The fake news game: actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation

References

• Allcott, H., and M. Gentzkow. 2017. “Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31 (2): 211–236. doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. 2005. “Metaspin: Demonisation of Media Manipulation.” Political Science 57 (2): 17–27. doi:10.1177/003231870505700203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakir, V., and A. McStay. 2017. “Fake News and the Economy of Emotions: Problems, Causes, Solutions.” Digital Journalism 6 (2): 154–175. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., S. Messing, and L. Adamic. 2015. “Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook.” Science 348: 1130–1132. doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., and G. Miller. 2013. “Inducing Resistance to Conspiracy Theory Propaganda: Testing Inoculation and Metainoculation Strategies.” Human Communication Research 39 (2): 184–207. doi:10.1111/hcre.12000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., and S. A. Rains. 2010. “A Meta-Analysis of Research on Inoculation Theory.” Communication Monographs 77 (3): 281–311. doi:10.1080/03637751003758193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthel, M., A. Mitchell, and J. Holcomb. 2016. “Many Americans Believe Fake News Is Sowing Confusion.” Pew Research Center. http://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowing-confusion/.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, L., and E. K. Vraga. 2015. “In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media.” Journal of Communication 65 (4): 619–638. doi:10.1111/jcom.12166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boididou, C., S. Papadopoulos, L. Apostolidis, and Y. Kompatsiaris. 2017. “Learning to Detect Misleading Content on Twitter.” In ICMR 2017 – Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval, 278–286. doi:10.1145/3078971.3078979.10.1145/3078971
   Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T., and J. N. Druckman. 2015. “Counteracting the Politicization of Science.” Journal of Communication 65 (5): 745–769. doi:10.1111/jcom.12171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremner, C. 2018. “France Aims to Ban Fake News at Election Time.” The times. Accessed February 12. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/france-aims-to-ban-fake-news-at-election-time-jwspzjx83
   Google Scholar
• Budak, C., D. Agrawal, and A. El Abbadi. 2011. “Limiting the Spread of Misinformation in Social Networks.” In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, 665–674, New York, NY, USA, ACM. doi:10.1145/1963405.1963499.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, H.-C., and S. Abe. 2013. “Is Two-Tailed Testing for Directional Research Hypotheses Tests Legitimate?” Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1261–1266. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.023.10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COA. 2016. “Incidentenmeldingen COA Eerste Helft 2016.” Accessed August 30, 2017 https://www.coa.nl/nl/actueel/nieuws/incidentenmeldingen-coa-eerste-helft-2016
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J. 2013. “Inoculation Theory.” In The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice, edited by J. P. Dillard and L. Shen. 2nd ed., 220–236. Thousand Oaks: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452218410.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J., B. Jackson, and J. A. Dimmock. 2016. “Persuading Others to Avoid Persuasion: Inoculation Theory and Resistant Health Attitudes.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J., S. Lewandowsky, and U. K. H. Ecker. 2017. “Neutralizing Misinformation through Inoculation: Exposing Misleading Argumentation Techniques Reduces Their Influence.” PLOS ONE 12 (5): 1–21. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, N. A. 2017. “Posttruth, Truthiness, and Alternative Facts: Information Behavior and Critical Information Consumption for a New Age.” Library Quarterly 87 (3): 211–221. doi:10.1086/692297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, P., and J. A. Kuypers. 2009. Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, 1–13. Abingdon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203864463.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaxman, S., S. Goel, and J. M. Rao. 2016. “Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (1): 298–320. doi:10.1093/poq/nfw006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., and R. K. Nielsen. 2017. “Are News Audiences Increasingly Fragmented? A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Cross-Platform News Audience Fragmentation and Duplication.” Journal of Communication 67 (4): 476–498. doi:10.1111/jcom.12315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, D. J., B. Nyhan, and J. Reifler. 2017. “The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs about Politics.” Political Psychology 38: 127–150. doi:10.1111/pops.12394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greussing, E., and H. G. Boomgaarden. 2017. “Shifting the Refugee Narrative? An Automated Frame Analysis of Europe’s 2015 Refugee Crisis.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43 (11 ): 1749 –1774. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1282813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groshek, J., and K. Koc-Michalska. 2017. “Helping Populism Win? Social Media Use, Filter Bubbles, and Support for Populist Presidential Candidates in the 2016 US Election Campaign.” Information Communication and Society 20 (9): 1389–1407.10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, L., V. Kropotov, and F. Yarochkin. 2017. The Fake News Machine: How Propagandists Abuse the Internet and Manipulate the Public. TrendLabs Research Paper. https://documents.trendmicro.com/assets/white_papers/wp-fake-news-machine-how-propagandists-abuse-the-internet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Guess, A., B. Lyons, B. Nyhan, and J. Reifler. (2018). Avoiding the Echo Chamber about Echo Chambers: Why Selective Exposure to Like-minded Political News is Less Prevalent than you Think. Miami, FL: Knight Foundation White Paper, Knight Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. 2017. “Fallacies.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017), edited by E. N. Zalta. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=fallacies.
   Google Scholar
• Harriss, L., and K. Raymer. 2017. Online Information and Fake News (PostNotes). PostNote. http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/POST-PN-0559#fullreport.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, K. 2016. “Post-Truth: A Guide for the Perplexed.” Nature 540 (7631): 9. doi:10.1038/540009a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, R. 1964. The Paranoid Style in American Politics. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, S., E. Myung, and S. L. Johnson. 2016. “Open Media or Echo Chamber: The Use of Links in Audience Discussions on the Facebook Pages of Partisan News Organizations.” Information, Communication & Society 19 (7): 875–891. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1064461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L. 1952. “Tests of Hypotheses: One-Sided vs. Two-Sided Alternatives.” Psychological Bulletin 49 (1): 43–46. doi:10.1037/h0056832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucharski, A. 2016. “Post-Truth: Study Epidemiology of Fake News.” Nature 540 (7634): 525.10.1038/540525a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuklinski, J. H., P. J. Quirk, J. Jerit, D. Schwieder, and R. F. Rich. 2000. “Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship.” Journal of Politics 62 (3): 790–816.10.1111/0022-3816.00033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer, D., M. Baum, N. Grinberg, L. Friedland, K. Joseph, W. Hobbs, and C. Mattsson 2017. Combating Fake News: An Agenda for Research and Action. https://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Combating-Fake-News-Agenda-for-Research-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., U. K. Ecker, and J. Cook. 2017. “Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 6 (4): 353–369.10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, R. 2005. Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230503946
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A., and R. Lewis. 2017. “Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online.” Data & Society Research Institute. Accessed December 23, 2017. https://datasociety.net/pubs/oh/DataAndSociety_MediaManipulationAndDisinformationOnline.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, R., R. Wasserstein, and D. Spiegelhalter. 2017. “The ASA’s P-Value Statement, One Year on.” Significance 14 (2): 38–41.10.1111/sign.2017.14.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M., and R. Carter. 2004. “‘There’s Millions of Them’: Hyperbole in Everyday Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (2): 149–184.10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00116-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. 1964. “Some Contemporary Approaches.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1: 191–229. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60052-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J., and D. Papageorgis. 1961. “The Relative Efficacy of Various Types of Prior Belief-Defense in Producing Immunity against Persuasion.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62: 327–337.10.1037/h0042026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J., and D. Papageorgis. 1962. “Effectiveness of Forewarning in Developing Resistance to Persuasion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 26 (1): 24–34.10.1086/267068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A., J. Gottfried, M. Barthel, and E. Shearer. 2016. Pathways to News. http://www.journalism.org/2016/07/07/pathways-to-news/.
   Google Scholar
• Mustafaraj, E., and P. T. Metaxas. 2017. “The Fake News Spreading Plague: Was It Preventable?” In WebSci 2017 – Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Web Science Conference, 235–239. doi:10.1145/3091478.3091523.10.1145/3091478
   Google Scholar
• Niederdeppe, J., S. E. Gollust, and C. L. Barry. 2014. “Inoculation in Competitive Framing Examining Message Effects on Policy Preferences.” Public Opinion Quarterly 78 (3): 634–655. doi:10.1093/poq/nfu026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford Dictionaries. 2016. “Word of the Year 2016 is …” Accessed August 30, 2017. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/word-of-the-year/word-of-the-year-2016
   Google Scholar
• Papageorgis, D., and W. J. McGuire. 1961. “The Generality of Immunity to Persuasion Produced by Pre-Exposure to Weakened Counterarguments.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62: 475–481.10.1037/h0048430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, K. A., S. A. Rains, and B. Ivanov. 2016. “Examining the “Blanket of Protection” Conferred by Inoculation: The Effects of Inoculation Messages on the Cross-Protection of Related Attitudes.” Communication Monographs 83 (1): 49–68.10.1080/03637751.2015.1030681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., R. L. Boyd, K. Jordan, and K. Blackburn. 2015. The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015. Austin: University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. 1995. “Designing Messages for Behavioral Inoculation.” In Designing Health Messages: Approaches from Communication Theory and Public Health Practice, edited by E. Maybach and R. Louiselle Parrott, 99–113. Thousand Oaks: Sage.10.4135/9781452233451
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., and M. Burgoon. 1988. “Inoculation in Political Campaign Communication.” Human Communication Research 15 (1): 91–111. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00172.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., H. C. Kenski, M. Nitz, and J. Sorenson. 1990. “Efficacy of Inoculation Strategies in Promoting Resistance to Political Attack Messages: Application to Direct Mail.” Communication Monographs 57 (1): 25–43. doi:10.1080/03637759009376183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., J. Tusing, A. F. Koerner, W. Lee, L. C. Godbold, L. J. Penaloza, and Y. Y.-H. Hong. 1997. “Enriching the Inoculation Construct: The Role of Critical Components in the Process of Resistance.” Human Communication Research 24 (2): 187–215. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00413.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., A. Szabo, J. Anderson, J. Morrill, J. Zubric, and H.-H. H-Wan. 2001. “The Role and Impact of Affect in the Process of Resistance to Persuasion.” Human Communication Research 27 (2): 216–252. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00781.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., M. M. Haigh, J. Sims, and S. Wigley. 2007. “The Influence of Corporate Front-Group Stealth Campaigns.” Communication Research 34 (1): 73–99. doi:10.1177/0093650206296083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., S. M. Semmler, L. Deatrick, A. Mason, G. Nisbett, L. Lane, A. Aaaa, and J. Banas. 2009. “Nuances about the Role and Impact of Affect in Inoculation.” Communication Monographs 76 (1): 73–98.10.1080/03637750802378807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Pérez, C. 2017. “News Framing and Media Legitimacy: An Exploratory Study of the Media Coverage of the Refugee Crisis in the European Union.” Communication and Society 30 (3): 169–184 doi:10.15581/003.30.3.169-184.10.15581/003.30.3.169-184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucker, D. D., K. J. Preacher, Z. L. Tormala, and R. E. Petty. 2011. “Mediation Analysis in Social Psychology: Current Practices and New Recommendations.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 5 (6): 359–371. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O. 1986. “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology’s View of Human Nature.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (3): 515.10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., and C. L. Funk. 1999. “Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults’ Political Predispositions.” The Journal of Politics 61 (1): 1–28. doi:10.2307/2647773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Select Committee on Communications. 2017. Growing Up With the Internet (HL Paper No. 130). https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201617/ldselect/ldcomuni/130/13002.htm
   Google Scholar
• Sethi, R. J. (2017). “Crowdsourcing the Verification of Fake News and Alternative Facts.” In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, 315–316, New York, USA, ACM. doi:10.1145/3078714.3078746.
   Google Scholar
• Shao, C., G. Luca Ciampaglia, O. Varol, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer. 2017. The Spread of Fake News by Social Bots. arXiv:1707.07592
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, C., and J. Singer-Vine. 2016. “Most Americans Who See Fake News Believe It, New Survey Says.” https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/fake-news-survey?utm_term=.crb9mRqA8#.xuXlQbZLg.
   Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S. 2015. “The Conspiracy-Effect: Exposure to Conspiracy Theories (about Global Warming) Decreases pro-Social Behavior and Science Acceptance.” Personality and Individual Differences 87: 171–173.10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S. 2017. “Beating the Hell out of Fake News.” Ethical Record: The Proceedings of the Conway Hall Ethical Society 122 (6): 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S., A. Leiserowitz, S. Rosenthal, and E. Maibach. 2017. “Inoculating the Public Against Misinformation About Climate Change.” Global Challenges 1 (2): 1600008. doi:10.1002/gch2.201600008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S., E. Maibach, J. Cook, A. Leiserowitz, and S. Lewandowsky. 2017. “Inoculating Against Misinformation.” Science 358 (6367): 1141–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi, S., M. Mohsenvand, and D. Roy. 2017. “Rumor Gauge: Predicting the Veracity of Rumors on Twitter.” ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 11 (4): 50. doi:10.1145/3070644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, D. 1998. Ad Hominem Arguments. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. L. M. 2007. “Rethinking the Inoculation Analogy: Effects on Subjects with Differing Preexisting Attitudes.” Human Communication Research 33 (3): 357–378. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00303.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum 2013. “Outlook on the Global Agenda 2014.” http://reports.weforum.org/outlook-14/.
   Google Scholar
• YouGov 2017. "C4 Study Reveals Only 4% Surveyed Can Identify True or Fake News. Accessed August 29, 2017. http://www.channel4.com/info/press/news/c4-study-reveals-only-4-surveyed-can-identify-true-or-fake-news
   Google Scholar
• Zeitel-Bank, N. 2017. “Dimensions of Polity, Politics and Policy in the Austrian Media System: Media Coverage of the “Refugee/Asylum Seeker Crisis”.” International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics 13 (1–2): 91–109. doi:10.1386/macp.13.1-2.91_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar