Family policies and single parent poverty in 18 OECD countries, 1978–2008

References

• Andringa, W., Nieuwenhuis, R., & Van Gerven, M. (2015). Women's working hours: The interplay between gender role attitudes, motherhood, and public childcare support in 23 European countries. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35(11/12).
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1991). A Treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J., & Finch, N. (2002). A comparison of child benefit packages in 22 countries. Department for Work and Pensions. Research Report No. 174.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, D., & Burroway, R. (2012). Targeting, universalism and single mother poverty: A multi-level analysis across 18 affluent democracies. Demography, 49, 719–746. doi: 10.1007/s13524-012-0094-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budig, M. J., Misra, J., & Boeckmann, I. (2012). The motherhood penalty in cross-national perspective: The importance of work-family policies and cultural attitudes. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 19(2), 163–193. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxs006
   Google Scholar
• Casey, T., & Maldonado, L. (2012). Worst off: Single-parent households in the United States. A cross-national comparison of single parenthood in the U.S. and sixteen other high-income countries. Tech Report, December, Legal Momentum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, P. N. (2014). The family. Diversity, inequality, and social change. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Dingeldey, I. (2001). European tax systems and their impact on European tax systems and their impact on family. Journal of Social Policy, 30(4), 653–672.
   Google Scholar
• Fahlén, S. (2013). The agency gap: Policies, norms, and working time capabilities across welfare states. In B. Hobson (Ed.), Worklife balance: The agency and capabilities gap (pp. 35–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frase, P., & Gornick, J. (2013). The time divide in cross-national perspective: The work week, education, and institutions that matter. Social Forces, 91(3), 697–724. doi: 10.1093/sf/sos189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, I. (1992). Assuring child support: An extension of social security. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier, A. H. (1996). The state and the family. A comparative analysis of family policies in industrialized countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier, A. H. (2010). Comparative Family Policy Database, Version 3. Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstel, N., & McGonagle, K. (1999). Job leaves and the limits of the family and medical leave act: The effects of gender, race, and family. Work and Occupations, 26(4), 510–534. doi: 10.1177/0730888499026004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghysels, J., & Van Lancker, W. (2011). The unequal benefits of activation: An analysis of the social distribution of family policy among families with young children. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(5), 472–485. doi: 10.1177/0958928711418853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornick, J., & Jäntti, M. (2009). Child poverty in upper-income countries: Lessons from the Luxembourg Income Study. In S. Kamerman & A. Ben-Ariel (Eds.), From child welfare to child wellbeing: An international perspective on knowledge in the service of policy making (pp. 339–368). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. K. (2003). Families that work. Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Heuveline, P., Timberlake, J., & Furstenberg, F. (2003). Shifting childrearing to single mothers: Results from 17 western countries. Population and Development Review, 29, 47–71.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, B. (2011). The agency gap in work-life balance: Applying Sen's capabilities framework within European contexts. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 18(2), 147–167. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxr012
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, B. (2013). Worklife balance: The agency and capabilities gap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaumotte, F. (2003). Labour force participation of women: Empirical evidence on the role of policy and other determinants in OECD countries. OECD Economic Studies, 2003(2), 51–108. doi: 10.1787/eco_studies-v2003-art9-en
   Google Scholar
• Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 7(2), 127–191. doi: 10.1093/sp/7.2.127
   Google Scholar
• Korpi, W., Ferrarini, T., & Englund, S. (2013). Women's opportunities under different family policy constellations: Gender, class, and inequality tradeoffs in western countries re-examined. Social Politics, 20(1), 1–40. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxs028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz, J., Villeneuve, P., & Garfinkel, I. (2001). Child support among selected OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Child well-being, child poverty and child policy in modern nations. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• LIS (2015). Luxembourg Income Study. Multiple Countries, Database. Retrieved July, 2015, from http://www.lisdatacenter.org
   Google Scholar
• McLanahan, S., Casper, L., & Sorensen, A. (1995). Women's roles and women's poverty in eight industrialized countries. In K. Mason & A. Jenson (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 258–278). Oxford: IUSSP/Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56–63. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, J., Budig, M. J., & Moller, S. (2007). Reconciliation policies and the effects of motherhood on employment, earnings and poverty. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 9(2), 135–155. doi: 10.1080/13876980701311588
   Google Scholar
• Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (2012). Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morissens, A., & Sainsbury, D. (2005). Migrants’ social rights, ethnicity and welfare regimes. Journal of Social Policy, 34(04), 637–660. doi: 10.1017/S0047279405009190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, R. (2014). Family policy outcomes: Combining institutional and demographic explanations of women's employment and earnings inequality in OECD countries, 1975–2005. Enschede: University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, R., Need, A., & Van der Kolk, H. (2012). Institutional and demographic explanations of women's employment in 18 OECD Countries, 1975–1999. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 614–630. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00965.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2011). Doing better for families. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/doingbetterforfamilies.htm
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, B., & Hook, J. L. (2009). Gendered tradeoffs. Family, social policy, and economic inequality in twenty-one countries. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2015). Our kids. The American dream in crisis. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rainwater, L., & Smeeding, T. (2004). Single-parent poverty, inequality, and the welfare state. In D. Moynihan, T. Smeeding, & L. Rainwater (Eds.), The future of the family (pp. 96–113). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Ritakallio, V.-M., & Bradshaw, J. (2006). Family poverty in the European Union. In J. Bradshaw & A. Hatland (Eds.), Social policy, family change and employment in comparative perspective (pp. 237–254). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, P. (2012). Tax disincentives and female employment in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(1), 17–29. doi: 10.1177/0958928711425267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, H., & Figari, F. (2013). EUROMOD: The European Union tax-benefit microsimulation model. International Journal of Microsimulation, 6(1), 4–26.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 57–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00390.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbroucke, F., & Vleminckx, K. (2011). Disappointing poverty trends: Is the social investment state to blame? Journal of European Social Policy, 21(5), 450–471. doi: 10.1177/0958928711418857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Lippe, T., & Van Dijk, L. (2002). Comparative research on women's employment. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 221–241. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker, W. (2014). To whose benefit? An empirical and comparative investigation into the (un)intended consequences of family policy in the social investment state. Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen.
   Google Scholar