Engaging publics about environmental and technology risks: frames, values and deliberation

References

• Árvai, J., R. Gregory, and T. McDaniels. 2001. “Testing a Structured Decision-Aiding Approach: Value-Focused Thinking for Deliberative Risk Communication.” Risk Analysis 21 (6): 1065–1076. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.216175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asayama, S., R. Bellamy, O. Geden, W. Pearce, and M. Hulme. 2019. “Why Setting a Climate Deadline is Dangerous.” Nature Climate Change 9 (8): 570–572. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0543-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., J. Chilvers, N. Vaughan, and T. Lenton. 2013. “'Opening Up’ Geoengineering Appraisal: Multi–Criteria Mapping of Options for Tackling Climate Change.” Global Environmental Change 23 (5): 926–937. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., and J. Lezaun. 2017. “Crafting a Public for Geoengineering.” Public Understanding of Science 26 (4): 402–417. doi:10.1177/0963662515600965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., I. Lorenzoni, M. Jones, and N. F. Pidgeon. 2010. “Locating Scientific Citizenship: The Institutional Contexts and Cultures of Public Engagement.” Science Technology and Human Values 35 (4): 474–500. doi:10.1177/0162243909345835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., I. Lorenzoni, N. F. Pidgeon, W. Poortinga, and P. Simmons. 2008. “Re-Framing Nuclear Power in the UK Energy Debate: Nuclear Power, Climate Change Mitigation and Radioactive Waste.” Public Understanding of Science 17 (2): 145–169. doi:10.1177/0963662506066719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., P. Simmons, and N. F. Pidgeon. 2008. “Constructing Responsibility for Risk(s): Negotiating Citizen-State Relationships.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (6): 1312–1330. doi:10.1068/a39150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boholm, Å., and R. Löfstedt, eds. 1999. Facility Siting: Risk Power and Identity in Land Use Planning. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, C. 2010. “Morality and Climate Change: Is Leaving Your T.” Environmental Values 19 (2): 169–192. doi:10.3197/096327110X12699420220554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, C., C. C. Demski, K. A. Parkhill, N. F. Pidgeon, and A. Spence. 2015. “Public Values for Energy Futures: Framing, Indeterminacy and Policy Making.” Energy Policy 87: 665–672. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, C., and N. F. Pidgeon. 2011. “From ‘Flood Defence’ to ‘Flood Risk Management’: Exploring Governance, Responsibility and Blame.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29 (3): 533–547. doi:10.1068/c09181j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capstick, S., N. F. Pidgeon, and K. L. Henwood. 2015. “Stability and Change in Public Discourses about Climate Change between 1997 and 2010.” Environmental Values 24 (6): 725–753. doi:10.3197/096327115X14420732702617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. M. A., T. Satterfield, and J. Goldstein. 2012. “Rethinking Ecosystem Services to Better Address and Navigate Cultural Values.” Ecological Economics 74: 8–18. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, C. E., K. Scott, J. Barrett, and N. F. Pidgeon. 2018. “Public Acceptance of Resource Efficiency Strategies to Mitigate Climate Change.” Nature Climate Change 8 (11): 1007–1012. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0298-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., and J. Burgess. 2008. “Power Relations: The Politics of Risk and Procedure in Nuclear Waste Governance.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (8): 1881–1900. doi:10.1068/a40334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., and M. Kearns, eds. 2016. Remaking Participation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collingridge, D. 1980. The Social Control of Technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corner, A., K. Parkhill, and N. Pidgeon. 2011. Experiment Earth? Reflections on a Public Dialogue on Geoengineering. Cardiff: Cardiff University, Understanding Risk Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Corner, A. J., K. A. Parkhill, N. F. Pidgeon, and N. E. Vaughan. 2013. “Messing with Nature? Exploring Public Perceptions of Geoengineering in the UK.” Global Environmental Change 23 (5): 938–947. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, E., E. Spence and N. F. Pidgeon (in press) “Public Perceptions of Carbon Dioxide Removal in the US and UK.” Nature Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, P., J. Niewöhner, N. Pidgeon, S. Gerrard, B. Fischhoff, and D. Riley. 2003. “The Use of Mental Models in Chemical Risk Protection: Developing a Generic Workplace Methodology.” Risk Analysis 23 (2): 311–324. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R., and P. Macnaghten. 2010. “Narratives of Mastery and Resistance: Lay Ethics of Nanotechnology.” Nanoethics 4 (2): 141–151. doi:10.1007/s11569-010-0096-5.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R., and C. Selin. 2012. “Energy Futures: Five Dilemmas of the Practice of Anticipatory Governance.” Environmental Communication 6 (1): 119–136. doi:10.1080/17524032.2011.644632.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, Ana, Kamilla Lein Kjølberg, and Fern Wickson. 2011. “Public Engagement Coming of Age: From Theory to Practice in STS Encounters with Nanotechnologies.” Public Understanding of Science 20 (6): 826–845. doi:10.1177/0963662510363054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T. 2013. “Bridging Values and Deliberation in Science Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Sciences 110 (Supplement_3): 14081–14087. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212740110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dietz, T., and P. Stern. 2008. Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elam, M., and M. Bertilsson. 2003. “Consuming, Engaging and Confronting Science: The Emerging Dimensions of Scientific Citizenship.” European Journal of Social Theory 6 (2): 233–251. doi:10.1177/1368431003006002005.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U., and M. Fochler. 2010. “Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and Describing Publics in Public Engagement.” Minerva 48 (3): 219–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorino, D. 1990. “Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms.” Science Technology and Human Values 15 (2): 226–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B. 1995. “Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process.” Risk Analysis 15 (2): 137–145. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00308.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, E., R. L. Mahajan, and C. Mitcham. 2006. “Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance from Within.” Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 26 (6): 485–496. doi:10.1177/0270467606295402.
   Google Scholar
• Fleishman-Mayer, L., and W. Bruine de Bruin. 2013. “The ‘Mental Models’ Methodology for Developing Communications: Adaptations for Informing Public Risk Management Decisions about Emerging Technologies.” In Effective Risk Communication, edited by J. Árvai and L. Rivers, 165–189. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., and J. R. Ravetz. 1992. “Three Types of Risk Assessment and the Emergence of Post-Normal Science.” Social Theories of Risk, edited by S. Krimsky and D. Golding, 251–274. Westport: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1991. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R., L. Failing, M. Harstone, G. Long, T. McDaniels, and D. Ohlson. 2012. Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, C., K. L. Henwood, F. Shirani, C. Butler, K. A. Parkhill, and N. Pidgeon. 2016. “Energy Biographies: Narrative Genres, Lifecourse Transitions and Practice Change.” Science, Technology and Human Values 41 (3): 483–508. doi:10.1177/0162243915609116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove-White, R., P. Macnaghten, S. Mayer, and B. Wynne. 1997. Uncertain World: GMOs, Food and Public Attitudes in Britain. Lancaster: CSEC and Unilever.
   Google Scholar
• Hagendijk, R. and A. Irwin. 2006. “Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe.” Minerva 44 (2): 167–184. doi:10.1007/s11024-006-0012-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagendijk, R., and E. Kallerud. 2003. Changing Practices of Governance in Science and Technology in Europe: A Framework for Analysis. Science Technology and Governance in Europe (STAGE) Discussion Paper No. 2. Uxbridge: Brunel University.
   Google Scholar
• Hagendijk, R., P. Healey, M. Horst, and A. Irwin. 2006. Science, Technology and Governance in Europe: Challenges of Public Engagement. Science Technology and Governance in Europe (STAGE) Final Report. Uxbridge: Brunel University.
   Google Scholar
• Harthorn, B., L. Halcomb, T. Partridge, M. Thomas, C. Enders, and N. F. Pidgeon. 2019. “Health risk perception and shale development in the UK and US.” Health, Risk and Society 21 (1-2): 35–56. doi:10.1080/13698575.2019.1601685.
   Google Scholar
• Harthorn, B., N. F. Pidgeon, and T. Satterfield. 2016. CNS Synthesis Report on IRG 3: Understanding Nanotechnologies’ Risks and Benefits: Emergence, Expertise & Upstream Participation, Santa Barbara, CA: CNS-UCSB, 1–56. Accessed 22 November 2019. http://www.cns.ucsb.edu/irg-synthesis-report
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, K. L., and N. F. Pidgeon. 1992. “Qualitative Research and Psychological Theorizing.” British Journal of Psychology 83 (1): 97–111. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02426.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henwood, K. L., and N. F. Pidgeon. 2014. Risk and Identity Futures. London: Government Office of Science/Foresight. Accessed 23 November 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/identity-and-risk
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, K. L., and N. F. Pidgeon. 2016. “Interpretive Environmental Risk Research: Affect, Discourses and Change.” In Communicating Risk, edited by J. Crichton, C. N. Candlin and A. S. Firkins, 155–170. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, K. L., N. F. Pidgeon, and K. A. Parkhill. 2014. “Explaining the ‘Gender-Risk Effect’ in Risk Perception Research: A Qualitative Secondary Analysis Study.” Psyecology 5 (2–3): 167–213. doi:10.1080/21711976.2014.977532.
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, K. L., N. F. Pidgeon, S. Sarre, P. Simmons, and N. Smith. 2008. “Risk, Framing and Everyday Life: Methodological and Ethical Reflections from Three Sociocultural Projects.” Health, Risk and Society 10 (5): 421–438. doi:10.1080/13698570802381451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henwood, K. L., N. F. Pidgeon, C. Groves, F. Shirani, C. Butler, and K. A. Parkhill. 2015. Energy Biographies: Final Research Report. Cardiff: Cardiff University. Accessed 22 November 2019. http://energybiographies.org/our-work/our-findings/reports/
   Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T. 1998. “Meaning and Contextualisation in Risk Assessment.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 59 (1): 79–89. doi:10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00122-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T., J. Sime, and N. F. Pidgeon. 2003. “The Social Dynamics of Environmental Risk Perception: Implications for Risk Communication Research and Practice.” In The Social Amplification of Risk, edited by N. F. Pidgeon, R. K. Kasperson, and P. Slovic, 262–285. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T., J. Walls, G. Rowe, N. F. Pidgeon, W. Poortinga, G. Murdock, and T. O’Riordan. 2007. The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Deliberation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. 2000. Science and Society 3rd Report. HL Paper 38. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. 2001. “Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences.” Public Understanding of Science 10 (1): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, A., T. E. Jensen, and K. E. Jones. 2013. “The Good the Bad and the Perfect: Criticising Engagement Practice.” Social Studies of Science 43 (1): 118–135. doi:10.1177/0306312712462461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, A., P. Simmons, and G. Walker. 1999. “Faulty Environments and Risk Reasoning: The Local Understanding of Industrial Hazards.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 31 (7): 1311–1326. doi:10.1068/a311311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, A., and B. Wynne, eds. 1996. Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1998. “The Political Science of Risk Perception.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 59 (1): 91–100. doi:10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00129-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and Kim, S-H., eds. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago, IL: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalof, L., and T. Satterfield. 2005. The Earthscan Reader in Environmental Values. London: Earthscan
   Google Scholar
• Karpowitz, C. F., and C. Raphael. 2014. Deliberation, Democracy and Civic Forums. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. K. 1986. “Six Propositions on Public Participation and Their Relevance for Risk Communication.” Risk Analysis 6 (3): 275–281. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00219.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasperson, J. X., R. Kasperson, N. F. Pidgeon, and P. Slovic. 2003. “The Social Amplification of Risk: Assessing Fifteen Years of Research and Theory.” In The Social Amplification of Risk, edited by N. F. Pidgeon, R. K. Kasperson, and P. Slovic, 13–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R., O. Renn, P. Slovic, H. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J. X. Kasperson, and S. Ratick. 1988. “The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework.” Risk Analysis 8 (2): 177–187. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, M., I. Scoones, and B. Wynne. 2005. Science and Citizens. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. 2015. Do-it-Yourself Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lezaun, J., and L. Soneryd. 2007. “Consulting Citizens: Technologies of Elicitation and the Mobility of Publics.” Public Understanding of Science 16 (3): 279–297. doi:10.1177/0963662507079371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, S., and P. Slovic. 2006. The Construction of Preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, R., and Å. Boholm. 2009. Earthscan Reader On Risk. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P. 2017. “Focus Groups as Anticipatory Methodology: A Contribution from Science and Technology Studies towards Socially-Resilient Governance.” In A New Era of Focus Group Research, edited by R. Barbour and D. Morgan, 343–363. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., and J. Chilvers. 2014. “The Future of Science Governance: Publics, Policies, Practices.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32 (3): 530–548. doi:10.1068/c1245j.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., and G. Myers. 2004. “Focus Groups: The Moderator’s View and the Analyst’s View.” In Qualitative Research Practice, edited by G. Gobo, J. Gubrium, C. Seale, and D. Silverman, 65–79. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., and B. Szerszynski. 2013. “Living the Global Social Experiment: An Analysis of Public Discourse on Solar Radiation Management and Its Implications for Governance.” Global Environmental Change 23 (2): 465–474. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. 1988. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G., B. Fischhoff, A. Bostrom, and C. Atman. 2002. Risk Communication: A Mental Model Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., J. Gastil, G. M. Weiksner, and M. Leighninger. 2012. Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Okrent, D. 1998. “Risk Perception and Risk Management: On Knowledge, Resource Allocation and Equity.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 59 (1): 17–26. doi:10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00115-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okrent, D., and N. F. Pidgeon. 1998. “Risk Assessment versus Risk Perception.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 59 (1): 1–159. doi:10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00345-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhill, K. A., N. F. Pidgeon, K. L. Henwood, P. Simmons, and D. Venables. 2010. “From the Familiar to the Extraordinary: Local Residents’ Perceptions of Risk When Living with Nuclear Power in the UK.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35 (1): 39–58. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00364.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N.F., Groves, C., Cherry, C.C, Thomas, G. and Henwood, K.A., (forthcoming) 'A little self-sufficient town close to the beach’: local energy system transformation. In J. Webb, M. Tingey and F. Wade (eds) Research Handbook of Energy and Society. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord, J. Bridgeman, and M. Ferguson-Smith. 2000. The BSE Inquiry Report. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F. 1988. “Risk Assessment and Accident Analysis.” Acta Psychologica 68 (1-3): 355–368. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(88)90066-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F. 1998. “Risk Assessment, Risk Values and the Social Science Programme: Why we Do Need Risk Perception Research.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 59 (1): 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F., and C. C. Demski. 2012. “From Nuclear to Renewable: Energy System Transformation and Public Attitudes.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 68 (4): 41–51. doi:10.1177/0096340212451592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F., C. C. Demski, C. Butler, K. A. Parkhill, and A. Spence. 2014. “Creating a National Citizen Engagement Process for Energy Policy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Sciences 111 (Supplement_4): 13606–13613. doi:10.1073/pnas.1317512111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F., and R. Gregory. 2004. “Judgment, Decision Making and Public Policy.” In Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision-Making, edited by D. Koehler and N. Harvey, 604–623. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F., B. Harthorn, K. Bryant, and T. Rogers-Hayden. 2009. “Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnology for Energy and Health Applications in the US and UK.” Nature Nanotechnology 4 (2): 95–98. Vol Feb 2009, doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F., and K. L. Henwood. 2004. “Grounded Theory.” In Handbook of Data Analysis, edited by M. Hardy and A. Bryman, 625–648. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F., C. Hood, D. Jones, B. Turner, and R. Gibson. 1992. “Risk Perception.” Chap. 5 in Risk - Analysis, Perception and Management: Report of a Royal Society Study Group, 89–134. London: The Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F., K. A. Parkhill, A. Corner, and N. Vaughan. 2013. “Deliberating Stratospheric Aerosols for Climate Geoengineering and the SPICE Project.” Nature Climate Change 3 (5): 451–457. doi:10.1038/nclimate1807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F., W. Poortinga, G. Rowe, T. Horlick-Jones, J. Walls, and T. O’Riordan. 2005. “Using Surveys in Public Participation Processes for Risk Decision-Making: The Case of the 2003 British GM Nation? Public Debate.” Risk Analysis 25 (2): 467–480. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00603.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F., and T. Rogers-Hayden. 2007. “Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement?’” Health, Risk and Society 9 (2): 191–210. doi:10.1080/13698570701306906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F., P. Simmons, and K. L. Henwood. 2006. “Risk, Environment and Technology.” In Risk in Social Science, edited by P. Taylor-Gooby and J. Zinn, 94–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., and N. F. Pidgeon. 2003. “Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation.” Risk Analysis 23 (5): 961–972. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O. 2003. “Social Amplification of Risk in Participation: Two Case Studies.” In The Social Amplification of Risk, edited by N. F. Pidgeon, R. K. Kasperson and P. Slovic, 374–401. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. 2008. Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O., and D. Levine. 1991. “Credibility and Trust in Risk Communication.” In Communicating Risks to the Public, edited by R. E. Kasperson and P. J. M. Stallen, 157–218. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O., T. Webler, and P. Wiedemann. 1995. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers-Hayden, T., and N. F. Pidgeon. 2007. “Moving Engagement ‘Upstream’?” Public Understanding of Science 16 (3): 345–364. doi:10.1177/0963662506076141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, E. A. 1998. “Meta Theoretical Foundations for Post-Normal Risk.” Journal of Risk Research 1 (1): 15–44. doi:10.1080/136698798377303.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, E. A. 2003. “The Logical Structure of the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF): Metatheoretical Foundations and Policy Implications.” In The Social Amplification of Risk, edited by N. F. Pidgeon, R. K. Kasperson and P. Slovic, 47–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• RS/RAEng. 2004. Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. London: Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering
   Google Scholar
• Shirani, F., C. Groves, K. L. Henwood, N. F. Pidgeon, and E. Roberts. 2019. “What Counts as Success? Wider Implications of Obtaining Planning Permission in a Low-Impact Ecovillage.” Environmental Values. doi: 10.3197/096327119X15579936382536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirani, F., K. Parkhill, C. Butler, C. Groves, K. Henwood, and N. Pidgeon. 2016. “Asking about the Future: Methodological Insights from Energy Biographies.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 19 (4): 429–444. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1029208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., T. Earle, and H. Gutscher. 2007. Trust in Cooperative Risk Management. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, M. 1989. Ignorance and Uncertainty: Emerging Paradigms. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., and H. C. Fineberg. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington DC: US National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2005. “Opening up or Closing down? Analysis, Participation and Power in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” In Science and Citizens: Globalisation and the Challenge of Engagement, edited by M. Leach, I. Scoones, and B. Wynne, 218–231. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2010. “Keep It Complex.” Nature 468 (7327): 1029–1031. doi:10.1038/4681029a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., C. C. Demski, and N. F. Pidgeon. 2019. “Deliberating the Social Acceptability of Energy Storage in the UK.” Energy Policy 133: 110908. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. J., T. Partridge, B. Harthorn, and N. F. Pidgeon. 2017. “Deliberating the Perceived Risks, Benefits, and Societal Implications of Shale Gas and Oil Extraction by Hydraulic Fracturing in the US and UK.” Nature Energy 2 (5): 17054. doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., N. F. Pidgeon, and E. Roberts. 2018. “Ambivalence, Naturalness and Normality in Public Perceptions of Carbon Capture and Storage in Biomass, Fossil Energy, and Industrial Applications in the United Kingdom.” Energy Research & Social Science 46: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilsdon, J., and R. Willis. 2004. Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Wilsdon, J., B. Wynne, and J. Stilgoe. 2005. The Public Value of Science: Or How to Ensure That Science Really Matters. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 1992. “Risk and Social Learning: Reification to Engagement.” In Social Theories of Risk, edited by S. Krimsky and D. Golding, 275–300. Westport CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 2007. “Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political-Conceptual Category Mistake.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society Journal 1 (1): 99–110. doi:10.1215/s12280-007-9004-7.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 2016. “Ghosts of the Machine: Publics, Meanings and Science in a Time of Expert Dogma and Denial.” In Remaking Participation, edited by J. Chilvers and M. Kearns, 99–120. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar