Intersectionality and emergence in time use analysis: possible pathways for gender research and work–family reconciliation policy in Italy

References

• Albelda, R. (2011). Time binds: US anti-poverty policies, poverty and single mother’s wellbeing. Feminist Economics, 17(4), 189–214. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2011.602355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelucci, A. (2015). Origini e nuovi possibili scenari dell’Intersectionality Theory: Dal genere allo spazio urbano / Origins and new scenarios of the intersectionality theory: From gender to urban space. AG AboutGender, 4(8), 262–283.
   Google Scholar
• Antonopoulos, R., Masterson, T., & Zacharias, A. (2012, December). The Interlocking of Time and Income Deficits: Revisiting Poverty Measurement, Informing Policy Responses. Research Project Report. Annandale-on-Hudson, NY: Levy Economics Institute of Bard College. Part of the “Undoing Knots, Innovating for Change” series, issued by the UNDP Regional Centre for Latin America and the Caribbean through its Gender Practice Area.
   Google Scholar
• Anxo, A., Flood, L., Mencarini, L., Pailhé, A., Solaz, A., & Tanturri, M. L. (2007). Time allocation between work and family over the life-cycle: A comparative gender analysis of Italy, France, Sweden and the United States. (IZA DP No. 3193, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit) Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (2002). The capacity to aspire. In V. Rao & M. Walton (Eds.), Culture and public action (pp. 59–84). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnet, I. (2016). What works: Gender equality by design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boldyrev, I., & Svetolova, E. (Eds.). (2016). Enacting dismal science. New perspectives on the perfromaritvity of economics. London: Pagrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2010). Performing agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 147–161. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2010.494117
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (2013). Evaluating complex social interventions in a complex world. Evaluation, 19(3), 217–228. doi: 10.1177/1356389013495617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera, D., Colosi, L., & Lobdell, C. (2008). Systems thinking. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31, 299–310. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., & Weible, C. M. (2017). The new policy sciences: Combining the cognitive science of choice, multiple theories of context, and basic and applied analysis. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 619–627. doi: 10.1007/s11077-017-9304-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, E. (2014). Defamilization typology re-examined: Re-measuring the economic independence of women in welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 24(5), 442–454. doi: 10.1177/0958928714542734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 129–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01370.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Comim, F., & Nussbaum, M. (Eds.). (2014). Capabilities, gender, equality: Towards fundamental entitlements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (2004). (an interview with) Intersectionality: The double bind of race and gender, American Bar Association.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85. doi: 10.1177/1464700108086364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haan, J. (2006). How emergence arises. Ecological Complexity, 3, 293–301. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill, B., & Zambrana, R. E. (Eds.). (2009). Emerging intersections: Race, class, and gender in theory, policy, and practice. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M. (1996). The southern model of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37. doi: 10.1177/095892879600600102
   Google Scholar
• Forss, K., Marra, M., & Schwartz, R. (Eds.). 2011. Evaluating the complex. Beyond attribution and contribution. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fraire, M. (2006). Multi-way data analysis for comparing time use in different countries – Application to time-budgets at different stages of life in six European countries. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 3(1), 88–109. doi: 10.13085/eIJTUR.3.1.88-109
   Google Scholar
• Fraire, M., Garofalo, M. R., & Marra, M. (2015). “La conciliazione dei tempi di donne occupate in differenti contesti di lavoro: un’indagine qualitativa sui bilanci del tempo” relazione presentata all’VIII conferenza Espanet Italia, Fisciano 17–19 settembre 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Garofalo, M. R., & Marra, M. (2011). Formalizing women’s work within social cooperatives: A route to social equity in the South of Italy. Giving, 2, 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Garofalo, M. R., & Marra, M. (2013). Sentieri di eguaglianza di genere. Approcci di valutazione e confronto, Natan Edizioni, Benevento-Roma.
   Google Scholar
• Garofalo, M. R., Marra, M., & Pelizzari, M. R. (Eds.). (2016). Quale genere di conciliazione? Intersezioni tra lavoro, famiglia e welfare. Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Garofalo, M. R., Marra, M., Pelizzari, M. R., & Truda, G. (a cura di). (2015). ConciliAzioni, Azioni di sostegno ai tempi di vita e di lavoro delle donne lavoratrici, Natan Edizioni, Benevento Roma.
   Google Scholar
• Greif, A. (2005). Commitment, coercion, and markets: The nature and dynamics of institutions support- ing exchange. In C. Ménard & M. Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of New institutional economics (pp. 727–786). Netherland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1984). Getting ahead collectively: Grassroots experiences in Latin America. New York: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, S., & Marquez, J. (2012). Empathy in leadership: Appropriate or misplaced? An empirical study on a topic that is asking for attention. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 95–105. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0951-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornshied, A. (2009). Intersectional challenges to gender studies – gender studies as a challenge to intersectionality. In C. Asberg, K. Harrison, B. Pernrud, & M. Gustavson (Eds.). Gender delight: Science, Knowledge, Culture and Writing…. For Nina Lykke (pp. 33–46). Linköping: Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Istat. (2015). Lavoro e conciliazione dei tempi di vita. Retrieved from https://www.istat.it/it/files/2015/12/03-Lavoro-conciliazione-tempi-vita-Bes2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Istat. (2017). Natalità e fecondità. Retrieved from https://www.istat.it/it/files/2017/11/Report-Nascite-e-fecondit%C3%A0.pdf?title=Natalit%C3%A0±e±fecondit%C3%A0±±-±28%2Fnov%2F2017±-±Testo±integrale±e±nota±metodologica.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J., Berschinger, N., & Olbrich, E. (2010). Emergence. New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 265–273. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levers, M. J. D. (2013). Philosophical paradigms, grounded theory, and perspectives on emergence. SAGE Open, 1–6. doi: 10.1177/2158244013517243
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, H. Vivar, M., & Supik, L. (Eds.). (2011). Framing Intersectionality: Debates on a Multi-faceted Concept. Gender Studies. Farnham: Ashgate, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Marra, M. (2012). The missing links of the European gender mainstreaming approach assessing work-family reconciliation policies in the Italian mezzogiorno. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 19(3), 349–370. doi: 10.1177/1350506812443631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marra, M. (2014a). Beyond feminist and gender-based approaches: Evaluating cooperation between men and women for gender equity. In K. Forss & M. Marra (Eds.), Speaking justice to power: Ethical and methodological challenges for evaluators (pp. 89–111). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marra, M. (2014b). Informal work and social expenditure in Italy: How to exit poverty traps? Politiche Sociali/Social Policies, 1, 41–64.
   Google Scholar
• Marra, M. (2015). Cooperating for a more egalitarian society: Complexity theory for evaluating gender equity. Evaluation, 21(1), 32–46. doi: 10.1177/1356389014564856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, M. (2015). Gender performativity. In P. Whelehan & A. Bolin (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of human sexuality (pp. 1–4). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Neilson, J., & Stanfors, M. (2014). It’s about time! Gender, parenthood, and household divisions of labor under different welfare regimes. Journal of Family Issues, 35(8), 1066–1088. doi: 10.1177/0192513X14522240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development in the capability approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realist evaluation. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rivitti, G. (a cura di) (2015). Intervista a Francesca Brezzi, in Nuova Etica pubblica. Anno, 3(5), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, P. (2008). Using program theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Evaluation, 14(1), 29–48.
   Google Scholar
• Saraceno, C. (2013). Family policies. In B. Greve (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the welfare state (pp. 381–390). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spissu, E., Eluru, N., Pendyala, R. M., Bhat, C. R., & Konduri, K. (2007). A comparative analysis of weekday time use and activity patterns between Italya and the United States. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11584/89525
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, S. (2014). The word-family interface. An introduction. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Westhorp, G. (2012). Using complexity-consistent theory for evaluating complex systems. Evaluation, 18(4), 405–420.
   Google Scholar