Governance and risk in everyday life: depoliticization and citizens' experiences of cell site deployment in the Netherlands and Southern California

References

• AD. 2018. “Straling antennes aan banden: onduidelijkheid over gevaar volksgezondheid [Radiation antennas limited: uncertainty about danger to public health]”. Algemeen Dagblad. March 27th. https://www.ad.nl/politiek/straling-antennes-aan-banden-onduidelijkheid-over-gevaar-volksgezondheid∼a388a34d/
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35: 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Árvai, J. 2014. “The End of Risk Communication as we Know it.” Journal of Risk Research 17 (10): 1245–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, J., L. Timotijevic, R. Sheperd, and V. Senior. 2007. “Public Responses to Precautionary Information from the Department of Health (UK) About Possible Health Risks from Mobile Phones.” Health Policy 82 (2): 240–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, J., L. Timotijevic, M. Vassallo, and R. Sheperd. 2008. “Precautionary Advice About Mobile Phones: Public Understandings and Intended Responses.” Journal of Risk Research 11 (4): 525–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., and D. A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. 2017. “Constructing Worlds: Reflections on Science, Technology and Democracy (and a Plea for Bold Modesty).” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 3: 315–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boholm, A., and H. Corvellec. 2011. “A Relational Theory of Risk.” Journal of Risk Research 14 (2): 175–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boholm, A., H. Corvellec, and M. Karlsson. 2012. “The Practice of Risk Governance: Lessons from the Field.” Journal of Risk Research 15 (1): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröer, C. 2008. “Private Trouble, Policy Issue, How Policy Discourses Shape Our Experience of Aircraft Sound.” Critical Policy Studies 2 (2): 93–117.
   Google Scholar
• Bröer, C., and J. W. Duyvendak. 2012. “Sensing and Seizing Opportunities.” In Contention in context, edited by J. Jasper, 241–255, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bröer, C., M. B. de Graaff, J. W. Duyvendak, and R. A. Wester. 2016. “Engaging Citizens: Local Interactions, Policy Discourse and Courses of Protest Against Mobile Phone Cell Site Deployment.” European Journal for Cultural and Political Sociology 3 (4): 447–468. doi: 10.1080/23254823.2016.1201427.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., and S. de Graaf. 2013. “Considering a Future Which May Not Exist: The Construction of Time and Expectations Amidst Advanced-Stage Cancer.” Health, Risk & Society 15: 543–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., and A. Olofsson. 2014. “Risk, Uncertainty and Policy: Towards a Social-Dialectical Understanding.” Journal of Risk Research 17 (4): 425–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, A. 2004. Cellular Phones, Public Fears, and a Culture of Precaution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory - A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Claassen, L., D. van Dongen, and D. R. M. Timmermans. 2015. “Improving Lay Understanding of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields; The Effect of Information on Perception of and Responses to Risk.” Journal of Risk Research. 20(9): 1151–1131. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2015.1031268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, M., and M. Siegrist. 2015. “The Stability of Risk and Benefit Perceptions: A Longitudinal Study of Assessing the Perception of Biotechnology.” Journal of Risk Research. 19 (4): 461–475. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2014.988169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2007. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaff, M. B. 2016. “Should I be Worried? Citizens’ Experiences and the Risk Politics of Cell Site Deployment.” PhD thesis, Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.535001
   Google Scholar
• de Graaff, M. B., C. Bröer, and R. A. Wester 2015. “Biomedical Risks and Citizenship: Depoliticizing Cell Site Deployment in the Netherlands and Southern California.” Journal of Risk Research 20 (9): 1195–1210. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2015.1071864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, F. 2011. “Protesting Mobile Phone Masts: Risk, Neoliberalism, and Governmentality.” Science, Technology & Human Values 36 (4), 522–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijk, H. F. G., E. van Rongen, G. Eggermont, E. Lebret, W. E. Bijker, and D. R. M. Timmermans. 2011. “The Role of Scientific Advisory Bodies in Precaution-Based Risk Governance Illustrated with the Use of Uncertain Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields.” Journal of Risk Research 14 (4): 451–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. 1996. “Making A Fragile Public: A Talk-Centered Study of Citizenship and Power”. Sociological Theory 14 (3): 262–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N., and P. Lichterman. 2003. “Culture in Interaction.” American Journal of Sociology 108 (4): 735–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, P. 2014. “NIMBYism - A Re-Examination of the Phenomenon.” Social Science Research 48: 185–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Few, R., K. Brown, and E. L. Tompkins. 2007. “Public Participation and Climate Change Adaptation: Avoiding the Illusion of Inclusion.” Climate policy 7: 46–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B. 1995. “Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process.” Risk Analysis 15 (2): 137–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2005. “Coalitions, Practices and Meaning in Environmental Politics: From Acid Rain to BSE.” In Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy, and Governance, edited by D. R. Howarth and J. Torfing, 297–315. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., and H. Wagenaar, eds. 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis - Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, K., N. Pidgeon, S. Sarre, P. Simmons, and N. Smith. 2008. “Risk, Framing and Everyday Life: Epistemological and Methodological Reflections from Socio-Cultural Projects.” Health, Risk & Society 10 (5): 421–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, M. 2014. “Engaging with Risks: Citizens, Science and Policy in Mobile Phone Mast Siting Controversies.” PhD thesis, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. J. 2014. “Smart Meters and Public Acceptance: Comparative Analysis and Governance Implications.” Health, Risk & Society 16 (3): 243–258. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2014.911821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. 1979. “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology 85 (3): 551–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. 2003. The Commercialization of Intimate Life: Notes from Home and Work. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J., R. Thomson, and S. Henderson. 2006. “Qualitative Longitudinal Research: A Discussion Paper.” Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group, Working Paper 21. London: London South Bank University.
   Google Scholar
• ICNIRP. 1996. “International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Statement on Health Issues Related to the Use of Hand-Held Radiotelephones and Base Transmitters.” Health Physics 70 (4): 383–387.
   Google Scholar
• Interphone Study Group. 2010. “Brain Tumour Risk in Relation to Mobile Telephone Use: Results of the INTERPHONE International Case-Control Study.” International Journal of Epidemiology, 39: 675–694. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2007. “Technologies of Humility.” Nature 450: 33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. 2011. “Emotions and Social Movements: Twenty Years of Theory and Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 37: 14.1–14.9. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasperson, J. X., R. E. Kasperson, N. Pidgeon, and P. Slovic. 2003. “The Social Amplification of Risk: Assessing Fifteen Years of Research and Theory.” In The Social Amplification of Risk, edited by N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson, and P. Slovic, 13–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E. 2014. “Four Questions for Risk Communication.” Journal of Risk Research 17 (10): 1233–1239. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2014.900207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J., ed. 2008. Handbook of Mobile Communication Studies. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2007. “The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy.” Social Studies of Science 37 (5): 759–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuda, J. R., and T. Garvin. 2006. “Place, Culture, and the Social Amplification of Risk.” Risk Analysis 26 (2): 437–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., and H. S. Boudet. 2012. Putting Social Movements in their Place: Explaining Opposition to Energy Projects in the United States, 2000-2005. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. 2014. “Is Participation Without Power Good Enough? Introduction to ‘Democracy Now: Ethnographies of Contemporary Participation’.” The Sociological Quarterly 55: 453–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1993. “Government, Authority and Expertise in Advanced Liberalism.” Economy and Society 223: 283–299.
   Google Scholar
• SCENHIR. 2015. “Opinion on Potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF).” European Commission - Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risk. Adopted January 27th 2015. doi: 10.2772/75635
   Google Scholar
• Tavory, I., and N. Eliasoph. 2013. “Coordinating Futures: Toward A Theory of Anticipation.” American Journal of Sociology 118 (4): 908–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TNS. 2010. Electromagnetic Fields. Special Eurobarometer 347, Wave 73.3, TNS Opinion & Social, European Commission, June 2010.
   Google Scholar
• van Poll, H. F. P. M., O. R. P. Breugelmans, and J. L. A. Devilee. 2011. “Hinder, bezorgdheid en woontevredenheid in Nederland – Inventarisatie Verstoringen 2008.” RIVM Rapport. 630741001/2011. https://rivm.openrepository.com/rivm/bitstream/10029/258593/3/630741001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, I., and J. W. Duyvendak. 2015. “Enter Emotions: Appealing to Anxiety and Anger in a Process of Municipal Amalgamation.” Critical Policy Studies 10: 468–485. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2015.1032990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers, V. H. M., and M. Siegrist. 2012. “How a Nuclear Power Plant Accident Influences Acceptance of Nuclear Power: Results of a Longitudinal Study Before and After the Fukushima Disaster.” Risk Analysis 33 (2): 333–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. 2008. “Life in the Fast Lane? Towards a Sociology of Technology and Time.” The British Journal of Sociology 59 (1): 59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardman, J. K., and R. Löfstedt. 2018. “Anticipating or Accomodating to Public Concern? Risk Amplification and the Politics of Precaution Reexamined.” Risk Analysis. Online. doi: 10.1111/risa.12997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring, J. 2017. “Blog: How Many Global Base Stations are There Anyway?” Mobile World Live, September 1st 2017. Available at: https://www.mobileworldlive.com/blog/blog-global-base-station-count-7m-or-4-times-higher/
   Google Scholar
• Wiedemann, P. M., H. Schuetz, F. Boerner, M. Clauberg, R. Croft, R. Shukla, T. Kikkawa, R. Kemp, J. M. Gutteling, B. de Villiers, et al. 2013. “When Precaution Creates Misunderstandings: The Unintended Effects of Precautionary Information on Perceived Risks, the EMF Case.” Risk Analysis 33 (10): 1788–1801. doi: 10.1111/risa.12034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. 2000. Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar