Planning for community: understanding diversity in resident experiences and expectations of social connections in a new urban fringe housing estate, Australia

References

• Atkinson, R. (2006). Padding the bunker: Strategies of middle-class disaffiliation and colonisation in the city. Urban Studies, 43(4), 819–832. doi: 10.1080/00420980600597806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2001). Seeking safety in an insecure world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, P., Charafeddine, R., Frohlich, K. L., Daniel, M., Kestens, Y., & Potvin, L. (2007). Health inequalities and place: A theoretical conception of neighbourhood. Social Science and Medicine, 65(9), 1839–1852. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakely, E. J., & Snyder, M. G. (1997). Fortress America – gated communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blandy, S., & Lister, D. (2005). Gated communities: (Ne)Gating community development? Housing Studies, 20(2), 287–301. doi: 10.1080/026730303042000331781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman, C. (2009). Building a golden grove ‘community’: A study of suburban production processes in South Australia, 1970s–1980s. Planning Perspectives, 24, 219–240. doi: 10.1080/02665430902734335
   Google Scholar
• Bounds, M. (2000). The community concept and planned estates. Research in Community Sociology, 10, 447–459.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, J. S. (1994). Styles of ethnography. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 159–185). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., Moen, P., & Garbarino, J. (1984). The family. In R. D. Parke (Ed.), Review of child development research, volume 7 (pp. 283–328). Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, L., & Winter, I. (1999). Social change, suburban lives: An Australian Newtown 1960’s to 1990’s. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, V., Dines, N., Gesler, W., & Curtis, S. (2008). Mingling, observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations. Health & Place, 14(3), 544–561. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheshire, L., Rosenblatt, T., Lawrence, G., & Walters, P. (2009). The governmentality of master planning: Housing consumption, aesthetics and community on a new estate. Housing Studies, 24(5), 653–667. doi: 10.1080/02673030903082302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheshire, L., Walters, P., & Rosenblatt, T. (2010). The politics of housing consumption: Renters as flawed consumers on a master planned estate. Urban Studies, 47(12), 2597–2614. doi: 10.1177/0042098009359028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costley, D. (2006). Master planned communities: Do they offer a solution to urban sprawl or a vehicle for seclusion of the more affluent consumers in Australia? Housing, Theory and Society, 23(3), 157–175. doi: 10.1080/14036090600862346
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, R., Atkinson, R., & McGuirk, P. (2010). Privatism, privatisation and social distinction in master-planned residential estates. Urban Policy and Research, 28(4), 391–410. doi: 10.1080/08111146.2010.508870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, C. S. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frazer, E. (1999). The problem of communitarian politics: Unity and conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1999). The great disruption. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galston, W. A. (1998, October). Policies for the 21st century: Reexamining the idea of community. Current, pp. 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gans, H. J. (1962). The urban villagers: Group and class in the life of Italian-Americans. NewYork, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the Late Modern Age (1st ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giles-Corti, B., Broomhall, M. H., Knuiman, M., Collins, C., Douglas, K., Ng, K., … Donovan, R. J. (2005). Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2, Suppl. 2), 169–176. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B. (2002). Australia’s suburbs: Aspiration and exclusion. Urban Policy and Research, 20(3), 229–232. doi: 10.1080/0811114022000005870
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R., & Douglas, K. (2008). Privatised communities: The use of owners corporations in master planned estates in Melbourne. Australian Geographer, 39(4), 521–536. doi: 10.1080/00049180802419229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, A. M., & Wierzbicki, S. K. (1999). Social ties at the neighborhood level: Two Decades of GSS evidence. Urban Affairs Review, 35(1), 92–111. doi: 10.1177/10780879922184301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwyther, G. (2005). Paradise planned: Community formation and the master planned estate. Urban Policy and Research, 23(1), 57–72. doi: 10.1080/0811114042000335304
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. (1997). The oracles of Delfin: Women and suburban developments. Urban Policy and Research, 15(2), 103–114. doi: 10.1080/08111149708551509
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. C. (2010). Master planned estates: Pariah or panacea? Urban Policy and Research, 28(4), 375–390. doi: 10.1080/08111146.2010.532475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, C., & Lewis, S. (1998). Editorial. Community, Work & Family, 1, 5–9. doi: 10.1080/13668809808414693
   Google Scholar
• Kasarda, J. D., & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39(3), 328–339. doi: 10.2307/2094293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, P. (1993). The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kenna, T. (2005). Exclusive suburban ‘villages’: Master planned estate development and socio-spatial polarisation in Western Sydney. State of Australian Cities Conference, 30 Nov-2nd Dec. Brisbane: Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Kenna, T. (2007a). Consciously constructing exclusivity in the suburbs? Unpacking a master planned estate development in Western Sydney. Geographical Research, 45(3), 300–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00462.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenna, T. (2007b). Consciously constructing exclusivity in the suburbs? Unpacking a master planned estate development in Western Sydney. Geographical Research, 45(3), 300–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00462.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenna, T., & Stevenson, D. (2010). Negotiating community title: Residents’ lived experiences of private governance arrangements in a master planned estate. Urban Policy and Research, 28(4), 435–449. doi: 10.1080/08111146.2010.527284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenna, T., & Stevenson, D. (2013). Experiences of ‘community’ in a gated residential estate. Geographical Research, 51(4), 412–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leighton, B. (1988). The community concept in criminology: Toward a social network approach. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25, 351–374. doi: 10.1177/0022427888025004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, S. (2001). The edge and the center: Gated communities and the discourse of urban fear. American Anthropologist, 103(1), 45–58. doi: 10.1525/aa.2001.103.1.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, S. (2003). Behind the gates – life, security and the pursuit of happiness in Fortress America. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Low, S. M. (2008). Fortification of residential neighbourhoods and the new emotions of home. Housing, Theory and Society, 25(1), 47–65. doi: 10.1080/14036090601151038
   Google Scholar
• Maller, C., & Nicholls, L. (2013). Encountering the multiplicity of community in planning and designing new neighbourhoods. Urban Policy and Research, 32(1), 17–32. doi: 10.1080/08111146.2013.844120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCambridge, J., Witton, J., & Elbourne, D. R. (2014). Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(3), 267–277. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P., & Dowling, R. (2007). Understanding master-planned estates in Australian cities: A framework for research. Urban Policy and Research, 25(1), 21–38. doi: 10.1080/08111140701225586
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. (1999). Myth 19: Qualitative inquiry is not systematic. Qualitative Health Research, 9(5), 573–574. doi: 10.1177/104973299129122063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J., & Richards, L. (2002). Read me first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, L., Phelan, K., & Maller, C. (2015, December 9–11). Time poor, health poor? Travel-related time poverty and resident health in a greenfield master-planned estate. State of Australian Cities Conference, Gold Coast. Retrieved from http://apo.org.au/collections/soac-conferences
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, R. A. (1969). The quest for community. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, R. E. (1967). On social control and collective behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pawley, M. (1973). The private future: Causes and consequences of community collapse in the west. London: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. L. (1993). Looking backward: A critical appraisal of communitarian thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Planning Institute of Australia. (2016). Selandra rise. Retrieved from http://www.planning.org.au/viccontent/selandra-rise
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, B., Skinner, N., & Williams, P. (2012). Time bomb: Work, rest and play in Australia today. Retrieved from http://RMIT.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=882959
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1998). Social capital: Its importance to housing and community development – foreword. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 5–8. doi: 10.1080/10511482.1998.9521283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Real Estate Institute of Victoria. (2013). Median house prices. Retrieved from http://www.reiv.com.au/property-data/median-prices/median-house-prices
   Google Scholar
• Richards, L. (1990). Nobody’s home – dreams and realities in a new suburb. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, T., Cheshire, L., & Lawrence, G. (2009). Social interaction and sense of community in a master planned community. Housing, Theory and Society, 26(2), 122–142. doi: 10.1080/14036090701862484
   Google Scholar
• State Government of Victoria. (2016). Healthy together Victoria. Retrieved from http://www.healthytogether.vic.gov.au/incommunity/index
   Google Scholar
• Strange, C., Fisher, C., Howat, P., & Wood, L. (2014). The essence of being connected: The lived experience of mothers with young children in newer residential areas. Community, Work & Family, 17(4), 486–502. doi: 10.1080/13668803.2014.935704
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2010). The context of diversity: A study of six Chicago neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 47(3), 486–513. doi: 10.1177/0042098009349778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (2013). Master-planned estates: Privatization, socio-spatial polarization and community. Geography Compass, 7(1), 85–93. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12021
   Google Scholar
• Tonnies, F. (1963). Community and society: Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Voydanoff, P. (2001). Conceptualizing community in the context of work and family. Community, Work & Family, 4(2), 133–156. doi: 10.1080/713658928
   Google Scholar
• Walters, P., & Rosenblatt, T. E. D. (2008). Co-operation or co-presence? The comforting ideal of community in a master planned estate. Urban Policy and Research, 26(4), 397–413. doi: 10.1080/08111140801986517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warr, D., & Robson, B. (2013). ‘Everybody’s different’: Struggles to find community on the suburban frontier. Housing Studies, 28(7), 971–992. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2013.778959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wierzbicki, S. (2000). Immigrant isolation, the presence of strong ties among Hispanics and Asians (PhD). University of Washington, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P., & Pocock, B. (2010). Building ‘community’ for different stages of life: Physical and social infrastructure in master planned communities. Community, Work & Family, 13(1), 71–87. doi: 10.1080/13668800902903300
   Google Scholar
• Yigitcanlar, T., Dodson, J., Gleeson, B., & Sipe, N. (2007). Travel self-containment in master planned estates: Analysis of recent Australian trends. Urban Policy and Research, 25(1), 129–149. doi: 10.1080/08111140701255823
   Google Scholar
• Zelinsky, W., & Lee, B. A. (1998). Heterolocalism: An alternative model of the sociospatial behaviour of immigrant ethnic communities. International Journal of Population Geography, 4(4), 281–298. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1220(199812)4:4<281::AID-IJPG108>3.0.CO;2-O
   PubMedGoogle Scholar