388
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Emergency risk assessment: the Estonian approach

&
Pages 169-193 | Received 08 Jul 2011, Accepted 16 Jul 2012, Published online: 12 Nov 2012

References

  • A Framework for Major Emergency Management. 2006. A Guide to risk assessment in major emergency management. Guidance document 1. Working draft. http://www.dohc.ie/publications/pdf/risk_assessment.pdf?direct=1.
  • Adams , J. 2001 . Risk , London : Routledge .
  • Allinniemi , J. 1994 . Uhat ja mahdollisuudet , Helsinki : Yliopistopaino (in Finnish only) .
  • Aven , T. and Kristensen , V. 2005 . Perspectives on risk: review and discussion of the basis for establishing a unified and holistic approach . Reliability Engineering and System Safety , 90 : 1 – 14 .
  • Baldi, C., M. Martelli, and M.C. Treu. 2004. Territorial vulnerability analysis: the environmental risk management systems. In Risk analysis IV, ed. C.A. Brebbia, 747–52. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.
  • Beck, U. 2000. Risk society revisited: Theory, politics and research programmes. In The risk society and beyond. Critical issues from social theory, ed. B. Adam, U. Beck, and J. van Loon, 211–29. London: Sage.
  • Cabinet Office. 2010. National risk register of civil emergencies. http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/resources/nationalriskregister-2010.pdf (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Carpignano , A. , Golia , E. , Di Mauro , C. , Bouchon , S. and Nordvik , J.-P. 2009 . A methodological approach for the definition of multi-risk maps at regional level: First application . Journal of Risk Research , 12 ( 3–4 ) : 513 – 534 .
  • Christou, M.D. 1998. Introduction to risk concepts. In Risk assessment and management in the context of the seveso II directive, Vol. 6, ed. C. Kirchsteiger, M.D. Christou, and G.A. Papadakis, 109–28. Industrial Safety Series. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Christou , M.D. , Amendola , A. and Smeder , M. 1999 . The control of major accident hazards: The land-use planning issue . Journal of Hazardous Materials , 65 : 151 – 178 .
  • Commission of the European Communities. 2009. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Community approach on the prevention of natural and manmade disasters. 9 p, Brussels, 23.2.2009 COM(2009) 82 final. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52009DC0082:EN:NOT (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Cox , L.A. Jr. 2008 . What’s wrong with risk matrices? . Risk Analysis , 28 ( 2 ) : 497 – 512 .
  • Davidsson, G., L. Haeffler, B. Ljundman, and H. Frantzich. 2003. Handbok för riskanalys. Räddningsverket. http://msb.se/RibData/Filer/pdf/18458.pdf (In Swedish only; accessed March 15, 2011).
  • De Moel , H. , van Alphen , J. and Aerts , J.C.J.H. 2009 . Flood maps in Europe – Methods, availability and use . Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences , 9 : 1 – 13 .
  • De Vries , G. , Verhoeven , I. and Boeckhout , M. 2011 . Taming uncertainty: The WRR approach to rise governance . Journal of Risk Research , 14 ( 4 ) : 485 – 499 .
  • EC. 1985. Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. Amended by: Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 L 73 5 14.3.1997, Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003, Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009.
  • EC. 1997. Council directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, OJ No L 10 of 14 January 1997 (Seveso II-Directive), and Directive 2003/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2003 amending Council directive 96/82/EC, OJ of 31 December 2003.
  • EC. 2001. Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment. Official Journal L 197, 21/07/2001 P. 0030–0037.
  • EC. 2007a. The EU Civil Protection Financial Instrument (2007) 2007/162/EC, Euratom: Council Decision of 5 March 2007 establishing a Civil Protection Financial Instrument (Text with EEA relevance). http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32007D0162:EN:NOT (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • EC. 2007b. Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks, OJ L288, 6.11.2007, p. 28.
  • EC. 2008a. Assessing the Potential for a Comprehensive Community Strategy for the prevention of Natural and Manmade Disasters, Final Report, March 2008. http://ec.europa.eu/echo/civil_protection/civil/pdfdocs/stakeholders/potential_prevention_strategy.pdf. (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • EC. 2008b. Council Directive 2008/114/EC on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection, OJ L345, 23.12.2008, p. 75.
  • EC. 2009. Regulation 1221/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS), repealing Regulation 761/2001/EC and Commission Decisions 2001/681/EC and 2006/193/EC, OJ L 342/1 22.12.2009.
  • EC. 2010a. Commission Staff Working Paper: Risk assessment and Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management. Brusselsk 21,12,2010 SEC(2010) 1626 final, 42 p. http://ec.europa.eu/echo/civil_protection/civil/pdfdocs/prevention/COMM_PDF_SEC_2010_1626_F_staff_working_document_en.pdf (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • EC. 2010b. Vademecum - Civil Protection. http://ec.europa.eu/echo/civil_protection/civil/vademecum/menu/1.html (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • EEA. 2010. Glossary. http://glossary.eea.europa.eu/terminology/terminology_sources_html (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Elomaa, T., and A. Halonen. 2007. EUROBALTIC Survey: Civil Protection Research in the Baltic Sea Region. Eurobaltic II Civil Protection Project. Civil Protection Network. University of Helisinki. Aleksanteri Institute. http://www.helsinki.fi/aleksanteri/civpro/publications/EurobalticII_Civil_Protection_Research.pdf (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Emergency Management Australia. 2004. Emergency Risk Management Applications Guide. Manual 5. Australian Emergency Manuals Series. http://www.ema.gov.au/www/emaweb/rwpattach.nsf/VAP/%2899292794923AE8E7CBABC6FB71541EE1%29≃Manual±05-ApplicationsGuide.pdf/$file/Manual±05-ApplicationsGuide.pdf (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • EN 31010. 2010. Risk management – Risk assessment techniques.
  • EN 61511-3:2005. 2005. Functional safety – Safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector – Part 3: Guidance for the determination of the required safety integrity levels.
  • Estonian Land Board. 2012. Geoportaal. Kaardiserver. (Geoportal. Map Server). http://geoportaal.maaamet.ee (in Estonianonly; accessed January 20, 2012).
  • Estonian Ministry of the Interior. 2008. Emergency Risk Assessment Methodology. Tallinn.
  • Estonian Rescue Board. 2011. Suurõnnetuse ohuga ettevõtete nimekiri (The list of enterprises liable to be affected by major accident). http://www.rescue.ee/kemikaaliohutus/ohtlikudettevotted (in Estonian only; accessed July 1, 2011).
  • Flynn A.M., and L. Theodore. 2001. Health, safety and accident management in the chemical process industries. New York, NY: CRC Press.
  • Government of the Republic. 2010. Nende hädaolukordade nimekiri, mille kohta koostatakse riskianalüüs, ning hädaolukorra riskianalüüsi koostamiseks pädevate täidesaatva riigivõimu asutuste määramine (List of the Emergencies on Which Risk Analysis Is Performed and the Designation of the Executive Branch Institutions Competent to Perform Risk Analysis). Provision of the Government of the Republic, Feb 18, 2010 No 54 (in Estonian only). http://www.rescue.ee/vvfiles/0/HO%20nimekiri%20-%20riskianalyysid.pdf.
  • Government of the Republic. 2011. Nüuded ohtliku ja suurõnnetuse ohuga ettevõtte kohustuslikule dokumentatsioonile ja selle koostamisele ning avalikkusele edastatavale teabele ja õnnetusest teavitamisele (Requirements for Formal Documentation of Hazardous Establishments and Establishments with Major Accident Hazard, for Its Composing, for the Information to Be Presented to the Public and for Notification in Case of Accident) State Gazette I, 01.03.2011, 4 (in Estonian only).
  • Hedin, S., T. Hellenberg, and C. Pursiainen. 2006. The EUROBALTIC I (2003–2006) Project on Civil Protection in the Baltic Sea Region: Best Practices and Lessons Learned. Project part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) within the BSR INTERREG III B Programme. http://www.helsinki.fi/aleksanteri/english/projects/files/eurobaltic_summary_report_april_2006.pdf (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • HM Government. 2005. Emergency Preparedness – Guidance on Part I of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, its Associated Regulations and Non-Statutory Arrangements. http://interim.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/131903/emergprepfinal.pdf (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • ISO 14001. 2004. Environmental management systems. Specification with guidance for use.
  • Kupits, K., and M. Osjamets. 2010. Üleujutusohuga seotud riskide esialgne hindamine (The Initial Assessment of Risks Related to Flood Hazard). AS Maves. http://www.envir.ee/orb.aw/class=file/action=preview/id=115755/%DCleujutusohuga±seotud±riskide±esialgne±hindamine.pdf (in Estonian only; accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Leiss, W., and C. Chociolko. 1994. Risk and responsibility. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  • Levine, E. S. 2011. Improving risk matrices: The advantages of logarithmically scaled axes. Journal of Risk Research 15, no. 2: 209–22.
  • Lonka, H. 1999. Report on risk assessment procedures used in different European Union countries and in Norway, Publication of the Finnish Ministry of Interior 16/1999. http://ec.europa.eu/echo/civil_protection/civil/pdfdocs/riskassfinrep.pdf (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Magnusson, S.E., P. Göransson, K. Petersen, Y. Malmen, J. Hovden, L.H. Ringdahl, and R. Akselsson. Nordic Industrial Fund, project P98087, Co-operative Nordic Risk Research Project report, 1999. http://www.irisk.se/engpubl/lucram.pdf (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • MAHB. 2005. Guidance on the Preparation of a Safety Report to Meet the Requirements of Directive 96/82/EC as Amended by Directive 2003/105/EC (Seveso II). http://mahb.jrc.it/fileadmin/MAHB/downloads/guidance/id-23/guidance-amended-by-2003-105-EC.pdf (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • MAHB. 2006. Land Use Planning Guidelines in the Context of Article 12 of the Seveso II Directive 96/82/EC as Amended by Directive. http://mahbsrv.jrc.ec.europa.eu/downloads-pdf/LUP%20Guidance-2006.pdf (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Minister of the Interior . 1999 . Ohtlikus ettevõttes riskianalüüsi tegemise kord, õnnetuste ärahoidmise ja õnnetuste korral tegutsemise nõuded ning suurõnnetuse ohuga ettevõtte teabelehe, ohutusaruande ja hädaolukorra plaanide koostamise ja esitamise kord (The procedure for performing risk analysis in a hazardous establishment, the requirements for accident prevention and action in case of accident, the procedure of devising and presenting fact sheets, safety reports and emergency plans for establishments with major accident hazard) . Appendix to the State Gazette , 107 : 1372 (in Estonian only)
  • Minister of the Interior. 2001. Maakonna ning valla ja linna riskianalüüsi metoodika (The methodology of risk analysis for counties, municipalities and towns). Appendix to the State Gazette, 82, 1112 (in Estonian only).
  • Minister of the Interior. 2003. Ohtliku ja suurõnnetuse ohuga ettevõtte teabelehe, ohutusaruande ja hädaolukorra lahendamise plaanide koostamise ja esitamise kord ning suurõnnetuse ohuga ettevõtete loetelu pidamine (The procedure for composing and presenting fact sheets, safety reports and emergency management plans for hazardous establishments and establishments with major accident hazard and keeping a list of establishments with major accident hazard). Appendix to the State Gazette 61, 874, (in Estonian only).
  • Minister of the Interior. 2010a. Hädaolukorra riskianalüüsi koostamise juhend (Instructions for performing a risk analysis for an emergency). State Gazette I, 8, 145 (in Estonian only).
  • Minister of the Interior. 2010b. Toimepidevuse riskianalüüsi koostamise juhend (Instructions for performing a risk analysis on continuous operation). State Gazette I 33, 179 (in Estonian only).
  • Ministry of the Environment. 2010. Five typical SEVESO establishments and one company with highly radioactive sources for analysing. http://www.envir.ee/960269 (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Ministry of the Interior. 2003. Ministeeriumi riskianalüüsi ajakava ja alused (The schedule and principles of risk assessment of the Ministry). http://www.kiirabi.ee/index.php?tid=ksHfX0ZaTIKhK0YuXXsXxfKahjjHKZRppHsKOlK (in Estonian only; accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Ministry of the Interior. 2007a. Ministeeriumide riskianalüüside kokkuvõte 2006 (A summary of the risk analyses for Ministries in 2006). http://www.kul.ee/webeditor/files/kriisireguleerimine/Ministeeriumide_riskianal_side_kokkuv_te_2006.pdf (in Estonian only; accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Ministry of the Interior. 2007b. Ministeeriumi valitsemisala hädaolukordade riskianalüüsi ajakava ja metoodika (The methodology and schedule of risk assessment for emergencies within the jurisdiction of the Ministry). http://www.siseministeerium.ee/failid/riskianalyysi_metoodika.pdf (in Estonian only; accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Ministry of the Interior. 2008a. Emergency risk assessment methodology. Tallinn 2008.
  • Ministry of the Interior. 2008b. 2007. aasta riiklik hädaolukordade riskianalüüs (The 2007 national risk assessment for emergencies). http://www.siseministeerium.ee/18014/ (in Estonian only; accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Ministry of the Interior. 2009. Riiklik 2008. aasta hädaolukordade riskianalüüside kokkuvõte (The 2008 national summary of risk assessments for emergencies). http://www.siseministeerium.ee/public/rhorak_2008.pdf (in Estonian only; accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Ministry of the Interior. 2011. 2011. aasta hädaolukordade riskianalüüside kokkuvõte (The 2011 summary of risk assessments for emergencies). http://www.siseministeerium.ee/public/HO_RA_2011.pdf (in Estonian only; accessed January 21, 2012).
  • Ministry of the Interior. 2006. Ministeeriumide ja maakondade riskianalüüsi kokkuvõte 2005 (A summary of the risk analyses for ministries and counties 2005). http://www.kul.ee/webeditor/files/riskianaluusi_kokkuvote_.pdf (in Estonian only; accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Mugra, T. and Ü. Sults. 2006. Juhise ning tegevuskava koostamine üleujutusriskide haldamiseks (Devising guidelines and plan of action for flood risks management). Projekteerimisbüroo Maa ja Vesi AS. http://www.envir.ee/orb.aw/class=file/action=preview/id=203305/.JUHIS30012006_1.doc (in Estonian only; accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Paas, Õ., P. Tint, and M. Järvis. 2009. The assessment of major accident risks in Tallinn (Estonia). Hazards XXI: Process Safety and Environmental Protection in a Changing World (CD-ROM) Symposium Series 155, 729–38. Manchester, UK: The Institution of Chemical Engineers.
  • Parliament of Estonia . 1992 . Civil protection act . State Gazette , 24 : 334
  • Parliament of Estonia . 1998 . Chemicals act . State Gazette I , 47 : 697
  • Parliament of Estonia . 2000 . Emergency preparedness act . State Gazette I , 95 : 613
  • Parliament of Estonia . 2002 . Planning act . State Gazette I , 99 : 579
  • Parliament of Estonia . 2005 . Environmental impact assessment and environmental management system act . State Gazette I , 15 : 87
  • Parliament of Estonia . 2009 . Emergency act . State Gazette I , 39 : 262
  • Pursiainen, C., P. Lindblom, and P. Francke. 2007. Towards a Baltic sea region strategy in critical infrastructure protection. Nordregio Report 2007:5. http://www.nordregio.se/filer/Files/r0705.pdf (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Salvi , O. and Debray , B. 2006 . A global view on ARAMIS, a risk assessment methodology for industries in the framework of the SEVESO II directive . Journal of Hazardous Materials , 130 : 187 – 199 .
  • Salvi , O. and Gaston , D. 2004 . Risk assessment and risk decision-making process related to hazardous installation in France . Journal of Risk Research , 7 ( 6 ) : 599 – 608 .
  • Schmidt-Thomé, P., H. Kallio, J. Jarva, T. Tarvainen, S. Greiving, et al. 2006. The Spatial Effects and Management of Natural and Technological Hazards in Europe - ESPON 1.3.1 Executive Summary. Geological Survey of Finland. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/3621_Finalreport.pdf (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Seppälä, J. 1994. The environmental risk analysis in the industry. Waters and the Environment No 571. Helsinki: National Board of Waters and the Environment.
  • Smith , K. 2001 . Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster , London : Routledge .
  • Stern , E. , Sundelius , B. , Nohrstedt , D. , Hansen , D. , Newlove , L. and Hart , P. 2002 . Crisis management in transitional democracies: The baltic experience . Government and Opposition , 37 ( 4 ) : 524 – 550 .
  • Swedish Rescue Services Agency . 1989 . Att skydda och rädda liv – Handbok i kommunal riskhantering (To protect and save lives − Handbook of Municipal Risk Management) , Karlstad : Räddningsverket (in Swedish only) .
  • Tammepuu, A., K. Sepp, and E. Uiga. 2007. Aspects of risk assessment in land use planning: the case study of Tartu. In: Safety and security engineering II: The built environment, ed. M. Guarascio, C.A. Brebbia, and F. Garzia, 83–95. Southampton: WIT Press.
  • Tammepuu , A. and Sepp , K. 2012 . “ National emergency risk assessments: Comparative study of Estonia and the UK ” . In Management of natural resources, sustainable development and ecological hazards III , Edited by: Brebbia , C.A. and Zubir , S.S. 633 – 644 . Southampton : WIT Press .
  • Tammepuu , A. , Sepp , K. , Paasoja , R. and Kuusemets , V. 2008 . “ Risk assessment of the cities of Estonia and the UK: Comparative study ” . In Sustainable city V: Urban regeneration and sustainability , Edited by: Gospodini , A. , Brebbia , C.A. and Tiezzi , E. 591 – 604 . Southampton : WIT Press .
  • Tammepuu , A. , Tammepuu , O. and Sepp , K. 2009 . “ Emergency preparedness in integrated management systems: case study of the Port of Tallinn ” . In Disaster management and human health risk: Reducing risk, improving outcomes , Edited by: Duncan , K. and Brebbia , C.A. 65 – 76 . Southampton : WIT Press .
  • Tint, P., R. Munter, J. Lavrentjev, A. Siirde, K. Möller, and V. Siirak. 2003. Risk management of major accident hazards in Estonia. Paper presented at KONBiN 2003, Safety and Reliability International Conference. To Safer Life and Environment, Conference Proceedings, Series: Monographs Nr 3/2003, Vol. 1, 151–58, May 27–30, in Gdynia, Poland.
  • Treu , M.C. , Colucci , A. and Lodrini , S. 2004 . “ Territorial vulnerability analysis: The methodological framework ” . In Risk Analysis IV , Edited by: Brebbia , C.A. 754 – 761 . Southampton : WIT Press .
  • Treu , M.C. , Colucci , A. and Samakovlija , M. 2005 . “ Territorial vulnerability and local risks ” . In Sustainable development and planning II , Edited by: Brebbia , C.A. and Kungolos , A. Vol. 2 , 1261 – 1268 . Southampton : WIT Press .
  • UN ISDR. 2009. UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. http://www.unisdr.org/eng/terminology/UNISDR-Terminology-English.pdf (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • UNEP IE/PAC. 1992. Hazard identification and evaluation in a local community.
  • University of Melbourne. 2003. Environment health and safety manual. risk management (Planning). http://www.unimelb.edu.au/ehsm-new/3.html (accessed March 15, 2011).
  • Van Asselt , M.B.A. and Renn , O. 2011 . Risk governance . Journal of Risk Research , 14 ( 4 ) : 431 – 449 .
  • Vrijling , J.K. , van Gelder , P.H.A.J.M. , Goossens , L.H.J. , Voortman , H.G. and Pandey , M.D. 2004 . A framework for risk criteria for critical infrastructures: Fundamentals and case studies in the Netherlands . Journal of Risk Research , 7 : 569 – 679 .
  • Wlodarczyk , T.L. and Tennyson , J. 2003 . Attitudes to risk: Social and economic effects from attitudes towards risk . Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 21 ( 3 ) : 179 – 185 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.