Total efficient risk priority number (TERPN): a new method for risk assessment

References

• Aguiar, D. C., H. J. Celani de Souza, and V. A. P. Salomon. 2010. “An AHP Application to Evaluate Scoring Criteria for Failure.” International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process 2 (1): 3–13. ISSN: 1936-6744
   Google Scholar
• Aven, T. 2016. “Risk Assessment and Risk Management: Review of Recent Advances on their Foundation.” European Journal of Operational Research 253 (2016): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Daya, M., and A. Raouf. 1996. “A Revised Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Model.” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 13 (1): 43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bevilacqua, M., and M. Braglia. 2000. “The Analytic Hierarchy Process Applied to Maintenance Strategy Selection.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 70: 71–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, J. B. 2003. “An Assessment of RPN Prioritization in a Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis.” Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 380–386.
   Google Scholar
• Carmignani, G. 2009. “An Integrated Structural Framework to Cost-based FMECA: The Priority-cost FMECA.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 94 (2009): 861–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P.-S., and M.-T. Wu. 2013. “A Modified Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Method for Supplier Selection Problems in the Supply Chain Risk Environment: A Case Study.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 66: 634–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Felice, F., and A. Petrillo. 2014. “Proposal of a Structured Methodology for the Measure of Intangible Criteria and for Decision Making.” International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling 9 (3): 157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Fera, M., and R. Macchiaroli. 2010. “Appraisal of a New Risk Assessment Model for SME.” Safety Science 48 (2010): 1361–1368.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischer, J., U. Weismann, and S. Niggeschmidt. 2006. “Calculation and Optimisation Model for Costs and Effects of Availability Relevant Service Elements.” In Proceedings of 13th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering (LCE2006), 675–680. Leuven: Acco, May 31–June 2.
   Google Scholar
• Garbolino, E., J. P. Chery, and F. Guarnieri. 2016. “A Simplified Approach to Risk Assessment Based on System Dynamics: An Industrial Case Study.” Risk Analysis 36 (1): 16–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, W. 1993. “Modelling Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 10 (5): 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• IEC. 2006. IEC 60812:2006(E) Analysis Techniques for System Reliability – Procedure for Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA). 2nd ed. Brussels: International Electrotechnical Commission.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2009. ISO 31000:2009(E) Risk Management – Principles and Guidelines. 1st ed. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., D. Quan, and P. Chen. 2014. “The Improved Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis Method Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process.” In 65th International Astronautical Congress 2014: Our World Needs Space, IAC 2014. Vol. 9, 6169–6180. Toronto, September 29–October 3, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., J. X. You, X. Y. You, and M. M. Shan. 2015. “A Novel Approach for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis using Combination Weighting and Fuzzy VIKOR Method.” Applied Soft Computing 28: 579–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madu, C. 2000. “Competing Through Maintenance Strategies.” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 17 (9): 937–948.
   Google Scholar
• Muchiri, P. N., L. Pintelon, H. Martinb, and A. M. De Meyer. 2010. “Empirical Analysis of Maintenance Performance Measurement in Belgian Industries.” International Journal of Production Research 48 (20): 5905–5924.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1996. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS.
   Google Scholar
• Silvestri, A., F. De Felice, and A. Petrillo. 2012. “Multi-criteria Risk Analysis to Improve Safety in Manufacturing Systems.” International Journal of Production Research 50 (17): 4806–4821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rippl, Susanne. 2002. “Cultural Theory and Risk Perception: A Proposal for a Better Measurement.” Journal of Risk Research 5 (2): 147–165.
   Google Scholar
• Teoh, P. C., and K. Case. 2004. “Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Through Knowledge Modeling.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 153–154 (2004): 253–260.
   Google Scholar
• Trucco, P., M. Cavallin, and F. Lorenzi. 2012. “A Standardised FMECA and Risk Factors Monitoring Method for Clinical Risk Assessment: Results from a Multi Centric Application.” In 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012, ESREL 2012. Vol. 7, 5966–5975. Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, M. H. 2015. “Risk Assessment and Alternatives Assessment: Comparing Two Methodologies.” Risk Analysis 35 (2): 2129–2136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zammori, F., and R. Gabbrielli. 2012. “ANP/RPN: A Multi Criteria Evaluation of the Risk Priority Number.” Quality and Reliability Engineering International 28 (1): 85–104.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Q. Zeng, and G. Zhang. 2013. “A New Approach for Prioritization of Failure Mode in FMECA using Encouragement Variable Weight AHP.” Applied Mechanics and Materials 289 (2013): 93–98.
   Google Scholar