Environmental risk regulation and the Indian Supreme Court: an exercise in de-formalization of the law?

References

• Abraham, C. M., and Sushila Abraham. 1991. “The Bhopal Case and the Development of Environmental Law in India.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 40: 334–365.
   Google Scholar
• Agresto, John. 1984. Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, K. G. 2009. Judicial Activism under the Indian Constitution. Address given in Trinity College Dublin, Ireland on October 14. New Delhi: Supreme Court of India.
   Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay, J., and Vandana Shiva. 1984. “Planning for Underdevelopment: The Case of Doon Valley.” Economic and Political Weekly 19: 167–173.
   Google Scholar
• Baxi, Upendra. 1980. The Indian Supreme Court and Politics. Lucknow: Eastern Book.
   Google Scholar
• Baxi, Upendra. 1985. “Taking Suffering Seriously: Social Action Litigation in the Supreme Court of India.” Third World Legal Studies 4: 107–132.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Corwin, Edward S. 1938. Court over Constitution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, Ritwick, and Bhupender Yadav. 2007. The Supreme Court on Forest Conservation. Delhi: Universal Law.
   Google Scholar
• Dreze, Jean. 2005. Tribal Evictions from Forest Land. New Delhi: National Advisory Council.
   Google Scholar
• ELDF and WWF India. 2009. Protection of Forests in India – The Godavarman Story. New Delhi: WWF India.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, F. 1990. Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Elizabeth. 2000. “Drowning by Numbers: Standard Setting in Risk Regulation and the Pursuit of Accountable Public Administration.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20: 109–130.
   Google Scholar
• Gawali, Bhagwan R., and Dipa Dube. 2012. “Admissibility and Appreciation of Expert Evidence with Special Reference to Ballistics.” International Journal of Research in Computer Application and Management 2: 112–118.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms – Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jayakrishnan, P. C. 2005. “Is There a Need for this Bill.” Seminar 552: 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaraman, K. S. 2012. “India’s Nuclear Watchdog Criticized.” Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2012.11290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaur, Naunidhi. 2002. “Targeting Tribal People.” Frontline 19 (21), October 12–15. http://www.frontline.in/navigation/type=static&page=flonnet&rdurl=fl1921/stories/20021025005603100.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Kmiec, Keenan D. 2004. “The Origin and Current Meanings of Judicial Activism.” California Law Review 92: 1441–1478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskenniemi, Martti. 2009. “The Politics of International Law: Twenty Years Later.” European Journal of International Law 20: 7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskenniemi, Martti, and P. Leino. 2002. “Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties.” Leiden Journal of International Law 15: 553–579.
   Google Scholar
• Panigrahi, Jitendra K., and Susruta Amirapu. 2012. “An Assessment of EIA System in India.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 35: 23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellizzoni, L. 2004. “Responsibility and Environmental Governance.” Environmental Politics 13(3): 541–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirk, Paul J. 2008. “Putting Experts in Their Place.” Critical Review 20: 333–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, Usha. 1996. “Displacement and the Law.” Economic and Political Weekly 31: 1486–1488.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinstein, Max. 1954. Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. New York: Clarion.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Michael D. 2011. “Risk Management and the Record of the Precautionary Principle in EU Case Law.” Journal of Risk Research 14: 467–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosencranz, Armin, Edward Boenig, and Brinda Dutta. 2007. “The Godavarman Case: The Indian Supreme Court’s Breach of Constitutional Boundaries in Managing India’s Forests.” ELR News and Analysis 37: 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiter, Dick, and Ramses Wessel. 2012. “The Legal Nature in Informal International Law: A Legal Theoretical Exercise.” In Informal International Law-making, edited by Joost Pauwelyn, Ramses Wessel, and Jan Wouters, 162–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacher, Rajinder. 1999. “Judges as Governors.” The Indian Express, August 4, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Sathe, S. P. 2001. “Judicial Activism: The Indian Experience.” Journal of Law and Policy 6: 29–108.
   Google Scholar
• Sivaramakrishnan, K. 2011. “Environmental, Law and Democracy in India.” Journal of Asian Studies 70: 905–928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, Jenny. 2001. “Participation and Deliberation in Environmental Law: Exploring a Problem-solving Approach.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21: 415–442.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Court of India. 2012. Interim Report of the Technical Expert Committee. New Delhi: Supreme Court.
   Google Scholar
• Thiruvengadam, A. T. 1999. “A Case of Institutional Conflict.” The Hindu, April 27.
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyay, Videh. 2012. “Judicial Control of Policymaking and Implementation.” Economic and Political Weekly 47: 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. 2012. Global Risks 2012. 7th ed. Geneva: WEF.
   Google Scholar