Influences of individual-level characteristics on risk perceptions to various categories of environmental health and safety risks

References

• Bainbridge, W. S. 2002. “Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 4(6): 561–570. doi:10.1023/A:1022805516652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. 2005. “Distinguishing Red and Green Biotechnology: Cultivation Effects of the Elite Press.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17(1): 63–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berube, D. M., B. Faber, D. A. Scheufele, C. L. Cummings, G. E. Gardner, K. N. Martin, M. S. Martin, and N. M. Temple. 2010. Communicating Risk in the 21st Century: The Case of nanotechnology. Arlington, VA: National Nanotechnology Coordination Office. http://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/berube_risk_white_paper_feb_2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Berube, D. M., C. L. Cummings, J. H. Frith, A. R. Binder, and R. W. Oldendick. 2011. “Comparing Nanoparticle Risk Perceptions to Other Known EHS Risks.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13: 3089–3099.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, A. R., M. A. Cacciatore, D. A. Scheufele, B. R. Shaw, and E. A. Corley. 2010. “Measuring Risk/Benefit Perceptions of Emerging Technologies and their Potential Impact on Communication of Public Opinion Toward Science.” Public Understanding of Science 21 (7): 830–847.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, A. R., D. A. Scheufele, D. Brossard, and A. C. Gunther. 2011. “Interpersonal Amplification of Risk? Citizen Discussions and their Influence on Risk and Benefit Perceptions of a Biological Research Facility.” Risk Analysis 31(2): 324–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BMRB Social Research. 2004. Nanotechnology: Views of the General Public, Quantitative and Qualitative Research Carried Out as Part of the Nanotechnology Study. BMRB International, Report No. 45101666.
   Google Scholar
• Boeri, M. W., and B. D. Tyndall. 2012. “A Contextual Comparison of Risk Behaviors among Older Adult Drug Users and Harm Reduction in Suburban versus Inner-city Social Environments.” Journal of Applied Social Science 6: 72–91. doi: 10.1177/1936724411431035.
   Google Scholar
• Bortz, W. 2010. Next Medicine: The Science and Civics of Health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bracker, A. L., T. F. Morse, and N. J. Simcox. 2009. “Training Health and Safety Committees to Ude Control Banding: Lessons Learned and Opportunities for the United States.” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 6(5): 307–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, S., B. Peck, and W. Highfield. 2004. “Examining Localized Patterns of Air Quality Perception in Texas: A Spatial and Statistical Analysis.” Risk Analysis 24(6): 1561–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brossard, D., D. Scheufele, E. Kim, and B. Lewenstein. 2008. “Religiosity as a Perceptual Filter: Examining Processes of Opinion Formation about Nanotechnology.” Public Understanding of Science 18(5): 546–558.
   Google Scholar
• Burri, R. V., and S. Belluci. 2008. “Public Perception of Nanotechnology.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 10(3): 387–391. doi:10.1007/s11051-007-9286-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buse, K., and G. Martin. 2012. “AIDS: Ushering in a New Era of Shared Responsibility for Global Health.” Globalization and Health 8. Accessed October 29, 2012. http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/pdf/1744-8603-8-26.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M., D. Scheufele, and E. Corley. 2011. “From Enabling Technology to Applications: The Evolution of Risk Perceptions about Nanotechnology.” Public Understanding of Science 20(3): 385–404. doi:10.1177/0963662509347815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, I. J. 2011. “Social Amplification of Risk in the Internet Environment.” Risk Analysis 31 (12): 1883–1896.
   Google Scholar
• Clemons, R. S., M. K. McBeth, and E. Kusko. 2012. “Understanding the Role of Policy Narratives and the Public Policy Arena: Obesity as a Lesson in Public Policy Development.” World Medical & Health Policy 4: 1–26. doi:10.1515/1948-4682.1220.
   Google Scholar
• CNN Health; Dellorto, D. 2012. “WHO: Cell Phone Use can Increase Possible Cancer Risk.” CNN Health. May 31. Accessed October 30, 2012. http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/05/31/who.cell.phones/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., and P. Cohen. 1983. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, N., B. Knuth, and D. Kay. 2002. “Public Support for Ecosystem Restoration in the Hudson River Valley, USA.” Environmental Management 29(4): 467–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors, M. 1992. “Risk perception, Risk Taking and Risk Management among Intravenousdrug Users: Implications for AIDS Prevention.” Social Science & Medicine 34(6): 591–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culver, J., W. Burke, Y. Yasui, S. Durfy, and N. Press. 2001. “Participation in Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling: The Influence of Educational Level, Ethnic Background and Risk Perception.” Journal of Genetic Counseling 10(3): 215–301.
   Google Scholar
• Dhawan, S., and K. S. Handa. 2012. “Effects of Electromagnetic Radiations from Cell Phones: A Critical Study.” International Journal of Engineering, Business and Enterprise Applications (IJEBEA) 12 42–48.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, T., L. Ross, R. Goble, R. Subedi, S. Greenberg, and O. Taylor. 2011. “Vulnerability, Risk Perception, and Health Profile of Marginalized People Exposed to Multiple Built-Environment Stressors in Worcester, Massachusetts: A Pilot Project.” Risk Analysis 31(4): 609–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, B. 2009. “Anticipating Fatness: Childhood, Affect and the Pre-Emptive ‘War on Obesity’.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35: 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., S. Lichtenstein, P. Slovic, S. L. Derby, and R. L. Keeney. 1981. Acceptable Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. Read, and B. Combs. 1978. “How Safe is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Towards Technological Risks and Benefits.” Policy Sciences 9: 127–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, J., P. Slovic, and C. K. Mertz. 1994. “Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks.” Risk Analysis 14(6): 1101–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furst, R. T., and R. Balletto. 2012. “Heroin Abuse and Collective Identity: Correlates and Consequences of Geographical Place.” International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 10: 684–695. doi:10.1007/s11469-011-9354-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gard, M. 2011. “Truth, Belief and the Cultural Politics of Obesity Scholarship and Public Health Policy.” Critical Public Health 21: 37–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G., N. Allum, and S. Stares. 2003. Europeans and Biotechnology 2002. Eurobarometer 58.0. A Report to the Ec Directorate General for Research from the Project ‘Life Sciences in European Society’ QLG7-CT-1999-00286. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_177_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Goebel, J. R., P. Compton, L. Zubkoff, A. Lnato, S. M. Asch, C. D. Sherbourne, L. Shugarman, and K. A. Lorenz. 2011. “Prescription Sharing, Alcohol Use, and Street Drug Use to Manage Pain among Veterans.” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 41: 848–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment Gilovich T. Grifin D. Kahneman D. Cambridge University Press New York NY 2002
   Google Scholar
• González-Guarda, R. M., B. E. McCabe, A. Florom-Smith, R. Cianelli, and N. Peragallo. 2011. “Substance Abuse, Violence, HIN, and Depression: An Underlying Syndemic Factor among Latinas.” Nursing Research 60: 182–189. doi:10.1097/NNR.0b013e318216d5f4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M. 2009. “Energy Sources, Public Policy, and Public Preferences: Analysis of US National Site-specific Data.” Energy Policy 37(8): 3242–3249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, R. C. 2003. “Obesity: An Epidemic.” Southern Medical Journal 96(6): 531–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S., D. Brossard, and D. Scheufele. 2008. “Effects of Value Predispositions, Mass Media Use, and Knowledge on Public Attitudes Toward Embryonic Stem Cell Research.” International Journal on Public Opinion Research 20(2): 171–192. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edn017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, M., D. Shaw, S. Lin, and Y. Chiu. 2008. “How do Disaster Characteristics Influence Risk Perception?” Risk Analysis 28(3): 635–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, P. T., R. Leach, E. Kalamara, and M. Shayegi. 2012. “The Worldwide Obesity Epidemic.” Obesity: A Research Journal 9(S11): 228S–233S.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., P. Slovic, D. Braman, J. Gastil, G. Cohen, and D. Kysar. 2008. Biased Assimilation, Polarization, and Cultural Credibility: An Experimental Study of Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions. Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies Research Brief No. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D., P. Slovic, D. Braman, and J. Gastil. 2006. “Fear of Democracy: A Cultural Evaluation of Sunstein on Risk.” Harvard Law Review 119: 1071–1109.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. 2009. Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E. 1992. “The Social Amplification of Risk: Progress in Developing an Integrative Framework of Risk.” In Social Theories of Risk, edited by S. Krimsky and D. Golding, 153–178. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E., and J. X. Kasperson. 1996. “The Social Amplification and Attenuation of Risk.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 545: 95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E., O. Renn, P. Slovic, H. S. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J. X. Kasperson, and S. Ratick. 1988. “The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework.” Risk Analysis 8(2): 177–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenna, G. A., and D. C. Lewis. 2008. “Risk Factors for Alcohol and Other Drug Use by Healthcare Professionals.” Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 3:3. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-3-3 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265282/.
   Google Scholar
• Krieger, K. 2012. “Genetically Engineered Bacteria Could Help Fight Climate Change.” Science 335(6072): 1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krimsky, S. 2007. “Risk Communication in the Internet Age: The Rise of Disorganized Skepticism.” Environmental Hazards 7(2): 157–164. doi:10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.05.006.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R. 2005. “Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Scale Validation in Communication Research.” Communication Research Reports 22(4): 335–338.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J. C. 2012. “Are Cell Phones or Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Possibly Carcinogenic to Humans?” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine. 54: 210–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macoubrie, J. 2006. “Nanotechnology: Public Concerns, Reasoning, and Trust in Government.” Public Understanding of Science 15(2): 221–241. doi:10.1177/0963662506056993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, L. F. 2013. “Extending the Obesity Debate, Repudiating Misrecognition: Politicising Fatness and Health (practice).” Social Theory & Health 11: 81–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, C. 2006. The Republican War on Science. New York, NY: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, C. 2012. The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science – And Reality. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. T. 2009. “Evaluating Factor Analysis Decisions for Scale Design in Communication Research.” Communication Methods and Measures 3(4): 195–215.
   Google Scholar
• Moulder, J. E., L. S. Erdreich, R. S. Malyapa, J. Merritte, W. F. Pickard, and Vijayalaxmi. 1999. “Cell Phones and Cancer: What is the Evidence for a Connection?” Radiation Research 151: 513–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murley, B. and c. Roberts. 2005. Biting the Hand that Feeds: Blogs and Second-level Agenda Setting. Accessed November 6, 2012. http://bryanmurley.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Murley_Roberts12-05.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NAKFII (National Academies – Keck Futures Initiative). 2010. Synthetic Biology: Building on Nature’s Inspiration. Waahington, DC: The National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. 1998. “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises.” Review of General Psychology. 2(2): 175–202.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R., R. Bord, and A. Fisher. 1999. “Risk Perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and Willingness to Address Climate Change.” Risk Analysis 19(3): 461–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Páez, D., S. Ubillos, E. Zubieta, and J. Marques. 2012. “AIDS’ Social Representations: Beliefs, Attitudes, Memory, and Social Sharing of Rumours.” In Social Representations in the ‘Social Arena’, edited by Silvana de Rosa, A., 166–175. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paik, S. Y., D. M. Zalk, and P. Swuste. 2008. “Application of a Pilot Control Banding Tool for Risk Level Assessment and Control of Nanoparticle Exposures.” The Annals of Occupational Hygiene 52: 419–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., R. Daley, and D. Lemus. 2002. “The Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis and Principal Components Analysis in Communication Research.” Human Communication Research 28: 562–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter D. Hart Research Associates. 2006. Public Awareness of Nano Grows – Majority Remain Unaware. The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Project on Emerging Technologies. Accessed October 3, 2006. http://nanotechproject.org/78/public-awareness-of-nano-grows-but-majority-unaware.
   Google Scholar
• Peter D. Hart Research Associates. 2007. Awareness of and Attitude Toward Nanotechnology and Federal Regulatory Agencies. Accessed October 10, 2007. http://www.nanotechproject.org/138/9252007-poll-reveals-public-awareness-of-nanotech-stuck-at-low-level.
   Google Scholar
• Peter D. Hart Research Associates. 2008. Awareness of and Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology and Synthetic Biology. Accessed September 29, 2010. http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Nanotechnologies/final-synbioreport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Peter D. Hart Research Associates. 2009. Nanotechnology, Synthetic Biology and Public Opinion. Accessed September 29, 2010. http://www.nanotechproject.org/publications/archive/8286/.
   Google Scholar
• Peter D. Hart Research Associates. 2010. Awareness and Impression of Synthetic Biology. Accessed October 10, 2010, http://bio.org/ind/syntheticbiology/hart2010report_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• PEW (Pew Research Center for the People and the Press). 2008. Audience Segments in a Changing News Environment: Key News Audiences Now Blend Online and Traditional Sources. Accessed December 4, 2010. http://people-press.org/report/444/new-media.
   Google Scholar
• PEW (Pew Research Center for the People and the Press). 2010. Americans Spending More Time Following the News – Ideological News Sources: Who Watches and Why. Accessed December 4, 2010. http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/652.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Repacholi, M. H., A. Lerchi, M. Röösli, Z. Sienkiewicz, A. Auvinen, J. Brechenkamp, G. d’Inzeo, P. Elliott, P. Frei, S. Heinrich, I. Lagroye, A. Lahkola, D. L. McCormick, S. Thomas, and P. Vecchia. 2012. “Systematic Review of Wireless Phone Use and Brain Cancer and Other Head Tumors.” Bio Electro Magnetics 33: 187–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rettberg, J. 2008. Blogging. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rigg, K. K., S. P. Kurtz, and H. L. Surratt. 2012. “Patterns of Prescription Medication Diversion among Drug Dealers.” Drugs: Education Prevention, and Policy 19: 145–155. doi:10.3109/09687637.2011.631197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, C. M. 2001a. “Internet Media in Technological Risk Amplification: Plutonium on Board the Cassini-Huygens Spacecraft.” RISK: Health, Safety & Environment 12 (3/4): 221–254.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, C. M. 2001b. Construction of Hazard Perception and Activism on the Internet: Amplifying Trivial Risks and Obfuscating Serious Ones. Working Paper 106. Accessed October 5, 2011. http://www.colorado.edu/hazards/publications/wp/wp106/wp106.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, C. M. 2001c. “Impact of Internet Media Risk Debates: The Controversies Over the Cassini-Huygens Missions and the Anaheim Hills, California, landslide.” The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 16(1): 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Roger, V. L., and C. J. O’Donnell. 2012. “Population Health, Outcomes Research and Prevention. Examples of the American Heart Association 2020 Goals.” Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 5 6–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, S., and S. Lichter. 1987. “Elite Ideology and Risk Perception in Nuclear Energy Policy.” The American Political Science Review 81(2): 383–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, E., J. F. Boivin, and P. Leclerc. 2011. “Initiation to Drug Injection among Street Youth: A Gender-based Analysis.” Drug and Alcohol Dependence 114: 49–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundmo, T. 2011. “Associations Between Affect and Risk Perception.” Journal of Risk Research 5(2): 119–135.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., and B. V. Lewenstein. 2005. “The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7: 659–667. doi:10.1007/s11051-005-7526-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M., A. Ganguli-Mitra, H. Torgersen, A. Kelle, A. Deplazes, and N. Biller-Andorno. 2009. “A Priority Paper for the Societal and Ethical Apects of Synthetic Biology.” Systems and Synthetic Biology 3(1–4): 3–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. 1998. “Worry and Risk Perception.” Risk Analysis 18(1): 85–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. 1999. “Perceived Competence and Motivation in Industry and Government.” In Social Trust and the Management of Risk, edited by G. Cvetkovich and R. Löfstedt, 89–99. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. 2004. “Explaining Individual Risk Perception: The Case of Nuclear Waste.” Risk Management 6(1): 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 1987. “Perception of Risk.” Science 236(4799): 280–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 1999. “Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-assessment Battlefield.” Risk Analysis 19(4): 689–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K., and S. Watkins. 2005. “Perceptions of Risk and Strategies for Prevention: Responses to HIV/AIDS in Rural Malawi.” Social Science & Medicine 60: 649–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, G., M. Doull, and J. A. Shoveller. 2012. “Examining the Concept of Choice in Sexual Health Interventions for Young People.” Youth and Society. doi: 10.1177/0044118X12451277. http://yas.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/06/19/0044118X12451277.full.pdf+html.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, C. 1969. “Social Benefits vs. Technological Risks.” Science 165: 1232–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel, B., D. Soden, and R. Warner. 1990. “The Impact of Knowledge and Values on Perceptions of Environmental Risk to the Great Lakes.” Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal 3(4): 331–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TA-Swiss. 2006. Public Reactions to Nanotechnology in Switzerland: The Findings of the Publifocus Discussion Forum Nanotechnology, Health and the Environment. Bern: Center for Technology Assessment at the Swiss Science and Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M. 2008. “Quantitative Comparison of Search Engine Results.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(11): 1702–1710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. S., R. Head, R. V. Rikard, C. McNeil, and C. White. 2012. “University-Community Partnerships: Bridging People and Cultures in an HIV/AIDS Health Intervention in an African American Community.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement 16: 79–106.
   Google Scholar
• Towe, V. L., ul Hasan., S. Zafar, S. T. Zafar, and S. G. Sherman. 2008. “Street Life and Drug Risk behaviors Associated with Exchanging Sex among Male Street Children in Lahore, Pakistan.” Journal of Adolescent Health 3: 222–228.
   Google Scholar
• van der Star, S. M., and B. And van den Berg. 2011. “Individual Responsibility and Health-risk Behaviour: A Contingent Valuation Study from the Ex Ante Societal Perspective.” Health Policy 101: 300–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenstra, A. S. 2007. “Blogger/reader Interaction: How Motivations Impact Pathways to Political Interest.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Midwest Association for Public Opinion Research 2007, in Chicago, IL. November 16–17. Accessed November 6, 2012. http://smad.journalism.wisc.edu/papers/veenstra-2007.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Veenstra, A. S., B. Sayre, and K. Thorson. 2008. “Sticking Together Online: Political Participation and Ideologically Homogenouds Blog Consumption.” Paper presented at the 63rd annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, in New Orleans, LA, May 16, 2008. Accessed November 6, 2012. http://smad.journalism.wisc.edu/papers/veenstra-sayre-thorson-2008a.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A., and P. Collins. 2010. “Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Genetically Engineered Bacteria.” Gastroenterology 139(2): 685–687.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wickson, F., K. Grieger, and A. Baun. 2010. “Nature and Nanotechnology: Science, Ideology and Policy.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society 8(1): 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. 2009. “Biopower, Biopedagogies and the Obesity Epidemic: Governing Bodies.” edited by Wright, J., and Harwood, V., 1–14. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zalk, D. M., and D. I. Nelson. 2008. “History and Evolution of Control Banding: A Review.” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 5: 330–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar