Teacher Education: Enduring Questions in Changing Contexts, edited by M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, and J. McIntyre, 756–784. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wilches, J. U. 2007. “Teacher Autonomy: A Critical Review of the Research and Concept beyond Applied Linguistics.” Ikala 12 (1): 245–275. https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/ikala/article/view/2720.
   Google Scholar
• William, D. 2008. Leadership for Teacher Learning: Creating a Culture Where All Teachers Improve so that All Students Succeed. Florida: Learning Sciences International.
   Google Scholar
• Willner, R. G. 1990. “Images of the Future Now: Autonomy, Professionalism, and Efficacy.” PhD diss., Fordham University. https://research.library.fordham.edu/dissertations/AAI9123118
   Google Scholar
• Yazan, B. 2012. “Second Language Teacher Education: A Sociocultural Perspective.” TESOL Quarterly 46 (1): 218–221. doi:10.1002/tesq.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeşilbursa, A. 2011. “Descriptive versus Dialogic Reflection and Positive Versus.” Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 5 (2): 169–182. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/novroy/issue/10814/130366.
   Google Scholar