228
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Toward the validation of a National Risk Assessment against historical observations using a Bayesian approach: application to the Swiss case

, &
Pages 1323-1342 | Received 23 Dec 2016, Accepted 18 Feb 2018, Published online: 07 May 2018

References

  • Andrieu, C. , N. de Freitas , A. Doucet , and M. I. Jordan . 2003. “An Introduction to MCMC for Machine Learning.” Machine Learning 50 (1–2): 5–43. doi:10.1023/A:1020281327116.
  • Birrell, P. J. , G. Ketsetzis , N. J. Gay , B. S. Cooper , A. M. Presanis , R. J. Harris , A. Charlett , et al . 2011. “Bayesian Modeling to Unmask and Predict Influenza a/H1N1pdm Dynamics in London.” Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (45): 18238–18243. doi:10.1073/pnas.1103002108.
  • Boshuizen, H. C. , and P. H. van Baal . 2009. “Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis: Be a Bayesian.” Value in Health 12 (8): 1210–1214. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00590.x.
  • Brooks, Steve , A. Gelman , G. L. Jones , and X. L. Meng . 2011. Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo . Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.10.1201/CHHANMODSTA
  • Bundesamt fur Bevolkerungsschutz und Katastrophenhilfe (BBK) . 2010. “Methode für die Risikoanalyse im Bevölkerungsschutz.” In Wissenschaftsforum , 72. Bonn: Bundesamt fur Bevolkerungsschutz und Katastrophenhilfe (BBK).
  • Burgherr, P. , and S. Hirschberg . 2014. “Comparative Risk Assessment of Severe Accidents in the Energy Sector.” Energy Policy 74 (Supplement 1): S45–S56. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.035.
  • Cabinet Office UK . 2012. National Risk Register for Civil Emergencies . London: Cabinet Office.
  • Center for Chemical Process Safety . 2010. Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Choy, S. L. , R. O’Leary , and K. Mengersen . 2009. “Elicitation by Design in Ecology: Using Expert Opinion to Inform Priors for Bayesian Statistical Models.” Ecology 90 (1): 265–277. doi:10.1890/07-1886.1.
  • Cox Jr, L. A. 2008. “What’s Wrong with Risk Matrices?” Risk Analysis 28 (2): 497–512. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01030.x.
  • Cox, Tony , and Karen Lowrie . 2013. “From the Editors.” Risk Analysis 33 (8): 1383–1384. doi:10.1111/risa.12108.
  • Dartmouth Flood Observatory . Space-based Measurement and Modeling of Surface Water . Accessed May 2015. http://floodobservatory.colorado.edu
  • Department of Homeland Security . 2011. Strategic National Risk Assessment. the Strategic National Risk Assessment in Support of PPD 8: A Comprehensve Risk-based Approach toward a Secure and Resilient Nation . Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security.
  • Eckle, Petrissa , and Peter Burgherr . 2013. “Bayesian Data Analysis of Severe Fatal Accident Risk in the Oil Chain.” Risk Analysis 33 (1): 146–160. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01848.x.
  • Eckle, P. , P. Burgherr , and E. Michaux . 2012. “Risk of Large Oil Spills: A Statistical Analysis in the Aftermath of Deepwater Horizon.” Environmental Science & Technology 46 (23): 13002–13008. doi:10.1021/es3029523.
  • Ettlin, L. , and M. Bründl . 2014. Vergleich von Berechnungen des Schadenausmasses anhand von dokumentierten Schadenereignissen im Bereich Naturgefahren (DamageCompare) , 30. Davos Dorf: WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF.
  • European Commission . 2010. Risk Assessment and Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management . Commission Staff Working Paper SEC (2010) 1626 final.
  • Federal Office for Civil Protection (FOCP) . 1995. KATANOS – Katastrophen und Notlagen in der Schweiz. Eine vergleichende Übersicht . Bern: Federal Office for Civil Protection (FOCP).
  • Federal Office for Civil Protection (FOCP) . 2003. KATARISK. Disasters and Emergencies in Switzerland: Risk Assessment from a Civil Protection Perspective . Bern: Federal Office for Civil Protection (FOCP).
  • Federal Office for Civil Protection (FOCP) . 2013a. Disasters and Emergencies Switzerland: Risk Report 2012 , 177 p. Bern: Federal Office for Civil Protection (FOCP).
  • Federal Office for Civil Protection (FOCP) . 2013b. A Method for Risk Analysis of Disasters and Emergencies in Switzerland , 35 p. Bern: Federal Office for Civil Protection (FOCP).
  • Gelman, A. , and J. Hill . 2007. “Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models.” In Analytical Methods for Social Research , edited by R. M. Alvarez , N. L. Beck , and L. L. Wu , 648. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gilli, Manfred , and Evis Këllezi . 2006. “An Application of Extreme Value Theory for Measuring Financial Risk.” Computational Economics 27 (2–3): 207–228. doi:10.1007/s10614-006-9025-7.
  • Haimes, Y. Y. 2009. “On the Complex Definition of Risk: A Systems-based Approach.” Risk Analysis 29 (12): 1647–1654. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01310.x.
  • Hilker, N. , A. Badoux , and C. Hegg . 2009. “The Swiss Flood and Landslide Damage Database 1972-2007.” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 9: 913–925. doi:10.5194/nhess-9-913-2009.
  • Lowrance, William W. 1976. Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety . Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann.
  • MunichRe . NatCatSERVICE . Munich: MunichRe.
  • O’Hagan, Anthony . 2003. “Bayesian Statistics: Principles and Benefits.” In Bayesian Statistics and Quality Modelling in Agro-food Production Chain , edited by Majs van Boekel , A. Stein , and A. H. C. van Bruggen , 31–45. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • O’Hagan, Anthony , and B. R. Luce . 2003. “A Primer on Bayesian Statistics.” In Health Economics and Outcomes Research , edited by Cbshe , 76. MEDTAP International, Inc.
  • Plummer, M. Just Another Gibbs Sampler (JAGS) . Accessed May 2016. http://mcmc-jags.sourceforge.net
  • Pruyt, Erik , and Diederik Wijnmalen . 2010. “National Risk Assessment in the Netherlands.” In Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Energy and Transportation Systems , edited by Matthias Ehrgott , Boris Naujoks , Theodor J. Stewart , and Jyrki Wallenius , 133–143. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-04045-0
  • Pruyt, Erik , Diederik J. D. Wijnmalen , and Marc Bökkerink . 2013. “What Can We Learn from the Evaluation of the Dutch National Risk Assessment?” Risk Analysis 33 (8): 1385–1388. doi:10.1111/risa.12096.
  • Reis Jr, D. S. , and J. R. Stedinger . 2005. “Bayesian MCMC Flood Frequency Analysis with Historical Information.” Journal of Hydrology 313 (1–2): 97–116. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.028.
  • Science and Technology Committee (STC) . 2011. Third Report Scientific Advice and Evidence in Emergencies . London: House of Commons.
  • Spada, M. , P. Burgherr , and S. Hirschberg . 2014. “Comparative Assessment of Severe Accidents Risk in the Energy Sector: Uncertainty Estimation Using a Combination of Weighting Tree and Bayesian Hierarchical Models.” Paper presented at the 12th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM12), Honolulu, HI, USA, June 22–27.
  • Spada, Matteo , Stefan Wiemer , and Eduard Kissling . 2011. “Quantifying a Potential Bias in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment: Seismotectonic Zonation with Fractal Properties.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 101 (6): 2694–2711. doi:10.1785/0120110006.
  • Swiss Federal Institute for Forest Snow and Landscape Research (WSL) . Swiss Flood and Landslide Damage Database . Accessed May 2015. http://www.wsl.ch/fe/gebirgshydrologie/HEX/projekte/schadendatenbank/index_EN
  • Swiss Federal Roads Office . Strassenverkehrsunfälle mit Fahrzweck SDR-/ADR-Transport, 1992–2012 . Ittigen: Swiss Federal Roads Office.
  • SwissRe . Sigma: Insurance Research . Zürich: SwissRe.
  • Unified Industrial & Harbour Fire Department . 2015. Failure and Accidents Technical Information System (FACTS) . Unified Industrial & Harbour Fire Department. Accessed May 2015. http://www.factsonline.nl
  • Vlek, Charles . 2013a. “How Solid is the Dutch (and the British) National Risk Assessment? Overview and Decision-theoretic Evaluation.” Risk Analysis 33 (6): 948–971. doi:10.1111/risa.12052.
  • Vlek, Charles . 2013b. “What Can National Risk Assessors Learn from Decision Theorists and Psychologists?” Risk Analysis 33 (8): 1389–1393. doi:10.1111/risa.12097.
  • Wössner, J. , and S. Wiemer . 2005. “Assessing the Quality of Earthquake Catalogues: Estimating the Magnitude of Completeness and Its Uncertainty.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95 (2): 684–698. doi:10.1785/0120040007.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.