Tick-tock sounds different for women working in IT areas

References

• Acker, J. (1992). From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21(5), 565–569. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2075528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ba, S. (2014). ‘A great job and a family’: Work narratives and the work and family interaction. Community, Work & Family, 17(1), 43–59. doi: 10.1080/13668803.2013.877420
   Google Scholar
• Bailyn, L., Drago, R., & Kochan, T. (2001). Integrating work and family life: A holistic approach (Report for Alfred P. Sloan Foundation). Washington, DC: Family Policy Network. Retrieved from MIT: http://web.mit.edu/workplacecenter/docs/WorkFamily.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, S., Sayer, L., Milkie, M., & Robinson, J. (2012). Housework: Who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Social Forces, 91(1), 55–63. doi: 10.1093/sf/sos120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodker, S. (2016). Rethinking technology on the boundaries of life and work. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 20, 533–544. doi: 10.1007/s00779-016-0933-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, J. (2013). Occupational standing over the life course: What is the role of part time work? In A. Evans & J. Baxter (Eds.), Negotiating the life course: Stability and change in life pathways, life course research and social policies, 1. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-8912-0_11
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). She figures. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. (2007). Nuts and bolts and people. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 331–356. doi: 10.1177/0306312706072175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. (2009). Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox. Engineering Studies, 1(3), 169–189. doi: 10.1080/19378620903225059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. (2014). Can women engineers be ‘real engineers’ and ‘real women’? Gender in/authenticity in engineering. In E. Waltraud & I. Horwath (Eds.), Gender in science and technology: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 187–203). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, V., & Kinsey, S. (2014). Behind closed doors! Homosocial desire and the academic boys club. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 29(1), 44–64. doi:10.1108/ GM-10-2012-0080
   Google Scholar
• Gill, J., Mills, J., Franzway, S., & Sharp, R. (2008). ‘Oh you must be very clever!’ high-achieving women, professional power and the ongoing negotiation of workplace identity. Gender and Education, 20(3), 223–236. doi: 10.1080/09540250801968990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Ramos, A. M., & Bosch, N. V. (2013). International mobility of women in science and technology careers: Shaping plans for personal and professional purposes. Gender, Place and Culture, 20(5), 613–629. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2012.701198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Ramos, A., Vergés Bosch, N., & Martínez García, J. S. (2017). Women in the technology labour market. REIS, 159, 73–90. doi: 10.5477/cis/reis.159.73
   Google Scholar
• Hakim, C. (2000). Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hakim, C. (2003). Family matters, Australian Institute of family studies No. 64 Autumn. Retrieved from http://www.catherinehakim.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/AIFSarticle.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hari, A. (2017). Who gets to ‘work hard, play hard’? Gendering the work–life balance rhetoric in Canadian tech companies. Gender, Work & Organization, 24(2), 99–114. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatmaker, D. M. (2013). Engineering identity: Gender and professional identity negotiation among women engineers. Gender, Work and Organisation, 20(4), 382–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00589.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbrecht, M., & Lero, D. (2014). Self-employment and family life: Constructing work-life balance when you’re ‘always on’. Community, Work & Family, 17(1), 20–42. doi: 10.1080/13668803.2013.862214
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (2012). The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• INE (http://www.ine.es)
   Google Scholar
• Jolanki, O. (2015). To work or to care? Working women’s decision-making. Community, Work & Family, 18(3), 268–283. doi: 10.1080/133668803.2014.997194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalliath, P., & Kalliath, T. (2013). Does job satisfaction mediate the relationship between work–family conflict and psychological strain? A study of Australian social workers Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 23(2), 91–105. doi: 10.1080/02185385.2013.793019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelligher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83–106. doi: 10.1177/0018726709349199
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 704–730. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.43669916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liechty, J., & Anderson, E. (2007). Flexible workplace policies: Lessons from the federal alternative work schedules act. Family Relations, 56(3), 304–317. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00461.x/epdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, D., & Woodward, A. (2004). Gender and time at the top: Cultural construction of time in high-level careers and homes. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 11(2), 205–221. doi: 10.1177/1350506804042096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, S. (2003). Constraints and choices in mothers’s employment careers: A consideration of Hakim’s preference theory. British Journal of Sociology, 54(3), 317–338. doi: 10.1080/0007131032000111848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moen, P. (2011). From ‘work–family’ to the ‘gendered life course’ and ‘fit’: Five challenges to the field. Community, Work & Family, 14(1), 81–96. doi: 10.1080/13668803.2010.532661
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1981). Men, masculinity and the process of sociological enquiry. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 83–113). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, D., Hopkins, M., & Bilimoria, D. (2008). Women’s careers at the start of the 21st century: Patterns and paradoxes. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 727–743. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9465-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, P., Den Dulk, L., & Van der Lippe, T. (2009). The effects of time-spatial flexibility and new working conditions on employees' work-life balance: The dutch case. Community, Work & Family, 12(3), 279–297. doi:10.1080/13668800902968907
   Google Scholar
• Peters, P., & Van der Lippe, T. (2007). The time-pressure reducing potential of tele home working: The Dutch case. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3), 430–447. doi:10.1080/09585190601167730
   Google Scholar
• Probert, B. (2005). I just couldn’t fit it in: Gender and unequal outcomes in academic careers. Gender Work and Organisation, 12(1), 50–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00262.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, L., Myers, K., & Gailliard, B. (2014). Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations, 67(4), 413–440. doi 10.1177/0018726713495704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richman, A., Civian, J., Shannon, L., Jeffrey Hill, E., & Brennan, R. (2008). The relationship of perceived flexibility, supportive work–life policies, and use of formal flexible arrangements and occasional flexibility to employee engagement and expected retention. Community, Work & Family, 11(2), 183–197. doi: 10.1080/13668800802050350
   Google Scholar
• Sointu, E. (2005). The rise of an ideal: Tracing changing discourses of wellbeing. The Sociological Review, 53(2), 255–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00513.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, C., & Smithson, J. (2007). Perspectives of homeworkers and their partners on working flexibility and gender equity. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3), 448–461. doi: 10.1080/09585190601167797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet, S., Sarkisian, N., Matz-Costa, C., & Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (2016). Are women less career centric than men? Structure, culture, and identity investments. Community, Work & Family, 19(4), 481–500. doi: 10.1080/13668803.2015.1078287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Kovacs, D., Ryan, M., & Haslam, A. (2006). The glass-cliff: Women’s career paths in the UK private IT sector. Equal Opportunities International, 25(8), 674–687. doi: 10.1108/02610150610719137
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs, employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. Retrieved from: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar