Where’s the community in community, work and family? A community-based capabilities approach

References

• Abendroth, A.-K., & Pausch, S. (2017). German fathers and their preferences for shorter working hours for family reasons. Community, Work & Family, 21(4), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2017.1356805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annink, A. (2016). From social support to capabilities for the work–life balance of independent professionals. Journal of Management & Organization, Published, Published online, https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. C., & Gareis, K. G. (2008). Community: The critical missing link in work-family research. In The changing realities of work and family: A multidisciplinary approach, 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305272.ch4
   Google Scholar
• Bookman, A. (2005). Can employers be good neighbors? Redesigning the workplace–community interface. In S. M. Bianchi, L. M. Casper, & R. Berkowitz King (Eds.), Work, family, health, and well-being. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (pp. 139–153). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613523
   Google Scholar
• Boterman, W. R. (2018). Carrying class and gender: Cargo bikes as symbolic markers of egalitarian gender roles of urban middle classes in Dutch inner cities. Social & Cultural Geography, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2018.1489975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674224575&content=reviews
   Google Scholar
• Chatrakul, U., Ayudhya, N. A., Prouska, R., & Beauregard, T. A. (2017). The impact of global economic crisis and austerity on quality of working life and work-life balance: A capabilities perspective. European Management Review, https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, N. M., Kelly, P. F., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2007). Economic geography: A contemporary introduction. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cogswell, B. E. (1975). Variant family forms and life styles: Rejection of the traditional nuclear family. The Family Coordinator, 24(4), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/583026
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1998). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia, 13(3), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01370.x
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2000). Gender, black feminism, and black political economy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 568(1), 41–53. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1049471. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620056800105
   Google Scholar
• Dogan, M. (2004). The quantitative method in comparative research (1st ed.). In P. Kennett (Ed.), A handbook of comparative social policy (pp. 324–338). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1933/1997). The division of labor in society [De la Division du Travail Social] (W. D. Halls, Trans.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellem, B., & Shields, J. (1999). Rethinking ‘Regional Industrial Relations’: Space, place and the social relations of work. Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(4), 536–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/002218569904100404
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, A., & Urry, J. (2010). Mobile lives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Felstead, A., Jewson, N., & Walters, S. (2005). Changing places of work. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• French, K. A., & Johnson, R. C. (2016). A retrospective timeline of the evolution of work–family research. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The oxford handbook of work and family (pp. 9–22). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gareis, K. C., & Barnett, R. C. (2008). The development of a new measure for work–family research: Community resource fit. Community, Work & Family, 11(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800802133925
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Book. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D. T., Kossek, E. E., Briscoe, J. P., Pichler, S., & Lee, M. D. (2013). Nonwork orientations relative to career: A multidimensional measure. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, K. (1989). The return to community. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17(1), 1–15. https://search-proquest-com.proxy.library.uu.nl/docview/1295867064/citation/FF5A61719F0A4F0CPQ/4?accountid=14772. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herod, A., Rainnie, A., & McGrath-Champ, S. (2007). Working space: Why incorporating the geographical is central to theorizing work and employment practices. Work, Employment & Society, 21(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017007076633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, B. (2011). The agency gap in work-life balance: Applying Sen’s capabilities framework within European contexts. Social Politics, 18(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxr012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, B. (Ed.) (2014). Worklife balance. The agency and capabilities gap. Oxford University Press. http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780199681136.do
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, B., Fahlén, S., & Takács, J. (2011). Agency and capabilities to achieve a work-life balance: A comparison of Sweden and Hungary. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 18(2), 168–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxr007
   Google Scholar
• Hoogenboom, M., Kruiswijk, W., & Yerkes, M. A. (2015). Reconciling work and informal care across organisations: A question of capabilities?. Annual ESPANet conference.
   Google Scholar
• Hostetler, A. J., Desrochers, S., Kopko, K., & Moen, P. (2012). Marital and family satisfaction as a function of work–family demands and community resources. Journal of Family Issues, 33(3), 316–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513(11413877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvinden, B., & Halvorsen, R. (2017). Mediating agency and structure in sociology: What role for conversion factors? Critical Sociology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920516684541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaga, A. (2020). Something new from the South: Community, work and family in South Africa. Community, Work & Family. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2020.1800591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaga, A., Arabandi, B., Bagraim, J., & Mdlongwa, S. (2018). Doing the ‘gender dance’: Black women professionals negotiating gender, race, work and family in post-apartheid South Africa. Community, Work & Family, 21(4), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2017.1311840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. (2005). Moving to London time household co-ordination and the infrastructure of everyday life. Time & Society, 14(1), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X05050302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javornik, J., & Kurowska, A. (2017). Work and care opportunities under different parental leave systems: Gender and class inequalities in Northern Europe. Social Policy and Administration, 51(4), 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, P. H. (2017). Cause and effects of female labour force participation in local welfare systems. European Societies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2016.1268706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, C., & Lewis, S. (1998). Editorial. Community, Work and Family, 1(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668809808414693
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, C., Lewis, S., & Caton, S. (2000). Editorial: Community, work & family in the 21st Century. Community, Work and Family, 3(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/713658896
   Google Scholar
• Kamenou, N. (2008). Reconsidering work-life balance debates: Challenging limited understandings of the ‘life’ component in the context of ethnic minority women’s experiences. British Journal of Management, 19(SUPPL. 1), s99–s109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00575.x
   Google Scholar
• Kazepov, Y. (2010). Rescaling social policies: Towards multilevel governance in Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less ? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709349199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kispeter, E., & Yeandle, S. (2015). Local welfare policies in a centralized governance system: Childcare and eldercare in a period of rapid change in Leeds. In D. Kutsar & M. Kuronen (Eds.), Local Welfare policymaking in European Cities (pp. 101–116). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Korpi, W., Ferrarini, T., & Englund, S. (2013). Women’s opportunities under different family policy Constellations: Gender, class, and inequality tradeoffs in Western countries re-examined. Social Politics, 20(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxs028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koslowski, A., & Kadar-Satat, G. (2018). Fathers at work: Explaining the gaps between entitlement to leave policies and uptake. Community, Work & Family, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2018.1428174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossek, E. E., Sweet, S., & Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (2006). Introduction: The insights gained from integrating disciplines. In M. Pitt-Catsouphes, E. E. Kossek, & S. Sweet (Eds.), The work and family handbook: Multi-disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 67–72). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kruijswijk, W., Da Roit, B., & Hoogenboom, M. (2015). Elasticity of care networks and the gendered division of care. Ageing and Society, 35(4), 675–703. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X13000822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurowska, A. (2018a). (De)familialization and (de)genderization – Competing or complementary perspectives in comparative policy analysis? Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurowska, A. (2018b). Gendered effects of home-based work on parents’ capability to balance work with non-work: Two countries with different models of division of labour compared. Social Indicators Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2034-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leschied, A. W., Chiodo, D., Whitehead, P. C., & Hurley, D. (2006). The association of poverty with Child Welfare Service and Child and family clinical outcomes. Community, Work & Family, 9(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800500420988
   Google Scholar
• Lilius, J. (2017). Urban space in the everyday lives of mothers and fathers on family leave in Helsinki. European Urban and Regional Studies, 24(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776415619662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Månsdotter, A., Fredlunda, P., Hallqvist, J., & Magnusson, C. (2010). Who takes paternity leave? A cohort study on prior social and health characteristics among fathers in Stockholm. Journal of Public Health Policy, 31(3), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2010.24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinelli, F., Anttonen, A. A., & Mätzke, M. (Eds.). (2017). Social services disrupted: Changes, challenges and policy implications for Europe in times of austerity. Northampton, MA. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, L., Ward, K., Perrons, D., Ray, K., & Fagan, C. (2006). Place, class and local circuits of reproduction: Exploring the social geography of middle-class childcare in London. Urban Studies, 43(12), 2163–2182. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00420980600936509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, C., Naumann, I., & Koslowski, A. (2017). Access to childcare in Europe: Parents’ logistical challenges in cross-national perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 51(7), 1367–1385. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minnotte, K. L. (2016). Work, family and community. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and family (pp. 289–299). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moen, P. (2011). From ‘work–family’ to the ‘gendered life course’ and ‘fit’: Five challenges to the field. Community, Work & Family, 14(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2010.532661
   Google Scholar
• Moran, J., & Koslowski, A. (2019). Making use of work–family balance entitlements: How to support fathers with combining employment and caregiving. Community, Work and Family, 22(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2018.1470966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. http://books.google.com/books?id=oFnWbTqgNPYC&pgis=1
   Google Scholar
• Peters, P., den Dulk, L., & van der Lippe, T. (2009). The effects of time-spatial flexibility and new working conditions on employees’ work–life balance: The Dutch case. Community, Work & Family, 12(3), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800902968907
   Google Scholar
• Pitt-Catsouphes, M., MacDermid, S. M., Schwarz, R., & Matz, C. (2006). Community contexts: The perspectives and adaptations of working parents. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(10), 1400–1421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764206286562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock, B., Williams, P., & Skinner, N. (2012). Conceptualizing work, family and community: A socio-ecological systems model, taking account of power, time, space and life Stage. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(3), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2011.00852.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. J. (2016). Identifying and measuring capabilities for career development in NEET young people. Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques, 47(2), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.4000/RSA.1738
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2017). Wellbeing, freedom and social justice: The capability approach Re-Examined. Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0130
   Google Scholar
• Sack, R. D. (1993). The power of place and space. Geographical Review, 83(3), 326. https://doi.org/10.2307/215735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution (1st ed.). Crown Business/Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1990). Justice: Means versus freedoms. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19(2), 111–121. https://about.jstor.org/terms
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stjernø, S. (2009). Solidarity in Europe. The history of an idea. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, S., Swisher, R., & Moen, P. (2005). Selecting and assessing the family-friendly community: Adaptive strategies of middle-class, dual-earner couples. Family Relations, 54(5), 596–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2005.00344.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, M., Kamano, S., Matsuda, T., Onode, S., & Yoshizumi, K. (2014). Worklife balance in Japan: New policies, old practices. In B. Hobson (Ed.), Worklife balance. The agency and capabilities gap (pp. 92–125). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tandrayen-Ragoobur, V. (2018). Intimate partner violence and women’s labour force participation in Sub Saharan Africa. Community, Work & Family, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2018.1540400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tönnies, F. (1887/2001). Community and civil society [Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie] (M. Hollis, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• van der Klis, M., & Karsten, L. (2009). The commuter family as a geographical adaptive strategy for the work–family balance. Community, Work & Family, 12(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800902966372
   Google Scholar
• Van Ingen, E. (2008). Social participation revisited. Acta Sociologica, 51(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699308090038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voydanoff, P. (2001). Conceptualizing community in the context of work and family. Community, Work & Family, 4(2), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/713658928
   Google Scholar
• Voydanoff, P. (2007). Work, family, and community: Exploring interconnections. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, K. (2007). Thinking geographically about work, employment and society. Work, Employment & Society, 21(2), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017007076634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, M. F. (2012). Towards a critical global race theory. Sociology Compass, 6(4), 332–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2012.00457.x
   Google Scholar
• Whaley, L. (2018). Geographies of the self: Space, place, and scale revisited. Human Arenas, 1(1), 21–36. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs42087-018-0006-x.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0006-x
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P., & Pocock, B. (2010). Building ‘community’ for different stages of life: Physical and social infrastructure in master planned communities. Community, Work & Family, 13(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800902903300
   Google Scholar
• Yerkes, M. A., & Javornik, J. (2019). Creating capabilities: Childcare policies in comparative perspective. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(4), 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928718808421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerkes Mara, A., Javornik, J., & Kurowska, A. (eds.). (2019). Social policy and the capability approach. Concepts, measurement and application. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar