Enhancing mathematics teacher professional learning through a contextualized professional development program

References

• Abbitt, J. T. 2011. “An Investigation of the Relationship between Self-efficacy Beliefs about Technology Integration and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) among Preservice Teachers.” Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education 27 (4): 134–143. doi:10.1080/21532974.2011.10784670.
   Google Scholar
• Achieve. 2010. American Diploma Project (ADP) End-of-Course Exams: 2010 Annual Report.
   Google Scholar
• Amendum, S. J., and M. D. Liebfreund. 2019. “Situated Learning, Professional Development, and Early Reading Intervention: A Mixed Methods Study.” The Journal of Educational Research 112 (3): 342–356. doi:10.1080/00220671.2018.1523782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artman-Meeker, K., A. Fettig, E. E. Barton, A. Penney, and S. Zeng. 2015. “Applying an evidence-based Framework to the Early Childhood Coaching Literature.” Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 35 (3): 183–196. doi:10.1177/0271121415595550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L. 1990. “Reflections and Deflections of Policy: The Case of Carol Turner.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12: 247–259.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L. 1996. “Teacher Learning and the Mathematics Reform: What We Think We Know and What We Need to Learn.” Phi Delta Kappan 77 (7): 500–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., S. T. Lubienski, and D. S. Mewborn. 2001. “Research on Teaching Mathematics: The Unsolved Problem of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching, edited by V. Richardson, 433–456. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., M. H. Thames, and G. Phelps. 2008. “Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special?” Journal of Teacher Education 59 (5): 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bendixen, L. D., B. K. Hofer and P. R. Pintrich 2002. ”The Process Model of Epistemic Belief Change.” In Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing, B. K. Hofer and P. R. Pintrich edited by Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, P., M. McLaughlin, M. Bass, E. Pauly, and G. Zellman. 1977. Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change: Vol. VII. Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 140 432. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, R., P. Young, and J. Cohen. 2021. “How Elementary Teaching Candidates’ Learning Opportunities Are Associated with Their Knowledge, Self-efficacy, and Beliefs.” Teachers College Record 123: 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, T., L. M. Anderson, B. A. Sullivan, and S. A. Swidler. 1992. “Pedagogical Balancing Acts: Attempts to Influence Prospective Teachers’ Beliefs.” Teaching and Teacher Education 9 (3): 253–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., M. Eisenhart, C. A. Brown, R. G. Underhill, D. Jones, and P. C. Agard. 1992. “Learning to Teach Hard Mathematics: Do Novice Teachers and Their Instructors Give up Too Easily?” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 23 (3): 194–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., H. Lankford, S. Loeb, J. Rockoff, and J. Wyckoff. 2008. “The Narrowing Gap in New York City Teacher Qualifications and Its Implications for Student Achievement in High-poverty Schools.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 27: 793–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. E., and T. L. Good. 1986. “Teacher Behaviour and Pupil Achievement.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching, edited by M. C. Wittrock, 328–375. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. B. 2012. “Non-traditional Preservice Teachers and Their Mathematics Efficacy Beliefs.” School Science and Mathematics 112: 191–198.
   Google Scholar
• Buehl, M. M., and P. Alexander. 2001. “Beliefs about Academic Knowledge.” Educational Psychology Review 13: 385–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehl, M. M., and H. Fives. 2009. “Exploring Teachers’ Beliefs about Teaching Knowledge: Where Does It Come From? Does It Change?” Journal of Experimental Education 77 (4): 367–407. doi:10.3200/JEXE.77.4.367-408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderhead, J. 1996. “Teachers: Beliefs and Knowledge.” In Handbook of Educational Psychology, edited by D. Berliner and R. Calfee, 709–725. New York: Macmillan Library Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., O. McNamara, and P. Gilroy. 2004. Practitioner Research and Professional Development in Education. London: Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Chingos, M. M., and P. E. Peterson. 2011. “It’s Easier to Pick a Good Teacher than to Train One: Familiar and New Results on the Correlates of Teacher Effectiveness.” Economics of Education Review 30: 449–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., and H. Hollingsworth. 2002. “Elaborating a Model of Teacher Professional Growth.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18: 947–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C. T., H. F. Ladd, and J. L. Vigdor. 2006. “Teacher-student Matching and the Assessment of Teacher Effectiveness.” Journal of Human Resources 41: 778–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooney, T. J., and B. E. Shealy. 1997. “On Understanding the Structure of Teachers, Beliefs and Their Relationship to Change.” In Mathematics Teachers in Transition, edited by E. Fennema and B. S. Nelson, 87–109. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, A., and M. Szesztay. 2005. “The Impact of Teacher Knowledge Seminars: Unpacking Reflective Practice.” The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language 9(2). http://tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej34/a3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2009. “Recognizing and Enhancing Teacher Effectiveness.” The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment 3: 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. R., R. C. Wei, A. Andree, N. Richardson, and S. Orphanos. 2009. Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report on Teacher Professional Development in the United States and Abroad. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• De Corte, E., P. OptEynde, and L. Verschaffel. 2002. “Knowing What to Believe: The Relevance of Students, Mathematical Beliefs for Mathematics Education.” In Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing, edited by B. K. Hofer and P. R. Pintrich, 297–320. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189x08331140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., A. C. Porter, M. S. Garet, K. S. Yoon, and B. F. Birman. 2002. “Effects of Professional Development on Teachers’ Instruction: Results from a Three-year Longitudinal Study.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24 (3): 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döhrmann, M., G. Kaiser, and S. Blömeke. 2012. “The Conceptualization of Mathematics Competencies in the International Teacher Education Study TEDS-M.” ZDM – the International Journal on Mathematics Education 44 (3): 325–340.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, C., and M. G. Sherin. 2006. “Practicing Change: Curriculum Adaptation and Teacher Narrative in the Context of Mathematics Education Reform.” Curriculum Inquiry 36 (2): 153–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbaz, F. 1983. Teacher Thinking: A Study of Practical Knowledge. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Enochs, L. G., P. L. Smith, and D. Huinker. 2000. “Establishing Factorial Validity of the Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument.” School Science and Mathematics 100: 194–202. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17256.x.
   Google Scholar
• Farncis, D. C., L. Rapacki, and A. Elker. 2014. “The Individual, the Context, and Practice: A Review of the Research on Teachers’ Beliefs Related to Mathematics.” In International Handbook of Research on Teachers’ Beliefs, edited by H. Fives and M. G. Gill, 336–352. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. S. C. 2001. “Tailoring Reflection to Individual Needs: A TESOL Case Study.” Journal of Education for Teaching 27 (1): 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Fauskanger, J. 2015. “Challenges in Measuring Teachers’ Knowledge.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 90: 57–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennema, E., and L. M. Franke. 1992. “Teachers’ Knowledge and Its Impact.” In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by D. A. Grouws, 147–164. Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M., A. Porter, L. Desimone, B. Briman, and K. Yoon. 2001. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Analysis of a National Sample of Teachers.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (4): 915–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelter, H. 2003. “Why Is Reflective Thinking Uncommon.” Reflective Practice 4 (3): 337–344.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, S., and M. H. Dembo. 1984. “Teacher Efficacy: A Construct Validation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 503–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, M. G., P. T. Ashton, and J. Algina. 2004. “Changing Preservice Teachers’ Epistemological Beliefs about Teaching and Learning in Mathematics: An Intervention Study.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 29: 164–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding, J. 2017. “Mathematics Teachers’ Capacity for Change.” Oxford Review of Education 43 (4): 502–517. doi:10.1080/03054985.2017.1331846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, P., and G. Phelps. 2010. “Does Teacher Professional Development Affect Content and Pedagogical Knowledge: How Much and for How Long?” Economics of Education Review 29 (3): 432–439. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handal, B., and A. Herrington. 2003. “Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs and Curriculum Reform.” Mathematics Education Research Journal 15: 59–69. doi:10.1007/BF03217369.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., T. Carpenter, E. Fennema, K. Fuson, P. Human, and H. Murray. 1996. “Problem Solving as a Basis for Reform in Curriculum and Instruction: The Case of Mathematics.” Educational Researcher 25 (4): 12–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., B. Rowan, and D. L. Ball. 2005. “Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement.” American Educational Research Journal 42 (5): 371–406. doi:10.3102/00028312042002371.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. 2004. “The Process Model of Epistemic Belief Change.” In Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing, edited by B. K. Hofer and P. R. Pintrich. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K., and P. R. Pintrich. 1997. “The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning.” Review of Educational Research 67: 88–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., L. H. Bryant, J. D. Snyder, and D. Malone. 2012. “Preservice and Inservice Teachers’ Implicit Theories of Intelligence.” Teacher Education Quarterly 39: 87–101.
   Google Scholar
• Jussim, L., S. L. Robustelli, and T. R. Cain. 2009. “Teacher Expectations and Self-fulfilling Prophecies.” In Handbook of Motivation at School, edited by K. R. Wenzel and A. Wigfield, 349–380. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, G., S. Blomeke, J. Konig, A. Busse, M. Dohrmann, and J. Hoth. 2017. “Professional Competencies of (Prospective) Mathematics Teachers–Cognitive versus Situated Approaches.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 94: 161–182. doi:10.1007/s10649-016-9713-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, T. J., and D. O. Staiger. 2008. Estimating Teacher Impacts on Student Achievement: An Experimental Evaluation. Working Paper #14607. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, T. Z. 2019. Multiple Regression and Beyond: An Introduction to Multiple Regression and Structural Equation Modelling. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F. A. J. 2010. “Situated Learning Theory and the Pedagogy of Teacher Education: Towards an Integrative View of Teacher Behavior and Teacher Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (1): 98–106. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krainer, K., and S. Llinares. 2010. “Mathematics Teacher Education.” In International Encyclopaedia of Education, edited by P. Peterson, E. Baker, and B. McGaw, 702–705. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, P. 2009. “Situated Learning: What Ever Happened to Educational Psychology?” Educational Psychology Review 21 (2): 181–192. doi:10.1007/s10648-009-9099-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leatham, K. 2006. “Viewing Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs as Sensible Systems.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 9 (2): 91–102.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. J. 2004. “Developing a Professional Development Program Based on Teachers’ Needs.” The Professional Educator 27 (1 & 2): 39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. J. 2007. “Developing an Effective Professional Development Model to Enhance Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding and Pedagogical Strategies in Mathematics.” Journal of Educational Thought 41 (2): 125–144.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. J., and A. Ozgun-Koca. 2016. “Professional Development Model for Mathematics Teachers: Using Task Design and Analysis.” Current Issues in Education 19 (2). https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1519
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. J., A. Ozgun-Koca, M. Meagher, and M. T. Edwards. 2018. “Examining the Impact of a Framework to Support Prospective Secondary Teachers’ Transition from ‘Doer’ to ‘Teacher’ of Mathematics.” Mathematics Teacher Education and Development 20 (1): 112–131.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, A., and M. W. McLaughlin. 1992. “Networks for Educational Change: Powerful and Problematic.” Phi Delta Kappan 74: 673–677.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. 1993. “Teachers’ Professional Development in a Climate of Educational Reform.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15: 129–151. doi:10.3102/01623737015002129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., K. E. Stiles, S. Mundry, N. Love, and P. W. Hewson. 2010. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). 2014. Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). 2020. Standards for the Preparation of Middle Level Mathematics Teachers. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nurlu, Ö. 2015. “Investigation of Teachers’ Mathematics Teaching Self-efficacy.” International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education 8 (1): 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Oppermann, E., Y. Anders, and A. Hachfeld. 2016. “The Influence of Preschool Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Mathematical Ability Beliefs on Their Sensitivity to Mathematics in Children’s Play.” Teaching and Teacher Education 58: 174–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2009. “Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS.” Available at https://www.oecd.org/education/school/43023606.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. 1992. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning up a Messy Construct.” Review of Educational Research 62: 307–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. L., E. Fennema, T. P. Carpenter, and M. Loef. 1989. “Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Beliefs in Mathematics.” Cognition and Instruction 6 (1): 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipp, R. A. 2007. “Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs and Affect.” In Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by F. K. Lester Jr, 257–315. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Philippou, G. N., and C. Christou. 1998. “The Effects of a Preparatory Mathematics Program in Changing Prospective Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Mathematics.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 35: 189–206. doi:10.1023/A:1003030211453.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. 1999. “Motivational Beliefs as Resources for and Constraints on Conceptual Change.” In New Perspectives on Conceptual Change, edited by W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, and M. Carretero, 33–50. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Polly, D., H. Neale, and D. Pulalee. 2014. “How Does Ongoing Task-focused Mathematics Professional Development Influence Elementary School Teachers’ Knowledge, Beliefs and Enacted Pedagogies?” Early Childhood Education Journal 42: 1–10. doi:10.1007/s10643-013-0585-6.
   Google Scholar
• Rampey, B. D., G. S. Dion, and P. L. Donahue. 2009. “NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress.” NCES 2009–479. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, A. M. 1997. “Inconsistency between a Beginning Elementary Teachers’ Mathematics Belief and Practices.” Journal for Research on Mathematics Education 28 (5): 550–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. 2005. “Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula.” Review of Educational Research 75 (2): 211–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. 1996. “The Role of Attitudes and Beliefs in Learning to Teach.” In Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, edited by J. Sikula, T. Buttery, and E. Guyton, 102–119. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rotter, J. B. 1966. “Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement.” Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 80 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1037/h0092976.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. 1992. “Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem-solving, Metacognition, and Sense-making in Mathematics.” In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by D. Grouws, 334–370. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. 2011. How We Think: A Theory of Goal-oriented Decision Making and Its Educational Applications. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H., and J. Kilpatrick. 2008. “Toward a Theory of Proficiency in Teaching Mathematics.” In The International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education, Vol 2: Tools and Processes in Mathematics Teacher Education, edited by D. Tirosh and T. Wood, 321–354. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schommer, M. A. 1990. “Effects of Beliefs about the Nature of Knowledge on Comprehension.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 498–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. 2001. “Current Themes and Future Directions in Epistemological Research: A Commentary.” Educational Psychology Review 13: 451–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–23. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., and J. S. Zeuli. 1999. “Reform and Teaching: Exploring Patterns of Practice in the Context of National and State Mathematics Reforms.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21: 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stipek, D. J., K. B. Givvin, J. M. Salmon, and V. L. MacGyvers. 2001. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices Related to Mathematics Instruction.” Teaching and Teacher Education 17 (2): 213–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swackhamer, L. E., K. Koellner, C. Basile, and D. Kimbrough. 2009. “Increasing the Self-efficacy of Inservice Teachers through Content Knowledge.” Teacher Education Quarterly 36 (2): 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. G. 1992. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Conceptions: A Synthesis of the Research.” In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, edited by D. A. Grouws, 127–146, New York. Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., and A. Woolfolk Hoy. 2001. “Teacher Efficacy: Capturing an Elusive Construct.” Teaching and Teacher Education 17: 783–805. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vongkulluksn, V. W., K. Xie, and M. A. Bowman. 2018. “The Role of Value on Teachers’ Internalization of External Barriers and Externalization of Personal Beliefs for Classroom Technology Integration.” Computers & Education 118: 70–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. C., G. D. Haertel, and H. J. Walberg. 1993. “Toward a Knowledge Base for School Learning.” Review of Educational Research 63 (3): 249–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. 2017. Modern Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences: A Practical Introduction. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz‐Tuzun, O., and M. S. Topcu. 2008. “Relationships among Preservice Science Teachers’ Epistemological Beliefs, Epistemological World Views, and Self‐Efficacy Beliefs.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (1): 65–85. doi:10.1080/09500690601185113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurekli, B., M. K. Stein, R. Correnti, and Z. Kisa. 2020. “Teaching Mathematics for Conceptual Understanding: Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices and the Role of Constraints.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 51 (2): 234–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar