From risk to vulnerability: the role of perceived adaptive capacity for the acceptance of contested infrastructure

References

• Adger, W. N. 2006. “Vulnerability.” Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 16: 268–281.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberini, A., A. Chiabai, and L. Muehlenbachs. 2006. “Using Expert Judgment to Assess Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change: Evidence from a Conjoint Choice Survey.” Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 16: 123–144.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BFS. 2013. Gleichstellung von Frau und Mann – Daten, Indikatoren: Bildungsstand [Gender Equality – Data, Indicators: Education Levels]. Accessed February 7, 2014. http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/20/05/blank/key/gleichstellung_und/bildungsstand.html
   Google Scholar
• BFS. 2014a. Bevölkerung: Die wichtigsten Zahlen [Population: The Most Important Figures]. Accessed February 7, 2014. http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/01/01/key.html
   Google Scholar
• BFS. 2014b. Familien, Haushalte – Daten, Indikatoren: Privathaushalte nach Haushaltstyp, 2011 [Families, Households – Data, Indicators: Private Households according to Household Type, 2011]. Accessed February 7, 2014. http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/01/04/blank/key/haushaltstypen.html
   Google Scholar
• Böhm, G., and H.-R. Pfister. 2005. “Consequences, Morality, and Time in Environmental Risk Evaluation.” Journal of Risk Research 8: 461–479.10.1080/13669870500064143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boholm, Å. 2004. “Editorial: What Are the New Perspectives on Siting Controversy?” Journal of Risk Research 7: 99–100.10.1080/1366987042000158677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bord, R. J., and R. E. O’Connor. 1992. “Determinants of Risk Perceptions of a Hazardous Waste Site.” Risk Analysis 12: 411–416.10.1111/risk.1992.12.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buser, M. 2010. Literaturstudie zum Stand der Markierung von geologischen Tiefenlagern [State of the Art Literature Review Regarding the Implementation of Markers of Geological Repositories]. Ittigen: Bundesamt für Energie.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, J. B., and H.-K. Kim. 2009. “Competition, Economic Benefits, Trust, and Risk Perception in Siting a Potentially Hazardous Facility.” Landscape and Urban Planning 91: 8–16.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M. 2010. “Perceptions of Nuclear Wastes across Extreme Time Perspectives.” Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1: 231–253.
   Google Scholar
• Finucane, M. L., A. Alhakami, P. Slovic, and S. M. Johnson. 2000. “The Affect Heuristic in Judgments of Risks and Benefits.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13: 1–17.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. Read, and B. Combs. 1978. “How Safe is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits.” Policy Sciences 9: 127–152.10.1007/BF00143739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishburn, L. 1982. The Foundations of Expected Utility. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-017-3329-8
   Google Scholar
• Flüeler, T. 2006. Decision Making for Complex Socio-technical Systems: Robustness from Lessons Learned in Long-term Radioactive Waste Governance. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3529-2
   Google Scholar
• Flüeler, T. 2010. Modul 3: Nuklearabfall im Vergleich mit Sonderabfall: Umgang und Wahrnehmung. Systemstudie, Teil 1 [Module 3: Nuclear Waste Compared to Hazardous Waste: Handling and Perception. System Study, Part 1]. Zürich: ETH Zürich.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C. 2006. “Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social–ecological Systems Analyses.” Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 16: 253–267.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grothmann, T., and A. Patt. 2005. “Adaptive Capacity and Human Cognition: The Process of Individual Adaptation to Climate Change.” Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 15: 199–213.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krütli, P., T. Flüeler, M. Stauffacher, A. Wiek, and R. W. Scholz. 2010a. “Technical Safety vs. Public Involvement? A Case Study on the Unrealized Project for the Disposal of Nuclear Waste at Wellenberg (Switzerland).” Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 7: 229–244.10.1080/1943815X.2010.506879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krütli, P., M. Stauffacher, T. Flüeler, and R. W. Scholz. 2010b. “Functional-dynamic Public Participation in Technological Decision Making: Site Selection Processes of Nuclear Waste Repositories.” Journal of Risk Research 13: 861–875.10.1080/13669871003703252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krütli, P., M. Stauffacher, D. Pedolin, C. Moser, and R. W. Scholz. 2012. “The Process Matters: Fairness in Repository Siting for Nuclear Waste.” Social Justice Research 25: 79–101.10.1007/s11211-012-0147-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuruppu, N., and D. Liverman. 2011. “Mental Preparation for Climate Adaptation: The Role of Cognition and Culture in Enhancing Adaptive Capacity of Water Management in Kiribati.” Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 21: 657–669.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, M. L. 2004. “On the Influence of Risk Perception on Mental Health: Living near an Incinerator.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 71–84.10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., O. F. Canziani, N. A. Leary, D. J. Dokken, and K. S. White. 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the IPPC. Cambridge, MA: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, C., M. Stauffacher, P. Krütli, and R. W. Scholz. 2012. “The Crucial Role of Nomothetic and Idiographic Conceptions of Time: Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Nuclear Waste Management.” Risk Analysis 32: 138–154.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01639.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, C., M. Stauffacher, T. Smieszek, R. Seidl, P. Krütli, and R. W. Scholz. 2013. “Psychological Factors in Discounting Negative Impacts of Nuclear Waste.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 35: 121–131.10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagra. 2002. Project Opalinus Clay. Safety Report: Demonstration of Disposal Feasibility of Spent Fuel, Vitrified High-level Waste and Long-lived Intermediate-level Waste. NTB 02-05. Wettingen: Nagra.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2003. One Step at a Time: The Staged Development of Geologic Repositories for High-level Radioactive Waste. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peltonen, L. 2006. Coping Capacity and Adaptive Capacity. Centre for Urban and Regional Studies. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Reiner, D. M., and W. J. Nuttall. 2011. “Public Acceptance of Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: Similarities and Differences.” In Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: A Comparative Assessment, edited by F. L. Toth, 295–315. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-8712-6
   Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. L., and R. Rosenthal. 2003. “Effect Sizes for Experimenting Psychologists.” Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 57: 221–237.10.1037/h0087427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, R. W. 2011. Environmental Literacy in Science and Society: From Knowledge to Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921520
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, R. W., Y. B. Blumer, and F. Brand. 2012. “Risk, Vulnerability, Robustness, and Resilience from a Decision-theoretic Perspective.” Journal of Risk Research 15: 313–330.10.1080/13669877.2011.634522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, R. W., and M. Siegrist. 2010. “Low Risks, High Public Concern? The Cases of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), Heavy Metals, and Nanotech Particles.” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 16: 185–198.10.1080/10807030903459114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl, R., C. Moser, M. Stauffacher, and P. Krütli. 2013. “Perceived Risk and Benefit of Nuclear Waste Repositories: Four Opinion Clusters.” Risk Analysis 33: 1038–1048.10.1111/risa.2013.33.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SFOE (Swiss Federal Office of Energy). 2008. Sectoral Plan for Deep Geological Repositories: Conceptual Part. Bern: Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (DETEC).
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., H. Gutscher, and T. C. Earle. 2005. “Perception of Risk: The Influence of General Trust, and General Confidence.” Journal of Risk Research 8: 145–156.10.1080/1366987032000105315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. 2004. “Local Acceptance of a High-level Nuclear Waste Repository.” Risk Analysis 24: 737–749.10.1111/risk.2004.24.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L., and B.-M. Drottz-Sjöberg. 2009. “Public Risk Perception of Nuclear Waste.” International Journal of Risk Assessment & Management 11: 248–280.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., M. L. Finucane, E. Peters, and D. G. MacGregor. 2004. “Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality.” Risk Analysis 24: 311–322.10.1111/risk.2004.24.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, B., I. Burton, R. J. T. Klein, and R. Street. 1999. “The Science of Adaptation: A Framework for Assessment.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4: 199–213.10.1023/A:1009652531101
   Google Scholar
• Smit, B., and J. Wandel. 2006. “Adaptation, Adaptive Capacity and Vulnerability.” Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 16: 282–292.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffacher, M., P. Krütli, and R. W. Scholz, eds. 2008. Gesellschaft und radioaktive Abfälle. Ergebnisse einer schweizweiten Befragung [Society and Radioactive Waste: Results of a Survey in Switzerland]. Zürich: Rüegger.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., and H. F. Fineberg, eds. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg, U., and M. Andrén. 2009. “Editorial: Nuclear Waste Management in a Globalised World.” Journal of Risk Research 7–8: 879–895.10.1080/13669870903134899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenson, O., and G. Karlsson. 1989. “Decision-Making, Time Horizons, and Risk in the Very Long-term Perspective.” Risk Analysis 9: 385–399.10.1111/risk.1989.9.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitfield, S. C., E. A. Rosa, A. Dan, and T. Dietz. 2009. “The Future of Nuclear Power: Value Orientations and Risk Perception.” Risk Analysis 29: 425–437.10.1111/risk.2009.29.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar