Are people emotionally aroused by hypothetical medical scenarios in experiments? An eye tracking study with pupil dilation

References

• Andreassi, J. L. 2007. “Pupillary Response and Behavior.” In Psychophysiology: Human Behavior and Physiological Response, edited by J. L. Andreassi, 350–371. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, J. 1982. “Task-evoked Pupillary Responses, Processing Load, and the Structure of Processing Resources.” Psychological Bulletin 91 (2): 276–292.10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, J., and D. Kahneman. 1966. “Pupillary Changes in Two Memory Tasks.” Psychonomic Science 5 (10): 371–372.10.3758/BF03328444
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, J., and B. Lucero-Wagoner. 2000. “The Pupillary System.” In Handbook of Psychophysiology, edited by J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, and G. G. Berntson, 142–162. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., L. Miccoli, M. A. Escrig, and P. J. Lang. 2008. “The Pupil as a Measure of Emotional Arousal and Autonomic Activation.” Psychophysiology 45 (4): 602–607.10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchowski, A. T. 2007. Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gagl, B., S. Hawelka, and F. Hutzler. 2011. “Systematic Influence of Gaze Position on Pupil Size Measurement: Analysis and Correction.” Behavior Research Methods 43 (4): 1171–1181.10.3758/s13428-011-0109-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaissmaier, W., B. L. Anderson, and J. Schulkin. 2014. “How Do Physicians Provide Statistical Information about Antidepressants to Hypothetical Patients?” Medical Decision Making 34 (2): 206–215.10.1177/0272989X13501720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldwater, B. C. 1972. “Psychological Significance of Pupillary Movements.” Psychological Bulletin 77 (5): 340–355.10.1037/h0032456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granholm, E., and S. R. Steinhauer. 2004. “Pupillometric Measures of Cognitive and Emotional Processes.” International Journal of Psychophysiology 52 (1): 1–6.10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, J. L., R. Baser, N. D. Weinstein, Y. Li, L. Primavera, and M. M. Kemeny. 2014. “Examining Intuitive Risk Perceptions for Cancer in Diverse Populations.” Health, Risk & Society 16 (3): 227–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, E. H., and J. M. Polt. 1964. “Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-solving.” Science 143 (3611): 1190–1192.10.1126/science.143.3611.1190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, R., V. Visschers, and M. Siegrist. 2011. “Risk Communication with Pictographs: The Role of Numeracy and Graph Processing.” Judgment and Decision Making 6 (3): 263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janisse, M. P. 1974. “Pupil Size, Affect and Exposure Frequency.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 2 (2): 125–146.10.2224/sbp.1974.2.2.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., and P. A. Carpenter. 1980. “A Theory of Reading: From Eye Fixations to Comprehension.” Psychological Review 87 (4): 329–354.10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and J. Beatty. 1966. “Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory.” Science 154 (3756): 1583–1585.10.1126/science.154.3756.1583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, C., C. Kreuzmair, R. Leins-Hess, and M. Siegrist. 2014. “Numeric and Graphic Risk Information Processing of High and Low Numerates in the Intuitive and Deliberative Decision Modes: An Eye-tracker Study.” Judgment and Decision Making 9 (5): 420–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. 2010. “Fixation-aligned Pupillary Response Averaging.” In Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-tracking Research & Applications, 275–282. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klingner, J., R. Kumar, and P. Hanrahan. 2008. “Measuring the Task-evoked Pupillary Response with a Remote Eye Tracker.” In Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications, 69–72. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuzmair, C., M. Siegrist, and C. Keller. in press. “High Numerates Count Icons and Low Numerates Process Large Areas in Pictographs: Results of an Eye Tracking Study.” Risk Analysis.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, J., and M. Böttcher. 1999. Pupillography: Principles, Methods and Applications. Munich, Germany: Zuckschwerdt.
   Google Scholar
• Laeng, B., S. Sirois, and G. Gredeback. 2012. “Pupillometry: A Window to the Preconscious?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (1): 18–27.10.1177/1745691611427305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenfeld, I. E. 1999. The Pupil: Anatomy, Physiology, and Clinical Applications. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• MacLachlan, C., and H. C. Howland. 2002. “Normal Values and Standard Deviations for Pupil Diameter and Interpupillary Distance in Subjects Aged 1 Month to 19 Years.” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 22 (3): 175–182.10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00023.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathôt, S., A. Siebold, M. Donk, and F. Vitu. 2015. “Large Pupils Predict Goal-driven Eye Movements.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144 (3): 513–521.10.1037/a0039168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, M. M., and D. I. Shore. 2011. “Upbeat and Happy: Arousal as an Important Factor in Studying Attention.” Cognition & Emotion 25 (7): 1184–1195.10.1080/02699931.2010.524396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. G., and M. K. Kaiser. 1985. “MANOVA Method for Analyzing Repeated Measures Designs: An Extensive Primer.” Psychological Bulletin 97 (2): 316–333.10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okan, Y., R. Garcia-Retamero, E. T. Cokely, and A. Maldonado. 2012. “Individual Differences in Graph Literacy: Overcoming Denominator Neglect in Risk Comprehension.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 25 (4): 390–401.10.1002/bdm.751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partala, T., and V. Surakka. 2003. “Pupil Size Variation as an Indication of Affective Processing.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 (1–2): 185–198.10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00017-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peipins, L. A., F. McCarty, N. A. Hawkins, J. L. Rodriguez, L. E. Scholl, and S. Leadbetter. 2015. “Cognitive and Affective Influences on Perceived Risk of Ovarian Cancer.” Psycho-Oncology 24 (3): 279–286.10.1002/pon.3593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, E., P. S. Hart, and L. Fraenkel. 2011. “Informing Patients: The Influence of Numeracy, Framing, and Format of Side Effect Information on Risk Perceptions.” Medical Decision Making 31 (3): 432–436.10.1177/0272989X10391672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, Ceri, Paul Bennett, and Kate Brain. 2008. “Understanding Emotional Responses to Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment: An Applied Test of a Cognitive Theory of Emotion.” Psychology, Health & Medicine 13 (5): 545–558.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanners, R. F., M. Coulter, A. W. Sweet, and P. Murphy. 1979. “The Pupillary Response as an Indicator of Arousal and Cognition.” Motivation and Emotion 3 (4): 319–340.10.1007/BF00994048
   Google Scholar
• Steinhauer, S. R., G. J. Siegle, R. Condray, and M. Pless. 2004. “Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Innervation of Pupillary Dilation during Sustained Processing.” International Journal of Psychophysiology 52 (1): 77–86.10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verney, S. P., E. Granholm, and S. P. Marshall. 2004. “Pupillary Responses on the Visual Backward Masking Task Reflect General Cognitive Ability.” International Journal of Psychophysiology 52 (1): 23–36.10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, H. J. 1995. “The Form of the Human Pupil.” Vision Research 35 (14): 2021–2036.10.1016/0042-6989(94)00268-Q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., A. Fagerlin, and P. A. Ubel. 2010. “A Demonstration of “Less Can Be More” in Risk Graphics.” Medical Decision Making 30 (6): 661–671.10.1177/0272989X10364244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar