Genetically modified plants and the precautionary principle

REFERENCES

• American Society for Microbiology (2002) 100 Years of Bacillus thuringiensis: A Critical Scientific Assessment, available at: http://www.asmusa.org/acasrc/pdfs/Btreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Borchardt, K. D. (2000) The ABC of Community Law, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• De Marchi, B. and Ravetz J. R. (1998) Risk Management and Governance, a report carried out for the European Commission by the Institute of International Sociology, Gorizia and available from the author
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer (2000) The Europeans and Biotechnology, Report by INRA (Europe) on behalf of the DG-RTD of the European Commission, available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/eb/ebs_134_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (1994) Growth, Competitiveness, Employment – The Challenges and Ways Forward Into the 21st Century, White Paper. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (1997a) The European Commission creates a scientific steering committee (SSC) in the field of consumer health and food safety, Press Release, Brussels, 10 June, available at: http://www.europa.int via the ‘Rapid’ data base.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (1997b) Decision of 23 January 1997 concerning the placing on the market of genetically modified maize (Zea mays L.) with the combined modification for insecticidal properties conferred by the Bt-endotoxin gene and increased tolerance to the herbicide glufosinate ammonium pursuant to Council Directive 90/220/EEC, Official Journal of the European Communities, N° L 031/69-70.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2000a) Economic Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops on the Agri-Food Sector, available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/publi/gmo/fullrep/cover.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2000b) Communication from the European Commission on the Precautionary Principle, COM(2000)1, Brussels, 01.02.2000, available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/pp/pp_index_en.html
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2001a) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council concerning traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC, Official Journal of the European Communities, N° C 304 E/327-330, available at: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2001/ce304/ce30420011030en03270330.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2001b) European Governance – A White Paper, COM(2001) 428 final, adopted on 25.7.2001, available at: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/cnc/2001/com2001_0428en01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2002) List of Summary Notifications (SNIFS) circulated under Article 9 of Directive 90/220/EEC, available at: http://biotech.jrc.it/doc/snifs.doc
   Google Scholar
• European Council (1990a) Directive 90/219/EEC of 23 April 1990 on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms, Official Journal of the European Communities, N° L 117/1-14.
   Google Scholar
• European Council (1990b) Directive 90/220/EEC of 23 April 1990 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, Official Journal of the European Communities, N° L 117/15-27.
   Google Scholar
• European Council (1999) 2194th Council Meeting – ENVIRONMENT – Luxembourg, 24/25 June 1999, available at: http://ue.eu.int/newsroomLoadDoc.asp?MAX=1&BID=89&DID=58120&LANG=1
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC, Official Journal of the European Communities N° L 106, 17.4.2001, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (1987) Resolution on biotechnology in Europe and the need for an integrated policy, (see paragraph 11), Official Journal of the European Communities, N° C76/25-29.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (1999a) Treaty establishing the European Community, Article 174 (ex 130r) in Selected Instruments taken from the Treaties, volume 1, pp. 253–4, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (1999b) Treaty establishing the European Community, Article 95 (ex 100a) in Selected Instruments taken from the Treaties, volume 1, pp. 153–4, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, K. R. (1994) Welcome Address, in Conference on The Biosafety Results of Field Tests of Genetically Modified Plants and Micro-Organisms Monterey, CA, 13–16 November, The University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Fiechter, A. (1994) Regulation, European Biotech ’94, Ernst & Young, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Greenpeace (2000) Greenpeace wins case against GMO field trials licenses, Press Release 16 November, available at: http://www.greenpeace.org/pressreleases/geneng.shtml
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords (1993) Select Committee on Science and Technology, Regulation of the United Kingdom Biotechnology Industry and Global Competitiveness, House of Lords, Paper 80, 13 July, London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, F.-X. (1987) Norms and Institutions as means of coping with insecurity: The Sociological Perspective, in Bayerische Rückversicherung Aktiengesellschaft (ed.) Society and Uncertainty, VVW, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Levidow, L. and Carr, S. (1997) How biotechnology regulation sets a risk/ethics boundary, Agriculture and Human Values 14, 29–43.
   Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, R. E. and Vogel D. (2001) The changing character of regulation: a comparison of Europe and the United States, Risk Analysis 21(3), 399–405.
   Google Scholar
• Losey, J. E. et alia (1999) Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae, Nature 399, 214.
   Google Scholar
• Montague, P. (1999) The waning days of risk assessment, Rachel’s Environment & Health Weekly, 27 May, pp. 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (1986) Recombinant DNA Safety Considerations, Paris: OECD Publications, (93 86 02 1) ISBN 92-64-12857-3.
   Google Scholar
• UK (1990) Environmental Protection Act - Part VI – Genetically Modified Organisms, available at: http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts1990/Ukpga_19900043_en_1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• USDA (1999) Field Releases: Summary 1987 – 12/31/98, histogram available at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotech/images/status5.gif
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Eede, G. and Housten, M. (1999) Quantitative Environmental Risk Assessment for Genetically Modified Organisms, a report issued by the Joint Research Centre (IHCP) of the European Commission, and available from the author.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (1993) Health Aspects of Marker Genes in Genetically Modified Plants, Report of a WHO Workshop, Geneva: World Health Organisation, WHO/FNU/FOS/93.6.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, J. B. and Rogers, M. D. (2002) Comparing precaution in the United States and Europe, Journal of Risk Research 5(4), 317–49.
   Google Scholar