Are family-friendly organisations friendly for children? Navigating work, families with children, and discursive power use within organisations

References

• Abendroth, A. K. (2022). Transitions to parenthood, flexible working and time-based work-to-family conflicts: A gendered life course and organisational change perspective. Journal of Family Research, 34(4), 1033–1055. https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-730
   Google Scholar
• Adamson, M., Muhr, S. L., & Beauregard, T. A. (2023). Theorising work-life balance endeavours as a gendered project of the self: The case of senior executives in Denmark. Human Relations, 76(4), 629–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211073309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00138.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 414–435. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balan, C., van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2023). New fathers, ideal workers? New players in the field of father-friendly work organizations. Gender, Work & Organization, 30(3), 957–981. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, E., Harley, B., & Bryman, A. (2022). Business research methods. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, M., & Bloor, T. (2013). The practice of critical discourse analysis: An introduction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Breaugh, J. A., & Frye, N. K. (2008). Work-family conflict: The importance of family-friendly employment practices and family-supportive supervisors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(1), 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9081-1
   Google Scholar
• Brinton, M. C., Bueno, X., Oláh, L., & Hellum, M. (2018). Post-industrial fertility ideals, intentions and gender inequality: A comparative qualitative analysis. Population and Development Review, 44(2), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, R. J. (1997). Culture's consequences: Organisational values, family-friendliness and a level playing field. Women in Management Review, 12(6), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649429710182431
   Google Scholar
• Callan, S. (2007). Implications of family-friendly policies for organizational culture: Findings from two case studies. Work, Employment and Society, 21(4), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017007082876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H. (2022). The flexibility paradox: Why flexible working leads to (self-) exploitation. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, M. (1987). Architect or Bee: the Human Price of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Harré, R. (2001). Positioning. The discursive production of selves. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice. A reader (pp. 261–271). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. E., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2006). Family-friendly organizations? Work and family programs in the, 1990s. Work and Occupations, 33(2), 191–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888405280446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetz, S., & Mumby, D. K. (2012). Power, discourse and the workplace: Reclaiming the critical tradition. In J.A. Andersson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 13 (pp. 18–47). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doorewaard, H., & Benschop, Y. (2003). HRM and organizational change: An emotional endeavour. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(3), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810310475523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, T. L., & Perry-Smith, J. E. (2018). The paradox of family structure and plans after work: Why single childless employees may be the least absorbed at work. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1231–1252. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eräranta, K., & Kantola, J. (2016). The europeanization of Nordic gender equality: A foucauldian analysis of reconciling work and family in Finland. Gender, Work & Organization, 23(4), 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eydal, G. B., Rostgaard, T., & Hiilamo, H. (2018). Family policies in the Nordic countries: Aiming at equality. In G.B. Eydal & T. Rostgaard (Eds.), Handbook of Family Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Hanford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 35–46). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer, A., & Gagne, L. (2013). Family-friendly benefits? Journal of Management & Organization, 19(6), 721–741. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finland, Statistics. (2019). Labour force survey [online publication]. Available here: https://stat.fi/til/tyti/2018/14/tyti_2018_14_2019-11-14_en.pdf. Read 11.11.2023
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R. F. (1996). Harvesting minds: How TV commercials control kids. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, S., & Hirsh, C. E. (2019). “Family-friendly” jobs and motherhood pay penalties: The impact of flexible work arrangements across the educational spectrum. Work and Occupations, 46(1), 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888418771116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, S., & Agrawal, P. (2020). Family-friendly practices in the organisation: A citation analysis. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(7/8), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-12-2019-0251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatrell, C. J., Burnett, S. B., Cooper, C. L., & Sparrow, P. (2013). Work-life balance and parenthood: A comparative review of definitions, equity and enrichment. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00341.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, J., & Fujimoto, T. (1995). Employer characteristics and the provision of family-responsive policies. Work and Occupations, 22(4), 380–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888495022004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, J. L., & Finley, A. (2002). Coverage and effectiveness of family-responsive workplace policies. Human Resource Management Review, 12(3), 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00063-3
   Google Scholar
• Goh, Z., Ilies, R., & Wilson, K. S. (2015). Supportive supervisors improve employees’ daily lives: The role supervisors play in the impact of daily workload on life satisfaction via work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Programme. (2023). A strong and committed Finland - Programme of Prime Minister Petteri Orpo's Government. Publications of the Finnish Government. 2023:60 urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-383-818-5Link to an external website. Read 4.8.2023
   Google Scholar
• Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhaus, J. H., Ziegert, J. C., & Allen, T. D. (2012). When family-supportive supervision matters: Relations between multiple sources of support and work-family balance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, S., Jyrkinen, M., & Kangas, E. (2022). Fathers in focus: Two discursive analyses on addressing men, work and care. In B. Poggio & S. Bertolini (Eds.), Research handbook on work-life balance (pp. 160–175). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, S., & Lämsä, A. M. (2017). Narratives of spousal support for the careers of men in managerial posts. Gender, Work & Organisation, 24(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, S., Lämsä, A. M., & Niemistö, C. (2021). Work-family practices and complexity of their usage: A discourse analysis towards socially responsible human resource management. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(4), 815–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04458-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellstrand, J., Nisén, J., & Myrskylä, M. (2020). All-time low period fertility in Finland: Demographic drivers, tempo effects, and cohort implications. Population Studies, 74(3), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2020.1750677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, K. D., & Silver, W. A. (2020). Beyond time-binds: Rethinking work-family dynamics for a mobile world. Human Relations, 73(7), 924–952. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719846264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, D. (2013). Children: Their place in organisation studies. Organisation Studies, 34(10), 1487–1503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613495329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, D., Keohane, K., & Kuhling, C. (2009). Children and organisation. 25th EGOS Colloquium: Sub-theme 44, New sites/ sights in organization: Changing orientations in organization studies, ESADE Business School, Barcelona, 2-4 July. https://cora.ucc.ie/server/api/core/bitstreams/ca66f313-6082-42bf-8625-deec61670347/content. Read: 8.11.2023
   Google Scholar
• Kelliher, C., Richardson, J., & Boiarintseva, G. (2019). All of work? All of life? Reconceptualising work-life balance for the, 21s. t century. Human Resource Management Journal, 29(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korobov, N. (2010). A discursive psychological approach to positioning. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880902822321
   Google Scholar
• Kossek, E. E., & Michel, J. S. (2011). Flexible work schedules. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organisational psychology: Building and developing the organisation (pp. 535–572). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1999). Bridging the work-family policy and productivity gap: A literature review. Community, Work & Family, 2(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668809908414247
   Google Scholar
• Kossek, E. E., Perrigino, M. B., Russo, M., & Morandin, G. (2023). Missed connections between the leadership and work-life fields: Work-life supportive leadership for a dual agenda. Academy of Management Annals, 17(1), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2021.0085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work-family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work-family-specific supervisor and organisational support. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01211.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, A., & Kramer, K. Z. (2021). Putting the family back into work and family research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126, 103564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krstić, N., & Sladojević Matić, J. (2020). Should children become key stakeholders in designing family-friendly workplaces? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(9/10), 1125–1139. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-07-2020-0331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z. D., & Zhang, B. (2023). Family-friendly policy evolution: A bibliometric study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01483-z
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, C. (2021). Flexible time-but is the time owned? Family friendly and family unfriendly work arrangements, occupational gender composition and wages: A test of the mother-friendly job hypothesis in Sweden. Community, Work & Family, 24(3), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2019.1697644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mescher, S., Benschop, Y., & Doorewaard, H. (2010). Representations of work-life balance support. Human Relations, 63(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709349197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, M. J., Matthews, R. A., Henning, J. B., & Woo, V. A. (2014). Family-supportive organizations and supervisors: How do they influence employee outcomes and for whom? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(12), 1763–1785. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.860387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. (2022, January 13). Family leave reform enters into force in August 2022. https://stm.fi/en/-family-leave-reform-enters-into-forc-in-august-2022. Read 25.5.2023
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. S. (2020). Why don't employees use family-friendly work practices? Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 58(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullet, D. R. (2018). A general critical discourse analysis framework for educational research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(2), 116–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18758260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K., & Deetz, S. (1990). Power, discourse and the workplace: Reclaiming the critical tradition. Communication Yearbook, 13, 18–47.
   Google Scholar
• Nikander, P. (2012). Interviews as discourse data. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research. The complexity of the craft (2nd ed., pp. 397–413). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, M., Brandth, B., & Kvande, E. (2007). Fathers, work and family life: Global perspectives and new insights. Community, Work and Family, 10(4), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800701574971
   Google Scholar
• Padavic, I., Ely, R. J., & Reid, E. M. (2020). Explaining the persistence of gender inequality: The work-family narrative as a social defense against the 24/7 work culture. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1), 61–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219832310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrigino, M. B., Dunford, B. B., & Wilson, K. S. (2018). Work-family backlash: The “dark side” of work-life balance (WLB) policies. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 600–630. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantenga, J., & Remery, C. (2009). The provision of childcare services: A comparative review of 30 European countries. European Commission DG for Employment. Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. N. (2020). Work-family lockdown: Implications for a post-pandemic research agenda. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35(7/8), 639–646. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-05-2020-0148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, M. A., & Smith, A. B. (2009). Children's participation rights in research. Childhood (copenhagen, Denmark), 16(1), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568208101694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, E. (2015). Embracing, passing, revealing and the ideal worker image: How people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organisation Science, 26(4), 997–1017. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repo, K. (2004). Combining work and family in two welfare stage contexts: A discourse analytical perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 38(6), 622–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotkirch, A. (2021). Syntyvyyden toipuminen ja pitenevä elinikä: Linjauksia 2020-luvun väestöpolitiikalle. Translation: Fertility recovery and longer life expectancy: Orientations for population policies in the 2020s. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-383-073-8. Read 21.6.2023
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. F., Gilmer, D. O., & Stockdale, M. S. (2019). The importance of culture and support for workplace flexibility: An ecological framework for understanding flexibility support structures. Business Horizons, 62(5), 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spagnoli, P., Manuti, A., Buono, C., & Ghislieri, C. (2021). The good, the bad and the blend: The strategic role of the “middle leadership” in work-family/life dynamics during remote working. Behavioral Sciences, 11(112), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (1988 [1985]). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 66–111). University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C., Landry, D., & MacLean, G. M. (1996). Subaltern talk: Interview with the editors. In G. C. Spivak, D. Landry, & G. M. MacLean (Eds.), The Spivak reader: Selected works of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, S. R., & Kincheloe, J. L. (1997). Kinderculture: The corporate construction of childhood. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, P., & Hernandez, L. A. (2013). The all-or-nothing workplace: Flexibility stigma and “opting out” among professional-managerial women. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanquerel, S., & Grau-Grau, M. (2020). Unmasking work-family balance barriers and strategies among working fathers in the workplace. Organization, 27(5), 680–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419838692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Parliamentary National Child Strategy Committee. (2022). National child strategy committee report. Publications of the Finnish Government 2022:16. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bistream/handle/10024/163977/VN_2022_16.pdf?sequence = 1&isAllowed = y. Read 1.6.2023
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organisational attachment and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54(3), 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1998.1681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tienari, J., Quack, S., & Theobald, H. (2002). Organisational reforms, ideal workers’ and gender orders: A cross-societal comparison. Organisation Studies, 23(2), 249–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602232004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 466–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22
   Google Scholar
• Veiga, J. F., Baldridge, D. C., & Eddleston, K. A. (2004). Toward understanding employee reluctance to participate in family-friendly programs. Human Resource Management Review, 14(3), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Voydanoff, P. (2001). Incorporating community into work and family research: A review of basic relationships. Human Relations, 54(12), 1609–1637. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267015412003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (2003). Paranoia, ambivalence and discursive practices: Concepts of position and positioning in psychoanalysis and discursive psychology. In R. Harré & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.), The self and others. Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political and cultural contexts (pp. 99–120). Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Wittman, S. (2023). Why and how organizations manage workers’ “whole selves”: Exploring the case of kin. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2023, No. 1, p. 17336). Academy of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2015). Methods of critical discourse studies. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhead, M. (1999). Combatting child labour: Listen to what the children say. Childhood (copenhagen, Denmark), 6(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568299006001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Working Time Act. (872/2019). English translation. https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2019/en20190872.pdf. Read 15.6.2023
   Google Scholar