edTPA as educative, evaluative, and enduring professional tool for guiding teachers’ development?

References

• Alfano, M. 2020. “Connecticut’s New Teacher Preparation Program Earns Good Grades.” The Connecticut Mirror. https://ctmirror.org/category/ct-viewpoints/connecticuts-new-teacher-preparation-program-earns-good-grades/.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1977. Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baptiste, G. 2012. “Unpacking the Role of the Teacher Performance Assessment in Teacher Preparation Programs.” Doctoral diss., The University of Wisconsin, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, C., D. Kaufman, M. Kohan, and G. Mitoma. 2019. “Confronting the edTPA in Connecticut: Recommendations for Teacher Candidate Quality, Sustainability, and Empowerment.” Education Policy Paper. The University of Connecticut. https://thedoddcenter.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/319/2019/03/Confronting-the-edTPA-in-Connecticut.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, B. A., J. J. Henry, and J. R. Lindauer. 2015. “Working Together to Foster Candidate Success on the edTPA.” Journal of Inquiry & Action in Education 6 (2). https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/jiae/vol6/iss2/2.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, Z. 2017. “An Exploration of Dispositions for Success Among First-Year Teachers.” Doctoral diss., Aurora University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, S. 2014. “edTPA: An Assessment That Reduces the Quality of Teacher Education.” The Forum 14 (1): 28–30. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8VM4BVV.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, C. 2018. “Policy Meets Practice in New York State.” Teacher Education Quarterly 45 (3): 97–125.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and M. K. Fries. 2001. “Sticks, Stones, and Ideology: The Discourse of Reform in Teacher Education.” Educational Researcher 30 (8): 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen-Vogel, L., and H. Hunt. 2007. “Governing Quality in Teacher Education: Deconstructing Federal Text and Talk.” American Journal of Education 114 (1): 137–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2015. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 5th ed. New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2016. “Research on Teaching and Teacher Education and Its Influences on Policy and Practice.” Educational Researcher 45 (2): 83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., J. Ancess, and B. Falk. 1995. Authentic Assessment in Action: Studies of Schools and Students at Work. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and J. Snyder. 2000. “Authentic Assessment of Teaching in Context.” Teaching and Teacher Education 16 (5–6): 523–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, M. K., and S. O. Cannon. 2018. “The University Supervisor, edTPA, and the New Making of the Teacher.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 26 (28). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.2849.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, A. 2009. “U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan Says Colleges of Education Must Improve for Reforms to Succeed”. United States Department of Education. https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-secretary-education-arne-duncan-says-colleges-education-must-improve-reforms-succeed.
   Google Scholar
• edTPA. 2020. “edTPA.“ Accessed June 20, 2021. http://edtpa.aacte.org/.
   Google Scholar
• ETS. PRAXIS. 2020. “About the PRAXIS Test.” Accessed December 22, 2020. http://ets.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, D., and K. O’Hara. 2015. “Buyer Beware: Lessons Learned from edTPA Implementation in New York State.” Teacher Education Quarterly 42 (2): 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Heil, L., and M. Berg. 2017. “Something Happened on the Way to Completing the edTPA: A Case Study of Teacher Candidates’ Perceptions of the edTPA.” Contributions to Music Education 42: 181–199.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, E. L. 2015. “The edTPA Experience: Student Teachers’ Perceptions and Reflections on the edTPA Assessment.” Doctoral diss., Aurora University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Huston, T. P. 2015. “Being Assessed: Student Teachers’ Experiences of IUTPA.” Doctoral diss., Indiana University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hutt, E., J. Gottleib, and J. J. Cohen. 2018. “Diffusion in a Vacuum: edTPA, Legitimacy, and the Rhetoric of Teacher Professionalization.” Teaching and Teacher Education 69: 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H. 2020. “The Impact of the edTPA: An Inside Look from the Perspectives of Teacher Candidates and Novice Teachers.” . Doctoral diss., University of Alabama, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kissau, S., L. Hart, and B. Algozzine. 2019. “Investigating the Impact of edTPA Professional Development on Classroom Practice and Student Teaching Experience.” Journal of Teacher Education 70 (2): 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117721706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlie, T. J. 2015. “Teacher Performance Assessments: Exploring Student Perspectives of the edTPA.” . Doctoral diss., University of North Dakota, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ledwell, K., and C. Oyler. 2016. “Unstandardized Responses to a “Standardized” Test: The edTPA as Gatekeeper and Curriculum Change Agent.” Journal of Teacher Education 67 (2): 120–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S. 2015. “Learning Through Action: Teacher Candidates and Performance Assessments.” . Doctoral diss., University of Washington, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Madeloni, B., and J. Gorlewski. 2013. “Wrong Answer to the Wrong Question: Why We Need Critical Teacher Education, Not Standardization.” Rethinking Schools 27 (4): 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Merino, N., and R. Pecheone. 2013. “The Performance Assessment for California Teachers: An Introduction.” The New Educator 9 (1): 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2013.751310.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, R. 2015. “The Implications of Teacher Performance Assessment and the Impact on Teacher Decision Making.” Language Arts 93 (2): 96–107.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Public Law 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 et seq.
   Google Scholar
• Pecheone, R. L., and R. R. Chung. 2007. PACT Technical Report: Summary of Reliability Studies for the 2003-04 Pilot Year. Performance Assessment for California Teachers Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• SCALE (Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity). 2013. 2013 edTPA Field Test: Summary Report. Stanford University. http://edtpa.aacte.org/news-area/announcements/dTPA-summary-report-is-available.html.
   Google Scholar
• SCALE (Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity). 2020. Effectively Implementing edTPA: For Educator Preparation Programs. Amherst, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Seelke, J., A. Brantlinger, R. Croninger, D. Imig, T. Jackson, and L. Stapleton. 2018. “Teachers’ Perceptions of edTPA on Their Practice.” ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. http://search.proquest.com/docview/2120001116/.
   Google Scholar
• United States, National Commission on Excellence in Education. 1983. A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform: A Report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education. Washington, DC: The Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., L. Hart, and B. Algozzine. 2019. “Perception vs. Reality: edTPA Perceptions and Performance for Teacher Candidates of Color and White Candidates.” The Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education 83: 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., P. J. Hallam, R. Pecheone, and P. A. Moss. 2014. “Evaluating the Validity of Portfolio Assessments for Licensure Decisions.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 22 (6). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n6.2014.
   Google Scholar
• Working Group Established by the Connecticut General Assembly. 2020. Working Group to Study Issues Relating to the Implementation of Pre-Service Assessment, edTPA, as Adopted by the Connecticut State Board of Education, December 7, 2016. Final Report, January 31, 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, M. 2018. “edTPA as a Tool to Measure Teacher Readiness: A Case Study on First Year Teachers.” Georgia Educational Researcher 14 (2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ger.2018.14020.
   Google Scholar