777
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Comment

Sociocultural vectors of effective risk communication

Pages 1251-1257 | Received 24 Jun 2014, Accepted 27 Jun 2014, Published online: 08 Aug 2014

References

  • Arvai, J. 2003. “Using Risk Communication to Disclose the Outcome of a Participatory Decision-Making Process: Effects on the Perceived Acceptability of Risk Policy Decisions.” Risk Analysis 23 (2): 281–289.10.1111/risk.2003.23.issue-2
  • Árvai, J., and L. Rivers III. 2014. Effective Risk Communication. London: Earthscan.
  • Besley, J., K. McComas, and C. W. Trumbo. 2012. “Citizen Views about Public Meetings.” Journal of Risk Research 15 (4): 355–371.10.1080/13669877.2011.634516
  • Bier, V. M. 2001. “On the State of the Art: Risk Communication to Decision-Makers.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 71: 151–157.
  • Boholm, Åsa, H. Corvellec, and M. Karlsson. 2012. “The Practice of Risk Governance: Lessons From The Field.” Journal of Risk Research 15 (1): 1–20.10.1080/13669877.2011.587886
  • Demeritt, D. 2006. “Science Studies, Climate Change and the Prospects for Constructivist Critique.” Economy and Society 35 (3): 453–479.10.1080/03085140600845024
  • Demeritt, D., and S. Nobert. in press. “Models of Best Practice in Flood Risk Communication and Management.” Environmental Hazards.
  • Durodie, B. 2003. “Invited Comments.” Journal of Risk Research 6 (4–6): 597–601.
  • Fischhoff, B. 1995. “Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process1.” Risk Analysis 15 (2): 137–145.10.1111/risk.1995.15.issue-2
  • Fischhoff, B. 2007. “Nonpersuasive Communication about Matters of Greatest Urgency: Climate Change.” Environmental Science and Technology 41: 7204–7208.10.1021/es0726411
  • Fischhoff, B. 2013. The Sciences of Science Communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 Supplement 3 (August 20): 14033–14039.10.1073/pnas.1213273110
  • Freudenburg, W. R., S. Frickel, and R. E. Dwyer. 1998. “Diversity and Divergence: Higher Superstition and the Dangers of Insularity in Science and Technology Studies.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 18: 6–34.10.1108/01443339810788416
  • Gilbert, D. T. 1999. “What the Mind’s Not.” In Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, edited by S. Chaiken and Y. Trope, 3–11. New York: Guildford.
  • Horlick-Jones, T. 2003. “Managing Risk and Contingency: Interaction and Accounting Behaviour.” Health, Risk and Society 5 (2): 221–228.10.1080/1369857031000123975
  • Horlick-Jones, Tom. 2005. “Informal Logics of Risk: Contingency and Modes of Practical Reasoning.” Journal of Risk Research 8 (3): 253–272.10.1080/1366987042000270735
  • Horlick-Jones, T., and Farré, J. (2010) “On the Communicative Constitution of Risk Objects in Mediated Times.” In The Communicative Turn in Risk Communication: Theory and Practice. Special Issue of The Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, edited by T. Horlick-Jones and J. Farré. 2 (2): 131–143.
  • Jardine, C. G., and S. M. Driedger. 2014. “Risk Communication for Empowerment: An Ultimate or Elusive Goal?” In Effective Risk Communication, edited by J. Árvai and L. Rivers III, 258–276. London: Earthscan.
  • Kasperson, R. 2014. “Four Questions for Risk Communication.” Journal of Risk Research, doi:10.1080/13669877.2014.900207.
  • Kasperson, R. E., O. Renn, P. Slovic, H. S. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J. X. Kasperson, and S. Ratick. 1988. “The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework.” Risk Analysis 8 (2): 177–187.10.1111/risk.1988.8.issue-2
  • Leiss, W. 1995. “‘Down and Dirty:’ The Use and Abuse of Public Trust in Risk Communication.” Risk Analysis 15 (6): 685–692.10.1111/risk.1995.15.issue-6
  • Löfstedt, R. E. 2005. Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230503946
  • Lofstedt, R. 2010. “Risk Communication Guidelines for Europe: A Modest Proposition.” Journal of Risk Research 13 (1): 87–109.10.1080/13669870903126176
  • Lofstedt, R. 2014. “A Possible Way Forward for Evidence-Based and Risk-Informed Policy-Making in Europe.” Journal of Risk Research, doi:10.1080/13669877.2014.919518.
  • Lofstedt, R., F. Bouder, J. K. Wardman, and S. Chakraborty. 2011. “The Changing Nature of Risk Communication and Regulation in Europe.” Journal of Risk Research 14 (4): 409–429.10.1080/13669877.2011.557479
  • Lofstedt, R. P. 2008. “What Environmental and Technological Risk Communication and Health Risk Communication Can Learn from Each Other.” Journal of Risk Research 11 (1–2): 147–167.
  • Luhmann, N. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Morgan, G. 2006. Best Practice Approaches for Characterizing, Communicating, Incorporating Scientific Uncertainty in Climate Decisionmaking. SAP 5.2. Washington, DC: NOAA.
  • Morgan, G., B. Fischhoff, A. Bostrom, and C. A. Attman. 2002. Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • National Research Council. 1989. Improving Risk Communication. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Pidgeon, N., P. Slovic, and R. Kasperson, eds. 2003. The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rosa, E. A. 1998. “Metatheoretical Foundations for Post-Normal Risk.” Journal of Risk Research 1 (1): 15–44.10.1080/136698798377303
  • Servaes, J., L. Jacobson, and S. S. White. 1996. Participatory Communication for Social Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sturgis, P. 2014. “On the Limits of Public Engagement for the Governance of Emerging Technologies.” Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 38–42.10.1177/0963662512468657
  • Tansey, J. 2004. “Risk as Politics: Culture as Power.” Journal of Risk Research 7 (1): 17–32.10.1080/1366987042000151188
  • Wardman, J. K. 2008. “The Constitution of Risk Communication in Advanced Liberal Societies.” Risk Analysis 28 (6): 1619–1637.10.1111/risk.2008.28.issue-6
  • Wagoner, B. 2014. “A Sociocultural Approach to Peace and Conflict.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 20 (2): 187–190.10.1037/pac0000019
  • Wilkinson, I. 2001. “Social Theories of Risk Perception: At Once Indispensable and Insufficient.” Current Sociology 49 (1): 1–22.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.