The stability of risk and benefit perceptions: a longitudinal study assessing the perception of biotechnology

References

• Andersen, S., G. W. Harrison, M. I. Lau, and E. Elisabet Rutström. 2008. “Lost in State Space: Are Preferences Stable?” International Economic Review 49 (3): 1091–1112.10.1111/iere.2008.49.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredahl, L. 1999. “Consumers’ Cognitions with Regard to Genetically Modified Foods. Results of a Qualitative Study in Four Countries.” Appetite 33 (3): 343–360.10.1006/appe.1999.0267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. 2010. Structural Equation Modeling with Amos. Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Camerer, Colin F., and Howard Kunreuther. 1989. “Decision Processes for Low Probability Events: Policy Implications.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 8 (4): 565–592.10.2307/3325045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, M., and M. Siegrist. 2010. “Factors Influencing People’s Acceptance of Gene Technology: The Role of Knowledge, Health Expectations, Naturalness, and Social Trust.” Science Communication 32 (4): 514–538. doi:10.1177/1075547009358919.10.1177/1075547009358919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, M., and M. Siegrist. 2013. “Sorting Biotechnology Applications: Results of Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) and Cluster Analysis.” Public Understanding of Science 22 (2): 128–136. doi:10.1177/0963662510394251.10.1177/0963662510394251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, T. C. 2010. “Trust in Risk Management: A Model-based Review of Empirical Research.” Risk Analysis 30: 541–574.10.1111/risk.2010.30.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiser, J. Richard, Russell Spears, and Paul Webley. 1989. “Nuclear Attitudes before and after Chernobyl: Change and Judgment.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 19 (8): 689–700.10.1111/jasp.1989.19.issue-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fife-Schaw, Chris, and Gene Rowe. 2000. “Research Note: Extending the Application of the Psychometric Approach for Assessing Public Perceptions of Food Risk: Some Methodological Considerations.” Journal of Risk Research 3: 167–179.10.1080/136698700376653
   Google Scholar
• Finucane, Melissa L., Ali Alhakami, Paul Slovic, and Stephen M. Johnson. 2000. “The Affect Heuristic in Judgments of Risks and Benefits.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13: 1–17.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleury-Bahi, G. 2008. “Environmental Risk: Perception and Target with Local versus Global Evaluation.” Psychological Reports 102 (1): 185–193. doi:10.2466/pro.102.1.185-193.10.2466/pr0.102.1.185-193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, James, Paul Slovic, and C. K. Mertz. 1994. “Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks.” Risk Analysis 14: 1101–1108.10.1111/risk.1994.14.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., K. Bergmann, M. Brennan, R. Lion, R. Meertens, G. Rowe, M. Siegrist, and C. Vereijken. 2011. “Consumer Response to Novel Agri-food Technologies: Implications for Predicting Consumer Acceptance of Emerging Food Technologies.” Trends in Food Science & Technology 22 (8): 442–456. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2011.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., C. Howard, D. Hedderley, and R. Shepherd. 1997. “Consumer Attitudes Towards Different Food-processing Technologies Used in Cheese Production – The Influence of Consumer Benefit.” Food Quality and Preference 8 (4): 271–280.10.1016/S0950-3293(97)00002-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., C. Howard, and R. Shepherd. 1995. “Genetic Engineering and Food: What Determines Consumer Acceptance?” British Food Journal 97 (8): 31–36.10.1108/00070709510100118
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., C. Howard, and R. Shepherd. 1997. “Public Concerns in the United Kingdom about General and Specific Applications of Genetic Engineering: Risk, Benefit, and Ethics.” Science, Technology and Human Values 22 (1): 98–124.10.1177/016224399702200105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, Lynn J., Ivo A. van der Lans, Arnout R. H. Fischer, Machiel J. Reinders, Davide Menozzi, Xiaoyong Zhang, Isabelle van den Berg, and Karin L. Zimmermann. 2013. “Public Perceptions of Agri-food Applications of Genetic Modification – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” Trends in Food Science & Technology 30 (2): 142–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskell, George. 2000. “Agricultural Biotechnology and Public Attitudes in the European Union.” AgBioForum 3 (2–3): 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, George, Sally Stares, Agnes Allansdottir, J. Nick Allum, N. Kronberger Jackson, Juergen Hampel, A. Niels Mejlgaard, et al. 2010. Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010 – Winds of Change? Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Glenn W., Eric Johnson, M. Melayne McInnes, and E. Elisabet Rutström. 2005. “Temporal Stability of Estimates of Risk Aversion.” Applied Financial Economics Letters 1 (1): 31–35.10.1080/1744654042000311576
   Google Scholar
• Hartl, Jochen, and Roland Herrmann. 2009. “Do They Always Say No? German Consumers and Second-generation GM Foods.” Agricultural Economics 40: 551–560.10.1111/agec.2009.40.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoban, Thomas J. 1998. “Trends in Consumer Attitudes about Agricultural Biotechnology.” AgBioForum 1 (1): 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T., J. Walls, G. Rowe, N. Pidgeon, W. Poortinga, and T. O’Riordan. 2006. “On Evaluating the GM Nation? Public Debate about the Commercialisation of Transgenic Crops in Britain.” New Genetics and Society 25 (3): 265–288. doi:10.1080/14636770601032858.10.1080/14636770601032858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., and P. M. Bentler. 1995. “Evaluating Model Fit.” In Structural Equation Modelling, edited by R. H. Hoyle, 76–99. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. 1979. “Statistical Models and Methods for Analysis of Longitudinal Data.” In Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models, edited by Karl G. Jöreskog and D. Sörbom, 129–168. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, Roger E., Dominic Golding, and Seth Tuler. 1992. “Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks.” Journal of Social Issues 48: 161–187.10.1111/josi.1992.48.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, Anthony. 2006. “Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values.” Climatic Change 77 (1–2): 45–72.10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., and R. W. Perry. 1990. “Effects of the Chernobyl Accident on Public Perceptions of Nuclear Plant Accident Risks.” Risk Analysis 10 (3): 393–399.10.1111/risk.1990.10.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, J. L., M. Jamal, L. Kurlander, M. Roucan, and L. Taulman. 2005. “A Meta-analysis of Genetically Modified Food Valuation Studies.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 30 (1): 28–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, M. K., and U.-K. Koivisto Hursti. 2002. “Consumer Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Foods.” Appetite 39 (1): 9–24.10.1006/appe.2002.0486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardis, Elaine R. 2011. “A Decade’s Perspective on DNA Sequencing Technology.” Nature 470: 198–203.10.1038/nature09796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, R., and F. Calvo. 2008. “Attitudes Toward Embryo Research, Worldviews, and the Moral Status of the Embryo Frame.” Science Communication 30 (1): 8–47.10.1177/1075547008319432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perhac, R. M. 1996. “Defining Risk: Normative Considerations.” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 2 (2): 381–392.10.1080/10807039609383615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prati, Gabriele, Luca Pietrantoni, and Bruna Zani. 2012. “The Prediction of Intention to Consume Genetically Modified Food: Test of an Integrated Psychosocial Model.” Food Quality and Preference 25 (2): 163–170.10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, Gene, and Lynn J. Frewer. 2000. “Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation.” Science, Technology and Human Values 25: 3–29.10.1177/016224390002500101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoemaker, Paul J. H., and John C. Hershey. 1992. “Utility Measurement: Signal, Noise, and Bias.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52 (3): 397–424.10.1016/0749-5978(92)90027-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael. 2000. “The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology.” Risk Analysis 20 (2): 195–204. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.202020.10.1111/risk.2000.20.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael, Bernadette Sütterlin, and Carmen Keller. 2014. “Why Have Some People Changed Their Attitudes Toward Nuclear Power after the Accident in Fukushima?” Energy Policy 69: 356–363.10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael, and Vivianne H. M. Visschers. 2013. “Acceptance of Nuclear Power: The Fukushima Effect.” Energy Policy 59: 112–119. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, Paul. 1995. “The Construction of Preference.” American Psychologist 50: 364–371.10.1037/0003-066X.50.5.364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, Paul, Melissa Finucane, Ellen Peters, and Donald G. MacGregor. 2002. “The Affect Heuristic.” In Heuristics and Biases, edited by T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman, 397–420. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808098
   Google Scholar
• Smidts, A. 1997. “The Relationship between Risk Attitude and Strength of Preference: A Test of Intrinsic Risk Attitude.” Management Science 43 (3): 357–370.10.1287/mnsc.43.3.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiley, S., R. de Loe, and R. Kreutzwiser. 2010. “Appropriate Public Involvement in Local Environmental Governance: A Framework and Case Study.” Society & Natural Resources 23 (11): 1043–1059. doi:10.1080/08941920802627491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, Y. 2013. “Attitude Gaps Between Conventional Plant Breeding Crops and Genetically Modified Crops, and Psychological Models Determining the Acceptance of the Two Crops.” Journal of Risk Research 16 (1): 69–80. doi:10.1080/13669877.2012.726236.10.1080/13669877.2012.726236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verplanken, B. 1989. “Beliefs, Attitudes, and Intentions Toward Nuclear Energy before and after Chernobyl in a Longitudinal Within-subjects Design.” Environment and Behavior 21 (4): 371–392.10.1177/0013916589214001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers, Vivianne H. M., and Michael Siegrist. 2013. “How a Nuclear Power Plant Accident Influences Acceptance of Nuclear Power: Results of a Longitudinal Study before and after the Fukushima Disaster.” Risk Analysis 33 (2): 333–347. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01861.x.10.1111/risk.2013.33.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehrung, D. A., K. R. Maccrimmon, and K. M. Brothers. 1984. “Utility-assessment – Domains, Stability, and Equivalence Procedures.” Infor 22 (2): 98–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar