The utmost ends of the nuclear fuel cycle: Finnish perceptions of the risks of uranium mining and nuclear waste management

References

• Andrén, M. 2012. Nuclear Waste Management and Legitimacy: Nihilism and Responsibility. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barke, R. P., and H. C. Jenkins-Smith. 1993. “Politics and Scientific Expertise: Scientists, Risk Perception, and Nuclear Waste Policy.” Risk Analysis 13: 425–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berner, B., B.-M. Drottz Sjöberg, and E. Holm, Eds. 2011. Social Science Research 2004–2010: Themes, Results and Reflections (On Nuclear Waste Issues). http://www.skb.se/upload/publications/pdf/SocialScienceResearch2004_2010webb.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bruge, D., and R. Goble. 2002. “The History of Uranium Mining and the Navajo People.” American Journal of Public Health 92: 1410–1419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desvousges, W., H. Kunreuther, P. Slovic, and E. A. Rosa. 1993. “Perceived Risk and Attitudes Toward Nuclear Wastes: National and Nevada Perspectives.” In Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens’ Views of Repository Siting, edited by R. E. Dunlap, M. E. Kraft, and E. A. Rosa, 176–208. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eerola, T. 2008. “Uranium Exploration, Non-governmental Organizations, and Local Communities: The Origin, Anatomy, and Consequences of a New Challenge in Finland.” Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences 57: 112–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, B., J. D. O’Neil, and A. Yassi. 1997. Wollaston Lake: The Uranium Mining Industry and the Perceptions of Health Risks. Winnipeg: Centre for Aboriginal Health Research, University of Manitoba. http://epub.sub.uni-hamburg.de/epub/volltexte/2010/5159/pdf/WOLLASTON_LAKE.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer. 2007. Europeans and nuclear safety. Special eurobarometer 271. Wave 66.2. TNS Opinion & Social. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_271_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fig, D. 2005. Uranium Road: Questioning South Africa’s Nuclear Direction. Johannesburg: Jacana Media.
   Google Scholar
• Fig, D. 2008. “Stripping the Desert: Uranium Mining Inside Namibia’s Namib-Naukluft National Park.” South African Review of Sociology 39: 245–261.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J., P. Slovic, and C. K. Mertz. 1993. “Decidedly Different: Expert and Public Views of Risk from a Radioactive Waste Repository.” Risk Analysis 13: 643–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, J. H. 1993. “Risk Perceptions Associated with a High-level Nuclear Waste Repository.” Sociological Spectrum 13: 139–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M., and H. B. Truelove. 2011. “Energy Choices and Risk Beliefs: Is It Just Global Warming and Fear of a Nuclear Power Plant Accident? Risk Analysis 31: 819–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenpeace. 2007. Fact Sheet Uranium Mining 4: Health Effects of Uranium Mining. Amsterdam: Greenpeace International. http://www.ippnw.org/pdf/uranium-factsheet4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, M., and P. Karhu, Eds. 2008. Implementing Nuclear Non-proliferation in Finland: Regulatory Control, International Cooperation and the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. Helsinki, Annual report 2007, STUK-B 88.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, B. L., B. Flett, S. Harris, C. Abeyta, and F. Kirschner. 2002. “The Spokane Tribe’s Multipathway Subsistence Exposure Scenario and Screening Level RME.” Risk Analysis 22: 513–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. 2002. “Rupture-talk in the Nuclear Age: Conjugating Colonial Power in Africa. Social Studies of Science 32: 691–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. 2009. The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity After World War II. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. 2012. Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, I. 2002. “Waste Not Want Not? Australia and the Politics of High-level Nuclear Waste.” Australian Journal of Political Science 37: 283–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HS. 2012. Uranium raises questions among Sotkamo residents. Talvivaara building uranium separation plant although licences not yet granted. Helsingin Sanomat, International Edition, 4.4.2012. http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Uranium+raises+questions+among+Sotkamo+residents/1329103746141.
   Google Scholar
• Jartti, T. 2010. Finns Valuing Nuclear and Uranium Economy. Studying Nuclear Power and Uranium Attitudes from the Perspective of Moral Economy (in Finnish) Master thesis in sociology. Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä. https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/handle/123456789/23330.
   Google Scholar
• Jartti, T., and T. Litmanen. 2011. “Uraanin hyväksyttävyys: Suomalaisten asennoituminen uraaniin, uraanin etsintään ja uraanin louhintaan [Acceptability of Uranium: Finns’ Perception on Uranium, Exploration of Uranium and Extraction of Uranium].” Terra. Geographical Journal 123 (3): 145–153.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C., and G. W. Bassett. 1994. “Perceived Risk and Uncertainty of Nuclear Waste: Differences Among Science, Business, and Environmental Group Members.” Risk Analysis 14: 851–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kari, M., M. Kojo, and T. Litmanen. 2010. Community Divided: Adaptation and Aversion Towards the Spent Nuclear Fuel Repository in Eurajoki and its Neighbouring Municipalities. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä and University of Tampere.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E., Ed. 1983. Equity Issues in Radioactive Waste Management. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
   Google Scholar
• Kauppinen, O.-P. 2011. Suomen ydinpolttoainekierto. [Finnish nuclear fuel cycle]. Lappeenranta University of Technology. Faculty of Technology, LUT Energy Research Report 16. http://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/69983/isbn%209789522651242.pdf?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Kojo, M. 1999. “Ei voimalla, vaan taidolla: Kansanliikkeen poliittinen tyyli ydinjätekamppailussa [Not with Power, but Style: The Political Style of a Social Movement in Nuclear Waste Struggle].” In Ydinjäte käsissämme: Suomen ydinjätehuolto ja suomalainen yhteiskunta[Nuclear Waste in Our Hands: Finnish Nuclear Waste Management and Finnish Society ], edited by T. Litmanen, P. Hokkanen, and M. Kojo, 157–189Jyväskylä: SoPhi.
   Google Scholar
• Kojo, M. 2009. “The strategy of site selection for the spent nuclear fuel repository in Finland.” In The Renewal of Nuclear Power in Finland, edited by M. Kojo and T. Litmanen, 161–191. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kojo, M., M. Kari, and T. Litmanen. 2010. “The Socio-economic and Communication Challenges of Spent Nuclear Fuel Management in Finland: The Post Site Selection Phase of the Repository Project in Eurajoki.” Progress in Nuclear Energy 52: 168–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojo, M., and T. Litmanen, Eds. 2009. The Renewal of Nuclear Power in Finland. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kunreuther, H., D. Easterling, W. Desvousges, and P. Slovic. 1990. “Public Attitudes toward Siting a High-level Nuclear Waste Repository in Nevada.” Risk Analysis 10: 469–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., and T. Litmanen. 1997. “The Social Shaping of Radwaste Management: The Cases of Sweden and Finland.” Current Sociology 45: 59–79.
   Google Scholar
• Litmanen, T. 2008. “Uraanikaivoksien vastustaminen. Paikallistason NIMBY -kiistoja vai transnationaalia liikehdintää geopolitiikkaan ja globalisoituneen talouden muutoksiin? [Opposing Uranium Mines: Local NIMBY-disputes or Transnational Movement to Geopolitics and Changes of Global Economy]” In Ei meidän pihallemme! [Not in Our Yard! Local Disputes over Space], edited by T. Kopomaa, L. Peltonen, and T. Litmanen, 123–152. Helsinki: Gaudeamus..
   Google Scholar
• Litmanen, T., and M. Kojo. 2011. “Not Excluding Nuclear Power: The Dynamics and Stability of Nuclear Power Policy Arrangements in Finland.” Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 8: 171–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, A., and E. Ruokola. 2011. “License Procedure for Uranium Recovery from Talvivaara Deposit, Eastern Finland.” In The New Uranium Mining Boom: Challenge and Lessons Learned, edited by B. Merkel and M. Schipek, 17–22. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Malin, S. A. 2011. “The Paradox of Uranium Development: A Polanyian Analysis of Social Movements Surrounding the Piñon Ridge Uranium Mill” Unpublished PhD Thesis, Utah State University.
   Google Scholar
• Malin, S. A., and P. Petrzelka. 2010. “Left in the Dust: Uranium’s Legacy and Victims of Mill Tailings Exposure in Monticello, Utah.” Society & Natural Resources 23: 1187–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazher, A. K. 2009. “A Review of Uranium Economics.” International Journal of Nuclear Governance, Economy and Ecology 2: 337–361.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Employment and the Economy. 2008. Nuclear Energy in Finland. http://www.tem.fi/files/21275/38981_TEM_Nuclear_Energy_in_Finland_LR.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moody, R. 1992. Rocks & Hard Places: The Globalisation of Mining. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moorhouse, R., G. Habibi, D. Richard, T. Byambaa, and T. Fabro. 2011. Uranium Mining: Assessing the Potential Health Impact of Uranium Mining in Nunavut. Faculty of Health Sciences, HSCI 845: Environmental and Occupational Health. Burnaby, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Nieminen, M. 2012. Talvivaaran historiallinen tulos [Historical Result of Talvivaara] Luonnonsuojelija 5/2012. 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• van der Pligt, J. 1994. Nuclear Energy and the Public. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Posiva. 2012a. Final Disposal Facility. http://ww.posiva.fi/en/final_disposal/final_disposal_facility.
   Google Scholar
• Posiva. 2012b. Construction License Application. http://www.posiva.fi/files/2923/Posivan_rakentamislupahakemus.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rericha, V., M. Kulich, R. Rericha, D. L. Shore, and D. P. Sandler 2006. “Incidence of Leukemia, Lymphoma, and Multiple Myeloma in Czech Uranium Miners: A Case-cohort Study.” Environmental Health Perspectives 114: 818–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruostetsaari, I. 2009. “Governance and Political Consumerism in Finnish Energy Policy-making.” Energy Policy 37: 102–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruostetsaari, I. 2010a. “Changing regulation and governance of Finnish Energy policy making: New rules but old elites?” Review of Policy Research 27: 273–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruostetsaari, I. 2010b. Energiavalta: Eliitti ja kansalaiset muuttuvilla energiamarkkinoilla. [Energy Power: Elite and Citizens’ in Changing Energy Markets]. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samet, J. M. 1984. “Radon and Lung Cancer.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 81: 745–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säynässalo, E. 2009. “Nuclear Energy Policy Processes in Finland in a Comparative Perspective: Complex Mechanisms of a Strong Administrative State.” In The Renewal of Nuclear Power in Finland, edited by M. Kojo and T. Litmanen, 126–158. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schenkel, R. 2010. “The Challenge of Feeding Scientific Advice into Policy-making.” Science 330: 1749–1751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrader-Frechette, K. 1993. Burying Uncertainty: Risk and the Case Against Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, K. 1996. “The Yellowed Archives of Yellowcake.” Public Health Reports 111: 116–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. 2004. Local Acceptance of a High-level Nuclear Waste Repository. Risk Analysis 24: 737–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L., and B.-M. Drottz-Sjöberg.2001. “Fairness, Risk and Risk Tolerance in the Siting of a Nuclear Waste Repository. Journal of Risk Research 4: 75–101.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L., and B.-M. Drottz-Sjöberg. 2009. “Public Risk Perception of Nuclear Waste.” International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management 11: 264–296.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 1987. “Perception of Risk.” Science 236: 280–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 1994. “Perceptions of Risk: Paradox and Challenge.” In Future risks and risk management, edited by B. Brehmer and N.-E. Sahlin, 63–78. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., B. Fischoff, and S. Lichtenstein. 1979. “Rating the Risks.” Environment 21: 14–20, 36–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., B. Fischoff, and S. Lichtenstein. 1985. “Characterizing Perceived Risk.” In Perilous progress: Technology and hazard, edited by R. W. Kates, C. Hohenemser, and J. X. Kasperson, 91–123. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., M. Layman, and J. H. Flynn. 1991. “Risk Perception, Trust, and Nuclear Waste: Lessons from Yucca Mountain.” Environment 33: 7–30.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., M. Layman, N. Kraus, J. H. Flynn, J. Chalmers, and G. Gesell. 1991. “Perceived Risk, Stigma, and Potential Economic Impacts of a High-level Nuclear Waste Repository in Nevada.” Risk Analysis 11: 683–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, B. D., M. Andrén, and U. Strandberg. 2010. “Three Decades of Social Science Research on High-level Nuclear Waste: Achievements and Future Challenges.” Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy 1: 13–47.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. 1989. Classification of Socio-economic Groups 1989 (in Finnish). Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, G. 2002. The Bedrock of Opinion: Science, Technology and Society in the Siting of High-level Nuclear Waste. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Suominen, P. 1999. “Ydinjätepolitiikan muotoutuminen suomessa [Shaping of Nuclear Waste Policy in Finland].” In Ydinjäte käsissämme: Suomen ydinjätehuolto ja suomalainen yhteiskunta [Nuclear Waste in Our Hands: Finnish Nuclear Waste Management and Finnish Society], edited by T. Litmanen, P. Hokkanen, and M. Kojo, 15–42.Jyväskylä: SoPhi.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasek, L., E. Kunz, S. C. Darby, A. J. Swerdlow, and V. Placek. 1993. “Radon Exposure and Cancers other than Lung Cancer among Uranium Miners in West Bohemia.” The Lancet 341: 919–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WNA (World Nuclear Association). 2012. World Nuclear Power Reactors & Uranium Requirements. http://world-nuclear.org/info/Facts-and-Figures/World-Nuclear-Power-Reactors-and-Uranium-Requirements/#.UjnCt-C5NSo
   Google Scholar
• WNN (World Nuclear News). 2013, January 2. Application in for Finnish repository. http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/WR-Application_in_for_Finnish_repository-0201134.html.
   Google Scholar
• Zoellner, T. 2009. Uranium: War, Energy, and the Rock that Shaped the World. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar