Reimagining professional development in secondary schools: shaping literacy instruction through lesson study

References

• Ball, S. J. 2016. “Neoliberal Education? Confronting the Slouching Beast.” Policy Futures in Education 14 (8): 1046–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316664259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia, N. K. H., and N. Kia Nam Kee. 2011. “Lesson Study as a Formative Assessment of Pre-Service Special Education (SPED) Teacher Trainees’ Teaching Practicum.” ASCD-Singapore Review 16:90–95. www.iosrjournals.org.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A. L., and R. J. Garmston. 2002. Cognitive Coaching: Developing Self-Directed Leaders and Learners. 1st ed. New York: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and M. W. McLaughlin. 2011. “Policies That Support Professional Development in an Era of Reform.” Phi Delta Kappan 92 (6 (March)): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doig, B., and S. Groves. 2011. “Japanese Lesson Study: Teacher Professional Development Through Communities of Inquiry.” Mathematics Teacher Education & Development 13 (1): 77–93.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, C. 2002. “Learning from Japanese Approaches to Professional Development: The Case of Lesson Study.” Journal of Teacher Education 53 (5): 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248702237394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, A. C., and H. S. Stubbs. 1997. ““Empowering Science Teachers: A Model for Professional Development.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 8 (3): 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009487417488.
   Google Scholar
• Lenski, S. J., M. M. Caskey, and V. A. Anfara. 2009. “Using the Lesson Study Approach to Plan for Student Learning.” Middle School Journal 40 (3): 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2009.11495587.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. 2000. “Lesson Study: The Core of Japanese Professional Development.” Invited Address to the Special Interest Group on Research in Mathematics Education, American Educational Research Association Meetings, New Orleans. Accessed March 18, 2011 from www.csudh.edu/math/syoshinobu/107web/aera2000.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., R. Perry, and A. Murata. 2006. “How Should Research Contribute to Instructional Improvement: The Case of Lesson Study.” Educational Researcher 35 (3): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035003003.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. D., and T. L. Wilkerson. 2011. “Lesson Study: The Impact on Teachers’ Knowledge of Teaching Mathematics.” In Lesson Study Research and Practice in Mathematics Education, edited by L. C. Hart, A. S. Alston, and A. Murata, 15–26. New York: Springer Science and Business Media. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9941-9_2.
   Google Scholar
• Morago, S., and S. G. Bauer. 2021. “Learner-Centered Facilitation in Lesson Study Groups.” In Stepping up to Lesson Study: An Educator’s Guide to Deeper Learning, edited by A. Murata and C. K. E. Lee, 106–115. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murata, A., and C. K.E. Lee, eds. 2021. Stepping Up to Lesson Study. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norwich, B., S. Benham-Clarke, and S. Lin Goei. 2021. “Review of Research Literature About the Use of Lesson Study and Lesson Study-Related Practices Relevant to the Field of Special Needs and Inclusive Education.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 36 (3): 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1755929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, R., and C. Lewis. 2008. “What Is a Successful Adaptation of Lesson Study in the US?“Journal of Educational Change 10:365–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9069-7.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, V., and R. L. Hughes. 2012. “Teaching Collaboration: The Essential Common-Core Ingredient.” Education Week. December 4. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/12/05/13hughes.h32.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rout, S., and S. K. Behera. 2014. “Constructivist Approach in Teacher Professional Development: An Overview.” American Journal of Educational Research 2 (12A): 8–12. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-12A-2.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. 1997. “Reclaiming the Agenda of Teacher Professionalism: An Australian experience.” Journal of Education for Teaching 23 (3): 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607479720006.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. 2011. ”Skilling or Emancipating? Metaphors for Continuing Teacher Professional Development.” Rethinking Educational Practice Through Reflexive Inquiry, edited by N. Mockler and J. Sachs, 153–167. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0805-1_11.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, D. 2018. These Six Things: How to Focus Your Teaching on What Matters Most. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. 2006. “A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data.” American Journal of Evaluation 27 (2): 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandeweghe, R., and K. Varney. 2006. “The Evolution of a School-Based Study Group.” Phi Delta Kappan 88 (4): 282–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170608800407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R. C., L. Darling-Hammond, A. Andree, N. Richardson, and S. Orphanos. 2009. Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report on Teacher Development in the United States and Abroad. Dallas: TX. National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, Y., and C. Day. 2019. “Collaborative Teacher Professional Development in Schools in England (UK) and Shanghai (China): Cultures, Contexts and Tensions.” Teachers & Teaching 25 (3): 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1593822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar