Travelling risks: How did nanotechnology become a risk in India and South Africa?

References

• van Asselt, M. B. A., and E. Vos. 2008. “Wrestling with Uncertain Risks: EU Regulation of GMOs and the Uncertainty Paradox.” Journal of Risk Research 11 (1): 281–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AZoNano. 2008. “India vice President Inaugurates the ‘Bangalore Nano 2008’”. AZOnano.Com. Accessed June 24, 2015. http://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=9152
   Google Scholar
• Bakshi, S. R. 2011. “HUL, ITC Put off Nano Tech-based Skincare Products.” Financial Chronicle, December 13, 2011. Accessed June 25, 2015. http://www.mydigitalfc.com/news/hul-itc-put-nano-tech-based-skincare-products-737
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W. 2002. “Controversial Medical and Agri-food Biotechnology: A Cultivation Analysis.” Public Understanding of Science 11 (2): 93–111.10.1088/0963-6625/11/2/301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1999. World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., A. Giddens, and S. Lash. 1994. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, P. L. 1996. Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoldo, R., C. Mays, M. Poumadère, N. Schneider, and C. Svendsen. 2016. “Great Deeds or Great Risks? Scientists’ Social Representations of Nanotechnology.” Journal of Risk Research 19 (6): 760–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., V. L. Kramer, and S. H. Priest. 2008. “Expert Opinion on Nanotechnology: Risks, Benefits, and Regulation.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 10 (4): 549–558.10.1007/s11051-007-9323-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beumer, K. 2014. “Nanotechnology and the Public in India: A Newspaper Analysis.” In India, Science and Technology. Vol. 3, edited by S. Pohit, K. Mehra and P. Banerjee, 299–303. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beumer, K. 2015. “The Co-production of Nanotechnology and Development in India, South Africa, and Kenya.” In Practices of Innovation and Responsibility. Insights from Methods, Governance and Action, edited by D. M. Bowman, A. Dijkstra, C. Fautz, J. Guivant, K. Konrad, H. van Lente and S. Woll, 85–98. Berlin: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beumer, K. 2016. “Nanotechnology and Development. Styles of Governance in India, South Africa, and Kenya.” PhD diss., Maastricht University.
   Google Scholar
• Beumer, K., and S. Bhattacharya. 2013. “Emerging Technologies in India: Developments, Debates and Silences about Nanotechnology.” Science and Public Policy 40 (5): 628–643.10.1093/scipol/sct016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boholm, Å. 2015. Anthropology and Risk. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Boholm, M., R. Arvidsson, Å. Boholm, H. Corvellec, and S. Molander. 2015. “Dis-ag-reement: The Construction and Negotiation of Risk in the Swedish Controversy over Antibacterial Silver.” Journal of Risk Research 18 (1): 93–110.10.1080/13669877.2013.879492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boholm, Å., and H. Corvellec. 2011. “A Relational Theory of Risk.” Journal of Risk Research 14 (2): 175–190.10.1080/13669877.2010.515313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borraz, O. 2008. “Risk and the Changing Nature of the State.” Paper Presented at the ISA FORUM, Barcelona, September 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, D. M., and G. A. Hodge. 2007. “Nanotechnology and Public Interest Dialogue: Some International Observations.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 27 (2): 118–132.10.1177/0270467606298216
   Google Scholar
• Carmody, P. 2002. “Between Globalization and (Post) Apartheid: The Political Economy of Restructuring in South Africa.” Journal of Southern African Studies 28 (2): 255–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, M. 2006. “Science in Africa: Conscious of Change.” Nature 444 (7118): 416–417.10.1038/444416a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J.-Y., G. Ramachandran, and M. Kandlikar. 2009. “The Impact of Toxicity Testing Costs on Nanomaterial Regulation.” Environmental Science & Technology 43 (9): 3030–3034.10.1021/es802388s
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloete, T. E., L. H. Nel, and J. Theron. 2006. “Biotechnology in South Africa.” Trends in Biotechnology 24 (12): 557–562.10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Court, E., A. S. Daar, E. Martin, T. Acharya, and P. A. Singer. 2004. “Will Prince Charles et al. Diminish the Opportunities of Developing Countries in Nanotechnology?” Nanotechweb.Org, January 28, 2004. Accessed November 9, 2015. http://nanotechweb.org/cws/article/indepth/18909
   Google Scholar
• Damodaran, A. 1999. “Regulating Transgenic Plants in India: Biosafety, Plant Variety Protection and beyond.” Economy and Political Weekly 34 (13): 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DST (Department of Science and Technology). 2006. The National Nanotechnology Strategy. Pretoria: Government of the Republic of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Dhawan, A., R. Shanker, M. Das, and K. C. Gupta. 2011. “Guidance for Safe Handling of Nanomaterials.” Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology 7 (1): 218–224.10.1166/jbn.2011.1276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. N., and G. Hecht. 2010. “History and the Technopolitics of Identity: The Case of Apartheid South Africa.” Journal of Southern African Studies 36 (3): 619–639.10.1080/03057070.2010.507568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erbis, S., Z. Ok, J. A. Isaacs, J. C. Benneyan, and S. Kamarthi. 2016. “Review of Research Trends and Methods in Nano Environmental, Health, and Safety Risk Analysis.” Risk Analysis 36 (8): 1644–1665.10.1111/risa.2016.36.issue-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ETC Group. 2003. The Big down. Atomtech: Technologies Converging at the Nano-scale. Accessed February 1, 2015. http://www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/thebigdown.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, R., and A. Gupta. 2009. “The Limits of Regulatory Convergence: Globalization and GMO Politics in the South.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 9 (2): 113–133.10.1007/s10784-009-9094-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gulumian, M. 2012. Responsible Development of Nanotechnology in SA. Accessed March 27, 2015. http://www.esastap.org.za/download/present_france_03_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511819766
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. 2012. Being Nuclear. Africans and the Global Uranium Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, M. A. 2014. “Engaging with Risks. Citizens, Science and Policy in Mobile Phone Mast Siting Controversies.” PhD diss., Maastricht University.
   Google Scholar
• Hristozov, D. R., S. Gottardo, and A. Critto. 2012. “Risk Assessment of Engineered Nanomaterials: A Review of Available Data and Approaches from a Regulatory Perspective.” Nanotoxicology 6 (8): 880–898.10.3109/17435390.2011.626534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C., A. Notten, and N. J. Rasters. 2011. “Nanoscience and Technology Publications and Patents: A Review of Social Science Studies and Search Strategies.” Journal of Technology Transfer 36 (2): 145–172.10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M., and H. Rothstein. 2013. “The Risk Organisation: Or How Organisations Reconcile Themselves to Failure.” Journal of Risk Research 16 (6): 651–675.10.1080/13669877.2012.761276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1999. “The Songlines of Risk.” Environmental Values 8 (2): 135–152.10.3197/096327199129341761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400837311
   Google Scholar
• Jayanthi, A. P., K. Beumer, and S. Bhattacharya. 2012. “Nanotechnology: Risk Governance in India.” Economic and Political Weekly 47 (4): 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, H. 2003. “Risk: From Perception to Social Representation.” British Journal of Social Psychology 42 (1): 55–73.10.1348/014466603763276126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalam, A. P. J. 2012. Turning Points. A Journey Through Challenges. New Delhi: HarperCollins Publishers India.
   Google Scholar
• Krabbenborg, L. 2013. “Involvement of Civil Society Actors in Nanotechnology: Creating Productive Spaces for Interaction.” PhD diss., Universiteit van Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, R. E., and D. Vogel. 2001. “The Changing Character of Regulation: A Comparison of Europe and the United States.” Risk Analysis 21 (3): 399–416.10.1111/risk.2001.21.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1993. Risk: A Sociological Theory. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Maclurcan, D. C. 2005. “Nanotechnology and Developing Countries. Part 2: What Realities?” AZojono. Journal of Nanotechnology Online 1. http://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=1429
   Google Scholar
• Marais, H. C., and M. Pienaar. 2010. “Evolution of the South African Science, Technology and Innovation System 1994-2010: An Exploration.” African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development 2 (3): 82–109.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, A. D., R. J. Aitken, T. Butz, V. Colvin, K. Donaldson, G. Oberdörster, M. A. Philbert, et al. 2006. “Safe Handling of Nanotechnology.” Nature 444: 267–269.10.1038/444267a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch, J. 2005. “Asbestos, Lies and the State: Occupational Disease and South African Science.” African Studies 64 (2): 201–216.10.1080/00020180500355694
   Google Scholar
• Molapisi, M. 2009. Nano-HSE Opening Address. Accessed June 24, 2015. http://www.csir.co.za/nre/pollution_and_waste/pdfs/DST%20Opening%20Address.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Musee, N. 2009. Development of National Nanotechnology Risk Assessment Research Platform: Fundamental Building Blocks. Accessed April 19, 2015. http://www.csir.co.za/nre/pollution_and_waste/pdfs/Musee_Development%20of%20National.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Musee, N., A. C. Brent, and P. J. Ashton. 2010. “A South African Research Agenda to Investigate the Potential Environmental, Health and Safety Risks of Nanotechnology.” South African Journal of Science 106 (3/4): 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster, G. 2000. “Toxicology of Ultrafine Particles: In Vivo Studies.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 358 (1775): 2719–2740.10.1098/rsta.2000.0680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster, G., V. Stone, and K. Donaldson. 2007. “Toxicology of Nanoparticles: A Historical Perspective.” Nanotoxicology 1 (1): 2–25.10.1080/17435390701314761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2011. Nanosafety at the OECD: The First Five Years 2006–2010. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., and T. Rogers-Hayden. 2007. “Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement’?” Health, Risk & Society 9 (2): 191–210.10.1080/13698570701306906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planning Commission. 2008. Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007–2012). Volume III. Agriculture, Rural Development, Industry, Services, and Physical Infrastructure. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poland, C. A, R. Duffin, I. Kinlock, A. Maynard, W. A. H. Wallace, A. Seaton, V. Stone, S. Brown, W. Macnee, and K. Donaldson. 2008. “Carbon Nanotubes Introduced into the Abdominal Cavity of Mice Show Asbestos-like Pathogenicity in a Pilot Study.” Nature Nanotechnology 3 (7): 423–428.10.1038/nnano.2008.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. 2004. “The Risk Management of Everything.” Journal of Risk Finance 5 (3): 58–65.10.1108/eb023001
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. 2007. Organized Uncertainty: Designing a World of Risk Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raina, D. 2012. “The Naturalization of Modern Science in South Asia: A Historical Overview of the Processes of Domestication and Globalization.” In The Globalization of Knowledge in History, edited by J. Renn, 345–366. Stuttgart: Holtzbrinck Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Reith, G. 2004. “Uncertain times: The Notion of ‘Risk’ and the Development of Modernity.” Time and Society 13 (2–3): 382–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O., and M. C. Roco. 2006. “Nanotechnology and the Need for Risk Governance.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 8 (2): 153–191.10.1007/s11051-006-9092-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H., M. Huber, and G. Gaskell. 2006. “A Theory of Risk Colonization: The Spiralling Regulatory Logics of Societal and Institutional Risk.” Economy and Society 35 (1): 91–112.10.1080/03085140500465865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RS & RAE (Royal Society and Royal Academy for Engineering). 2004. Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. Plymouth: Latimer Trend Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sachan, D. 2011. “Nanotech’s Mega Hazard.” Down to Earth. Accessed October 29, 2013. http://www.downtoearth.org.in/content/nanotech-s-mega-hazard
   Google Scholar
• Sarma, S. D. 2011. “How Resilient is India to Nanotechnology Risks? Examining Current Developments, Capacities and an Approach for Effective Risk Governance and Regulation.” European Journal of Law and Technology 2 (3). http://ejlt.org/article/view/98/161
   Google Scholar
• Schummer, J. 2007. “The Impact of Nanotechnologies on Developing Countries.” In Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology, edited by F. Allhoff, P. Lin, J. Moor and J. Weckert, 291–307. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, E. 2011. “‘Science’ in the Risk Politics of Bt Brinjal.” Economic & Political Weekly 46 (31): 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, N., and N. Chowdhury. 2008. “Regulation of Health Related Nano Applications in India: Exploring the Limitations of the Current Regulatory Design.” Paper Presented at the International Conference on Mapping the Uncertainty of Nanotechnology, Padua, May 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• TERI (The Energy and Resource Institute). 2008. A Report on Risks from a Developing Country Perspective. Project Report No. 2006ST21: D3. New Delhi: The Energy and Resource Institute.
   Google Scholar
• TERI (The Energy and Resource Institute) 2009a. Regulatory Challenges Posed by Nanotechnology Developments in India. Project Report No. 2006ST21: D6. New Delhi: The Energy and Resource Institute.
   Google Scholar
• TERI (The Energy and Resource Institute) 2009b. Review of International Nanotechnology Developments and Policy Concerns. Project Report No. 2006ST21:D1. New Delhi: The Energy and Resource Institute.
   Google Scholar
• TERI (The Energy and Resource Institute) 2010. Summary of the Workshop on ‘Issues of Risk in the Regulation of Nanotechnology’”. Accessed November 11, 2015. http://www.teriin.org/img_nano/Nano_8Jan2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2010. UNESCO Science Report 2010. The current status of science around the world. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. 1986. National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wetter, K. J. 2010. “Big Continent and Tiny Technology: Nanotechnology and Africa”. Panbazuka News. Accessed October 29, 2013. http://www.pambazuka.org/en/category/features/67525
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., and L. Leydesdorff. 2006. “The Emergence of China as a Leading Nation in Science.” Research Policy 35 (1): 83–104.10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar